Paola Piccolo

Low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin given "on demand" in combination with lamivudine: a highly cost-effective approach to prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus infection in the long-term follow-up after liver transplantation

Background. Cost of long-term prophylaxis with high-dose human hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) after liver transplantation is extremely high. The aim of the present study was to assess consumption rates of high (5,000 IU) and low (2,000 IU) doses of HBIg given intravenously “on demand,” and determine their cost-effectiveness compared with conventional fixed monthly schedules. Methods. The study included 11 male patients (mean age 53 years) who received transplants for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis 29 to 96 months earlier, all receiving lamivudine (100 mg/day) prophylaxis. Each patient received three consecutive intravenous infusions of 5,000 IU HBIg, followed by three 2,000 IU infusions. HBIg consumption was assessed by serial measurement of serum hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer at 2-week intervals. HBIg was readministered only when HBsAb titers dropped below 70 IU/L (i.e., “on demand”). Results. Mean HBsAb peak titers after high and low HBIg doses were 1,641±385 and 848±216 IU/L, respectively (P <0.0001). Mean time to reach an HBsAb titer less than 70 IU/L was 79.5±38.2 days versus 61.6±32.1 days, respectively (P =NS). Interindividual variation coefficients were 23±18% and 32±26% (5,000 IU and 2,000 IU, respectively). Using the on demand approach, maintenance of a protective anti-HBs titer required an average number of 4.0 (5,000 IU) and 5.6 (2,000 IU) HBIg administrations per year, respectively (P =NS). Conclusions. Individual HBIg consumption profiles are highly variable. A low-dose (2,000 IU) on demand HBIg administration schedule is highly cost-effective and provides more than 50% savings compared with conventional high-dose monthly schedules.

Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Co-Infection in Former Heroin Addicts in Methadone Maintenance Treatment

ABSTRACT Objectives: To investigate hepatitis C (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) prevalence in former opiate or heroin addicts currently in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Methods: Retrospective chart review for patients (n = 342) currently attending two MMT clinics affiliated with New York Presbyterian Hospital (Adolescent Development Program, ADP: n = 106, median age 30 years; Adult Clinic, AC: n = 236, median age 45 years), as of May 2000. Results: Overall seroprevalence of those tested was 67% for HCV (ADP, 44%; AC, 80%), and 29% for HIV-1 (ADP, 13%, AC, 39%). Co-infection was present in 26% of patients (ADP, 13%; AC, 35%). Prevalence of HCV reached 92% in the 45–49 year old group (n = 53). The greatest HIV-1 prevalence (45%) was in the 35–39 year old group (n = 33). There was a linear relationship between infection seroprevalence and age at admission into MMT. Conclusions: The high prevalence of HCV and HIV-1 infections in MMT patients varies both by current age and by age at admission to MMT. This population needs risk reduction education and treatment for HCV and HIV-1.

Markers for hepatitis A, B and C in methadone maintained patients: an unexpectedly high co‐infection with silent hepatitis B

AIMS To determine the prevalence of hepatitis A, B and C viruses in patients attending a methadone maintenance clinic in New York City. DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING The Adult Services Clinic of Weill Cornell Medical College, an urban hospital-affiliated methadone program. PARTICIPANTS Former heroin addicted adults (n = 103) on methadone maintenance therapy. MEASUREMENTS Markers for hepatitis A virus [HAV immunoglobulin M (IgM) and imunoglobulin G (IgG)], hepatitis B [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)] and hepatitis C virus (HCVAb). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and quantitative HCV RNA were also obtained. Qualitative detection of HBV DNA and HCV genotype were obtained in a subset of subjects. FINDINGS More than 40% of subjects had markers for all three viruses. HCVAb was the most prevalent (83.5%), followed by HBcAb (65.0%), HAV IgG (46.1%) and HBsAb (41.1%). Hepatitis C RNA was detected in 70.6% of HCVAb positive subjects. While no subject had HBsAg, HBV DNA was detected in 26.4% of subjects who underwent this measure; all (n = 20) had HBcAb as their only HBV marker. The presence of HBV DNA did not influence ALT. Subjects with HCV RNA had higher ALTs than those without HCV RNA. CONCLUSIONS Most methadone-maintained subjects had at least one marker for viral hepatitis, with 41.8% having markers for HAV, HBV and HCV. A quarter of subjects had silent HBV infection, defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg. These subjects should be considered infectious and pose a public health risk.

A randomized controlled trial of sequential pegylated interferon-α and telbivudine or vice versa for 48 weeks in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND Short-term treatment for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B remains unsatisfactory. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two sequential regimens of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α and telbivudine (LdT). METHODS Adult patients with biopsy-proven HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum HBV DNA ≥ 2,000 IU/ml were randomized 1:1 at baseline to receive PEG-IFN 180 μg/week for 24 weeks followed by LdT 600 mg/day for 24 weeks (PEG-IFN first), or vice versa (LdT first), plus 24-week follow-up; individuals with HCV, HDV or HIV coinfections and lamivudine resistance were excluded. Primary end points were serum HBV DNA<2,000 IU/ml and normal ALT at week 72. RESULTS A total of 30 patients (86% male, median age 48 years) were enrolled: mean ±sd baseline serum HBV DNA was 5.56 ± 1.4 log IU/ml and ALT was 2.9 ± 2.5× upper limit of normal. At end of follow-up (week 72), HBV DNA<2,000 IU/ml was achieved in 13.3% of participants in the PEG-IFN first group versus 46.7% of those in the LdT first group (P=0.046). Mean ±sd ALT levels were significantly lower in the LdT first group (1.3 ± 0.9 versus 3.2 ± 2.7× upper limit of normal; P=0.03). PEG-IFN dose was reduced in 2 (7%) patients and 1 (7%) patient dropped out due to myalgia. CONCLUSIONS Sequential treatment with 24 weeks PEG-IFN followed or preceded by 24 weeks of LdT is safe. Virological response rate at week 72 was significantly higher in patients treated with LdT followed by PEG-IFN than vice versa. A sequential antiviral regimen of LdT followed by PEG-IFN, if confirmed in larger series, could improve response rates compared with standard PEG-IFN monotherapy.

Peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin versus peginterferon alpha-2a monotherapy in early virological responders and peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin versus peginterferon alpha-2a, ribavirin and amantadine triple therapy in early virological nonresponders: the SMIEC II trial in naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) treatment schedules on the basis of an early virological response (EVR), defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA (<50 IU/ml) after a 12-week induction course of peginterferon &agr;-2a (PEG-IFN) 180 mcg/week. Methods A total of 210 interferon-naïve patients (69% male; median age, 42 years) with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C infection (genotype 1: 62%) received PEG-IFN 180 mcg/week for 12 weeks. Patients with EVR (58%) were randomized to continue PEG-IFN monotherapy (n=64) or to add ribavirin (RBV), 800 mg/day (n=57), for 36 additional weeks. Patients without EVR (42%) were randomized to add RBV (n=42), or RBV plus amantadine, 200 mg/day (n=47), for 36 additional weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV-RNA 24 weeks after treatment completion) was compared among treatment groups. Results Patients with EVR: SVR rate was 60.3% in the PEG-IFN group versus 67.2% in the PEG-IFN+RBV group (NS). In genotypes 2/3, SVR rates were 66.7 versus 73.1% (NS); in genotypes 1/4, SVR rates were 51.6 versus 61.3%, respectively (NS). Patients without EVR: SVR was 16.7% in the PEG-IFN+RBV group versus 31.9% in the triple therapy group (P=0.07). In patients with genotypes 1/4, SVR rates were 9.4 versus 29.7% (P=0.041). Conclusion In genotypes 1/4 patients without EVR, triple therapy results in higher SVR rates than standard dual therapy. This study confirms that addition of amantadine is beneficial in early-recognized ‘difficult-to-treat’ patients.

Severe drug induced acute hepatitis associated with use of St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) during treatment with pegylated interferon α

A 61-year-old woman with chronic hepatitis C received peginterferon &agr; 180 &mgr;g/week, and obtained undetectable qualitative hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (lower limit of detection 50 IU/ml) after 8 weeks of treatment. Shortly thereafter aminotransferase values greatly increased (>20 × upper limit of normal) and did not decline after treatment suspension. The patient admitted taking St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) for depressed mood, recommended by a friend, during the preceding 6 weeks. Liver function tests continued to worsen and international normalised ratio (INR) prolongation developed; the patient was hospitalised. Test for antinuclear antibody was positive (1:320) and treatment with methylprednisolone was started; bilirubin and aminotransferase levels slowly declined, though a new flare occurred when steroids were tapered. After 6 months of prednisone treatment, the liver function tests returned to baseline levels. The combination of peginterferon &agr; and St John’s wort resulted in a severe acute hepatitis in this patient. Patients should be advised of this potential toxic effect of this herbal remedy.

A simple rule to personalize standard dual therapy across all genotypes in naive chronic hepatitis C patients: The TT4 randomized trial

BACKGROUND Rapid and early virological responses to peginterferon-alpha and ribavirin are predictive of sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We aimed at finding a simple rule to determine the shortest duration of dual therapy for all HCV genotypes, obtained by multiplying time to Initial Viral Response, IVR (first undetectable HCV-RNA) by 4 (Tailored Therapy-4, or TT4). METHOD 267 naïve HCV-infected patients with compensated liver disease were randomized (2:1) to the TT4 (n=180) or current standard-of-care (SoC, n=87) and received peginterferon-alpha plus ribavirin. Patients with HCV-RNA decrease ≤2log10 at week 12 or detectable HCV-RNA at week 24 discontinued treatment. RESULTS Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics, SVR rates were similar in the whole population (60.6% vs. 60.9%) and within each genotype subgroup (G1: 46.6% vs. 55.6%; G2: 90.2% vs. 94.4%; G3: 74.1% vs. 58.3%; G4: 45.8% vs. 33.3%). Relapse rate was higher in G1-TT4 than G1-SoC. Treatment duration in SVR patients was shorter in TT4 compared to SoC, both overall [25±15 vs. 36±12.1 weeks], and for subgroups: G1 [35.3±16.7 vs. 47.3±2.6 weeks], G2 [18.3±7.5 vs. 24±2.8 weeks], G3 [15.2±8.7 vs. 22.8±3 weeks] and G4 [26.9±13 vs. 48 weeks]. CONCLUSIONS In HCV-naive patients, TT4-rule treatment yields similar SVR rates compared to SoC but with shorter treatment duration and remarkable cost reduction.

A randomized controlled trial of sequential peginterferon-alpha and telbivudine or vice versa for 48 weeks in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND Short-term treatment for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B remains unsatisfactory. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two sequential regimens of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α and telbivudine (LdT). METHODS Adult patients with biopsy-proven HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum HBV DNA ≥ 2,000 IU/ml were randomized 1:1 at baseline to receive PEG-IFN 180 μg/week for 24 weeks followed by LdT 600 mg/day for 24 weeks (PEG-IFN first), or vice versa (LdT first), plus 24-week follow-up; individuals with HCV, HDV or HIV coinfections and lamivudine resistance were excluded. Primary end points were serum HBV DNA<2,000 IU/ml and normal ALT at week 72. RESULTS A total of 30 patients (86% male, median age 48 years) were enrolled: mean ±sd baseline serum HBV DNA was 5.56 ± 1.4 log IU/ml and ALT was 2.9 ± 2.5× upper limit of normal. At end of follow-up (week 72), HBV DNA<2,000 IU/ml was achieved in 13.3% of participants in the PEG-IFN first group versus 46.7% of those in the LdT first group (P=0.046). Mean ±sd ALT levels were significantly lower in the LdT first group (1.3 ± 0.9 versus 3.2 ± 2.7× upper limit of normal; P=0.03). PEG-IFN dose was reduced in 2 (7%) patients and 1 (7%) patient dropped out due to myalgia. CONCLUSIONS Sequential treatment with 24 weeks PEG-IFN followed or preceded by 24 weeks of LdT is safe. Virological response rate at week 72 was significantly higher in patients treated with LdT followed by PEG-IFN than vice versa. A sequential antiviral regimen of LdT followed by PEG-IFN, if confirmed in larger series, could improve response rates compared with standard PEG-IFN monotherapy.

Sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir with or without ribavirin is safe and effective for post-transplant hepatitis C recurrence and severe fibrosis and cirrhosis: A prospective study

In 2012, an Italian Named Patient Program began for hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected liver transplant (LT) recipients with advanced fibrosis, before approval of direct antiviral agents (DAA), to benefit severely ill patients. The aim of this “real‐life” study was to assess treatment efficacy and safety with an extended course of daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) with or without ribavirin (RBV).

Farewell from the Editors

Fig. 1. Total number of submissions to Digestive and Liver Disease per year Our term as Editor in Chief and Managing Editor of Digestive nd Liver Disease (DLD) is coming to an end, as this is in fact the nal issue produced under our leadership of the journal. After a 7ear course in this position, we can truly say that this has been a onderful, challenging and highly stimulating journey through all elds of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. As is customary at the nd of any cycle, we would take this occasion to reflect and draw ome concluding remarks. During this period, our Editorial team has been faced with many hallenging tasks. We aimed at improving the journal’s perforance and overall international reputation, while respecting the eeds of the many Scientific Societies who recognized DLD as their fficial publication. This was not always easy; we put great effort n selecting the best submissions based on unbiased peer review, voiding any conflict of interest. We also aimed to expand our pool f international reviewers, to reduce the perception of a mostly Italian” journal, given DLD’s history and the prevalence of Italian cientific Societies represented. When we took over the journal in January 2009, DLD had an mpact factor (IF) of 1.99 and received approximately 600 submisions per year (75% original articles); 40% of submitted papers were f Italian origin. In 2009, during the first year of our editorship, e published 130 full-length articles, of which 48% were of Italian rigin. In the following years, we observed a steady increase of submisions, especially from countries other than Italy. Fig. 1 shows the emarkable increase in submitted papers, as well as the most comon countries of origin. Conversely, the space limitations and fixed umber of pages allotted for publication automatically translated n a lower acceptance rate and therefore a stronger competition. The proportion of published papers from Europe, North America nd Asia increased, confirming the envisioned international shift of he journal. Fig. 2 shows the origin and topics of full-length articles ublished in 2009 vs. 2014.