Paolo Ciccarese

Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.

OBJECTIVESnMany groups are developing computer-interpretable clinical guidelines (CIGs) for use during clinical encounters. CIGs use Task-Network Models for representation but differ in their approaches to addressing particular modeling challenges. We have studied similarities and differences between CIGs in order to identify issues that must be resolved before a consensus on a set of common components can be developed.nnnDESIGNnWe compared six models: Asbru, EON, GLIF, GUIDE, PRODIGY, and PROforma. Collaborators from groups that created these models represented, in their own formalisms, portions of two guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians cough guidelines [correction] and the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.nnnMEASUREMENTSnWe compared the models according to eight components that capture the structure of CIGs. The components enable modelers to encode guidelines as plans that organize decision and action tasks in networks. They also enable the encoded guidelines to be linked with patient data-a key requirement for enabling patient-specific decision support.nnnRESULTSnWe found consensus on many components, including plan organization, expression language, conceptual medical record model, medical concept model, and data abstractions. Differences were most apparent in underlying decision models, goal representation, use of scenarios, and structured medical actions.nnnCONCLUSIONnWe identified guideline components that the CIG community could adopt as standards. Some of the participants are pursuing standardization of these components under the auspices of HL7.

Architectures and tools for innovative Health Information Systems: The Guide Project

This paper describes the architecture of the Guide Project, a proposal for innovation of Health Information Systems, putting together medical and organizational issues through the Separation of Concerns paradigm. In particular, we focus on one building block of the architecture: the Guideline Management System handling the whole life cycle of computerized Clinical Practice Guidelines. The communication between the Guideline Management System and the other components of the project architecture is message-based, according to specific contracts that allow an easy integration of the components developed by different parties and, in particular, with legacy systems (i.e. existing electronic patient records). In turn, the Guideline Management System components are organized in a distributed architecture: an editor to formalize guidelines, a repository to store and publish them, an enactment system to implement guidelines instances in a multi-user environment and a reporting system able to completely trace any individual physicians guideline-based decision process. The repository is organized in different levels that can be international, national, regional, down to the specific health care organization, according to the healthcare delivery policy of a country. Different organizations can get Clinical Practice Guidelines from the repository, adapt and introduce them in clinical practice.

Non-compliance with guidelines: motivations and consequences in a case study.

Guidelines are often based on a mixture of evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations. It is not straightforward that providing a series of good recommendations result in a guideline that is easily applicable, and it is not straightforward that acting according to such recommendations leads to an effective and efficient clinical practice. In this paper we summarize our experience in evaluating both the usability and the impact of a guideline for the acute/subacute stroke management. A computerised version of the guideline has been implemented and linked to the electronic patient record. We collected data on 386 patients. Our analysis highlighted a number of non-compliances. Some of them can be easily justified, while others depend only on physician resistance to behavioural changes and on cultural biases. From our results, health outcomes and costs are related to guideline compliance: a unit increase in the number of non-compliance results in a 7% increase of mortality at six months. Patients treated according to guidelines showed a 13% increase in treatment effectiveness at discharge, and an average cost of 2929 Euros vs 3694 Euros for the others.

The NewGuide Project: Guidelines, Information Sharing and Learning from Exceptions

Among the well agreed-on benefits of a guideline computerisation, with respect to the traditional text format, there are the disambiguation, the possibility of looking at the guideline at different levels of detail and the possibility of generating patient-tailored suggestions. Nevertheless, the connection of guidelines with patient records is still a challenging problem, as well as their effective integration into the clinical workflow. In this paper, we describe the evolution of our environment for representing and running guidelines. The main new features concern the choice of a commercial product as the middle layer with the electronic patient record, the consequent possibility of gathering information from different legacy systems, and the extension of this “virtual medical record” to the storage of process data. This last feature allows managing exceptions, i.e. decisions that do not comply with guidelines.

Modular representation of the guideline text: an approach for maintaining and updating the content of medical education.

One of the principal challenges in the medical practice is the update of their knowledge. One of the prime roles of the Continuing Medical Education is to train the medical practitioners with the latest advances in health care, specialized to their needs. Online courses and classroom teaching with computer-based representations have become an established mode of delivering medical education. This paper deals with the modularized representation of a medical text concerning clinical practice guidelines. The proposed system takes into consideration the semantics of the Unified Medical Language System and is based upon the marking up and display of the knowledge using the XML and XSLT languages. This modularization of the concepts leads to the determination of the context of a portion or the whole document. Thus, after marking up using our system, the text components can be exchanged, modified or reconstructed, which, in turn, would help to maintain the updates in medical knowledge.