Paolo Danise

Adherence and future discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. A patient-based survey on 1133 patients

Therapeutic approach for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has undergone a revolutionary change with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which improved overall survival and quality of life. Optimal therapy adherence has become of paramount importance to maximize the benefits in the long-term outcome. Several evidences have been reported that personal factors, such as social support, psychological and subjective perceptions about the drug used and the future, could influence adherence. We here report the results of a questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate factors influencing adherence and perceptions about the future, distributed to patients during regional Italian meetings. Overall, 1133 patients compiled the questionnaire: median age was 57 years. High rate of adherence was reported, but 42% of interviewed patients admitted that they had occasionally postponed a dose and 58% had discontinued therapy mainly for forgetfulness. The majority of patients discussed with personal physician about the importance of adherence and received sufficient information about illness and treatment, but would like to have discussed more about discomfort, anxiety and fear of the future. Summarizing personal drug compliance and estimating how many days a month, on average, the patients did not take the drug, the majority answered that it was less than 3 days (55%) and only a minority (4%) admitted that it was more than 7 days. Interviewed about discontinuation, 49% of patients answered that wouldnt interrupt because of fear of losing all the results achieved so far. This study suggests a higher level of satisfaction with more information received but the need of improving communication about possible future treatment free remission.

ITACA: A new validated international erythropoietic stimulating agent-response score that further refines the predictive power of previous scoring systems

BACKGROUNDnIn real-life, the Nordic score guides Erythropoietic stimulating agent (ESA) use in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with predicted response rates of 25% or 74%. As new treatments emerge, a more discriminating score is needed.nnnOBJECTIVESnTo validate existing ESA predictive scores and develop a new score that identifies non-responders.nnnMETHODSnESA-treated patients were identified in 3 MDS registries in Italy and Canada (FISM 555, GROM 233, and MDS-CAN 208). Clinical and disease-related variables were captured. Nordic, MDS-CAN, and IPSS-R-based ESA scores were calculated and documented ESA responses compared.nnnRESULTSn996 ESA-treated patients were identified. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59%. The database was randomly divided into balanced derivation (nu2009=u2009463) and validation (nu2009=u2009462) cohorts. By multivariate analysis, transfusion independence, erythropoietin (EPO) level <100 IU/L, and IPSS low-risk were independently predictive of response. Assigning a score of 1 to each resulted in a scoring system of 0-3 with response rates of 23%, 43%, 67%, and 85%. ORR was concordant in the validation cohort. The ITACA score had the highest discriminating power of response.nnnCONCLUSIONnITACA is an internally-validated predictive SS of ESA response in real-life good risk MDS patients derived from a large international dataset that surpasses others. The incorporation of biologic markers to better identify non-responders is still needed.

Effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on overall survival of IPSS low/INT-1 risk, transfusion independent myelodysplastic syndrome patients: a cohort study

Clinical guidelines recommend the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) in anemic patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)[1][1]–[4][2] and two registration trials for ESA have just been completed.[5][3],[6][4] We conducted a retrospective study in MDS patients selected by

O-020 Erythropoietin alpha therapy in 1110 lower-risk MDS patients: A real life survey from the network of regional Italian MDS Registries

Background: Erythroid stimulating agents (ESAs) are a common treatment for lower risk anaemic MDS patients (pts). The response rate varies from 20 to 60% according to the different published studies and ESAs are recommended in International Guidelines. Many clinical and biological parameters have been proposed as predictors of response. Little is known about ESAs therapy in real life. Purpose:We performed an analysis based on the network of regional Italian MDS Registries in order to assess which group of patients could benefit more of ESAs treatment. Materials and Methods: From 2487 pts enrolled in the Registry from 1999 to November 2012, we selected a group of 1411 low or intermediate-1 cases with follow-up data available. No differences in leukemic evolution rate have been observed by ESAs treatment (p=0,279). Subsequently, in order to study the effect of ESAs on survival, we excluded the 92 pts who experienced a leukemic evolution and the cases whose evolution was influenced by lenalidomide and/or azacytidine treatments. Cases treated with ESAs other than erythropoietin alpha (EPOa) were excluded because of the low number of observations and/or incomplete information and/or inhomogeneous dosages. Finally, we obtained a data base of 1110 pts treated by EPOa or observation only. We evaluated Overall Survival (OS) according to EPOa treatment considering the degree of anaemia at baseline. Results: The 1110 pts were subdivided according to Hb level as follows: 123 (11%) with Hb 10 g/dL. Three hundred and fifty six pts were treated by EPOa. The difference in OS by EPOa treatment in the whole cohort was not statistically significant. However, when considering patients not yet transfusion dependent with Hb levels ranging from 8 g/dL to 10 g/dL, there was a clear statistically significant difference in OS: median time 216 months in EPOa treated group vs 99 months in non treated pts (p=0,002). The influence of EPOa on OS in pts with Hb 10 g/dL did not reached a significant level. Additionally, no statistically significant difference was observed in deaths for thrombotic events. Conclusions: Our real life experience confirms that EPOa treatment is safe inMDS patients and it is particularly useful in prolonging OS of the selected group of lower risk pts with mild anaemia not yet transfusion dependent.