Paolo Fruscoloni

Coevolution of tRNA intron motifs and tRNA endonuclease architecture in Archaea

Members of the three kingdoms of life contain tRNA genes with introns. The introns in pre-tRNAs of Bacteria are self-splicing, whereas introns in archaeal and eukaryal pre-tRNAs are removed by splicing endonucleases. We have studied the structures of the endonucleases of Archaea and the architecture of the sites recognized in their pre-tRNA substrates. Three endonuclease structures are known in the Archaea: a homotetramer in some Euryarchaea, a homodimer in other Euryarchaea, and a heterotetramer in the Crenarchaeota. The homotetramer cleaves only the canonical bulge–helix–bulge structure in its substrates. Variants of the substrate structure, termed bulge–helix–loops, appear in the pre-tRNAs of the Crenarcheota and Nanoarcheota. These variant structures can be cleaved only by the homodimer or heterotetramer forms of the endonucleases. Thus, the structures of the endonucleases and their substrates appear to have evolved together.

Molecular recognition of amino acids by RNA aptamers: the evolution into an L-tyrosine binder of a dopamine-binding RNA motif.

We report the evolution of an RNA aptamer to change its binding specificity. RNA aptamers that bind the free amino acid tyrosine were in vitro selected from a degenerate pool derived from a previously selected dopamine aptamer. Three independent sequences bind tyrosine in solution, the winner of the selection binding with a dissociation constant of 35 microM. Competitive affinity chromatography with tyrosine-related ligands indicated that the selected aptamers are highly L-stereo selective and also recognize L-tryptophan and L-dopa with similar affinity. The binding site was localized by sequence comparison, analysis of minimal boundaries, and structural probing upon ligand binding. Tyrosine-binding sites are characterized by the presence of both tyrosine (UAU and UAC) and termination (UAG and UAA) triplets.

Cleavage of non‐tRNA substrates by eukaryal tRNA splicing endonucleases

Eukaryal tRNA splicing endonucleases use the mature domains of pre‐tRNAs as their primary recognition elements. However, they can also cleave in a mode that is independent of the mature domain, when substrates are able to form the bulge–helix–bulge structure (BHB), which is cleaved by archaeal tRNA endonucleases. We present evidence that the eukaryal enzymes cleave their substrates after forming a structure that resembles the BHB. Consequently, these enzymes can cleave substrates that lack the mature domain altogether. That raises the possibility that these enzymes could also cleave non‐tRNA substrates that already have a BHB. As predicted, they can do so, both in vitro and in vivo.

Separation of RNA transcription and processing activities from X. laevis germinal vesicles

A procedure suitable for en masse preparation of germinal vesicles (GV) from X.laevis oocytes (Scalenghe et al., 1978) has been adapted for studies of transcription. Extracts from GV contain activities for transcription of tRNA genes and for processing the transcription product. The two activities have been separated by column chromatography. One fraction allows synthesis of tRNA precursor molecules in the presence of X.laevis RNA polymerase III. Another fraction contains the activity that cuts and splices those precursors which contain an intervening sequence. Transcription occurs faithfully on linear DNA fragments.

Evolution of introns in the archaeal world.

The self-splicing group I introns are removed by an autocatalytic mechanism that involves a series of transesterification reactions. They require RNA binding proteins to act as chaperones to correctly fold the RNA into an active intermediate structure in vivo. Pre-tRNA introns in Bacteria and in higher eukaryote plastids are typical examples of self-splicing group I introns. By contrast, two striking features characterize RNA splicing in the archaeal world. First, self-splicing group I introns cannot be found, to this date, in that kingdom. Second, the RNA splicing scenario in Archaea is uniform: All introns, whether in pre-tRNA or elsewhere, are removed by tRNA splicing endonucleases. We suggest that in Archaea, the protein recruited for splicing is the preexisting tRNA splicing endonuclease and that this enzyme, together with the ligase, takes over the task of intron removal in a more efficient fashion than the ribozyme. The extinction of group I introns in Archaea would then be a consequence of recruitment of the tRNA splicing endonuclease. We deal here with comparative genome analysis, focusing specifically on the integration of introns into genes coding for 23S rRNA molecules, and how this newly acquired intron has to be removed to regenerate a functional RNA molecule. We show that all known oligomeric structures of the endonuclease can recognize and cleave a ribosomal intron, even when the endonuclease derives from a strain lacking rRNA introns. The persistance of group I introns in mitochondria and chloroplasts would be explained by the inaccessibility of these introns to the endonuclease.

The dawn of dominance by the mature domain in tRNA splicing

The relationship between enzyme architecture and substrate specificity among archaeal pre-tRNA splicing endonucleases has been investigated more deeply, by using biochemical assays and model building. The enzyme from Archeoglobus fulgidus (AF) is particularly interesting: it cleaves the bulge–helix–bulge target without requiring the mature tRNA domain, but, when the target is a bulge–helix–loop, the mature domain is required. A model of AF based on its electrostatic potential shows three polar patches interacting with the pre-tRNA substrate. A simple deletion mutant of the AF endonuclease lacking two of the three polar patches no longer cleaves the bulge–helix–loop substrate with or without the mature domain. This single deletion shows a possible path for the evolution of eukaryal splicing endonucleases from the archaeal enzyme.

Exonucleolytic degradation of double-stranded RNA by an activity in Xenopus laevis germinal vesicles

We have identified, in extracts from Xenopus laevis germinal vesicles, a 5′ exonuclease activity that cleaves double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Features of the 5′ ends of dsRNAs determine whether the strands are symmetrically or asymmetrically degraded. The activity hydrolyzes in the 5′ to 3′ direction, releasing 5′-mononucleotides processively, favoring strands with 5′-monophosphate termini; molecules with capped ends are resistant to digestion. Because of its ability to processively digest dsRNA to mononucleotides, we have named the exonuclease Chipper, which could cooperate or compete with Dicer (an endonuclease that produces molecules with a 5′-phosphate) in the processing of dsRNA.

Processing of multiple-intron-containing pretRNA

Computational studies predict the simultaneous presence of two and even three introns in certain crenarchaeal tRNA genes. In these multiple-intron-containing pretRNAs, the introns are nested one inside the other and the pretRNA folds into a conformation that is anticipated to allow splicing of the last intron only after splicing the others. A set of operations, each consisting of two cleavages and one ligation, therefore needs to be carried out sequentially. PretRNAs containing multiple introns are predicted to fold, forming bulge–helix–bulge (BHB) and BHB-like motifs. The tRNA splicing endonuclease should recognize these motifs. To test this hypothetical scenario, we used the homotetrameric enzyme from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (METJA) and the heterotetrameric enzyme from Sulfolobus solfataricus (SULSO). On the basis of our previous studies, the METJA enzyme should cleave only the BHB structure motif, while the SULSO enzyme can in addition cleave variant substrate structures, like the bulge-helix-loop (BHL). We show here that the processing of multiple-intron-containing pretRNA can be observed in vitro.