Paolo Pieragnoli

Interatrial septum pacing: A new approach to prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation.

Background. There are a variety of approaches to the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) with pacing. Aim of this study was to test the safety and feasibility of interatrial septum pacing at the posterior triangle of Koch for AF prevention and to exclude potential arrhythmic effects.Matherial and Methods.Interatrial septum pacing was performed in 34 patients (21 males, 13 females, mean age 69±12 years): 9 without a history and clinical evidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) (6 with sinus bradycardia, 2 with second-degree AV block, and 1 with carotid sinus hypersensitivity) and 25 with sinus bradycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (mean symptomatic episodes/month 6.2±10). In all patients a screw-in bipolar lead was positioned in the interatrial septum superiorly to the coronary sinus.Results.At implant the mean P wave amplitude was 2.5±1.5 mV, the pacing threshold was 1±0.6 V and the impedance was 907±477 Ohm. Mean P wave duration was 118±17 ms in sinus rhythm and 82±15 during interatrial septum pacing (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 10±7 months, no patients without atrial tachyarrhythmias before implantation experienced AF. During a 9±6 months follow-up we observed only 2 symptomatic arrhythmia recurrences between AF patients (mean symptomatic episodes/month 0.006±0.0022) (p < 0.01 vs before implant period).Conclusions. Our data indicate that interatrial septal pacing is safe and feasible. A significant less incidence of arrhythmic episodes has been observed during follow-up. Further controlled randomized prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact role of this technique respect to conventional or multisite stimulation when patients with paroxysmal AF need to be permanently paced.

P Wave Assessment: State of the Art Update

Diagnostic (mapping) and therapeutic (ablation, pacing) advances have provided insight into atrial depolarization processes and new developments in P wave analysis. Information about interatrial pathways is important to the understanding of interatrial conduction delay. A standardized method for P wave analysis is necessary for the development of a clinical role for management of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using signal-averaged P wave analysis and P wave dispersion. Algorithms for predicting localization of ectopic P waves may facilitate catheter ablation. P wave changes due to pacing at different atrial sites may be useful for permanent pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation. Introduction of these developments into clinical practice should allow better prevention and treatment of atrial arrhythmias and could have considerable impact in view of their high frequency especially in the older population.

Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the severity of mitral regurgitation

AIMS Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) could be managed by both cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and mitral-valve surgery. Clinical decision making regarding the appropriateness of mitral-valve surgery vs. CRT is a challenging task. This study assessed the prevalence and prognosis of various degrees of functional MR in CRT candidates. Additionally, we sought to identify functional MR patients who either can be adequately managed by CRT only or will need surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS Cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients (n= 794) were followed-up for 26 ± 18 months. Mitral regurgitation severity was quantified on scale 0-4. Cardiac resynchronization therapy responders were identified based on improvement in the New York Heart Association class and left-ventricular ejection fraction. Severity of MR and LV reverse remodelling were assessed at 3 and 12 months. Predictors of long-term MR change and CRT response were explored with multivariable models. Mitral regurgitation was present in 86%, with 35% prevalence of advanced MR (grade 3-4). Improvement of MR ≥ 1° after 12 months occurred in 46% of patients. It was relatively more frequent in patients with advanced MR at baseline (63%, P< 0.01). Baseline MR severity and change in MR at 3-month follow-up predicted response to CRT. Patients with ≥ 1° MR improvement at 12 months had more reverse remodelling compared with those with no change or worsening of MR. CONCLUSIONS Mitral regurgitation improvement at 3 months predicts CRT response and MR improvement at 12-month follow-up. This finding could have implications for subsequent MR surgical therapies.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy : Gender related differences in left ventricular reverse remodeling

Cardiac resynchronization refers to pacing techniques that change the degree of atrial and ventricular electromechanical asynchrony in patients with major atrial and ventricular conduction disorders. Atrial and ventricular resynchronization is usually accomplished by pacing from more than one site in an electrical chamber--atrium or ventricle--and occasionally by stimulation at a single unconventional site. Resynchronization produces beneficial hemodynamic and antiarrhythmic effects by providing a more physiologic pattern of depolarization. Atrial resynchronization may prevent atrial fibrillation in selected patients with underlying bradycardia or interatrial block. Its antiarrhythmic effect in the absence of bradycardia is unclear. Ventricular resynchronization is of far greater clinical value than atrial resynchronization. Biventricular (or single-chamber left ventricular) pacing is beneficial for patients with congestive heart failure, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, dilated cardiomyopathy (either ischemic or idiopathic), and a major left-sided intraventricular conduction disorder, such as left bundle branch block. The change in electrical activation from resynchronization, which has no positive inotropic effect as such, is translated into mechanical improvement with a more coordinated left ventricular contraction. Several recent randomized trials and a number of observational studies have demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of ventricular resynchronization in the above group of patients. The high incidence of sudden death among these patients has encouraged ongoing clinical trials to evaluate the benefit of a system that combines biventricular pacing and cardioversion-defibrillation into a single implantable device.Aim: Gender related differences in epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis of heart failure (HF) have been reported. We examined the sex influence in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Dual-site left ventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Simultaneous stimulation of 2 left ventricular (LV) sites could enhance the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic response to dual-site LV CRT. Two LV pacing leads were successfully implanted in 12 CRT candidates (New York Heart Association classes III to IV, QRS >or=120 ms). Target positions were the lateral or posterolateral vein (site A) and anterior or anterolateral vein (site B). A conductance catheter was placed in the left ventricle for pressure-volume measurements. Tested CRT configurations were alternated by atrial overdrive pacing at a fixed rate and included site A and B single-site CRT and dual-site LV CRT (2 LV sites plus right ventricular apex) at 4 atrioventricular intervals. Overall, single-site LV CRT significantly enhanced stroke volume, stroke work, maximum pressure derivative, and conductance-derived indexes of LV synchrony when delivered in site A, whereas no significant changes were noticed with pacing in site B. Specifically, site-A pacing resulted in a higher stroke volume increase (LV pacing site associated with the best hemodynamic response [best-LV]) in 8 patients, and site-B pacing, in 4 patients. At intermediate atrioventricular intervals, dual-site LV CRT resulted in improved stroke volume, stroke work, maximum pressure derivative, and LV synchrony with respect to single-site CRT when delivered at the best-LV (all p <0.05). However, single-site CRT at best-LV produced results similar to dual-site LV CRT when the atrioventricular interval was optimized in each patient. In conclusion, adding a second LV lead does not result in further improvement in acute hemodynamic response with respect to standard CRT when the single LV pacing site and atrioventricular interval are optimal.

Atrioventricular interval optimization in the right atrial appendage and interatrial septum pacing: a comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

PADELETTI, et al.: Atrioventricular Interval Optimization in the Right Atrial Appendage and Interatrial Septum Pacing: A Comparison Between ECHC and Peak Endocardial Acceleration. Interatrial septum pacing (IASP) reduces interatrial conduction time and consequently may interfere with atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization. We studied 14 patients with an implanted BEST Living system device able to measure peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) signal. The aims of our study were to compare the (1) optimal AVD (OAVD) in right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP) and IASP, and (2) OAVD derived by the PEA signal versus OAVD derived by Echo/Doppler evaluation of the left ventricular filling time (LVFT) and cardiac output (CO). Measurements were performed in DDD VDD modes Eight patients (group A) had RAAP and six patients (group B) had IASP. In group A, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 185 ± 23 ms, 177 ± 19 ms, and 192 ± 23 ms in DDD and 147 ± 19 ms, 135 ± 27 ms, and 146 ± 20 ms in VDD, respectively. OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was significantly longer in DDD mode than in VDD (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.001). In group B, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 116 ± 19 ms, 113 ± 10 ms, and 130 ± 30ms in DDD and 106 ± 16 ms, 96 ± 15 ms, and 108 ± 26 ms in VDD, respectively. No statistical differences were observed between DDD and VDD. Significant correlations between OAVDs PEA derived and OAVDs LVFT and CO derived were observed (r = 0.71, r = 0.69, respectively). When new techniques of atrial stimulation, as IASP, are used an OAVD shorter and similar in VDD and DDD has to be considered. The BEST Living system could provide a valid method to ensure, in every moment, the exact required OAVD to maximize atrial contribution to CO.

Atrial septal pacing: A new approach to prevent atrial fibrillation

Atrial pacing may prevent the onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) because of: (1) prevention of the relative bradycardia that triggers paroxysmal AF; (2) prevention of the bradycardia induced dispersion of refractoriness; (3)suppression or reduction of premature atrial contractions that initiate reentry and predispose to AF; (4) preservation of AV synchrony, which might prevent switch induced changes in atrial repolarization predisposing to AF. Atrial pacing locations that decrease atrial activation and dispersion of refractoriness may be preferable in patients with a history of AF. Two different interatrial septum sites have been proposed: the Bachmanns bundle and the coronary sinus ostium. The results of two prospective randomized studies indicate that septal pacing, when compared to the traditional right atrial appendage pacing, significantly reduces : (1) paroxysmal AF recurrences and burden; and (2) progression to chronic AF. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. II]:850–854)

CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores to predict morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are pivotal in assessing the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients, and were recently proved to predict hospitalizations and mortality in specific clinical settings. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether these scores could predict clinical outcomes [first hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and a combined event of HF hospitalization and death for any cause] in patients candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable defibrillator (CRT-D). METHODS AND RESULTS In a retrospective multicentre Italian study, we enrolled 559 consecutive HF patients candidates to CRT-D, and we grouped them in three pre-specified risk classes: low (CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc 1-2), moderate (CHADS2/CHA2DS2-VASc 3-4), and high (CHADS2 5-6/CHA2DS2-VASc 5-8). All patients underwent regular follow-up at implanting centres every 6 months; data collection was extended till the 72th month of follow-up. At a median FU of 30 months, 143 patients (25.4%) were hospitalized for HF and 110 (19.5%) died. Event-free survival analysis showed a significant difference according to baseline CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (Log-Rank for HF P < 0.001 for CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc; Log-Rank for combined end-point P = 0.001 for CHADS2, P < 0.001 for CHA2DS2-VASc). At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of endpoints were: previous atrial fibrillation (AF) or AF at implant, NYHA class, QRS duration and the CHA2DS2-VASc score (for HF hospitalization P = 0.013; for the combined event, P = 0.007), while the CHADS2 score was not independently associated with either the end-points. CONCLUSION In CRT-D patients, pre-implant CHA2DS2-VASc score is an independent predictor of major clinical events at 30-month follow-up.

Is a dual-sensor pacemaker appropriate in patients with sino-atrial disease? Results from the DUSISLOG study.

Background: Rate‐responsive pacemakers (PMs) are often supplied with accelerometer (XL) and minute ventilation (MV) sensors to provide a physiologic rate response according to patient needs. No information is available about the real benefit of dual‐sensor rate‐responsive pacing on the daily life of patients.

Prevention of Short Term Reversible Chronic Atrial Fibrillation by Permanent Pacing at the Triangle of Koch

AbstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate if single lead interatrial septum pacing could be effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients in whom restoration of sinus rhythm was only possible for a period of 2–24 hours after one or more previous electrical cardioversions, and in whom a sinus bradycardia was documented before arrhythmia restarted. The two hours limit was chosen because it was considered a sufficient time to implant a dual chamber pacemaker. Background: Alternative atrial pacing techniques have been demonstrated to be successful in preventing recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with sinus bradycardia. Excluding the AF occurring after only a few sinus beats, at 24 hours from electrical cardioversion an early restart of chronic AF has been reported in 12[emsp4 ]% to 17[emsp4 ]% of the patients. Methods: After sinus rhythm was restored by internal electrical cardioversion, 17 patients, 7 ablated at the AV junction, underwent a dual chamber rate response (DDDR) pacemaker implantation with a screw-in atrial lead placed in the interatrial septum. Results: After a follow-up period of 17±5 months (range 12 to 27 months) persistence of sinus rhythm was observed in 11 patients (65[emsp4 ]%). Six patients (35[emsp4 ]%) had recurrences of paroxysmal attacks, while five (30[emsp4 ]%) were totally free of AF. Recurrence of chronic AF was observed in six cases (35[emsp4 ]%) after 2 days–12 months from implantation. No dislodgements of the atrial lead and no complications were observed at implantation and during follow-up. Conclusions: Interatrial septum pacing is a safe and feasible technique with a satisfying success rate (65[emsp4 ]%) in long-term maintaining sinus rhythm in previously unsuccessfully cardioverted patients.