Paolo Scollo

Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Ovarian Cancer: The MITO-2 Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE Carboplatin/paclitaxel is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer-2 (MITO-2), an academic multicenter phase III trial, tested whether carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was more effective than standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IC to IV ovarian cancer (age ≤ 75 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2) were randomly assigned to carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) or to carboplatin AUC 5 plus PLD 30 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks for six cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). With 632 events in 820 enrolled patients, the study would have 80% power to detect a 0.80 hazard ratio (HR) of PFS. RESULTS Eight hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned. Disease stages III and IV were prevalent. Occurrence of PFS events substantially slowed before obtaining the planned number. Therefore, in concert with the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, final analysis was performed with 556 events, after a median follow-up of 40 months. Median PFS times were 19.0 and 16.8 months with carboplatin/PLD and carboplatin/paclitaxel, respectively (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P = .58). Median overall survival times were 61.6 and 53.2 months with carboplatin/PLD and carboplatin/paclitaxel, respectively (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.12; P = .32). Carboplatin/PLD produced a similar response rate but different toxicity (less neurotoxicity and alopecia but more hematologic adverse effects). There was no relevant difference in global quality of life after three and six cycles. CONCLUSION Carboplatin/PLD was not superior to carboplatin/paclitaxel, which remains the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. However, given the observed CIs and the different toxicity, carboplatin/PLD could be considered an alternative to standard therapy.

Outcome and risk factors for recurrence in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a MITO-9 retrospective study.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the outcome of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) and to define the risk factors for recurrence. Methods: A total of 123 patients with MOGCTs were retrospectively reviewed among MITO centers. Eighty-one patients had primary treatment in a MITO center, whereas the other 42 were referred for adjuvant chemotherapy or recurrence. The clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated for association with relapse or death. Results: Median age was 24 years (range, 11-76 years). Forty-nine (39.8%) had dysgerminomas, 35 (28.5%) had immature teratomas, 12 (9.8%) had mixed germ cell tumors, 26 (21.1%) had yolk sac tumors, and 1 (0.8%) had embryonal carcinoma. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution was as follows: stage I, 87 (70.7%); stage II, 3 (2.4%); stage III, 29 (23.6%); and stage IV, 4 (3.3%). Fertility-sparing surgery was performed in 92 patients, whereas the remaining 31 received radical surgery; 65.8% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Recurrence rate was 17.8% and the median time to recurrence was 9 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patient age (>45 years) and treatment outside a referral (MITO) center were the most important predictors of recurrence. The 5-year overall survival rate was 88.8%, with a median follow-up of 61 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that stage greater than I and yolk sac tumors were independent poor prognostic indicators. Conclusions: This study confirms that MOGCTs have excellent prognosis, with 5-year overall survival rates of 95.6% and 73.2% in stage I and advanced stages, respectively. Age older than 45 years and treatment not in a referral center are independent risk factors for recurrence, whereas stage greater than I and yolk sac histology are independent poor prognostic indicators.

Carboplatin and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Preliminary Activity Results of the MITO-2 Phase III Trial

Background: Based on the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in relapsed ovarian cancer, we are conducting a phase III study comparing carboplatin plus either paclitaxel or PLD as first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Because of limited phase I and II data on PLD plus carboplatin in this setting, we conducted an interim activity analysis. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage 1c-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomized to carboplatin AUC 5 plus either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 or PLD 30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The interim activity analysis was planned according to a single-stage phase II design with an auspicated 50% response rate; 50 patients eligible for response assessment were required. Response was defined according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Results: A complete response was achieved in 14 patients (28%) and a partial response in 20 (40%), which produced an overall response rate of 68%. The activity exceeded the minimum required for study continuation. Stable disease was reported in an additional 10 patients (20%). Conclusions: The adopted schedule of PLD plus carboplatin demonstrates activity as a first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

Extending the platinum-free interval with a non-platinum therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Results from the SOCRATES Retrospective Study.

Background: It has been proposed that extending the platinum-free interval with intervening non-platinum therapy increases the efficacy of a later re-treatment with platinum in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. This hypothesis is based on data from small series and although it has not been validated prospectively, this strategy has entered general practice in Italy in the last years. The SOCRATES study retrospectively assessed the pattern of care of a cohort of patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer observed in the years 2000–2002 in 37 Italian centres. Data were collected between April and September 2005. Methods: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval >6 months were eligible. 493 patient files were collected and 428 were eligible and analyzed. Results: The interval from the end of the 1st line to relapse was 6–12 months in 164 patients (39.5%) and >12 months in 251 cases (60.5%). Patients received a 2nd (100%), 3rd (80.1%), 4th (50.2%), 5th (28.3%), and 6th (11.9%) line of chemotherapy. At 2nd line 282 (65.9%) received platinum (group A), while 146 (34.1%) received non-platinum chemotherapy (group B). In the latter group, 67 patients received platinum at later progression (group B1), while 79 never received platinum (group B2). Median time to platinum re-treatment was 20 and 23.1 months in patients of groups A and B1, respectively. The response rate to the first platinum received was 74.4 and 57.4% in groups A and B1, respectively (p = 0.02). Group B2 was characterized by the worst response rate and survival. At multivariate analysis time of first platinum re-treatment (2nd line vs. later; p = 0.0132; OR = 2.34) and age (p = 0.0029; OR = 2.41) was independently associated with a higher possibility of response to platinum. Conclusions: With the limits of a retrospective study, our data question the hypothesis that extending the platinum-free interval with an intervening non-platinum therapy in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer improves the response rate of a further platinum re-treatment.

Evaluation of pemetrexed (Alimta, LY231514) as second-line chemotherapy in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: the CERVIX 1 study of the MITO (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies) Group

BACKGROUND The objective of the study was to estimate the antitumor activity of pemetrexed in patients with advanced/recurrent carcinoma of the cervix and to determine the nature and degree of toxicity. METHODS A multicenter phase II trial was conducted by the Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO) Group. Patients with advanced/recurrent measurable carcinoma of the cervix that had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen in association or not with radiotherapy were treated with pemetrexed at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days. All the patients had a measurable lesion according to RECIST criteria in a not previously irradiated field. RESULTS From November 2006 to September 2008, 43 patients were entered by seven member institutions of the MITO-Group. A total of 164 cycles (median 2, range 1-9) were administered. The treatment was well tolerated. More serious toxic effects (grades 3 and 4) included leukopenia in 27.9% and neutropenia in 30.2% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Six patients (13.9%) had partial responses (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter) with a median response of 7 weeks (range 3-27). Twenty-three patients (53.4%) had stable disease (less than a 50% reduction and less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions and the appearance of no new lesions) and fourteen (32.5%) patients had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 10 weeks and overall survival was 35 weeks. CONCLUSION Pemetrexed showed moderate activity against advanced/recurrent cervical cancer that had failed prior chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine Combined with Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Refractory or Resistant to Platinum and Taxane

Objectives: The aimof this multicenter feasibility study was to determine the toxicity profile and antitumor activity of the gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin combination as second-line treatment in platinum plus paclitaxel resistant/refractory advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: Twenty patients received a 30–60-min infusion of gemcitabine a week for 2 weeks, followed by 120–180 min infusion of oxaliplatin every 3 weeks. The doses used were 1,000 and 130 mg/m2, respectively. Seventeen cases (85% of the total) were platinum resistant and 3 (15%) were platinum refractory. Results: Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 14/20 of cases (70%); there were no symptomatic cases. 2 patients required platelet transfusion and 8 patients received hydrocortisone. The dose- limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. Combined grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 8/20 (40%) of cases (no sepsis was registered). Five patients were treated with recombinant erythropoietin because of grade 3 anemia and 4 cases received G-CSF prophylactically from the first cycle. The overall response rate of the combination in terms of antitumor activity was 26% (95% CI = 9–51%). Conclusion: A combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin using this schedule gave rise to a moderate/severe toxicity profile and would be feasible only if growth factors were used and/or gemcitabine were administered at lower doses. The antitumor activity of the combination was insufficient reward for the resultant toxicity profile. However, equivalent to that of other drugs used in platinum refractory and resistant patients.

Activity of chemotherapy in mucinous ovarian cancer with a recurrence free interval of more than 6 months: results from the SOCRATES retrospective study

BackgroundMucinous ovarian carcinoma have a poorer prognosis compared with other histological subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, the activity of chemotherapy in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent mucinous ovarian cancer.MethodsThe SOCRATES study retrospectively assessed the pattern of care of a cohort of patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer observed in the years 2000–2002 in 37 Italian centres. Data were collected between April and September 2005. Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with > 6 months of platinum free interval were considered eligible.ResultsTwenty patients with mucinous histotype and 388 patients with other histotypes were analyzed. At baseline, mucinous tumours differed from the others for an higher number of patients with lower tumor grading (p = 0.0056) and less advanced FIGO stage (p = 0.025). At time of recurrence, a statistically significant difference was found in performance status (worse in mucinous, p = 0.024). About 20% of patients underwent secondary cytoreduction in both groups, but a lower number of patients were optimally debulked in the mucinous group (p = 0.03). Patients with mucinous cancer received more frequently single agent platinum than platinum based-combination therapy or other non-platinum schedules as second line therapy (p = 0.026), with a response rate lower than in non-mucinous group (36.4% vs 62.6%, respectively, p = 0.04). Median time to progression and overall survival were worse for mucinous ovarian cancer. Finally, mucinous cancer received a lower number of chemotherapy lines (p = 0.0023).ConclusionThis analysis shows that platinum sensitive mucinous ovarian cancer has a poor response to chemotherapy. Studies dedicated to this histological subgroup are needed.

Development and validation of a microRNA-based signature (MiROvaR) to predict early relapse or progression of epithelial ovarian cancer: a cohort study

BACKGROUND Risk of relapse or progression remains high in the treatment of most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and development of a molecular predictor could be a valuable tool for stratification of patients by risk. We aimed to develop a microRNA (miRNA)-based molecular classifier that can predict risk of progression or relapse in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS We analysed miRNA expression profiles in three cohorts of samples collected at diagnosis. We used 179 samples from a Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer trial (cohort OC179) to develop the model and 263 samples from two cancer centres (cohort OC263) and 452 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas epithelial ovarian cancer series (cohort OC452) to validate the model. The primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival, and we adapted a semi-supervised prediction method to the miRNA expression profile of OC179 to identify miRNAs that predict risk of progression. We assessed the independent prognostic role of the model using multivariable analysis with a Cox regression model. FINDINGS We identified 35 miRNAs that predicted risk of progression or relapse and used them to create a prognostic model, the 35-miRNA-based predictor of Risk of Ovarian Cancer Relapse or progression (MiROvaR). MiROvaR was able to classify patients in OC179 into a high-risk group (89 patients; median progression-free survival 18 months [95% CI 15-22]) and a low-risk group (90 patients; median progression-free survival 38 months [24-not estimable]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·85 [1·29-2·64], p=0·00082). MiROvaR was a significant predictor of progression in the two validation sets (OC263 HR 3·16, 95% CI 2·33-4·29, p<0·0001; OC452 HR 1·39, 95% CI 1·11-1·74, p=0·0047) and maintained its independent prognostic effect when adjusted for relevant clinical covariates using multivariable analyses (OC179: adjusted HR 1·48, 95% CI 1·03-2·13, p=0·036; OC263: adjusted HR 3·09 [2·24-4·28], p<0·0001; and OC452: HR 1·41 [1·11-1·79], p=0·0047). INTERPRETATION MiROvaR is a potential predictor of epithelial ovarian cancer progression and has prognostic value independent of relevant clinical covariates. MiROvaR warrants further investigation for the development of a clinical-grade prognostic assay. FUNDING AIRC and CARIPLO Foundation.

Safety of a 3-weekly schedule of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first line chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer: preliminary results of the MITO-2 randomized trial

BackgroundThe MITO-2 (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer) study is a randomized phase III trial comparing carboplatin plus paclitaxel to carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in first-line chemotherapy of patients with ovarian cancer. Due to the paucity of published phase I data on the 3-weekly experimental schedule used, an early safety analysis was planned.MethodsPatients with ovarian cancer (stage Ic-IV), aged < 75 years, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, were randomized to carboplatin AUC 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks or to carboplatin AUC 5 plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2, every 3 weeks. Treatment was planned for 6 cycles. Toxicity was coded according to the NCI-CTC version 2.0.ResultsThe pre-planned safety analysis was performed in July 2004. Data from the first 50 patients treated with carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin were evaluated. Median age was 60 years (range 34–75). Forty-three patients (86%) completed 6 cycles. Two thirds of the patients had at least one cycle delayed due to toxicity, but 63% of the cycles were administered on time. In most cases the reason for chemotherapy delay was neutropenia or other hematological toxicity. No delay due to palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was recorded. No toxic death was recorded. Reported hematological toxicities were: grade (G) 3 anemia 16%, G3/G4 neutropenia 36% and 10% respectively, G3/4 thrombocytopenia 22% and 4% respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was infrequent: pulmonary G1 6%, heart rhythm G1 4%, liver toxicity G1 6%, G2 4% and G3 2%. Complete hair loss was reported in 6% of patients, and G1 neuropathy in 2%. PPE was recorded in 14% of the cases (G1 10%, G2 2%, G3 2%).ConclusionThis safety analysis shows that the adopted schedule of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin given every 3 weeks is feasible as first line treatment in ovarian cancer patients, although 37% of the cycles were delayed due to haematological toxicity. Toxicities that are common with standard combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (neurotoxicity and hair loss) are infrequent with this experimental schedule, and skin toxicity appears manageable.

Paclitaxel/carboplatin versus topotecan/paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with FIGO suboptimally resected stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer a multicenter, randomized study

OBJECTIVE The objective of this prospective randomized phase III trial was to compare paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) versus topotecan plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (TPC) in women with suboptimal stage III (residual tumour >1cm) or stage IV ovarian cancer to evaluate the survival rate and toxicities. METHODS Eligible for the study were patients aged at least 18 years old with histological/cytological diagnosis of FIGO stages III (residual tumour ≥1 cm after primary surgery)--IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients were randomized to iv PC on day 1, every 21 days or iv topotecan daily for three days and PC on day 3, every 21 days. RESULTS The intention to treat population was made of 326 patients in total, 170 in the PC group and 156 in the TPC group. The life table estimates of survival probabilities at one, three and five years were, respectively, 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.44-0.62) and 0.32 (95%CI: 0.23-0.42) in the PC group, and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42-0.61), and 0.32(95%CI: 0.22-0.43) in the TPC group (log-rank test at 5 years: ns). The results of the survival analysis based on Cox regression model showed no statistically significant differences between groups (p-value: ns). The number of subjects with at least one event with possible relationship to study medication was 151 (88.8%) in the PC group and 139 (89.1%) in the TPC group (p=ns). In the PC group, 79 patients (23.6%) experienced at least one Adverse Event (AE) graded as severe and 16 patients (4.8%) at least one life-threatening AE, whilst in the TPC group, the number of patients who presented at least one severe or life-threatening AE was 86 (24%) and 37 (10.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION The results of the present study show that the addition of topotecan to a standard paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer did not result in significant advantages in terms of survival rate. A slightly worse toxicity profile for TPC was observed.