Paraskevi Boura

Bevacizumab-Induced Hypertension Pathogenesis and Management

Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been approved in the US as first- and second-line treatment of colorectal cancer and in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The US FDA has also granted approval for the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and glioblastoma, and in Europe, it is also approved in metastatic breast cancer in combination with paclitaxel. Bevacizumab is under investigation in the first-line and adjuvant setting of almost all types of solid tumors. However, anti-VEGF therapy is associated with significant toxicity. The incidence of grade 3–4 hypertension differs among the various malignancies in which bevacizumab is administered, possibly because of drug interactions with co-administered chemotherapy drugs. Hypertension appears to be dose dependent, and it is under investigation as a biomarker for VEGF inhibition efficacy. There are three main theories concerning the underlying pathophysiology: (i) the nitric oxide theory; (ii) the renal impairment theory; and (iii) the pre-eclampsia-like theory. The correct evaluation of the levels of hypertension is of critical importance and home blood pressure monitoring seems to be the most effective technique. A baseline assessment and follow-up monitoring of blood pressure is considered necessary for all patients receiving bevacizumab. There are no evidence-based recommendations regarding which antihypertensives are more appropriate for the management of bevacizumab-related hypertension. It has been suggested that the benefits from antihypertensive treatment are largely independent of the drugs used, as long as they adequately lower blood pressure. Randomized prospective studies are necessary to provide data that will be useful for the development of specific guidelines for the management of bevacizumab-related hypertension. In the meantime, treatment of anti-VEGF-induced hypertension should follow current guidelines for diagnosis and management of hypertension in general.

Increased serum levels of ghrelin at diagnosis mediate body weight loss in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

OBJECTIVE Ghrelin is an orexigenic peptide implicated in body weight regulation, while cachexia is a multifactorial effect of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presented in patients with advanced disease. The aim of this study was to detect the role of ghrelin in cachexia and systemic inflammation of advanced NSCLC patients as well as its role as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. METHODS Ghrelin serum levels were measured in 101 inoperable NSCLC patients before receiving any therapy (75 patients with weight loss and 26 without weight loss) and 60 healthy control volunteers. Epidemiological, anthropometrical and laboratory data were assessed for all participants (patients and healthy volunteers). RESULTS NSCLC patients presented significantly higher ghrelin serum levels than healthy individuals, adjusted for sex, age and BMI (0.5+/-0.4 ng/ml vs. 0.4+/-0.3 ng/ml, P<0.001). NSCLC patients with weight loss presented significantly increased ghrelin serum levels (0.56+/-0.24 ng/ml vs. 0.52+/-0.44 ng/ml, P=0.017), compared to NSCLC patients without weight loss. CONCLUSIONS Ghrelin serum levels are significantly increased in NSCLC patients, mainly in the subgroup of patients diagnosed with cachexia, indicating a possible implication in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. Further studies are needed to determine its potential role as predictive and prognostic marker.

The diverse roles of adiponectin in non-small-cell lung cancer: current data and future perspectives

In recent years, there is growing research interest for the biological role of adipose tissue-derived bioactive factors, mainly including adipokines, in various forms of cancer. Adiponectin (APN) is the most abundant circulating adipokine, and a key mediator of several cancer-related processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, regulation of tumor cell invasion and angiogenesis. In this review we summarize and critically discuss the published literature on the diverse roles of APN in non-small-cell lung cancer, including its implication in lung cancer development, its use as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, and its correlation with cancer-related cachexia. The main challenges and future perspectives, mainly with regard to the potential development of APN-targeted therapeutic agents in cancer therapeutics, are also briefly presented and discussed.

Prospective Assessment of Clinical Risk Factors and Biomarkers of Hypercoagulability for the Identification of Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma at Risk for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: The Observational ROADMAP-CAT Study.

BACKGROUND The aim of this prospective study was to identify the most clinically relevant hypercoagulability biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma patients for elaboration of an improved risk assessment model (RAM) for venous thromboembolism (VTE). SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS One hundred fifty ambulatory patients with lung adenocarcinoma were prospectively enrolled. Thrombin generation, procoagulant phospholipid-dependent clotting time (Procoag-PPL), tissue factor activity (TFa), factor VIIa (FVIIa), factor V (FV), antithrombin, D-Dimers, P-selectin, and heparanase levels were assessed in platelet-poor plasma at inclusion (baseline) and at the end of the third chemotherapy cycle (third chemotherapy). Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent VTE predictors. RESULTS At baseline, patients had significantly attenuated thrombin generation, shorter Procoag-PPL, higher levels of TFa, D-Dimers, and heparanase, and lower levels of FVIIa and P-selectin, compared with controls. A significant increase in Procoag-PPL, FV, and FVIIa and a decrease of P-selectin levels were observed between baseline and third chemotherapy. Hospitalization within the last 3 months prior to assessment, time since cancer diagnosis less than 6 months, mean rate index (MRI) of thrombin generation, and Procoag-PPL were independently associated with symptomatic VTE. Accordingly, a prediction model including Procoag-PPL and MRI showed significant discriminating capacity (area under the curve: 0.84). CONCLUSION Ambulatory patients with lung adenocarcinoma may display pronounced blood hypercoagulability due to decreased Procoag-PPL, increased endothelial cell activation, and increased degradation of fibrin. Incorporation of Procoag-PPL and MRI of thrombin generation may improve the accuracy of a VTE-RAM in the above setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The prospective ROADMAP-CAT study identified two biomarkers of hypercoagulability, the procoagulant phospholipid-dependent clotting time (Procoag-PPL) and the mean rate index (MRI) of the propagation phase of thrombin generation assessed with the Calibrated Automated Thrombinoscope, as being clinically relevant for the classification of ambulatory patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving a maximum of one cycle of chemotherapy into high and intermediate/low risk for venous thromboembolism. Measurement of Procoag-PPL and MRI within 1 month after the administration of the first chemotherapy cycle provides significant accuracy of the assessment. Association of the Procoag-PPL and MRI with the clinical risk assessment model for cancer-associated thrombosis in ambulatory patients with solid tumors (COMPASS-CAT RAM) further improved its accuracy.

Khorana Score: Νew Predictor of Early Mortality in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a typical complication in patients with lung cancer. Khorana score is an established tool for thromboembolic risk stratification of ambulatory patients with cancer undergoing outpatient chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the Khorana score for VTE and death in patients with lung adenocarcinoma during first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy. Medical records of 130 patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively studied during the time period June 2013 to May 2015. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 13 (10.0%) patients. Thromboembolic events were significantly correlated with reduced survival during treatment period (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-9.49; P = .032). The VTE rates did not present statistically significant difference between different Khorana score groups (P = .96). In univariate analysis, the risk of death during treatment period (median: 16 weeks) was 3.75 times higher in high-risk versus intermediate-risk patients (HR: 3.75, 95% CI: 1.36-10.36; P = .001) and had 2.25 times higher per point increase in the Khorana score (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.36-3.73; P = .002); the above results were also reproduced in multivariate analysis. Khorana score represents a valuable tool for identifying patients with cancer in low thromboembolic risk but does not preserve its predictive value for higher risk individuals. Khorana score is an independent risk factor for death in patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy.