Pascal-André Vendittoli

A multimodal analgesia protocol for total knee arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND Although numerous methods of postoperative analgesia have been investigated in an attempt to improve pain control after total knee arthroplasty, parenteral narcotics still play a major role in postoperative pain management. Local anesthetics have the advantage of blocking pain conduction at its origin and minimizing the systemic side effects associated with postoperative narcotic use. This study was performed to evaluate the benefits and safety of a multimodal analgesia protocol that included periarticular injection of large doses of local anesthetics in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS We compared morphine consumption during the first twenty-four hours after unilateral total knee arthroplasty in forty-two patients who had been randomized to receive either (1) a perioperative infiltration mixture, consisting principally of local anesthetic, and self-administered morphine or (2) self-administered morphine only. Narcotics consumption, pain control, medication-related side effects, plasma levels of the local anesthetic (ropivacaine), and postoperative rehabilitation were monitored. RESULTS Although there was high satisfaction and good pain control in both groups, morphine consumption was significantly lower in the local analgesia group than it was in the control group (28.8 +/- 17.4 mg compared with 50.3 +/- 25.4 mg twenty-four hours after surgery, and 46.7 +/- 19.4 mg compared with 68.6 +/- 38.6 mg forty hours after surgery). Both groups achieved a similar amount of knee flexion on the fifth postoperative day. Over the five-day period after the procedure, the patients in the local analgesia group reported a total of 2.6 +/- 3.9 hours of nausea compared with 7.1 +/- 12.2 hours in the control group. No complications related to the infiltration of the local anesthetic were observed, and all plasma concentrations of the local anesthetic were below the toxic range. CONCLUSIONS This multimodal perioperative analgesia protocol that included infiltration of a local anesthetic offered improved pain control and minimal side effects to patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Our study also confirmed the safety of the protocol.

Metal-on-metal bearings total hip arthroplasty: The cobalt and chromium ions release concern

With certain concerns recently reported on metal-on-metal bearing couples in total hip arthroplasty, this studys objective is to review the current knowledge concerning release of metal ions and its potential consequences. Each metal-on-metal implant presents different tribological properties. The analytical techniques for metals are accurate and the Co ion rates seem acceptable up to 2 μg/L. A delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction (atypical lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesion [ALVAL]) may be the source of arthroplasty failure. Idiosyncratic, it remains unpredictable even using cutaneous tests and apparently is rare (0.3%). Today, there are no scientific or epidemiologic data supporting a risk of carcinogenesis or teratogenesis related to the use of a metal-on-metal bearings couple. Solid pseudotumors nearly exclusively are observed with resurfacing procedures, carrying a high annual revision rate in women under 40 years of age, occurring particularly in cases of acetabular malposition and with use of cast molded Cr-Co alloys. Osteolysis manifests through complete and progressive radiolucent lines or through cavitary lesions stemming from ALVAL-type alterations or impingement problems or implant incompatibility. The formation of wear debris exceeding the biological tolerance is possible with implant malposition, subluxation, and jamming of the femoral head in cases of cup deformity. Moreover, each implant presents different metal ion production; assessment of their performance and safety is required before their clinical use. With the knowledge available today, metal-on-metal bearing couples are contraindicated in cases of metal allergies or end stage renal dysfunction and small size resurfacing should cautiously be used.

Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels in four types of metal-on-metal large-diameter femoral head total hip arthroplasty: the potential influence of the adapter sleeve.

BACKGROUND Metal-on-metal bearings, as used in total hip arthroplasty prostheses that have a large-diameter femoral head, were proposed as an option for treating young and active patients with degenerative hip disorders. Despite the theoretical improved performance of large metal articulations with regard to wear, metal ion levels produced by total hip arthroplasty prostheses in which a large-diameter femoral head is used have not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS From 173 eligible patients, 144 patients were allocated to undergo a unilateral total hip arthroplasty with use of metal-on-metal components and a large-diameter femoral head. The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of metal ion release (chromium, cobalt, and titanium) from four different types of prostheses from four different implant manufacturers (Biomet, DePuy, Smith & Nephew, and Zimmer). RESULTS For cobalt ion levels, a significant difference was found between the different types of total hip arthroplasty prostheses with a large-diameter femoral head at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months, but only in male patients or patients with a femoral head size of 50 mm or greater. The highest mean cobalt levels at all follow-up periods were observed with the Zimmer implant and the lowest with the Biomet implant. Titanium ion levels were highest in the Zimmer group at all follow-up periods, whereas no difference between groups was found for chromium. At the most recent follow-up, one hip was revised after the development of an adverse local tissue reaction. Of concern was the observation at the time of revision surgery of black metallic deposits inside the adapter sleeve and on the prosthetic femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS This investigation revealed that metal ion release differs greatly between various total hip arthroplasty implants with a large-diameter femoral head. The sources of metal ion production are numerous, but it is hypothesized that wear and corrosion at the junction between the adapter sleeve and the femoral stem in some patients may be responsible for the elevated cobalt ion levels that were found in the Zimmer group. On the other hand, an adapter sleeve made of titanium, such as the one used with the Biomet large-diameter-head total hip arthroplasty, is an unlikely contributor to the release of cobalt ions. Current technology or design of some total hip arthroplasty systems that make use of a large-diameter femoral head may not yet allow the use of modular large heads with a metal-on-metal articulation, especially in young, active male patients whose activities generate high loads at the hip joint. Further research is needed to better understand the favorable design characteristics of modular junctions in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty implants that make use of large-diameter femoral heads.

Metal Ion Release With Large-Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty

Preoperative and postoperative ion concentrations were measured in 29 metal-on-metal, large-diameter head total hip arthroplasty (LDH-THA) patients. Mean chromium, cobalt (Co), and titanium levels from LDH-THA were 1.3, 2.2, and 2.7 μg/L at 12 months. The open femoral head design showed significantly higher Co concentrations than the closed design (3.0 vs 1.8 μg/L, P = .037). Compared with previously published ion levels from a hip resurfacing system presenting the same bearing characteristics, Co levels were significantly higher in LDH-THA (2.2 vs 0.7 μg/L, P < .001). This study has demonstrated that the addition of a sleeve with modular junctions and an open femoral head design of LDH-THA causes more Co release than bearing surface wear (157% and 67%, respectively). Even if no pathologic metal ion threshold level has been determined, efforts should be made to minimize its release. We recommend modification or abandonment of the modular junction and femoral head open design for this specific LDH-THA system.

Activités sportives après resurfaçage et prothèse totale de hanche : une étude prospective randomisée

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Since component wear of the prosthetic metal-polyethylene bearing is directly related to the level of patient activity, it would be logical, for patients with a total hip arthroplasty, to advise against long-term participation in activities with repeated movements The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the type, intensity and frequency of sports activities performed after resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RH) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a metal-on-metal bearing. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study concerned 205 hips, including 152 with a unilateral hip arthroplasty (71 THA and 81 RH). Three clinical scores were used: an overall activity score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score and the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, as well as patient satisfaction, return to sports activities (using a visual analog scale [VAS]) and frequency of factors limiting activity. Patients completed a questionnaire to determine the type, intensity and frequency of sports activities practiced pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS The mean overall activity score immediately before surgery was not statistically different between the two groups (p=0.111). One year after surgery, the score was 17.9 in the RH group and 12.4 in the THA group (p=0.001). At last follow-up, the mean WOMAC score was 8.1 (range 0-73, S.D. 13.1) in the RH group and 9.8 (range 0-41, S.D. 10.9) in the THA group (p=0.409). The mean UCLA score was 7.17 in the RH group (range 2-10, S.D. 1.90) and 6.75 in the THA group (range 2-10, S.D. 1.71) (p=0.174). The mean satisfaction with return to sports activities as assessed on the VAS was 7.78 in the RH group and 7.43 in the THA group (p=0.313). DISCUSSION The results of this study demonstrate that the degree and intensity of postoperative sports activities are greater in the RH group than in the THA group, although this difference was less pronounced than expected. The excellent joint stability after RH (big head effect) could be one of the main factors favoring a high activity level compared to conventional THA, by limiting the episodes of dislocation and increasing the suction effect between the joint components. It is nevertheless difficult to ascertain the long-term effect of intense sports activity on the fixation of osteo-integrated implants (cups) and cemented components (femoral stem).

Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND The role of aspirin in thromboprophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is controversial. OBJECTIVE To compare extended prophylaxis with aspirin and dalteparin for prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after THA. DESIGN Multicenter randomized, controlled trial with a noninferiority design based on a minimal clinically important difference of 2.0%. Randomization was electronically generated; patients were assigned to a treatment group through a Web-based program. Patients, physicians, study coordinators, health care team members, outcome adjudicators, and data analysts were blinded to interventions. (Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN11902170). SETTING 12 tertiary care orthopedic referral centers in Canada. PATIENTS 778 patients who had elective unilateral THA between 2007 and 2010. INTERVENTION After an initial 10 days of dalteparin prophylaxis after elective THA, patients were randomly assigned to 28 days of dalteparin (n = 400) or aspirin (n = 386). MEASUREMENTS Symptomatic VTE confirmed by objective testing (primary efficacy outcome) and bleeding. RESULTS Five of 398 patients (1.3%) randomly assigned to dalteparin and 1 of 380 (0.3%) randomly assigned to aspirin had VTE (absolute difference, 1.0 percentage point [95% CI, -0.5 to 2.5 percentage points]). Aspirin was noninferior (P < 0.001) but not superior (P = 0.22) to dalteparin. Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 5 patients (1.3%) receiving dalteparin and 2 (0.5%) receiving aspirin. The absolute between-group difference in a composite of all VTE and clinically significant bleeding events was 1.7 percentage points (CI, -0.3 to 3.8 percentage points; P = 0.091) in favor of aspirin. LIMITATION The study was halted prematurely because of difficulty with patient recruitment. CONCLUSION Extended prophylaxis for 28 days with aspirin was noninferior to and as safe as dalteparin for the prevention of VTE after THA in patients who initially received dalteparin for 10 days. Given its low cost and greater convenience, aspirin may be considered a reasonable alternative for extended thromboprophylaxis after THA. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Gait Patterns After Total Hip Arthroplasty and Surface Replacement Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE To compare gait patterns in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and surface hip arthroplasty. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Outpatient biomechanical laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Two groups of 10 surface hip arthroplasty and THA patients and 10 control subjects participated in the study (N=30). The patients were volunteers recruited from a larger randomized study. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Gait patterns, hip abductor muscle strength, clinical outcomes, and radiographic analyses were compared between groups. RESULTS In the sagittal plane, the THA group showed a larger flexor moment and larger mechanical work in H2S and K3S power bursts compared with surface hip arthroplasty and control subjects. In the frontal plane, both THA and surface hip arthroplasty patients had smaller hip abductor muscles energy generation (H3F) than the control group. No difference was found for the hip abductor muscles strength. CONCLUSIONS In the THA group, the larger energy absorption in H2S and K3S would be a cost-effective mechanical adaptation to increase stability. The surface hip arthroplasty characteristics could allow the return to a more normative gait pattern compared with THA. The modification in the frontal plane in surface hip arthroplasty and THA would be related to the hip abductor muscles strength.

Heterotopic Ossification After Surface Replacement Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Study

With a randomized clinical trial, we compared the incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification in cohorts of patients who have undergone either surface replacement arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Surface replacement arthroplasty group had a significantly higher rate of severe heterotopic ossification (Brooker grades 3-4) than the total hip arthroplasty group, 12.6% (13/103) vs 2.1% (2/97) respectively (P = .02). Grade 4 heterotopic ossification was observed (4.9%, 5/103) exclusively in the surface replacement arthroplasty group. Patients with severe heterotopic ossification had significantly inferior functional outcome scores. Surgeons offering surface replacement must be aware of this risk and use meticulous surgical technique and consider routine prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification.

Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases.

Many patients undergoing total hip resurfacing arthroplasty present with reduced anterior femoral neck concavity as a part of the degenerative process. Painful hip impingement may develop or persist after hip resurfacing when the retained femoral neck abuts against the metallic acetabular component or the anterior acetabular bony wall. We report on two cases of painful postoperative hip impingement after hip resurfacing, in one of whom anterior neck-contouring osteoplasty restored pain-free range of motion (ROM). To restore natural hip ROM, surgeons performing hip total hip resurfacing arthroplasty should aim to reproduce the normal femoral head-neck offset ratio. Femoral head-neck offset restoration can be achieved by proper femoral component positioning (especially optimal translation), by femoral neck osteoplasty or by increasing femoral component head size appropriately.

Periarticular injection in knee arthroplasty improves quadriceps function.

BackgroundThe postoperative analgesic potential of periarticular anesthetic infiltration (PAI) after TKA is unclear as are the complications of continuous femoral nerve block on quadriceps function.Questions/purposesWe asked (1) whether PAI provides equal or improved postoperative pain control in comparison to a femoral nerve block in patients who have undergone TKA; and (2) if so, whether PAI improves early postoperative quadriceps control and facilitates rehabilitation.MethodsWe randomized 60 patients to receive either PAI or femoral nerve block. During the first 5 days after TKA, we compared narcotic consumption, pain control, quadriceps function, walking distance, knee ROM, capacity to perform a straight leg raise, and active knee extension. Medication-related side effects, complications, operating room time, and hospitalization duration were compared.ResultsOpioid consumption was lower in the PAI group during the first 8 postoperative hours (12.5 mg versus 18.7 mg morphine), as was reported pain at rest (1.7 versus 3.5 on a 10-point VAS). Thereafter, narcotic consumption and reported pain were similar up to 120 hours. More subjects in the femoral nerve block group experienced quadriceps motor block (37% versus 0% in the PAI group). On Days 1 to 3, subjects in the PAI group experienced better capacity to perform the straight leg raise, active knee extension, and had longer walking distances.ConclusionsPAI provided pain control equivalent to that of a femoral nerve block while avoiding a motor block and its negative functional impacts. The data suggest it should be considered an alternative to a femoral nerve block.Level of EvidenceLevel I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.