Pascal Defaye

Sudden Cardiac Arrest Associated with Early Repolarization

BACKGROUND Early repolarization is a common electrocardiographic finding that is generally considered to be benign. Its potential to cause cardiac arrhythmias has been hypothesized from experimental studies, but it is not known whether there is a clinical association with sudden cardiac arrest. METHODS We reviewed data from 206 case subjects at 22 centers who were resuscitated after cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and assessed the prevalence of electrocardiographic early repolarization. The latter was defined as an elevation of the QRS-ST junction of at least 0.1 mV from baseline in the inferior or lateral lead, manifested as QRS slurring or notching. The control group comprised 412 subjects without heart disease who were matched for age, sex, race, and level of physical activity. Follow-up data that included the results of monitoring with an implantable defibrillator were obtained for all case subjects. RESULTS Early repolarization was more frequent in case subjects with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation than in control subjects (31% vs. 5%, P<0.001). Among case subjects, those with early repolarization were more likely to be male and to have a history of syncope or sudden cardiac arrest during sleep than those without early repolarization. In eight subjects, the origin of ectopy that initiated ventricular arrhythmias was mapped to sites concordant with the localization of repolarization abnormalities. During a mean (+/-SD) follow-up of 61+/-50 months, defibrillator monitoring showed a higher incidence of recurrent ventricular fibrillation in case subjects with a repolarization abnormality than in those without such an abnormality (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.5; P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a history of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, there is an increased prevalence of early repolarization.

Outcome After Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Brugada Syndrome A Multicenter Study

Background— Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications in Brugada syndrome remain controversial, especially in asymptomatic patients. Previous outcome data are limited by relatively small numbers of patients or short follow-up durations. We report the outcome of patients with Brugada syndrome implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a large multicenter registry. Methods and Results— A total of 378 patients (310 male; age, 46±13 years) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (31 for aborted sudden cardiac arrest, 181 for syncope, and 166 asymptomatic) were included. Fifteen patients (4%) were lost to follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 77±42 months, 7 patients (2%) died (1 as a result of an inappropriate shock), and 46 patients (12%) had appropriate device therapy (5±5 shocks per patient). Appropriate device therapy rates at 10 years were 48% for patients whose implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication was aborted sudden cardiac arrest, 19% for those whose indication was syncope, and 12% for the patients who were asymptomatic at implantation. At 10 years, rates of inappropriate shock and lead failure were 37% and 29%, respectively. Inappropriate shock occurred in 91 patients (24%; 4±4 shocks per patient) because of lead failure (n=38), supraventricular tachycardia (n=20), T-wave oversensing (n=14), or sinus tachycardia (n=12). Importantly, introduction of remote monitoring, programming a high single ventricular fibrillation zone (>210–220 bpm), and a long detection time were associated with a reduced risk of inappropriate shock. Conclusions— Appropriate therapies are more prevalent in symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients but are not insignificant in asymptomatic patients (1%/y). Optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and follow-up dramatically reduce inappropriate shock. However, lead failure remains a major problem in this population.

Outcome After Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Brugada Syndrome

Background— Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease characterized by an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by ventricular fibrillation. At present, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the recommended therapy in high-risk patients. This multicenter study reports the outcome of a large series of patients implanted with an ICD for Brugada syndrome. Methods and Results— All patients (n=220, 46±12 years, 183 male) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern implanted with an ICD in 14 centers between 1993 and 2005 were investigated. ICD indication was based on resuscitated SCD (18 patients, 8%), syncope (88 patients, 40%), or positive electrophysiological study in asymptomatic patients (99 patients, 45%). The remaining 15 patients received an ICD because of a family history of SCD or nonsustained ventricular arrhythmia. During a mean follow-up of 38±27 months, no patient died and 18 patients (8%) had appropriate device therapy (10±15 shocks/patient, 26±33 months after implantation). The complication rate was 28%, including inappropriate shocks, which occurred in 45 patients (20%, 4±3 shocks/patient, 21±20 months after implantation). The reasons for inappropriate therapy were lead failure (19 patients), T-wave oversensing (10 patients), sinus tachycardia (10 patients), and supraventricular tachycardia (9 patients). Among implantation parameters, high defibrillation threshold, high pacing threshold, and low R-wave amplitude occurred, respectively, in 12%, 27%, and 15% of cases. Conclusion— In this large Brugada syndrome population, a low incidence of arrhythmic events was found, with an annual event rate of 2.6% during a follow-up of >3 years, in addition to a significant risk of device-related complications (8.9%/year). Inappropriate shocks were 2.5 times more frequent than appropriate ones.

High Prevalence of Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Patients With Long-Term Pacing The European Multicenter Polysomnographic Study

Background— Cardiovascular diseases leading to pacemaker implantations are suspected of being associated with a high rate of undiagnosed sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). We sought to determine the prevalence and consequences of SAS in pacemaker patients according to pacing indications: heart failure, symptomatic diurnal bradycardia, and atrioventricular block. Methods and Results— Ninety-eight consecutive patients (mean age, 64±8 years) not known to have sleep apnea were included; 29 patients were paced for dilated cardiomyopathy (29%), 33 for high-degree atrioventricular block (34%), and 36 for sinus node disease (37%). All underwent Epworth Sleepiness Scale assessment and polysomnography with the pacemaker programmed to right ventricular DDI pacing mode (lower pacing rate, 50 pulses per minute). SAS was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index ≥10/h. Mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale was in the normal range (7±4), although 13 patients (25%) had an abnormal score >11/h. Fifty-seven patients (59%) had SAS; of these, 21 (21.4%) had a severe SAS (apnea-hypopnea index >30/h). In patients with heart failure, 50% presented with SAS (mean apnea-hypopnea index, 11±7) compared with 68% of patients with atrioventricular block (mean apnea-hypopnea index, 24±29) and 58% with sinus node disease (mean apnea-hypopnea index, 19±23). Conclusions— In paced patients, there is an excessively high prevalence of undiagnosed SAS (59%). Whether treating SAS would have changed the need for pacing is unknown. Treatment effects should be further evaluated particularly because these patients are less symptomatic than typical SAS patients. In any case, SAS should be systematically searched for in paced patients owing to potential detrimental effects on their cardiovascular evolution.

Outcome After Implantation of a Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Brugada SyndromeClinical Perspective: A Multicenter Study–Part 2

Background— Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications in Brugada syndrome remain controversial, especially in asymptomatic patients. Previous outcome data are limited by relatively small numbers of patients or short follow-up durations. We report the outcome of patients with Brugada syndrome implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a large multicenter registry. Methods and Results— A total of 378 patients (310 male; age, 46±13 years) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (31 for aborted sudden cardiac arrest, 181 for syncope, and 166 asymptomatic) were included. Fifteen patients (4%) were lost to follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 77±42 months, 7 patients (2%) died (1 as a result of an inappropriate shock), and 46 patients (12%) had appropriate device therapy (5±5 shocks per patient). Appropriate device therapy rates at 10 years were 48% for patients whose implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication was aborted sudden cardiac arrest, 19% for those whose indication was syncope, and 12% for the patients who were asymptomatic at implantation. At 10 years, rates of inappropriate shock and lead failure were 37% and 29%, respectively. Inappropriate shock occurred in 91 patients (24%; 4±4 shocks per patient) because of lead failure (n=38), supraventricular tachycardia (n=20), T-wave oversensing (n=14), or sinus tachycardia (n=12). Importantly, introduction of remote monitoring, programming a high single ventricular fibrillation zone (>210–220 bpm), and a long detection time were associated with a reduced risk of inappropriate shock. Conclusions— Appropriate therapies are more prevalent in symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients but are not insignificant in asymptomatic patients (1%/y). Optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and follow-up dramatically reduce inappropriate shock. However, lead failure remains a major problem in this population.

Overdrive atrial pacing does not improve obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of overdrive atrial pacing to reduce sleep apnoea severity. A total of 17 unselected patients (12 males; mean±sd age 71±10 yrs; body mass index 27±3 kg·m−2) who had received permanent atrial-synchronous ventricular pacemakers for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias and not known to have central or obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) were studied. Using a crossover study design, patients were or were not in pacing mode with atrial overdrive (15 beats·min−1 faster than mean baseline nocturnal cardiac frequency) for 1 month. Patients were paced only during sleep periods, identified by a specific algorithm included in the pacemaker. Patients underwent three overnight polysomnographic evaluations 1 month apart. The first was performed for baseline evaluation. The patients were then randomly assigned to either 1 night in spontaneous rhythm or to 1 night in pacing mode with atrial overdrive. Two patients refused to continue the study after the first polysomnographic evaluation. OSAS was highly prevalent in this population: 10 of the 15 (67%) patients exhibited an apnoea–hypopnoea index of >30 events·h−1. The nocturnal spontaneous rhythm was 59±7 beats·min−1 at baseline, compared to 75±10 beats·min−1 with atrial overdrive pacing. The apnoea–hypopnoea index was 46±29 events·h−1 in spontaneous rhythm, compared to 50±24 events·h−1 with atrial overdrive pacing. Overdrive pacing changed none of the respiratory indices, or sleep fragmentation or sleep structure parameters. In conclusion, atrial overdrive pacing has no significant effect on obstructive sleep apnoea.

Results From the Loire-Ardèche-Drôme-Isère-Puy-de-Dôme (LADIP) Trial on Atrial Flutter, a Multicentric Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Amiodarone and Radiofrequency Ablation After the First Episode of Symptomatic Atrial Flutter

Background— There is no published randomized study comparing amiodarone therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) after only 1 episode of symptomatic atrial flutter (AFL). The aim of the Loire-Ardèche-Drôme-Isère-Puy-de-Dôme (LADIP) Trial of Atrial Flutter was 2-fold: (1) to prospectively compare first-line RFA (group I) versus cardioversion and amiodarone therapy (group II) after only 1 AFL episode; and (2) to determine the impact of both treatments on the long-term risk of subsequent atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results— From October 2002 to February 2006, 104 patients (aged 78±5 years; 20 women) with AFL were included, with 52 patients in group I and 52 patients in group II. The cumulative risk of AFL or AF was interpreted with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by the log-rank test. Clinical presentation, echocardiographic data, and follow-up were as follows: age (78.5±5 versus 78±5 years), history of AF (27% versus 21.6%); structural heart disease (58% versus 65%), left ventricular ejection fraction (56±14% versus 54.5±14%), left atrial size (43±7 versus 43±6 mm), mean follow-up (13±6 versus 13±6 months; P=NS), recurrence of AFL (3.8% versus 29.5%; P<0.0001), and occurrence of significant AF beyond 10 minutes (25% versus 18%; P=0.3). Five complications (10%) were noted in group II (sick sinus syndrome in 2, hyperthyroidism in 1, and hypothyroidism in 2) and none in group I (0%) (P=0.03). Conclusions— RFA should be considered a first-line therapy even after the first episode of symptomatic AFL. There is a better long-term success rate, the same risk of subsequent AF, and fewer secondary effects.

A New Dual‐Chamber Pacing Mode to Minimize Ventricular Pacing

Despite the low long‐term incidence of high‐degree atrioventricular (AV) block and the known negative effects of ventricular pacing, programming of the AAI mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) remains exceptional. A new pacing mode was, therefore, designed to combine the advantages of AAI with the safety of DDD pacing. AAIsafeR behaves like the AAI mode in absence of AV block. First‐ and second‐degree AV blocks are tolerated up to a predetermined, programmable limit, and conversion to DDD takes place in case of high‐degree AV block. From DDD, the device may switch back to AAI, provided AV conduction has returned. The safety of AAIsafeR was examined in 43 recipients (70 ± 12‐year old, 24 men) of dual chamber pacemakers implanted for SND or paroxysmal AV block. All patients underwent 24‐hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings before hospital discharge and at 1 month of follow‐up with the AAIsafeR mode activated. No AAIsafeR‐related adverse event was observed. At 1 month, the device was functioning in AAIsafeR in 28 patients (65%), and the mean rate of ventricular pacing was 0.2%± 0.4%. Appropriate switches to DDD occurred in 15 patients (35%) for frequent, unexpected AV block. AAIsafeR mode was safe and preserved ventricular function during paroxysmal AV block, while maintaining a very low rate of ventricular pacing. The performance of this new pacing mode in the prevention of atrial fibrillation will be examined in a large, controlled study.

Extraction of Old Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads by Laser Sheath Versus Femoral Approach

Background—Some operators routinely extract chronically implanted transvenous leads from a femoral, whereas others prefer a superior approach. This prospective study compared the safety and effectiveness of laser sheaths versus femoral snare extractions. Methods and Results—The single-center study comprised 101 patients referred for unequivocal indications to extract ≥1 transvenous lead(s). Patients were >4 years of age and were randomly assigned to extractions with a laser sheath (group 1: n=50) versus a snare via femoral approach (group 2: n=51). The multicenter study comprised 358 patients who underwent extraction of old transvenous leads using laser sheaths (n=218, group 3) in 3 centers and from a femoral approach (n=138, group 4) in 3 other centers. In the single-center study, the success and complications rates were similar in groups 1 and 2. No patient died of a periprocedural complication. The procedural duration (51±22 versus 86±51 minutes) and duration of total fluoroscopic exposure (7±7 versus 21±17 minutes) were significantly shorter (each P<0.01) in group I than in group 2. In the multicenter study, we observed 2 procedure-associated deaths in group 3 versus 1 in group 4. Major procedural complications were observed in 3% of patients in group 3, versus 3% in group 4 (P=NS). The rates of complete, partial, and unsuccessful extractions were similar in groups 3 and 4. Conclusions—Old transvenous leads were extracted with similar success and complication rates by the femoral and laser approaches. However, the femoral approach was associated with longer procedures and a longer duration of fluoroscopic exposure.

ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS The ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC) study evaluated the feasibility and safety of left ventricular endocardial pacing (LVEP) using a market-released pacing lead implanted via a single pectoral access by a novel atrial transseptal lead delivery system. METHODS AND RESULTS ALSYNC was a prospective clinical investigation with a minimum of 12-month follow-up in 18 centres of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-indicated patients, who had failed or were unsuitable for conventional CRT. The ALSYNC system comprises the investigational lead delivery system and LVEP lead. Patients required warfarin therapy post-implant. The primary study objective was safety at 6-month follow-up, which was defined as freedom from complications related to the lead delivery system, implant procedure, or the lead ≥70%. The ALSYNC study enrolled 138 patients. The LVEP lead implant success rate was 89.4%. Freedom from complications meeting the definition of primary endpoint was 82.2% at 6 months (95% CI 75.6-88.8%). In the study, 14 transient ischaemic attacks (9 patients, 6.8%), 5 non-disabling strokes (5 patients, 3.8%), and 23 deaths (17.4%) were observed. No death was from a primary endpoint complication. At 6 months, the New York Heart Association class improved in 59% of patients, and 55% had LV end-systolic volume reduction of 15% or greater. Those patients enrolled after CRT non-response showed similar improvement with LVEP. CONCLUSIONS The ALSYNC study demonstrates clinical feasibility, and provides an early indication of possible benefit and risk of LVEP. CLINICAL TRIAL NCT01277783.