Pascal Hammel

Gemcitabine in Combination With Oxaliplatin Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a GERCOR and GISCAD Phase III Trial

PURPOSE Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion). RESULTS Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem). CONCLUSION These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Gemcitabine Combined With Oxaliplatin in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Final Results of a GERCOR Multicenter Phase II Study

PURPOSE Based on preclinical in vitro synergy data, this study evaluated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination in patients with metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled onto this multicenter phase II study. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 10-mg/m(2)/min infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks. Patients with metastatic disease were treated until evidence of progressive disease, whereas patients with locally advanced disease received six cycles in the absence of progression, followed when appropriate by concomitant radiochemotherapy. RESULTS Among 64 eligible patients included in eight centers, 30 had locally advanced and 34 had metastatic disease. Response rate for the 62 patients with measurable disease was 30.6% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 42.3%), 31.0% for locally advanced and 30.3% for metastatic patients. Among 58 assessable patients, 40% had clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival (OS) were 5.3 and 9.2 months, respectively, with 36% of patients alive at 1 year. Median OS for patients with metastatic disease and locally advanced disease were 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. With 574 treatment cycles (median per patient, nine; range, zero to 27), grade 3/4 toxicity per patient was 11% for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 14% for nausea or vomiting, 6.2% for diarrhea, and 11% for peripheral neuropathy, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSION Palliative effects, response rate, and survival observed with this well-tolerated gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination deserve additional evaluation. A comparative study of combination therapy versus gemcitabine alone is ongoing.

Circulating tumor cells in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the ancillary CirCe 07 study to the LAP 07 trial

BACKGROUND Pancreatic carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. At the time of diagnosis, 30% of patients present with a locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). As circulating tumor cells (CTCs) count may be a surrogate of the cancer metastatic abilities, CTC detection rates and prognostic value were studied in a prospective cohort of LAPC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS An LAP07 international multicenter randomized study assesses in patients whose LAPC is controlled after 4 months of chemotherapy whether chemoradiotherapy could increase survival versus continuation of chemotherapy. A subgroup of patients included in the LAP07 trial was screened for CTCs (CellSearch®) before the start of the chemotherapy and after 2 months of treatment. Patient characteristics and survival were obtained prospectively and were correlated with CTC detection. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were included. One or more CTCs/7.5 ml were detected in 5% of patients before treatment and in 9% of patients after 2 months of treatment (overall detection rate: 11% of patients). CTC positivity was associated with poor tumor differentiation (P = 0.04), and with shorter overall survival (OS) in multivariable analysis (RR = 2.5, P = 0.01), together with anemia. CONCLUSIONS The evaluation of micrometastatic disease using CTC detection appears as a promising prognostic tool in LAPC patients.

Acute Hepatitis After Tetrahydroaminoacridine Administration for Alzheimer's Disease

Tetrahydroaminoacridine administration has been proposed as a treatment for Alzheimers disease. Although recent studies have shown that tetrahydroaminoacridine administration can be associated with mild or moderate liver dysfunction, to our knowledge, no case of symptomatic hepatitis with severe liver lesions has heretofore been reported. We describe a patient who developed jaundice after receiving tetrahydroaminoacridine for three weeks. Histologic examination showed extensive hepatocellular necrosis. Tetrahydroaminoacridine withdrawal was followed by the disappearance of jaundice within a few days and complete recovery within 5 weeks. This case shows that tetrahydroaminoacridine administration can induce marked liver cell necrosis resulting in symptomatic acute hepatitis.

Phase II trial of bimonthly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (FOLFUGEM)

BACKGROUND Gemcitabine alone or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) according to several schedules are used for palliation of metastatic and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to test the efficacy of the leucovorin 5-FU and gemcitabine combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II trial combined a simplified bimonthly LV5FU2 with gemcitabine: leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in a two-hour infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2 or 3 g/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours; gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was infused over 30 min on day 3 after 5-FU. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (250 mg/m2 every two cycles up to 1500 mg/m2) in the absence of NCI-CTC toxicity > 2. RESULTS Among the 62 patients included in this study, 22 had LA and 40 had metastatic disease. Objective response rate for the 54 patients with measurable disease was 25.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14%-37.8%) and 22.6% (95% CI: 12%-33.2%) in the intent-to-treat population: the clinical benefit rate for the 59 assessable patients was 49.2%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.8 and 9 months, respectively, with 32.3% of patients alive at 1 year. The most frequent toxicity (grade 3-4) was neutropenia (56.5%) usually asymptomatic (1.1% febrile neutropenia), but requiring decreases of 5-FU and gemcitabine doses. Unexpected complete alopecia occurred in 97% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Palliative effects, response rate and survival observed in this multicenter study seem to be superior to those obtained with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone, despite a limiting hematological toxicity.

Disseminated and circulating tumor cells in gastrointestinal oncology

Circulating (CTCs) and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) are two different steps in the metastatic process. Several recent techniques have allowed detection of these cells in patients, and have generated many results using different isolation techniques in small cohorts. Herein, we review the detection results and their clinical consequence in esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colorectal, and liver carcinomas, and discuss their possible applications as new biomarkers.

State of the art and future directions of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is expected to become the second cause of cancer-related death in 2030. PDAC is the poorest prognostic tumor of the digestive tract, with 80% of patients having advanced disease at diagnosis and 5-year survival rate not exceeding 7%. Until 2010, gemcitabine was the only validated therapy for advanced PDAC with a modest improvement in median overall survival as compared to best supportive care (5-6 vs 3 months). Multiple phase II-III studies have used various combinations of gemcitabine with other cytotoxics or targeted agents, most in vain, in attempt to improve this outcome. Over the past few years, the landscape of PDAC management has undergone major and rapid changes with the approval of the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimens in patients with metastatic disease. These two active combination chemotherapy options yield an improved median overall survival (11.1 vs 8.5 months, respectively) thus making longer survival a reasonably achievable goal. This breakthrough raises some new clinical questions about the management of PDAC. Moreover, better knowledge of the environmental and genetic events that underpin multistep carcinogenesis and of the microenvironment surrounding cancer cells in PDAC has open new perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. In this new dynamic context of deep transformation in basic research and clinical management aspects of the disease, we gathered updated preclinical and clinical data in a multifaceted review encompassing the lessons learned from the past, the yet unanswered questions, and the most promising research priorities to be addressed for the next 5 years.

Etiology of chronic hepatitis in France: predominant role of hepatitis C virus

The aim of this study was to assess the causes of histologically proven chronic hepatitis in a series of 357 consecutively admitted patients. Patients with chronic alcohol intake above 50 g per day, Wilsons disease, idiopathic hemochromatosis or homozygous alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency were excluded. Sera of all patients were tested for antibodies to hepatitis C virus with second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay and recombinant immunoblot assay, for markers of hepatitis B and hepatitis D viruses, and for autoantibodies. Detection of hepatitis C viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction was attempted if recombinant immunoblot assay was indeterminate, or if both viral and autoimmune markers were absent. If no serum markers, including HCV RNA, were found, the cause of chronic hepatitis was considered as unknown. The cause of chronic hepatitis was found in 343 cases (96.4%), including three patients with HCV RNA as the only marker. Chronic hepatitis was related to hepatitis C virus in 51.8%, to hepatitis B virus in 32.8% (including hepatitis D infection in 3.1%), and to autoimmune hepatitis in 5.9% of cases, respectively. No case of drug-induced chronic hepatitis was observed in this series, and in 5.9% of cases, there were probably multiple causes. Finally, in 3.6% of the cases the cause of chronic hepatitis remained unknown despite extensive evaluation suggesting the existence of a non-A, non-B, non-C viral agent.

High c-Met expression in stage I-II pancreatic adenocarcinoma: proposal for an immunostaining scoring method and correlation with poor prognosis.

AIMS c-Met is an emerging biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); there is no consensus regarding the immunostaining scoring method for this marker. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of c-Met overexpression in resected PDAC, and to elaborate a robust and reproducible scoring method for c-Met immunostaining in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS c-Met immunostaining was graded according to the validated MetMab score, a classic visual scale combining surface and intensity (SI score), or a simplified score (high c-Met: ≥ 20% of tumour cells with strong membranous staining), in stage I-II PDAC. A computer-assisted classification method (Aperio software) was developed. Clinicopathological parameters were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival(OS). One hundred and forty-nine patients were analysed retrospectively in a two-step process. Thirty-seven samples (whole slides) were analysed as a pre-run test. Reproducibility values were optimal with the simplified score (kappa = 0.773); high c-Met expression (7/37) was associated with shorter DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 3.456, P = 0.0036] and OS (HR 4.257, P = 0.0004). c-Met expression was concordant on whole slides and tissue microarrays in 87.9% of samples, and quantifiable with a specific computer-assisted algorithm. In the whole cohort (n = 131), patients with c-Met(high) tumours (36/131) had significantly shorter DFS (9.3 versus 20.0 months, HR 2.165, P = 0.0005) and OS (18.2 versus 35.0 months, HR 1.832, P = 0.0098) in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Simplified c-Met expression is an independent prognostic marker in stage I-II PDAC that may help to identify patients with a high risk of tumour relapse and poor survival.

Phase II trial of high dose adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (55 Gy in 5 wks) after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

4111 Background: Radiotherapy (Rth) of 45 Gy or equivalent, with 5FU bolus infusion is the usual adjuvant treatment scheme for resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This work intends to demonstrate the feasibility of a higher dose of Rth with continuous 5FU infusion. METHODS Inclusion criteria were any adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or the biliary tract completely resected with negative or positive microscopic margins, age < 75 years. Adjuvant treatment began when possible, without limited delay, at least 4 weeks after surgery. Pts received 55 Gy of chemo-Rth: 45 Gy in 25 fract (median vol. = 2000 ml), 5 d/wk combined with 5FU continuously infused 250 mg/m2/d during the 5 wks; a 10 Gy concomitant boost (median vol. = 1000 ml) was given in celiac axis and tumor bed in 8 fract during wks 4 & 5, six hours apart the large volume irradiation. All pts gave writing consent. Endpoints were tolerance, relapse free survival and overall survival. RESULTS From Oct 1998 to March 2001, 80 pts have been included, aged 34 to 75 years, sex ratio was balanced, 7 cases were tumors of biliary tract. Most of the tumors were pT2-T3 and pN0-N1, median diameter was 30 mm. All the pts completed the treatment, 72% without any delay in the Rth schedule, 83% without any delay in chemotherapy and with the total planned dose. Only five pts required hospitalization during a mean duration of 3 wks. Maximal toxicities (OMS scale) were grade 2-3 leucopenia in 6 pts, grade 2 anemia in 2 pts, grade 2-3 diarrhea in 12 pts, grade 2-3 nausea-vomiting in 19 pts, grade 2 mucositis in 5 pts, two delayed gastro-intestinal bleeding without any related death. 45% of the pts had stable body weight. Fifty one relapses happened until July 2003, forty one have been at least radiologically documented: 46% were metastatic diseases only, 17% were local relapse only and 37% were local and metastatic relapse. Median relapse free survival is 11 months and median overall survival is 21 months. The 3 ys overall survival is 36 %. CONCLUSIONS This chemo-Rth with 10 Gy above the classical adjuvant scheme of 45 Gy is clearly safe and feasible. The very low toxicity and the persistence of many local relapses urge to study a more effective scheme. [Table: see text].