Pasquale Frosina

Prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea with the use of VSL#3, a new high-potency probiotic preparation

ditis. The time that elapsed between the upper endoscopy and the onset of fever (about 1 month) is also compatible with a typical incubation of a subacute endocarditis. Guidelines for prophylaxis in infectious endocarditis recommend antibiotic treatment before endoscopic procedures associated with high rates of bacteremia (esophageal dilation, variceal sclerotherapy, and laser therapy) in all patients, but also before therapeutic ERCP and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with lesions susceptible to endocarditis (heart valve diseases) (5). On the other hand, some studies have demonstrated that antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of bacteremia, but it does not seem to prevent infectious postendoscopic endocarditis (6). We would recommend prophylactic therapy in all immune deficient patients with susceptible conditions even if they undergo low-risk endoscopic procedures. We hope that this prophylactic management can prevent infectious endocarditis, which is a potentially life-threatening disease.

Prophylaxis of diarrhoea in patients submitted to radiotherapeutic treatment on pelvic district: personal experience

Diarrhoea is a severe side-effect of radiotherapy on the pelvic area. It is due to acute enteric damage. We aimed at determining the ability of a highly concentrated freeze-dried living bacteria compound (VSL/3) to reduce these side-effects in 190 patients receiving radio therapy on the pelvic area. A total of 95 patients received radiotherapy alone and 95 were also administered VSL/3 bags, at doses of one bag three times a day beginning on the first day of the radiotherapy treatment. The same diet was indicated for both groups. All patients were irradiated for 6 to 7 weeks, with Linac X-6 MV or 15 MV through a box multiportal technique with the lower limit of the fields below the obturator foramina, upper limit at L5-S1, lateral limit 1.5 cm beyond the innominate hip. The total radiated dose ranged from 60 to70 Gy for a daily dose of 180 cGy. Gastroenteric toxicity was rated in WHO degrees. Two patients receiving radiotherapy alone had to discontinue the treatment due to acute enteritis. Toxicity was found in 52 (50.6%) patients with radiotherapy alone vs 36 (30.5%) patients receiving VSL/3. None of them had to discontinue radiotherapy. Toxicity of degrees 3 or 4 was found in 28 patients receiving radiotherapy alone vs 7 with VSL/3. These preliminary data suggest the effectiveness of VSL/3 in preventing the occurrence of diarrhoea in patients submitted to radiotherapy with a direct and indirect improvement of their quality of life and a good tolerance.

WHAT IS THE BEST POSITION OF THE ARMS IN MANTLE FIELD FOR HODGKIN'S DISEASE?

PURPOSE To evaluate the best position of the arms in mantle field for Hodgkins disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS In 12 patients, with surgical clips placed at the time of an axillary dissection for breast cancer, the radiological projection of the clips according to three arm positions was prospectively evaluated: akimbo (A), extended (E), and up over the head (U). The surgical clips were arbitrarily separated into two groups: lower and upper. In each patient, the distance between the surgical clips and chest wall was measured, and the possibility of shielding the lungs and humeral heads was evaluated. RESULTS The mean displacement of the lower clips away from the chest wall when the patients were in A, E, and U positions was 2.5, 3.0, and 4.6 cm, respectively. The upper group clips showed a lower difference in distance from chest wall. In the U position, there was always a clip of the lower group that projected over the humeral head, making it impossible to block this structure. CONCLUSION In the A position, there is the possibility of blocking the humeral head, but it is necessary to irradiate more lung parenchyma. Type E treatment setup allows the shielding of both lung and humeral head, while maintaining adequate margins around the axillary nodes. In the U position, there is a greater possibility of shielding the lung parenchyma, but it is impossible to block the humeral heads.

Enlarged axillary nodes and position of the arms in axillary irradiation A computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the axillary node displacement away from chest wall and their anatomical location in relation to the humeral head, according to the position of the arms, when the axilla is the site of enlarged nodes. In 13 patients with enlarged axillary nodes, the anatomical span of the nodes according to two arms positions, akimbo (A) and up over the head (U), was prospectively evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The nodes were classified into two groups, i.e. the lower and upper groups. The mean distances of the lower node group from the chest wall when the patients were in A, and U positions were 3 cm and 6.4 cm, respectively (p=0.002). The upper group nodes showed a smaller difference in the distance from the chest wall: in A position, mean 2.1 cm; in U position 2.8 cm (p=0.03). In U position, there was always a node of the lower group that was displaced in front of the humeral head. This study demonstrates the displacement of enlarged axillary nodes according to the position of the arms. In patients with axillary node involvement, CT planning should be considered when they have their arms held up over their heads.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly-unfit patients with concomitant illness: can a curative radiation therapy be delivered?

Aims and background There is no standard treatment for elderly-unfit patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Pelvic irradiation alone is an usual approach in this instance, and some reports have demonstrated that curative radiotherapy is feasible in elderly patients. To our knowledge, no data exist about the feasibility of a curative treatment in elderly patients with concomitant illness and a Charlson Comorbidity Index (an index of comorbidity that includes age) greater than 2. The main purpose of the present study was to establish the feasibility of irradiation in a cohort of elderly patients in poor general condition. Methods The records of 45 elderly-unfit patients (median age, 75 years; range, 70-85), with a comorbid Charlson score >2, treated with curative dose, planned continuous-course, external beam radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer were reviewed. The patients were treated to a median total dose of 60 Gy (range, 56–64), with an average fractional dose of 190 ± 10 cGy using megavoltage (6–15 MV). All patients were treated with radiation fields encompassing the bladder and grossly involved lymph nodes with a radiographic margin of at least 1.5 cm. Results No treatment-related mortality and clinically insignificant acute morbidity was recorded. No patient was hospitalized during or after the irradiation because of gastrointestinal or urogenital side effects. In one patient a week rest from therapy was necessary due a febrile status. Median survival was 21.5 months; overall 3- and 5-year survival was 36% and 19.5%, respectively. Conclusions Elderly-unfit patients with comorbidities and >70 years of age can be submitted to radical pelvic irradiation. The results observed in this retrospective analysis have encouraged us to use non-palliative radiotherapy doses in these patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.