Patrice Gabler Blair

Women in Surgery Residency Programs: Evolving Trends from a National Perspective

BACKGROUND Similar numbers of men and women are currently graduating from United States (US) medical schools; therefore, surgery residency programs need to attract graduates of both genders. This study compared gender distributions of allopathic US medical graduates (USMG) from academic years 1999-2000 through 2004-2005. In addition, the gender distributions of USMG and international medical graduates (IMG; analyzed separately) entering accredited general surgery (GS) programs and USMG entering other surgical specialty programs were compared across academic years 2000-2001 through 2005-2006. STUDY DESIGN Data were extracted from the American College of Surgeons Resident Master File and the Association of American Medical Colleges FACTS Website and Data Warehouse. Chi-square statistics compared gender distributions across years for all USMG graduating and applying to GS programs each year between 1999-2000 and 2004-2005 and for USMG and IMG entering training between 2000-2001 and 2005-2006. RESULTS During the study period, the proportion of women increased significantly (p < 0.001) among USMG (43% to 47%), USMG applying to GS programs (27% to 33%), and USMG entering GS residencies (32% to 40%); the percentages of women among IMG entering GS residencies ranged from 11% to 18%, with no apparent linear increase. Proportions of women among USMG entering training increased in most surgical specialties examined. CONCLUSIONS The gender gap among USMG entering GS training appears to be closing, concurrent with that of USMG overall during the study period. Surgery programs must continue to recruit and retain women to attract the best and brightest trainees.

Transition to surgical residency: a multi-institutional study of perceived intern preparedness and the effect of a formal residency preparatory course in the fourth year of medical school.

Purpose To evaluate interns’ perceived preparedness for defined surgical residency responsibilities and to determine whether fourth-year medical school (M4) preparatory courses (“bootcamps”) facilitate transition to internship. Method The authors conducted a multi-institutional, mixed-methods study (June 2009) evaluating interns from 11 U.S. and Canadian surgery residency programs. Interns completed structured surveys and answered open-ended reflective questions about their preparedness for their surgery internship. Analyses include t tests comparing ratings of interns who had and had not participated in formal internship preparation programs. The authors calculated Cohen d for effect size and used grounded theory to identify themes in the interns’ reflections. Results Of 221 eligible interns, 158 (71.5%) participated. Interns self-reported only moderate preparation for most defined care responsibilities in the medical knowledge and patient care domains but, overall, felt well prepared in the professionalism, interpersonal communication, practice-based learning, and systems-based practice domains. Interns who participated in M4 preparatory curricula had higher self-assessed ratings of surgical technical skills, professionalism, interpersonal communication skills, and overall preparation, at statistically significant levels (P < .05) with medium effect sizes. Themes identified in interns’ characterizations of their greatest internship challenges included anxiety or lack of preparation related to performance of technical skills or procedures, managing simultaneous demands, being first responders for critically ill patients, clinical management of predictable postoperative conditions, and difficult communications. Conclusions Entering surgical residency, interns report not feeling prepared to fulfill common clinical and professional responsibilities. As M4 curricula may enhance preparation, programs facilitating transition to residency should be developed and evaluated.

Interventions to address challenges associated with the transition from residency training to independent surgical practice

BACKGROUND Concerns regarding preparation of residents for independent surgical practice are widespread and support for junior surgeons entering practice is variable across institutions and practices. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Division of Education partnered with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to convene a National Invitational Conference to define key issues relating to the transition to practice and develop recommendations to address various challenges. OUTCOMES OF THE NATIONAL INVITATIONAL CONFERENCE Leaders from ACS, ACGME, certifying boards, residency review committees, program director organizations, and professional societies representing the breadth of surgical specialties, along with other key stakeholders, were invited to participate in the 1.5-day conference in July 2012. Key recommendations generated during the conference included the need to focus on the transition to practice within the context of the continuum of professional development; definition of specific levels of knowledge and skills expected of graduating surgery residents; development and adoption of competency-based methods for training, assessment, and advancement of residents; implementation of special interventions during the chief resident year to prepare residents for practice; robust evaluations of residents before graduation; intake assessments of junior surgeons during the onboarding processes; and effective mentorship for junior surgeons as they enter practice. Recommendations also highlighted major regulatory, legal, and financial issues. The key role of ACS and other national organizations in implementing the recommendations was underscored. CONCLUSION The recommendations from the conference should be of great help in addressing various challenges associated with the transition from surgery residency to independent practice.

American College of Surgeons/Association for Surgical Education medical student simulation-based surgical skills curriculum needs assessment.

BACKGROUND Simulation can enhance learning effectiveness, efficiency, and patient safety and is engaging for learners. METHODS A survey was conducted of surgical clerkship directors nationally and medical students at 5 medical schools to rank and stratify simulation-based educational topics. Students applying to surgery were compared with others using Wilcoxons rank-sum tests. RESULTS Seventy-three of 163 clerkship directors (45%) and 231 of 872 students (26.5%) completed the survey. Of students, 28.6% were applying for surgical residency training. Clerkship directors and students generally agreed on the importance and timing of specific educational topics. Clerkship directors tended to rank basic skills, such as examination skills, higher than medical students. Students ranked procedural skills, such as lumbar puncture, more highly than clerkship directors. CONCLUSIONS Surgery clerkship directors and 4th-year medical students agree substantially about the content of a simulation-based curriculum, although 4th-year medical students recommended that some topics be taught earlier than the clerkship directors recommended. Students planning to apply to surgical residencies did not differ significantly in their scoring from students pursuing nonsurgical specialties.

A new educational role for plastic surgery in the fourth year of medical school.

At most medical schools, students are offered limited or sporadic experiences in plastic surgery. This is unfortunate because all physicians need to possess the knowledge and skills to evaluate skin lesions and participate in wound management. Also, students who are considering a career in plastic surgery do not have adequate information to make informed decisions. With the restructuring of plastic surgery training programs, career decisions of individuals interested in plastic surgery are being made earlier than ever before in the education continuum, and the aforementioned problem assumes greater magnitude both for the students and the faculty. At MCP-Hahnemann School of Medicine, basic plastic surgery experiences have been integrated into the third-year surgery clerkship as a requirement for all students, and a Plastic Surgery Pathway has been designed in conjunction with the schools pathway system for fourth-year students. The Pathway provides a framework for the student to select a combination of rotations that will best provide an appropriate broad-based education in preparation for training in plastic surgery, and it provides extensive guidance by faculty members in the discipline to assist with career decisions, rotation selection, and preparations for the residency application process. Students in the Plastic Surgery Pathway are required to take rotations in medicine, neurology, and plastic surgery. The remaining rotations are selected from a list of options based on the students individual learning needs, interests, and career aspirations. Early experience with the Plastic Surgery Pathway has shown that it has been well received by students and faculty, has assisted students with their career decisions, and has led to an increased student awareness of the importance and relevance of the specialty.

Education and Training to Address Specific Needs During the Career Progression of Surgeons

Surgeons have specific education and training needs as they enter practice, progress through the core period of active practice, and then as they wind down their clinical work before retirement. These transitions and the career progression process, combined with the dynamic health care environment, present specific opportunities for innovative education and training based on practice-based learning and improvement, and continuous professional development methods. Cutting-edge technologies, blended models, simulation, mentoring, preceptoring, and integrated approaches can play critical roles in supporting surgeons as they provide the best surgical care throughout various phases of their careers.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Office of promoting excellence in end-of-life care: Executive summary of the report from the field

I. BACKGROUND AND CONVENING PROCESS In recognition of a growing interest in palliative care by clinicians, patients, and families, the Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care national program of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, in conjunction with the American College of Surgeons, created a national Peer Workgroup to facilitate introduction of the precepts and techniques of palliative care to surgical practice and education in the United States and Canada. The World Health Organization has defined palliative care as “The active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive to curative treatment.” The Surgeons Palliative Care Workgroup brought together surgeons with demonstrated interest and experience in palliative care to share resources, strategies, and expertise, and in so doing act as a catalyst for change. This is a summary of their analysis of the current state of palliative care in the surgical field and their recommendations. The full report will be released this summer by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Workgroup met during a 14-month period from September 2001 through November 2002. The initial Workgroup membership of 20 consisted of 17 surgeons representing 6 subspecialties, representatives of the executive and administrative staff of the American College of Surgeons, two recognized leaders in palliative care research and education, and a representative of the National Program Office of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Workgroup divided into seven subcommittees and conducted its business at four plenary sessions and periodic teleconferences. The Workgroup adopted the American College of Surgeons’ Statement of Principles Guiding Care at End of Life (1998) as its compass in the execution of its charge. After approval by the American College of Surgeons Board of Regents in October 2002, the Workgroup became integrated into the Division of Education of the American College of Surgeons as the Surgical Palliative Care Task Force.

Reactions of Surgical Program Directors to a Web-Based Interactive Educational Program Focusing on Cognitive Skills

OBJECTIVE To assess reactions by program directors (PDs) to a preview of a scenario from the Fundamentals of Surgery Curriculum (FSC), which is a case-based interactive curriculum developed by the American College of Surgeonss (ACS) Division of Education and designed to be delivered online to first-year (PGY-1) surgical residents. DESIGN After previewing a scenario, each PD completed a questionnaire requesting age and ratings of comfort using computers, the scenarios utility in addressing 9 educational goals (eg, provides a solid foundation for future learning), and 6 separate features of the scenario (eg, ease of use and feasibility). All ratings were based on a 1-9 scale. For items related to educational goals, ratings were anchored: 1-3 = poor/needs revision; 4-6 = adequate/as good as current methods; 7-9 = excellent/superior to current methods. Informal discussions were also conducted and comments were collected. SETTING October 2007 ACS Clinical Congress. PARTICIPANTS In all, 31 PDs participated in the study. RESULTS Most PDs perceived that the scenario addressed 8 of the 9 educational goals in a manner superior to current methods [eg, provides a solid foundation for future learning (97%), challenges residents (90%), and delivers content consistent with current practices and/or evidence (90%)]. The mean ratings of all scenario features were 7 or greater on the 9-point scale. CONCLUSION Most PDs reacted very positively to a preview of FSC perceiving that it can address several important educational goals in a manner superior to existing methods. Comments from PDs suggest a high level of interest in incorporating FSC into their residency programs as well as participating in a coordinated multi-institutional evaluation project. The results provide baseline data concerning PD expectations of the utility of FSC that will help to guide and evaluate further developments and applications of this curriculum.