Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Patricia Balvanera is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Patricia Balvanera.


American Journal of Botany | 2011

The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems

Bradley J. Cardinale; Kristin L. Matulich; David U. Hooper; Jarrett E. Byrnes; Emmett Duffy; Lars Gamfeldt; Patricia Balvanera; Mary I. O'Connor; Andrew Gonzalez

Over the past several decades, a rapidly expanding field of research known as biodiversity and ecosystem functioning has begun to quantify how the worlds biological diversity can, as an independent variable, control ecological processes that are both essential for, and fundamental to, the functioning of ecosystems. Research in this area has often been justified on grounds that (1) loss of biological diversity ranks among the most pronounced changes to the global environment and that (2) reductions in diversity, and corresponding changes in species composition, could alter important services that ecosystems provide to humanity (e.g., food production, pest/disease control, water purification). Here we review over two decades of experiments that have examined how species richness of primary producers influences the suite of ecological processes that are controlled by plants and algae in terrestrial, marine, and freshwater ecosystems. Using formal meta-analyses, we assess the balance of evidence for eight fundamental questions and corresponding hypotheses about the functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. These include questions about how primary producer diversity influences the efficiency of resource use and biomass production in ecosystems, how primary producer diversity influences the transfer and recycling of biomass to other trophic groups in a food web, and the number of species and spatial /temporal scales at which diversity effects are most apparent. After summarizing the balance of evidence and stating our own confidence in the conclusions, we outline several new questions that must now be addressed if this field is going to evolve into a predictive science that can help conserve and manage ecological processes in ecosystems.


BioScience | 2012

Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement

Kai M. A. Chan; Anne D. Guerry; Patricia Balvanera; Sarah Klain; Terre Satterfield; Xavier Basurto; Ann Bostrom; Ratana Chuenpagdee; Rachelle K. Gould; Benjamin S. Halpern; Neil Hannahs; Jordan Levine; Bryan G. Norton; Mary Ruckelshaus; Roly Russell; Jordan Tam; Ulalia Woodside

A focus on ecosystem services (ES) is seen as a means for improving decisionmaking. In the research to date, the valuation of the material contributions of ecosystems to human well-being has been emphasized, with less attention to important cultural ES and nonmaterial values. This gap persists because there is no commonly accepted framework for eliciting less tangible values, characterizing their changes, and including them alongside other services in decisionmaking. Here, we develop such a framework for ES research and practice, addressing three challenges: (1) Nonmaterial values are ill suited to characterization using monetary methods; (2) it is difficult to unequivocally link particular changes in socioecological systems to particular changes in cultural benefits; and (3) cultural benefits are associated with many services, not just cultural ES. There is no magic bullet, but our framework may facilitate fuller and more socially acceptable integrations of ES information into planning and management.


International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management | 2012

Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review

Maria Jose Martinez-Harms; Patricia Balvanera

Mapping key areas for ecosystem service (ES) supply is essential for the development of strategies that will ensure their future supply. Given the rapid development in this area of research, we performed a review of different approaches used to map ES, with a special focus on those that use social–ecological data. We used an analytical framework based on five criteria for analyzing and comparing the methodological approaches: the types of ES, availability of data sources, types of data sources, spatial scale, and methods used to model ES. We found that regulating services were the most commonly mapped, followed by provisioning, cultural, and supporting services. Secondary (readily available) data were used more frequently than primary data to map ES. Biophysical data (land-cover variables) and mixed sources (databases like global statistics) were the most commonly employed ones. Most studies were performed at the regional or at the national scale. The most commonly used method to model services was the development of models based on the well-known causal relationships between environmental variables, followed by the extrapolation of ES values from primary data to the total analyzed area frequently using land-cover maps. Our synthesis reveals that the majority of studies are based on secondary data, applied at broad scales, without validation techniques. There is an urgent need to develop methods for deepening our understanding of the social–ecological processes behind the supply of ES in order to improve our ability to map ES for decision making.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

Kai M. A. Chan; Patricia Balvanera; Karina Benessaiah; Mollie Chapman; Sandra Díaz; Erik Gómez-Baggethun; Rachelle K. Gould; Neil Hannahs; Kurt Jax; Sarah Klain; Gary W. Luck; Berta Martín-López; Barbara Muraca; Bryan G. Norton; Konrad Ott; Unai Pascual; Terre Satterfield; Marc Tadaki; Jonathan Taggart; Nancy J. Turner

A cornerstone of environmental policy is the debate over protecting nature for humans’ sake (instrumental values) or for nature’s (intrinsic values) (1). We propose that focusing only on instrumental or intrinsic values may fail to resonate with views on personal and collective well-being, or “what is right,” with regard to nature and the environment. Without complementary attention to other ways that value is expressed and realized by people, such a focus may inadvertently promote worldviews at odds with fair and desirable futures. It is time to engage seriously with a third class of values, one with diverse roots and current expressions: relational values. By doing so, we reframe the discussion about environmental protection, and open the door to new, potentially more productive policy approaches.


Nature | 2016

Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests

Lourens Poorter; Frans Bongers; T. Mitchell Aide; Angélica M. Almeyda Zambrano; Patricia Balvanera; Justin M. Becknell; Vanessa K. Boukili; Pedro H. S. Brancalion; Eben N. Broadbent; Robin L. Chazdon; Dylan Craven; Jarcilene Silva de Almeida-Cortez; George A. L. Cabral; Ben H J De Jong; Julie S. Denslow; Daisy H. Dent; Saara J. DeWalt; Juan M. Dupuy; Sandra M. Durán; Mario M. Espírito-Santo; María C. Fandiño; Ricardo G. César; Jefferson S. Hall; José Luis Hernández‐Stefanoni; Catarina C. Jakovac; André Braga Junqueira; Deborah Kennard; Susan G. Letcher; Juan Carlos Licona; Madelon Lohbeck

Land-use change occurs nowhere more rapidly than in the tropics, where the imbalance between deforestation and forest regrowth has large consequences for the global carbon cycle. However, considerable uncertainty remains about the rate of biomass recovery in secondary forests, and how these rates are influenced by climate, landscape, and prior land use. Here we analyse aboveground biomass recovery during secondary succession in 45 forest sites and about 1,500 forest plots covering the major environmental gradients in the Neotropics. The studied secondary forests are highly productive and resilient. Aboveground biomass recovery after 20 years was on average 122 megagrams per hectare (Mg ha−1), corresponding to a net carbon uptake of 3.05 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, 11 times the uptake rate of old-growth forests. Aboveground biomass stocks took a median time of 66 years to recover to 90% of old-growth values. Aboveground biomass recovery after 20 years varied 11.3-fold (from 20 to 225 Mg ha−1) across sites, and this recovery increased with water availability (higher local rainfall and lower climatic water deficit). We present a biomass recovery map of Latin America, which illustrates geographical and climatic variation in carbon sequestration potential during forest regrowth. The map will support policies to minimize forest loss in areas where biomass resilience is naturally low (such as seasonally dry forest regions) and promote forest regeneration and restoration in humid tropical lowland areas with high biomass resilience.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2007

The future of production systems in a globalized world

Elena M. Bennett; Patricia Balvanera

Human life is ultimately dependent on ecosystem services supplied by the biosphere. These include food, disease regulation, and recreational opportunities. Over the past 50 years, humans have changed ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than at any other time in human history, primarily to meet our growing demands for provisioning ecosystem services (eg food, freshwater, and timber). These changes have impacted other ecosystem services (eg climate regulation and erosion control). Current demand for ecosystem services is growing rapidly. How these demands are met will play a major role in determining the ecological, economic, and cultural future of the planet. While much is known about improving management of production systems to be more sustainable, research gaps remain. Challenges for ecologists include understanding the connection between management regimes, ecosystem structures and provision of multiple types of ecosystem services, understanding interactions among ecosystem services, and exploring ...


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015

An estimate of the number of tropical tree species

J. W. Ferry Slik; Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez; Shin-ichiro Aiba; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Luciana F. Alves; Peter S. Ashton; Patricia Balvanera; Meredith L. Bastian; Peter J. Bellingham; Eduardo van den Berg; Luís Carlos Bernacci; Polyanna da Conceição Bispo; Lilian Blanc; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Pascal Boeckx; Frans Bongers; Brad Boyle; M. Bradford; Francis Q. Brearley; Mireille Breuer-Ndoundou; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Darley Calderado; Leal Matos; Miguel Castillo-Santiago; Eduardo Luís Martins Catharino; Shauna-Lee Chai; Yukai Chen; Eizi Suzuki; Natália Targhetta; Duncan W. Thomas

Significance People are fascinated by the amazing diversity of tropical forests and will be surprised to learn that robust estimates of the number of tropical tree species are lacking. We show that there are at least 40,000, but possibly more than 53,000, tree species in the tropics, in contrast to only 124 across temperate Europe. Almost all tropical tree species are restricted to their respective continents, and the Indo-Pacific region appears to be as species-rich as tropical America, with each of these two regions being almost five times as rich in tree species as African tropical forests. Our study shows that most tree species are extremely rare, meaning that they may be under serious risk of extinction at current deforestation rates. The high species richness of tropical forests has long been recognized, yet there remains substantial uncertainty regarding the actual number of tropical tree species. Using a pantropical tree inventory database from closed canopy forests, consisting of 657,630 trees belonging to 11,371 species, we use a fitted value of Fisher’s alpha and an approximate pantropical stem total to estimate the minimum number of tropical forest tree species to fall between ∼40,000 and ∼53,000, i.e., at the high end of previous estimates. Contrary to common assumption, the Indo-Pacific region was found to be as species-rich as the Neotropics, with both regions having a minimum of ∼19,000–25,000 tree species. Continental Africa is relatively depauperate with a minimum of ∼4,500–6,000 tree species. Very few species are shared among the African, American, and the Indo-Pacific regions. We provide a methodological framework for estimating species richness in trees that may help refine species richness estimates of tree-dependent taxa.


Journal of Vegetation Science | 2002

Patterns of β-diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest

Patricia Balvanera; Emily J. Lott; Gerardo Segura; Christina Siebe; Ángeles Islas

Abstract Patterns of β-diversity in a highly diverse tropical dry forest tree community are described; the contribution of environmental heterogeneity and distance to β-diversity was assessed. Significant differences in elevation, insolation, slope and soil water holding capacity (p < 0.01), variables related to water availability, were found among 8 30 m × 100 m transects laid along contrasting slopes of a system of three parallel microbasins. A gradient in elevation and insolation was found within north-facing transects, among 10 m × 10 m sites; south-facing transects showed an elevation gradient while crest transects showed a gradient in water holding capacity. In total 119 species were registered, with 27 to 64 species per transect, and 4 to 16 species per site. A large β-diversity was found among and within transects; two indices of β-diversity consistently showed a higher β-diversity within transects than among them. Among transects, 64% of the variance in species composition could be attributed to the environmental variables; an additional 22% to the spatial distribution of sites. Within transects, 42% of the deviance in β-diversity values was explained by insolation, and 19% by distance. β-diversity increased with distance and with difference in insolation among sites; north-facing transects, those with most contrasting insolation conditions, had the steepest increase in β-diversity with distance. Such increase was clearly associated with changes in species composition, not with changes in species richness. Nomenclature: Lott (1993; in press). Abbreviations: AWHC = Available water holding capacity; TDF = Tropical dry forest.


Science Advances | 2016

Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics

Robin L. Chazdon; Eben N. Broadbent; Danaë M. A. Rozendaal; Frans Bongers; Angélica M. Almeyda Zambrano; T. Mitchell Aide; Patricia Balvanera; Justin M. Becknell; Vanessa K. Boukili; Pedro H. S. Brancalion; Dylan Craven; Jarcilene Silva de Almeida-Cortez; George A. L. Cabral; Ben de Jong; Julie S. Denslow; Daisy H. Dent; Saara J. DeWalt; Juan Manuel Dupuy; Sandra M. Durán; Mario M. Espírito-Santo; María C. Fandiño; Ricardo G. César; Jefferson S. Hall; José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni; Catarina C. Jakovac; André Braga Junqueira; Deborah Kennard; Susan G. Letcher; Madelon Lohbeck; Miguel Martínez-Ramos

Models reveal the high carbon mitigation potential of tropical forest regeneration. Regrowth of tropical secondary forests following complete or nearly complete removal of forest vegetation actively stores carbon in aboveground biomass, partially counterbalancing carbon emissions from deforestation, forest degradation, burning of fossil fuels, and other anthropogenic sources. We estimate the age and spatial extent of lowland second-growth forests in the Latin American tropics and model their potential aboveground carbon accumulation over four decades. Our model shows that, in 2008, second-growth forests (1 to 60 years old) covered 2.4 million km2 of land (28.1% of the total study area). Over 40 years, these lands can potentially accumulate a total aboveground carbon stock of 8.48 Pg C (petagrams of carbon) in aboveground biomass via low-cost natural regeneration or assisted regeneration, corresponding to a total CO2 sequestration of 31.09 Pg CO2. This total is equivalent to carbon emissions from fossil fuel use and industrial processes in all of Latin America and the Caribbean from 1993 to 2014. Ten countries account for 95% of this carbon storage potential, led by Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. We model future land-use scenarios to guide national carbon mitigation policies. Permitting natural regeneration on 40% of lowland pastures potentially stores an additional 2.0 Pg C over 40 years. Our study provides information and maps to guide national-level forest-based carbon mitigation plans on the basis of estimated rates of natural regeneration and pasture abandonment. Coupled with avoided deforestation and sustainable forest management, natural regeneration of second-growth forests provides a low-cost mechanism that yields a high carbon sequestration potential with multiple benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services.


BioScience | 2012

A Global System for Monitoring Ecosystem Service Change

Heather Tallis; Harold A. Mooney; Sandy Andelman; Patricia Balvanera; Wolfgang Cramer; Daniel S. Karp; Stephen Polasky; Belinda Reyers; Taylor H. Ricketts; Steve Running; Kirsten Thonicke; Britta Tietjen; Ariane Walz

Earths life-support systems are in flux, yet no centralized system to monitor and report these changes exists. Recognizing this, 77 nations agreed to establish the Group on Earth Observations (GEO). The GEO Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) integrates existing data streams into one platform in order to provide a more complete picture of Earths biological and social systems. We present a conceptual framework envisioned by the GEO BON Ecosystem Services Working Group, designed to integrate national statistics, numerical models, remote sensing, and in situ measurements to regularly track changes in ecosystem services across the globe. This information will serve diverse applications, including stimulating new research and providing the basis for assessments. Although many ecosystem services are not currently measured, others are ripe for reporting. We propose a framework that will continue to grow and inspire more complete observation and assessments of our planets life-support systems.

Collaboration


Dive into the Patricia Balvanera's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miguel Martínez-Ramos

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manuel Maass

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francisco Mora

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helena Cotler

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jefferson S. Hall

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frans Bongers

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lourens Poorter

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alicia Castillo

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra Quijas

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge