Patricia C. Pillow

Phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer: a case-control study using a new database.

In the last several years, attention has been focused on comparing the Western diet, which is rich in fat, protein, and refined carbohydrates, with the Asian diet, which is rich in phytoestrogens, as a possible explanation for the contrasting rates of clinically relevant prostate cancer. Phytoestrogens, plant-derived nutrients, include several isoflavones, flavonoids, lignans, phytosterols, and coumestans, some of which have been postulated as having anticarcinogenic properties. Using a new database, we examined the role of phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer risk in 83 Caucasian cases and 107 controls. Controls reported consuming higher amounts of foods containing genistein, daidzein, and coumestrol and lower amounts of foods containing campesterol and stigmasterol. Multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, family history of prostate cancer, alcohol consumption, and total calorie intake, showed an inverse association between coumestrol (p = 0.03) and daidzein (p = 0.07) and prostate cancer risk. Genistein, the most studied phytoestrogen, showed a slight protective effect (p = 0.26). However, a positive association was found between campesterol (p = 0.08) and stigmasterol (p = 0.03) and risk of prostate cancer. These results are suggestive of a possible relationship between phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer risk. Larger comprehensive studies are needed to further refine the role of phytoestrogen intake in prostate cancer risk.

Development of a database for assessing dietary phytoestrogen intake

For the past two decades, epidemiologists have observed lower risks of lung, breast, prostate, colon, and other cancers in populations that frequently consume fruits and vegetables. Numerous phytoestrogens have been shown to be anticarcinogenic under experimental conditions and may account for at least part of the cancer-prevention effects of fruit and vegetable consumption. These plant constituents include isoflavonoids, coumestans, lignans, phytosterols, and flavonoids. DietSys, the nutrient analysis program associated with the National Cancer Institute Health Habits and History Questionnaire (HHHQ), and other nationally available nutrient analysis databases do not fully assess these constituents. Therefore, we modified DietSys to include these components in foods on the basis of published values. In addition, as part of an epidemiological study of prostate cancer, we modified the food-frequency component of the HHHQ to include the main foods contributing to phytoestrogen intake. Although there are limitations to the consistency and quality of many of the values because they were gathered from a variety of sources, our approach should provide a useful first tool for assessing the epidemiological association between phytoestrogen consumption and cancer risk. Furthermore, this work has already facilitated the identification of the major dietary contributors with phytoestrogen activity and prioritized future laboratory analyses of specific foods toward the development of a more complete and accurate database.

Sex Differences in Risk of Lung Cancer Associated with Methylene-tetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphisms

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) catalyzes the metabolism of folate and nucleotides needed for DNA synthesis and repair. Variations in MTHFR functions likely play roles in the etiology of lung cancer. The MTHFR gene has three nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (i.e., C677T, A1298C, and G1793A) that have a minor allele frequency of >5%. We investigated the associations between the frequencies of MTHFR variant genotypes and risk of lung cancer in a hospital-based case-control study of 1,051 lung cancer patients and 1,141 cancer-free controls in a non-Hispanic White population. We found that compared with the MTHFR 1298AA genotype, the 1298CC genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of lung cancer in women [(odds ratio (OR), 2.09; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.32-3.29)] but not in men (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.62-1.45). The MTHFR 677TT genotype was associated with a significantly decreased risk of lung cancer in women (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.92) but not in men. No association was found between the MTHFR G1793A polymorphism and risk of lung cancer. Further analysis suggested evidence of gene-dietary interactions between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and dietary intake of vitamin B6, vitamin B12, and methionine in women and evidence of gene-environment interactions between the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and tobacco smoking in men. In conclusion, the polymorphisms of MTHFR may contribute to the risk of lung cancer in non-Hispanic Whites and modify the risk associated with the dietary and environmental exposure in a sex-specific manner.

Variant alleles of the D2 dopamine receptor gene and obesity

Abstract The mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic reward pathways have a role in the neuromodulation of appetite. There are data supporting a role of allelic variants of the D2 dopamine receptor ( DRD 2) gene and the number of receptor binding sites in vulnerability to substance abuse and obesity. We recently demonstrated that the A1 and B1 genotypes are in linkage disequilibrium and predictive of smoking status. Previous studies have evaluated the relationship between obesity and A1 but not B1 genotypes. Our objective was to assess the relationships between obesity and DRD 2 Taq I A and Taq I B genotypes in healthy individuals. Subjects were 139 Caucasian average weight and 37 obese individuals (body mass index ⩾30) identified as comparison subjects for ongoing case-control studies. Among the obese group, only 41.7% exhibited the A2 genotypes and 58.3% the A1 genotypes compared with 68.8% and 31.2% respectively for the average weight subjects (P=0.002). There was a similar pattern for B2 genotypes (51.4% compared with 78.9% respectively, P=0.003). The risk of obesity associated with the DRD 2 A1 genotypes was 3.48 (95% confidence intervals=1.55, 7.80), compared with 4.55 (1.94, 10.69) for the DRD 2 B1 genotypes. Individuals who had the A1 or B1 genotypes had higher BMI than those with the wildtype genotypes (P=0.086 and 0.05 respectively). The prevalence of the A1 genotypes was 2 of 5 (40%) obese individuals who never smoked, 12 of 22 (54.6%) for obese former smokers, and 7 of 9 (77.9%) for obese current smokers. The comparable percentages for the B1 genotypes were 0%, 56.5% and 55.6%. Further emphasis needs to be placed on identifying the genetic basis for obesity in order to develop targeted weight reduction interventions, that may improve potential for success.

A case-control study of diet and testicular carcinoma

No risk factor other than cryptorchidism has been consistently associated with testicular cancer, and the influence of diet on testicular cancer risk has not been extensively explored. A few studies have found increased testicular cancer risk in men whose diets are high in fat, red meats, and milk or low in fruits and vegetables. We evaluated the relationship of dietary factors and risk of testicular cancer and also examined whether this risk varied by type of testicular cancer. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) of 160 testicular cancer cases diagnosed between 1990 and 1996 and 136 friend-matched controls. The results of multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that after adjustment for age, education, income, ethnicity, cryptorchidism, and total daily calories, increasing total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol consumption were associated with increasing risk of nonseminoma testicular cancer, with odds ratios (ORs) for the highest vs. the lowest quartiles of 6.3, 5.3, and 4.6, respectively. The risk for seminoma testicular cancer marginally increased with increasing intake of total fat and saturated fat, with ORs for the highest vs. lowest quartiles of 1.9 and 2.1, respectively. Higher total fat consumption was nearly significantly related to increased mixed germ cell tumor risk, with an OR for highest vs. lowest quartile of 4.2. This study supports the hypothesis that diet (particularly high fat consumption) increases testicular cancer risk in young men. However, the small sample size and the possibility that these observations may be due to bias indicate that the relationship of diet and testicular cancer risk needs to be further examined within a prospective or incident case-control study.

Effect of dietary intake of phytoestrogens on estrogen receptor status in premenopausal women with breast cancer

Abstract: Although many dietary studies have focused on breast cancer risk, few have examined dietary influence on tumor characteristics such as estrogen receptor (ER) status. Because phytoestrogens may modulate hormone levels and ER expression, we analyzed ER status and phytoestrogen intake in a case-case study of 124 premenopausal breast cancer patients. We assessed intake with a food-frequency questionnaire and obtained ER status from medical records. Rather than focusing on risk, we evaluated whether low intakes were more strongly associated with ER-negative tumors than with ER-positive disease. In logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders, threefold greater risks of ER-negative tumors relative to ER-positive tumors were associated with low intake of the isoflavones genistein (odds ratio, OR = 3.50; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.43–8.58) and daidzein (OR = 3.10; 95% CI = 1.31–7.30). Low intake of the flavonoid kaempferol (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.16–0.83), the trace element boron (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.13–0.83), and the phytosterol β-sitosterol (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18–0.98) were associated with decreased risk of ER-negative tumors relative to ER-positive disease. Other phytoestrogens were not significantly associated with ER status. Thus, in premenopausal patients, some phytoestrogens may affect breast carcinogenesis by influencing ER status. Such findings suggest new directions for mechanistic research on dietary factors in breast carcinogenesis that may have relevance for prevention and clinical treatment.

A Case-Control Study of Dietary Phytoestrogens and Testicular Cancer Risk

A few dietary studies have found elevated testicular cancer risks for higher red meat, fat, and milk intakes and lower intakes of fruits, vegetables, and fiber. Because hormonal modulation by dietary intake of plant estrogens could affect risk of testicular cancer, we chose to explore the possible relationship between dietary phytoestrogens and testicular cancer. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study of 159 testicular cancer cases diagnosed between 1990 and 1996 and 136 adult friend-matched controls at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Amounts of phytoestrogenic compounds in foods were added to the National Cancer Institutes DietSys program and then grouped into prelignans, lignans, flavonoids, isoflavonoids, phytosterols, and coumestrol for statistical analysis, expressed per 1,000 kcal. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed, after adjustment for age, education, income, ethnicity, cryptorchidism, body mass index, baldness unrelated to therapy, severe acne in adolescence, early puberty, daily fiber and fat intake, and total daily calories, no discernable monotonic increased or decreased risk estimates across quartiles of phytoestrogen intake. A U-shaped pattern was observed for lignans and coumestrol. Further evaluation of this pattern by cubic spline parameterization did fit the data, but the data were also consistent with no effect. This hypothesis-generating study does not support the premise that dietary phytoestrogens increase or decrease testicular cancer risk in young men.

Development of a food frequency instrument: ethnic differences in food sources

Dietary intake was assessed among 431 black, white, and Mexican American men and women in southeast Texas using 24-hour dietary recall interviews. These data were collected to provide information on ethnic-specific food sources of selected nutrients; this information was used to construct a food frequency questionnaire for a study of nutrient intake and cancer. Nutrient content of total fat, total vitamin A, and vitamin C was determined for all foods consumed and was aggregated across unique food codes. These aggregated food codes were then ranked according to the contribution of each food to the total population intake of each nutrient. Ethnic differences existed in food sources of nutrients that would not be identified if data from only the analysis of the combined data set were used. Generally, however, the food sources identified from analyses of the combined data set included those foods that were important nutrient sources for each of the ethnic groups as well.

Case-control analysis of dietary folate and risk of bladder cancer

Abstract: Dietary folate, a water-soluble B vitamin found in a variety of fruits and vegetables, is of particular interest as a chemopreventive agent due to its role in DNA methylation and DNA synthesis and repair. We hypothesized that individuals with low folate intake would be at an increased risk for bladder cancer. Using an ongoing case-control study we assessed dietary folate in 409 incident bladder cancer patients and 451 healthy control subjects. A food-frequency questionnaire was used to estimate naturally occurring food folate (μg/kcal/day), dietary folate equivalents (DFE) from food sources (μg DFE/kcal/day), and DFE from all sources (μg DFE/kcal/day). Unconditional logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bladder cancer patients reported a statistically significant lower intake of folate than control subjects for food folate and DFE from food sources (P < 0.001) but not for DFE from all sources (P = 0.061). In the highest quartile of food folate intake there was a 54% reduced risk for bladder cancer (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.29-0.73) after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, smoking, and total energy intake. Similarly, the highest quartile of intake was associated with a 59% reduced risk for DFE from food sources (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.26-0.65) and a 35% reduced risk for DFE from all sources (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.42-1.00). In the joint-effects analyses using never smokers with high folate intake as the reference group (OR = 1.0), heavy smokers with low food folate intake had a 2.31-fold (95% CI = 1.11-4.82) increased risk, whereas heavy smokers with high folate intake had a reduced OR of 1.31 (95% CI = 0.53-3.26). Although the ORs were not statistically significant, light smokers and high folate intake exhibited a protective effect (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.20-1.94), whereas an increased risk was observed for light smoking and low folate intake (OR = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.57-3.45). These patterns were consistent for the joint effects of smoking and DFE from food sources and DFE from all sources. In summary, high intake of dietary folate was associated with an overall decrease in bladder cancer risk. These data may have important implications for cancer prevention; however, large, hypothesis-driven, population-based clinical trials will be required to confirm these findings.

Case‐control assessment of diet and lung cancer risk in African Americans and Mexican Americans

In this case-control study we determined whether dietary differences underlie some of the ethnic and sex differences in US lung cancer rates. We examined the relationship between diet and lung cancer development in 137 lung cancer cases (93 African Americans and 44 Mexican Americans) and 187 controls (78 African Americans and 109 Mexican Americans). Cases reported a higher daily mean total fat intake (p < 0.001), whereas controls had a higher daily mean intake of dietary fiber (p < 0.001) and fruits (p = 0.02). Ethnic differences in diet were also observed: Mexican Americans consumed less total fat (p < 0.02) and more fiber (p < 0.001) and vegetables (p = 0.08) than African Americans. Additionally, men consumed more total fat (p = 0.08) and less fiber (p = 0.001), fruits (p < 0.001), and vegetables (p = 0.002) than women. Multivariable analysis, after adjustment for the effects of pack-years of smoking, age, total energy intake, sex, and ethnicity, demonstrated a positive association between high total fat consumption and lung cancer risk (p < 0.01) and an inverse association between high fruit consumption and lung cancer risk (p = 0.05). In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis that diet, particularly high fat consumption and low fruit and vegetable consumption, contributes (independent of cigarette smoking) to the excess lung cancer risk in African-American men, who have the highest lung cancer rates in the United States.