Patricia E. Cole

Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: The RAD-IR Study Part I: Overall Measures of Dose

PURPOSE To determine patient radiation doses for interventional radiology and neuroradiology procedures, to identify procedures associated with higher radiation doses, and to determine the effects of various parameters on patient doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective observational study was performed at seven academic medical centers. Each site contributed demographic and radiation dose data for subjects undergoing specific procedures in fluoroscopic suites equipped with built-in cumulative dose (CD) and dose-area-product (DAP) measurement capability compliant with International Electrotechnical Commission standard 60601-2-43. The accuracy of the dosimetry was confirmed by comprehensive measurements and by frequent consistency checks performed over the course of the study. RESULTS Data were collected on 2,142 instances of interventional radiology procedures, 48 comprehensive physics evaluations, and 581 periodic consistency checks from the 12 fluoroscopic units in the study. There were wide variations in dose and statistically significant differences in fluoroscopy time, number of images, DAP, and CD for different instances of the same procedure, depending on the nature of the lesion, its anatomic location, and the complexity of the procedure. For the 2,142 instances, observed CD and DAP correlate well overall (r = 0.83, P <.000001), but correlation in individual instances is poor. The same is true for the correlation between fluoroscopy time and CD (r = 0.79, P <.000001). The correlation between fluoroscopy time and DAP (r = 0.60, P <.000001) is not as good. In 6% of instances (128 of 2,142), which were principally embolization procedures, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures, and renal/visceral artery stent placements, CD was greater than 5 Gy. CONCLUSIONS Most procedures studied can result in clinically significant radiation dose to the patient, even when performed by trained operators with use of dose-reducing technology and modern fluoroscopic equipment. Embolization procedures, TIPS creation, and renal/visceral artery stent placement are associated with a substantial likelihood of clinically significant patient dose. At minimum, patient dose data should be recorded in the medical record for these three types of procedures. These data should include indicators of the risk of deterministic effects as well as the risk of stochastic effects.

Intravascular brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 60

Recent preclinical and clinical studies indicate that irradiation using ionizing radiation in the dose range of 15 to 30 Gy may reduce the occurrence of restenosis in patients who have undergone an angioplasty. Several delivery systems of intravascular brachytherapy have been developed to deliver radiation doses in this range with minimal normal tissue toxicity. In late 1995 the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed a task group to investigate these issues and to report the current state of the art of intravascular brachytherapy physics. The report of this task group is presented here.

Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: The RAD-IR Study Part II: Skin Dose

PURPOSE To determine peak skin dose (PSD), a measure of the likelihood of radiation-induced skin effects, for a variety of common interventional radiology and interventional neuroradiology procedures, and to identify procedures associated with a PSD greater than 2 Gy. MATERIALS AND METHODS An observational study was conducted at seven academic medical centers in the United States. Sites prospectively contributed demographic and radiation dose data for subjects undergoing 21 specific procedures in a fluoroscopic suite equipped with built-in dosimetry capability. Comprehensive physics evaluations and periodic consistency checks were performed on each unit to verify the stability and consistency of the dosimeter. Seven of 12 fluoroscopic suites in the study were equipped with skin dose mapping software. RESULTS Over a 3-year period, skin dose data were recorded for 800 instances of 21 interventional radiology procedures. Wide variation in PSD was observed for different instances of the same procedure. Some instances of each procedure we studied resulted in a PSD greater than 2 Gy, except for nephrostomy, pulmonary angiography, and inferior vena cava filter placement. Some instances of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation, renal/visceral angioplasty, and angiographic diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal hemorrhage produced PSDs greater than 3 Gy. Some instances of hepatic chemoembolization, other tumor embolization, and neuroembolization procedures in the head and spine produced PSDs greater than 5 Gy. In a subset of 709 instances of higher-dose procedures, there was good overall correlation between PSD and cumulative dose (r = 0.86; P <.000001) and between PSD and dose-area-product (r = 0.85, P <.000001), but there was wide variation in these relationships for individual instances. CONCLUSIONS There are substantial variations in PSD among instances of the same procedure and among different procedure types. Most of the procedures observed may produce a PSD sufficient to cause deterministic effects in skin. It is suggested that dose data be recorded routinely for TIPS creation, angioplasty in the abdomen or pelvis, all embolization procedures, and especially for head and spine embolization procedures. Measurement or estimation of PSD is the best method for determining the likelihood of radiation-induced skin effects. Skin dose mapping is preferable to a single-point measurement of PSD.

Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Management of the Thrombosed or Dysfunctional Dialysis Access

John E. Aruny, MD, Curtis A. Lewis, MD, John F. Cardella, MD, Patricia E. Cole, PhD, MD, Andrew Davis, MD, Alain T. Drooz, MD, Clement J. Grassi, MD, Richard J. Gray, MD, James W. Husted, MD, Michael Todd Jones, MD, Timothy C. McCowan, MD, Steven G. Meranze, MD, A. Van Moore, MD, Calvin D. Neithamer, MD, Steven B. Oglevie, MD, Reed A. Omary, MD, Nilesh H. Patel, MD, Kenneth S. Rholl, MD, Anne C. Roberts, MD, David Sacks, MD, Orestes Sanchez, MD, Mark I. Silverstein, MD, Harjit Singh, MD, Timothy L. Swan, MD, Richard B. Towbin, MD, Scott O. Trerotola, MD, Curtis W. Bakal, MD, MPH, for the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee

Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Ziv J. Haskal, MD, Louis Martin, MD, John F. Cardella, MD, Patricia E. Cole, PhD, MD, Alain Drooz, MD,Clement J. Grassi, MD, Timothy C. McCowan, MD, Steven G. Meranze, MD, Calvin D. Neithamer, MD,Steven B. Oglevie, MD, Anne C. Roberts, MD, David Sacks, MD, Mark I. Silverstein, MD,Timothy L. Swan, MD, Richard B. Towbin, MD, and Curtis A. Lewis, MD, MBA, for the Society ofInterventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee

Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: The RAD-IR study. Part III: Dosimetric performance of the interventional fluoroscopy units

PURPOSE To present the physics data supporting the validity of the clinical dose data from the RAD-IR study and to document the performance of dosimetry-components of these systems over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sites at seven academic medical centers in the United States prospectively contributed data for each of 12 fluoroscopic units. All units were compatible with International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard 60601-2-43. Comprehensive evaluations and periodic consistency checks were performed to verify the performance of each units dosimeter. Comprehensive evaluations compared system performance against calibrated ionization chambers under nine combinations of operating conditions. Consistency checks provided more frequent dosimetry data, with use of each units built-in dosimetry equipment and a standard water phantom. RESULTS During the 3-year study, data were collected for 48 comprehensive evaluations and 581 consistency checks. For the comprehensive evaluations, the mean (95% confidence interval range) ratio of system to external measurements was 1.03 (1.00-1.05) for fluoroscopy and 0.93 (0.90-0.96) for acquisition. The expected ratio was 0.93 for both. For consistency checks, the values were 1.00 (0.98-1.02) for fluoroscopy and 1.00 (0.98-1.02) for acquisition. Each system was compared across time to its own mean value. Overall uncertainty was estimated by adding the standard deviations of the comprehensive and consistency measurements in quadrature. The authors estimate that the overall error in clinical cumulative dose measurements reported in RAD-IR is 24%. CONCLUSION Dosimetric accuracy was well within the tolerances established by IEC standard 60601-2-43. The clinical dose data reported in the RAD-IR study are valid.

Guidelines for the Reporting of Renal Artery Revascularization in Clinical Trials

Although the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis with use of percutaneous angioplasty, stent placement, and surgical revascularization has gained widespread use, there exist few prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these techniques to each other or against the standard of medical management alone. To facilitate this process as well as help answer many important questions regarding the appropriate application of renal revascularization, well-designed and rigorously conducted trials are needed. These trials must have clearly defined goals and must be sufficiently sized and performed so as to withstand intensive outcomes assessment. Toward this end, this document provides guidelines and definitions for the design, conduct, evaluation, and reporting of renal artery revascularization RCTs. In addition, areas of critically necessary renal artery revascularization investigation are identified. It is hoped that this information will be valuable to the investigator wishing to conduct research in this important area.

Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Transcatheter Embolization

Alain T. Drooz, MD, Curtis A. Lewis, MD, Timothy E. Allen, MD, Steven J. Citron, MD, Patricia E. Cole, PhD, MD, Neil J. Freeman, MD, James W. Husted, MD, Patrick C. Malloy, MD, Louis G. Martin, MD, A. Van Moore, MD, Calvin D. Neithamer, MD, Anne C. Roberts, MD, David Sacks, MD, Orestes Sanchez, MD, Anthony C. Venbrux, MD, Curtis W. Bakal, MD, MPH, for the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee

The American Brachytherapy Society perspective on intravascular brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND Recent clinical studies indicate that intravascular brachytherapy (IVB) can reduce the rate of restenosis substantially after angioplasty procedures. However, no clinical guidelines exist for optimal therapy. METHODS The members of the IVB Subcommittee of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) identified the areas of consensus and controversies in IVB to issue the ABS perspective on IVB, based on analysis of published reports and the clinical experience of the members in brachytherapy. RESULTS IVB is still experimental. The long-term efficacy, toxicity, the target tissue, and dose required for IVB are not established. The ABS recommends that IVB procedures must be performed, with careful attention to radiation-related issues, in the context of controlled multidisciplinary clinical trials with the approval of the institutional review board, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Food and Drug Administration, and under an Investigational Device Exemption. The therapeutic radiologist, with a qualified radiation physicist, is responsible for dose prescription and delivery and needs to be present during the IVB procedure as part of this multidisciplinary team. The long-term outcome from these studies should be reviewed critically and published in peer-reviewed journals. The ABS endorsed the dosimetric guidelines of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 60 (AAPM TG-60) report. The ABS recommends that dose specification be defined clearly; to allow comparisons between studies, the dose should be prescribed at 2 mm from the source for intracoronary brachytherapy and at an average luminal radius of +2 mm for peripheral vascular brachytherapy. The prescription doses at the above point is generally in the 12-18 Gy range. Comprehensive procedures for quality assurance, radiation protection, and emergencies should be in place before initiating an IVB program. Higher energy beta sources, lower energy gamma sources, dose-volume histograms, and correlation of three-dimensional reconstructions of delivered dose with patterns of failure are areas for further research. CONCLUSION The ABS perspective on IVB is presented to assist the interventional team in developing protocols for the use of IVB in the prevention of restenosis. Long-term outcome data with a standardized reporting system are needed to establish the role of brachytherapy in preventing vascular restenosis. Endovascular brachytherapy is a new and evolving modality, and these recommendations are subject to modifications as new data become available.

Calculation of dose distribution near an innovative concentric balloon catheter for endovascular brachytherapy

PURPOSE Using a radioactive solution-filled catheter for intravascular irradiation has the potential problem of chemical and radiological toxicity in the case of a balloon rupture. In order to reduce this risk, an innovative concentric balloon catheter was developed. METHODS AND MATERIALS The concentric balloon was made by inner and outer balloons filled with saline and radioactive solution, respectively. The optimal inner radius was determined by comparing the dose rate reduction vs. the volume reduction for various inner and outer radii for 188Re, 32P, and 90Y solutions. RESULTS For a balloon with an outer radius of 1.5 mm, there was no advantage of a concentric balloon. For balloons with outer radii of 3.0 and 5 mm, the optimal inner radius was 1.5 and 3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS With the newly designed concentric balloon, the risk of toxicity can be reduced while keeping the dose rate high enough so that the treatment times within tolerable limits are still maintained.