Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Patricia Eadie is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Patricia Eadie.


Pediatrics | 2010

Predicting Language Outcomes at 4 Years of Age: Findings From Early Language in Victoria Study

Sheena Reilly; Melissa Wake; Obioha C. Ukoumunne; Edith L. Bavin; Margot Prior; Eileen Cini; Laura Conway; Patricia Eadie; Lesley Bretherton

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the contributions of child, family, and environmental predictors to language ability at 4 years. METHODS: A longitudinal study was performed with a sample of 1910 infants recruited at 8 months in Melbourne, Australia. Predictors were child gender, prematurity, birth weight and order, multiple birth, socioeconomic status, maternal mental health, vocabulary, education, and age at childs birth, non–English-speaking background, and family history of speech/language difficulties. Outcomes were Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool, language scores, low language status (scores >1.25 SDs below the mean), and specific language impairment (SLI) (scores >1.25 SDs below the mean for children with normal nonverbal performance). RESULTS: A total of 1596 children provided outcome data. Twelve baseline predictors explained 18.9% and 20.9% of the variation in receptive and expressive scores, respectively, increasing to 23.6% and 30.4% with the addition of late talking status at age 2. A total of 20.6% of children (324 of 1573 children) met the criteria for low language status and 17.2% (251 of 1462 children) for SLI. Family history of speech/language problems and low maternal education levels and socioeconomic status predicted adverse language outcomes. The combined predictors discriminated only moderately between children with and without low language levels or SLIs (area under the curve: 0.72–0.76); this improved with the addition of late talking status (area under the curve: 0.78–0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Measures of social disadvantage helped explain more variation in outcomes at 4 years than at 2 years, but ability to predict low language status and SLI status remained limited.


Pediatrics | 2007

Predicting Language at 2 Years of Age: A Prospective Community Study

Sheena Reilly; Melissa Wake; Edith L. Bavin; Margot Prior; Joanne Williams; Lesley Bretherton; Patricia Eadie; Yin Barrett; Obioha C. Ukoumunne

OBJECTIVE. This article responds to evidence gaps regarding language impairment identified by the US Preventive Services Task Force in 2006. We examine the contributions of putative child, family, and environmental risk factors to language outcomes at 24 months of age. METHODS. A community-ascertained sample of 1720 infants who were recruited at 8 months of age were followed at ages 12 and 24 months in a prospective, longitudinal study in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Outcomes at 24 months were parent-reported infant communication (Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories vocabulary production score). Putative risk factors were gender, preterm birth, birth weight, multiple birth, birth order, socioeconomic status, maternal mental health, maternal vocabulary and education, maternal age at birth of child, non–English-speaking background, and family history of speech-language difficulties. Linear regression models were fitted to total standardized Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and Communicative Development Inventories vocabulary production scores; a logistic regression model was fitted to late-talking status at 24 months. RESULTS. The regression models accounted for 4.3% and 7.0% of the variation in the 24-month Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales and Communicative Development Inventories scores, respectively. Male gender and family history were strongly associated with poorer outcomes on both instruments. Lower Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales scores were also associated with lower maternal vocabulary and older maternal age. Lower vocabulary production scores were associated with birth order and non–English-speaking background. When the 12-month Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Total score was added as a covariate in the linear regression of 24-month Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Total score, it was by far the strongest predictor. CONCLUSIONS. These early risk factors explained no more than 7% of the variation in language at 24 months. They seem unlikely to be helpful in screening for early language delay.


Pediatrics | 2009

Predicting Stuttering Onset by the Age of 3 Years: A Prospective, Community Cohort Study

Sheena Reilly; Mark Onslow; Ann Packman; Melissa Wake; Edith L. Bavin; Margot Prior; Patricia Eadie; Eileen Cini; Catherine Bolzonello; Obioha C. Ukoumunne

OBJECTIVES. Our goals were to document (1) the onset of stuttering and (2) whether specific child, family, or environmental factors predict stuttering onset in children aged up to 3 years. METHODS. Participants included a community-ascertained cohort of 1619 2-year-old Australian children recruited at 8 months of age to study the longitudinal development of early language. The main outcome measure was parental telephone report of stuttering onset, verified by face-to-face expert diagnosis. Preonset continuous measures of the childs temperament (approach/withdrawal) and language development were available. Information on a range of predictor measures hypothesized to be associated with stuttering onset was obtained (maternal mental health and education levels, gender, premature birth status, birth weight, birth order, twinning, socioeconomic status, family history of stuttering). RESULTS. By 3 years of age, the cumulative incidence of stuttering onset was 8.5%. Onset often occurred suddenly over 1 to 3 days (49.6%) and involved the use of word combinations (97.1%). Children who stuttered were not more shy or withdrawn. Male gender, twin birth status, higher vocabulary scores at 2 years of age, and high maternal education were associated with stuttering onset. The multivariable model, however, had low predictive strength; just 3.7% of the total variation in stuttering onset was accounted for. CONCLUSIONS. The cumulative incidence of stuttering onset was much higher than reported previously. The hypothesized risk factors for stuttering onset together explained little of the variation in stuttering onset up to 3 years of age. Early onset was not associated with language delay, social and environmental factors, or preonset shyness/withdrawal. Health professionals can reassure parents that onset is not unusual up to 3 years of age and seems to be associated with rapid growth in language development.


Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health | 2006

Growth of infant communication between 8 and 12 months: a population study.

Sheena Reilly; Patricia Eadie; Edith L. Bavin; Melissa Wake; Margot Prior; Joanne Williams; Lesley Bretherton; Yin Barrett; Obioha C. Ukoumunne

Aim:  To describe changes in infant prelinguistic communication skills between 8 and 12 months, and identify factors associated with those skills.


International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology | 2009

The Early Language in Victoria Study (ELVS): A prospective, longitudinal study of communication skills and expressive vocabulary development at 8, 12 and 24 months

Sheena Reilly; Edith L. Bavin; Lesley Bretherton; Laura Conway; Patricia Eadie; Eileen Cini; Margot Prior; Obioha C. Ukoumunne; Melissa Wake

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the methods and preliminary findings from the Early Language In Victoria Study (ELVS) a prospective, longitudinal study of child language impairment. Specifically, we provide a summary of early communication and vocabulary development and examine the contributions a range of risk factors and predictors make to these outcomes. The sample was a community-ascertained cohort of 1911 infants, recruited at 8 months and followed at ages 12 and 24 months. The main outcomes of interest were parent reported infant and toddler communication (Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales, CSBS) and expressive vocabulary (MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, CDI). Predictors included gender, preterm birth, birth weight, multiple birth, birth order, socioeconomic status, maternal mental health, maternal vocabulary and education, maternal age at birth of child, non–English-speaking background, and a family history of speech and/or language difficulties. Results demonstrated rapid development in communication skills measured by the three CSBS domains (social, speech and symbolic) and in vocabulary development (CDI). There was rapid growth in gesture use between 8 and 12 months and symbolic use of objects between 12 to 24 months. At approximately 24 months, 19.7% had delayed expressive vocabulary. Male gender and family history were associated with poorer outcomes on the CSBS and the CDI at 8, 12 and 24 months, although the regression models explained only a small amount of the variance in outcome. In summary we measured rapid growth in communication skills and vocabulary between 12 and 24 months, but the hypothesized early risk factors and predictors explained little of the variation in these outcomes. We conclude that the risk factors/predictors examined in this study therefore seem unlikely to be helpful in screening for early language delay.


Infant Behavior & Development | 2008

Influences on communicative development at 24 months of age: Child temperament, behaviour problems, and maternal factors.

Margot Prior; Edith L. Bavin; Eileen Cini; Sheena Reilly; Lesley Bretherton; Melissa Wake; Patricia Eadie

Within a longitudinal study using a large representative, community sample of infants recruited at mean age 8 months, we examined influences on infant communication development at 24 months, including child gender, shy temperament, behavioural and emotional problems, and several variables relating to maternal psychosocial health. On most developmental measures girls were in advance of boys and they also showed shyer temperament. Child gender, shy temperament and maternal psychosocial indices were associated with both vocabulary development as measured by the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI), and communication and symbolic development assessed via the Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scales-Developmental Profile (CSBS) at 24 months. No prediction was found using scores at 8 or 12 months, although moderate stability between measures between 12 and 24 months was evident. Predictors of 24 month outcomes were all concurrently measured variables, and included temperamental shyness, but very little variance in communication outcomes was explained. Children whose mothers were experiencing clinical levels of depression and life difficulties reported more child behavioural problems.


Journal of Child Language | 2008

The early language in Victoria study : predicting vocabulary at age one and two years from gesture and object use

Edith L. Bavin; Margot Prior; Sheena Reilly; Lesley Bretherton; Joanne Williams; Patricia Eadie; Yin Barrett; Obioha C. Ukoumunne

The Macarthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI) have been used widely to document early communicative development. The paper reports on a large community sample of 1,447 children recruited from low, middle and high socioeconomic (SES) areas across metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Regression analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which communicative behaviours reported at 0 ; 8 and 1 ; 0 predicted vocabulary development at 1 ; 0 and 2 ; 0. In support of previous findings with smaller, often less representative samples, gesture and object use at 1 ; 0 were better predictors of 2 ; 0 vocabulary than were gesture and object use at 0 ; 8. At 1 ; 0, children from the lower SES groups were reported to understand more words than children from the higher SES groups, but there were no SES differences for words produced at 1 ; 0 or 2 ; 0. The findings add to our understanding of the variability in the development of early communicative behaviours.


Pediatrics | 2013

Natural History of Stuttering to 4 Years of Age: A Prospective Community-Based Study

Sheena Reilly; Mark Onslow; Ann Packman; Eileen Cini; Laura Conway; Obioha C. Ukoumunne; Edith L. Bavin; Margot Prior; Patricia Eadie; Susan Block; Melissa Wake

OBJECTIVES: To document the natural history of stuttering by age 4 years, including (1) cumulative incidence of onset, (2) 12-month recovery status, (3) predictors of stuttering onset and recovery, and (4) potential comorbidities. The study cohort was a prospective community-ascertained cohort (the Early Language in Victoria Study) from Melbourne, Australia, of 4-year-old children (n = 1619; recruited at age 8 months) and their mothers. METHODS: Outcome was stuttering onset by age 4 years and recovery within 12 months of onset, defined using concurrent monthly parent and speech pathologist ratings. Potential predictors: child gender, birth weight, birth order, prematurity, and twinning; maternal mental health and education; socioeconomic status; and family history of stuttering. Potential comorbidities: preonset and concurrent temperament, language, nonverbal cognition, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: By age 4 years, the cumulative incidence of stuttering onset was 11.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7% to 12.8%). Higher maternal education (P = .004), male gender (P = .02), and twinning (P = .005) predicted stuttering onset. At outcome, stuttering children had stronger language (mean [SD]: 105.0 [13.0] vs 99.6 [14.6]; mean difference 5.5, 95% CI: 3.1 to 7.8; P < .001) and nonverbal cognition (mean [SD]: 106.5 [11.4] vs 103.9 [13.7], mean difference 2.6, 95% CI: 0.4 to 4.8; P = .02) and better health-related quality of life but were otherwise similar to their nonstuttering peers. Only 9 of 142 children (6.3%; 95% CI: 2.9% to 11.7%) recovered within 12 months of onset. CONCLUSIONS: Although stuttering onset is common in preschoolers, adverse affects are not the norm in the first year after onset.


International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders | 2014

Trajectories of language delay from age 3 to 5: persistence, recovery and late onset

Imac M. Zambrana; Francisco Pons; Patricia Eadie; Eivind Ystrom

BACKGROUND Knowledge is scarce on what contributes to whether children with early language delay (LD) show persistent, recovering or sometimes late-onset LD without a prior history of early LD in subsequent preschool years. AIMS To explore whether an integrative model of vital risk factors, including poor early communication skills, family history of language-related difficulties and male gender, predicts the development of persistent, recovering or late-onset LD trajectories from 3 to 5 years quantitatively and qualitatively differently. METHODS & PROCEDURES LD was assessed by maternal reports on the Ages and Stages Questionnaire at 3 and 5 years for 10 587 children in The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Children were classified across time as having no, late onset, transient or persistent LD. Multinomial logistic regression analyses included the integrative model of vital risk factors and covariates. OUTCOME & RESULTS Across time, 3%, 5% and 6.5% of the children displayed persistent, transient and late-onset LD, respectively. The odds for persistent LD were doubled for boys and children with low language comprehension at 1.5 years; and tripled by late-talking familial risk. These same odds decreased for transient LD, and even further for late-onset LD. Familial risk for writing and reading difficulties especially increased the odds for late-onset and persistent LD, while familial risk of unintelligible speech increased the odds for transient LD. Although girls had on average far better language comprehension than boys, low language comprehension was a stronger risk factor for persistent LD in girls. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Preschool LD trajectories were uniquely predicted from the integrative risk model of poor early communicative skills, family history and male gender. This might benefit identification of different LD trajectories by supporting broader severe vulnerability for persistent LD, milder vulnerability for transient LD, and possibly a specific risk for reading and learning difficulties for children with late-onset LD.


Autism | 2012

Early indicators of autism spectrum disorders at 12 and 24 months of age: A prospective, longitudinal comparative study:

Carly Veness; Margot Prior; Edith L. Bavin; Patricia Eadie; Eileen Cini; Sheena Reilly

Prospective questionnaire data from a longitudinal population sample on children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), developmental delay, specific language impairment, or typical development (TD), were collected at ages eight, 12 and 24 months, via the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scale Developmental Profile (CSBS) – Infant Toddler Checklist, and the Actions and Gesture section of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI):Words and Gestures. The four groups were compared at four years of age to identify whether any early behaviours differentiated the groups. While children with ASD differed from TD children on most social communicative measures by 12 months of age, the only social communication characteristic which could differentiate the children with ASD from the other groups were gesture scores on the CDI at 12 months and the CSBS at 24 months. Significant markers of ASD were identifiable in this community sample at an early age, although discrimination between clinical groups was rarely evident.

Collaboration


Dive into the Patricia Eadie's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margot Prior

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melissa Wake

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fiona Mensah

Royal Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eileen Cini

Royal Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Conway

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge