Patricia Gideon

Antidepressants and the Risk of Falls among Nursing Home Residents

BACKGROUND In nursing home residents, the use of tricyclic and other heterocyclic antidepressants is associated with an increased risk of falls. The newer selective serotonin-reuptake-inhibitor antidepressants are largely free of the side effects of the tricyclic agents thought to cause falls and so have been hypothesized to be safer for those at high risk for falls. METHODS We retrospectively identified an inception cohort of 2428 nursing home residents in Tennessee who were new users of tricyclic antidepressants (665 subjects), selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (612 subjects), or trazodone (304 subjects) or nonusers of antidepressants (847 subjects). We ascertained the number of falls during therapy and during a similar follow-up period for nonusers, then calculated the rate ratios for falls with adjustments for an extensive set of potential confounding factors. RESULTS The new users of each type of antidepressant had higher rates of falls than the nonusers, with adjusted rate ratios of 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 2.2) for tricyclic antidepressants, 1.8 (1.6 to 2.0) for selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, and 1.2 (1.0 to 1.4) for trazodone. The rate ratios increased with the daily dose for tricyclic antidepressants, reaching 2.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 2.8) for doses of 50 mg or more of amitriptyline or its equivalent, and for the serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, reaching 1.9 (1.7 to 2.2) for 20 mg or more of fluoxetine or its equivalent. The elevated rates of falls persisted through the first 180 days of therapy and beyond. CONCLUSIONS In this large study of nursing home residents, there was little difference in rates of falls between those treated with tricyclic antidepressants and those treated with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors. Hence, the preferential use of the newer antidepressants is unlikely to reduce the higher rate of falls among nursing home residents taking antidepressants.

Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: a comparative study of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the circumstances of, incidence of, and risk factors for falls resulting in serious injuries in nonambulatory nursing home residents compared with those for ambulatory residents.

Benzodiazepines and the risk of falls in nursing home residents.

CONTEXT: For nursing home residents who require a benzodiazepine, short‐acting agents are recommended, primarily to avoid increased risk of falls and other injuries associated with the long‐acting agents. However, much of the data for the clinical outcomes of falls and injuries comes from community‐dwelling older people.

Comparison of clinical and biomechanical measures of balance and mobility in elderly nursing home residents

Objective: To compare biomechanics force platform measurements of postural sway with clinical measures of balance and mobility, in frail elderly residents of community nursing homes, in terms of feasibility, correlation with other known risk factors for falls, and intercorrelation with each other.

Effects of antipsychotic withdrawal in elderly nursing home residents.

To study the effects of antipsychotic withdrawal in elderly nursing home residents.

Nonaspirin NSAIDs, Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors, and the Risk for Stroke

Background and Purpose— There is limited information regarding the cerebrovascular safety of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (coxibs) and noncoxib nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We determined whether specific NSAIDs, including coxibs, are associated with risk of stroke. Methods— Retrospective cohort study among Tennessee Medicaid enrollees aged 50 to 84 years between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004. Noninstitutionalized persons with continuous enrollment in Medicaid and no stroke or other serious medical illness in the year before cohort entry were included. The 7 most common NSAIDs were examined: celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, and indomethacin. Nonuse of NSAIDs was the reference group. Because new use is less susceptible to bias, we conducted a similar analysis confined to new users. The outcome was hospitalization for an incident cerebrovascular event: ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results— The cohort included 336 906 persons, with 989 826 person-years of follow-up, and 4354 stroke hospitalizations. There were 4.51 strokes per 1000 person years in the nonuse group, 5.15 strokes per 1000 person years (adjusted HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06, 1.53) with rofecoxib use, and 5.95 strokes per 1000 person years (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04, 1.91) with valdecoxib use. New use of rofecoxib and valdecoxib led to 6.06 (adjusted HR 1.46 95% CI 1.08, 1.98) and 6.19 (adjusted HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.74, 2.59) strokes per 1000 person years respectively. No other NSAID significantly increased the risk of incident stroke. Conclusions— Our results indicate an increased risk of stroke with current use of two highly selective coxibs, rofecoxib and valdecoxib, also shown to increase cardiovascular risk. These results also provide some reassurance about other specific NSAIDs regarding stroke risk.

Educational program for physicians to reduce use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among community-dwelling elderly persons: a randomized controlled trial.

Context.Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs for patients 65 years of age or older, primarily for musculoskeletal symptoms of osteoarthritis. Because NSAIDs frequently cause serious gastrointestinal (GI) and other complications among elderly patients, expert guidelines for osteoarthritis recommend acetaminophen-based regimens, which are safer and often as effective as NSAIDs. Objective.Evaluate a physician education program that communicated guidelines for management of osteoarthitis in elderly patients that emphasized avoidance of NSAIDs when possible. The program reviewed NSAID risks and benefits and recommended: re-evaluating continuous NSAID users, considering substitution of up to 4 g/d of acetaminophen for the NSAID, and trying topical agents and nonpharmacologic measures. Design and setting. Randomized controlled trial among community-dwelling Tennessee Medicaid enrollees. Subjects.Study physicians had 5 or more patients who: were community-dwelling Medicaid enrollees 65 years of age or older; had used NSAIDs regularly for at least 180 days; had had no medical care encounters during this period suggesting an indication other than osteoarthritis; and had 1 year of baseline and follow-up data. The study thus included 209 physicians (103 intervention/106 control) with 1,566 qualifying regular NSAID users (768/798). Interventions.Face-to-face visit to study physicians by another physician, and reminder placements in the charts of patients eligible to have NSAID use reevaluated. Outcomes.Change between baseline and follow-up years in: days of prescribed NSAIDs, acetaminophen, other drugs for musculoskeletal disorders, and GI drugs; outpatient visits and inpatient days of stay; SF36 measures of general health, physical function, and bodily pain (from 40% random patient sample); and over-the-counter NSAIDs (from the sample). Results.Intervention-attributable reduction of 7% (95% CI, 3% to 11%) in days of prescribed NSAIDs use with concomitant increase in acetaminophen use. No significant changes in other study endpoints. The intervention effect was greater among 75 physicians with a completed study visit, whose 564 patients had a 10% (95% CI, 6% to 14%) attributable reduction in NSAID use. Conclusions.The educational program modestly reduced NSAID exposure in community-dwelling elderly patients without undesirable substitution of other medications or detectable worsening of musculoskeletal symptoms.

ANTIBIOTICS POTENTIALLY USED IN RESPONSE TO BIOTERRORISM AND THE RISK OF MAJOR CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS

This study was designed to assess the association between pregnancy-related exposures to antibiotics recommended for use in the event of a bioterrorism attack and major congenital malformations. A retrospective cohort study included 30 049 infants from Tennessee Medicaid born between 1985 and 2000 identified from computerised state databases. Infants with fetal exposures to ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, doxycycline and amoxicillin (antibiotics recommended for potential bioterrorism attacks) (n = 24 521) and erythromycin (included as a positive control) (n = 2128) were compared with infants with no fetal exposure to any antibiotics (n = 3400). Major congenital malformations identified from computerised records were confirmed through medical record review. Overall, 869 (2.9%) of infants in the cohort had a confirmed major congenital malformation, with major malformations ranging from 2.5% to 3.0% among the antibiotic-specific exposure groups. No increased risk was present in multivariable analyses for any malformations and for malformations of specific organ systems. In conclusion, these data suggest that ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, doxycycline or amoxicillin use by pregnant women should not result in a greater incidence of overall major congenital malformations in infants whose mothers take these medications, though a large increase in risk cannot be ruled out.

Prenatal exposure to metronidazole and risk of childhood cancer

To evaluate the role of in utero exposure to metronidazole (a carcinogen in some animal models) and the risk of subsequent cancer, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of childhood cancer.

An algorithm to identify incident myocardial infarction using Medicaid data

Studies of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cardiovascular events using administrative data require identification of incident acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) and information on whether confounders differ by NSAID status.