Patricia Melville

Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical trial

Objective: To determine the effect of donepezil in treating memory and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: This single-center double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated 69 MS patients with cognitive impairment who were randomly assigned to receive a 24-week treatment course of either donepezil (10 mg daily) or placebo. Patients underwent neuropsychological assessment at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment. The primary outcome was change in verbal learning and memory on the Selective Reminding Test (SRT). Secondary outcomes included other tests of cognitive function, patient-reported change in memory, and clinician-reported impression of cognitive change. Results: Donepezil-treated patients showed significant improvement in memory performance on the SRT compared to placebo (p = 0.043). The benefit of donepezil remained significant after controlling for various covariates including age, Expanded Disability Status Scale, baseline SRT score, reading ability, MS subtype, and sex. Donepezil-treated patients did not show significant improvements on other cognitive tests, but were more than twice as likely to report memory improvement than those in the placebo group (p = 0.006). The clinician also reported cognitive improvement in almost twice as many donepezil vs placebo patients (p = 0.036). No serious adverse events related to study medication occurred, although more donepezil (34.3%) than placebo (8.8%) subjects reported unusual/abnormal dreams (p = 0.010). Conclusions: Donepezil improved memory in MS patients with initial cognitive impairment in a single center clinical trial. A larger multicenter investigation of donepezil in MS is warranted in order to more definitively assess the efficacy of this intervention.

Cognitive performance and MR markers of cerebral injury in cognitively impaired MS patients

Objective: To relate neuropsychological performance to measures of cerebral injury in persons with MS selected for cognitive impairment. Methods: Participants were 37 individuals with relapsing–remitting (59.5%) and secondary progressive (40.5%) MS. They were tested at baseline as part of a clinical trial to enhance cognition with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Eligibility criteria included at least mild cognitive impairment on a verbal learning and memory task. A modified Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests formed the core of the behavioral protocol. Neuroimaging measures were central (ventricular) cerebral atrophy, lesion volume, and ratios of N -acetyl aspartate (NAA) to both creatine and choline. Results: A clear, consistent relation was found between cognitive and MR measures. Among neuroimaging measures, central atrophy displayed the highest correlations with cognition, accounting for approximately half the variance in overall cognitive performance. NAA ratios in right hemisphere sites displayed larger correlations than those on the left. Multiple regression models combining the MR measures accounted for well over half the variance in overall cognitive performance. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test was the neuropsychological task most strongly associated with the neuroimaging variables. Conclusions: If a strong and stable association can be firmly established between cognitive and MR variables in appropriate subsets of MS patients, it might aid in the investigation of interventions to enhance cognition and modify the course of the disease.

Unemployment in multiple sclerosis: the contribution of personality and disease

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the leading cause of neurological disability among young and middle-aged adults. One of the most devastating consequences of MS in this relatively young population group is unemployment. Although certain demographic and disease factors have been associated with employment, few studies have examined the contribution of person-specific factors, such as personality. Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which personality, demographics, and clinical measures contribute to unemployment in MS. Method: A total of 101 individuals with MS who were enrolled in a clinical trial on cognition underwent a brief neuropsychological battery and completed questionnaires related to vocation, mood, fatigue, and personality. Neurological impairment was measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Results: Employment status was related with disease duration, MS subtype, level of neurological impairment, fatigue, performance on measures assessing information processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)), learning and memory (Selective Reminding Test), and the personality characteristic of persistence. Based on a forward logistic regression analysis, EDSS, SDMT, and persistence were the strongest predictors of employment status. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of personality on outcomes in MS and point to the need for more clinical attention and research in this area.

Multicenter randomized clinical trial of donepezil for memory impairment in multiple sclerosis

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine if memory would be improved by donepezil as compared to placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT). Methods: Donepezil 10 mg daily was compared to placebo to treat memory impairment. Eligibility criteria included the following: age 18–59 years, clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS), and performance ≤½ SD below published norms on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Neuropsychological assessments were performed at baseline and 24 weeks. Primary outcomes were change on the Selective Reminding Test (SRT) of verbal memory and the participants impression of memory change. Secondary outcomes included changes on other neuropsychological tests and the evaluating clinicians impression of memory change. Results: A total of 120 participants were enrolled and randomized to either donepezil or placebo. No significant treatment effects were found between groups on either primary outcome of memory or any secondary cognitive outcomes. A trend was noted for the clinicians impression of memory change in favor of donepezil (37.7%) vs placebo (23.7%) (p = 0.097). No serious or unanticipated adverse events attributed to study medication developed. Conclusions: Donepezil did not improve memory as compared to placebo on either of the primary outcomes in this study. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence which does not support the hypothesis that 10 mg of donepezil daily for 24 weeks is superior to placebo in improving cognition as measured by the SRT in people with MS whose baseline RAVLT score was 0.5 SD or more below average.

Perceived cognitive dysfunction and observed neuropsychological performance: longitudinal relation in persons with multiple sclerosis.

The relation between self-reported cognitive dysfunction and neuropsychological performance over 24 weeks was assessed in a sample of 53 multiple sclerosis patients. Subjects were assessed at Weeks Zero and 24 as part of a clinical trial to enhance cognition. At baseline, subjects had at least mild cognitive impairment on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and an absence of depression. Neuropsychological performance was assessed with a modification of the well standardized Brief Repeatable Battery. The 5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire and a 2-item memory and attention/concentration questionnaire assessed self-perceived cognitive impairment. Self-assessed cognition did not correlate with neuropsychological performance at either baseline or 24 weeks. However, changes in the self-assessment measures did correlate with changes in neuropsychological performance. Patients accurately perceived some changes in their level of cognitive dysfunction, though they were insensitive to the degree of their current dysfunction. Possible explanations of this pattern of results are discussed.

Negative affect predicts subsequent cognitive change in multiple sclerosis.

Baseline predictors of cognitive change were explored in a sample of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Potential predictors included demographic features, baseline clinical characteristics, and psychological state. Participants were 38 individuals diagnosed with either relapsing remitting or secondary progressive MS who did not meet criteria for a current major depressive episode. Subjects were tested at baseline and approximately 1 year in an ongoing longitudinal study of cognition in MS. Participants completed neuropsychological tests sensitive to impairment in MS. They also completed self-report measures of depression, anxiety, fatigue, apathy, and positive and negative affect. Baseline measures of negative affect (e.g., depressed mood, state anxiety, and negative affective state) consistently predicted cognitive change over the course of the study. Higher baseline levels of negative affect were associated with greater relative declines in cognitive performance. This longitudinal relation occurred in the absence of a cross-sectional relation between negative affect and overall cognition. High baseline negative affect particularly predicted a relative decline in episodic memory for newly learned verbal and visuospatial information. The negative affect measures were unique in their predictive value among all the baseline measures assessed. (JINS, 2009, 15, 53-61.).

Remotely-delivered cognitive remediation in multiple sclerosis (MS): protocol and results from a pilot study

Background Cognitive impairment represents a critical unmet treatment need in multiple sclerosis (MS). Cognitive remediation is promising but traditionally requires multiple clinic visits to access treatment. Computer-based programs provide remote access to intensive and individually-adapted training. Objective Our goal was to develop a protocol for remotely-supervised cognitive remediation that enables individuals with MS to participate from home while maintaining the standards for clinical study. Methods MS participants (n = 20) were randomized to either an active cognitive remediation program (n = 11) or a control condition of ordinary computer games (n = 9). Participants were provided study laptops to complete training for five days per week over 12 weeks, targeting a total of 30 hours. Treatment effects were measured with composite change via scores of a repeated neuropsychological battery. Results Compliance was high with an average of 25.0 hours of program use (80% of the target) and did not differ between conditions (25.7 vs. 24.2 mean hours, p = 0.80). The active vs. control participants significantly improved in both the cognitive measures (mean composite z-score change of 0.46 ± 0.59 improvement vs. −0.14 ± 0.48 decline, p = 0.02) and motor tasks (mean composite z-score change of 0.40 ± 0.71improvement vs. −0.64 ± 0.73 decline, p = 0.005). Conclusions Remotely-supervised cognitive remediation is feasible for clinical study with potential for meaningful benefit in MS.

High-dose cyclophosphamide for moderate to severe refractory multiple sclerosis: 2-year follow-up (investigational new drug No. 65863).

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) is a chemotherapy treatment designed to eradicate autoreative B- and T-cells responsible for lymphocyte-mediated autoimmune illness while sparing the pluripotent blood stem cell of any ill effects. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common inflammatory and demyelinating immune-mediated disorder of the central nervous system in young adults. Patients with moderate to severe, refractory MS, defined as an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.5 or higher after two or more Food and Drug Administration-approved disease-modifying agents, received 200 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide over 4 days. For the next 2 years, quarterly EDSS score evaluations and biannual brain magnetic resonance imaging and neuro-ophthalmologic evaluations were obtained. Fifteen patients were evaluated for clinical response. During follow-up, one patient increased their baseline EDSS score by 1.0. EDSS score stability of decrease was realized in five of seven (71%) patients with relapsing-remitting MS and six of eight (75%) patients with secondary progressive MS. Four patients required additional immunomodulatory treatment after treatment. Treatment response was seen regardless of the baseline presence or absence of contrast lesion activity. HDC can effectively decrease symptoms, stop disease progression, and allow for disability regression in relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS patients. The most appropriate candidates for HDC, its duration of benefit, and the potential need for prophylactic preventative immune manipulation after HDC all require further investigation.