Patricia Neuman

Medicare Part D Update — Lessons Learned and Unfinished Business

In this report, the authors review the experience to date with the Medicare Part D prescription-drug plan and discuss the challenges facing policymakers.

Prescription Coverage, Use and Spending Before and After Part D Implementation: A National Longitudinal Panel Study

BACKGROUNDIn January 2006, 43 million Medicare beneficiaries became eligible for subsidized prescription coverage (Part D) through Medicare. To date, no longitudinal study has afforded information on beneficiaries’ prescription coverage transitions and corresponding changes in prescription use and spending.OBJECTIVETo evaluate changes in Medicare beneficiaries’ prescription coverage, use and spending before and after Part D implementation, including comparison of those who enrolled in Part D with those who did not.DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSLongitudinal observational study of non-institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older (n = 9,573) employing administrative data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and survey-based data from beneficiaries (2003, 2006). Sampling drew from a 1% national probability sample (2003), oversampling low-income beneficiaries including those dually-enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTSNumber and type of prescriptions, monthly out-of-pocket prescription spending, and cost-related non-adherence to prescription regimens. Most respondents who lacked prescription coverage in 2003 had acquired it by 2006 (82.6%)—primarily through Part D (63.1%). Part D enrollees who previously lacked coverage or had Medigap coverage appear particularly advantaged by Part D, as evidenced by significantly increased prescription use, lower out-of-pocket spending and lower non-adherence. Those with employer-based coverage experienced significantly increased spending. Among those still lacking coverage in 2006, high rates of cost-related non-adherence (31.8%) were reported by the low-income, chronically ill subgroup.CONCLUSIONSIn its first year, Part D coverage appears to have moderated prescription spending and cost-related burden for those who previously had meager benefits or none. Increased spending among those with employer-based coverage may reflect a narrowing of those benefits over this period. Evidence of foregone care among low-income, chronically ill seniors who still lack prescription coverage highlights the importance of targeted outreach to this group for Part D’s low-income subsidy program.

Medicare Doesn’t Work As Well For Younger, Disabled Beneficiaries As It Does For Older Enrollees

Medicare is not working as well for its eight million disabled beneficiaries under age sixty-five as it is for its older beneficiaries. We report on a 2008 survey that found significant differences between the two Medicare populations, with the younger group experiencing more problems of cost and access. Even with the Medicare Part D prescription drug program, the nonelderly disabled reported greater difficulty in affording medications, and more adverse health consequences as a result. One potential remedy is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The law includes reforms that could improve access to care and limit out-of-pocket expenses for the nonelderly disabled in Medicare-as well as those who are waiting to become eligible for the program.

Dx For A Careful Approach To Moving Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries Into Managed Care Plans

Policy makers are moving rapidly to develop and test reforms aimed at doing a better job of managing the costs and care for people dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. This commentary underscores the importance of pursuing new initiatives to address care coordination and spending concerns. It then focuses on key issues raised by proposals that would shift dual-eligible beneficiaries into managed care plans. The paper describes the heterogeneity and complexity of this population, emphasizing the need for approaches closely tied to the needs of particular subgroups of dual-eligible beneficiaries. It warns against moving too quickly, noting the time and resources required to build capacity to serve patients, secure provider networks, and develop an infrastructure for integrating and managing both Medicare and Medicaid services. The commentary cautions that optimistic savings assumptions might not materialize, raises questions about how savings will be allocated, and highlights the need for accountability as new models are being developed and tested to improve care for a population with complex needs.

Medicare Per Capita Spending By Age And Service: New Data Highlights Oldest Beneficiaries

Medicare per capita spending for beneficiaries with traditional Medicare over age 65 peaks among beneficiaries in their mid-90s and then declines, and it varies by type of service with advancing age. Between 2000 and 2011 the peak age for Medicare per capita spending increased from 92 to 96. In contrast, among decedents, Medicare per capita spending declines with age.

Medicare’s Part D Drug Benefit At 10 Years: Firmly Established But Still Evolving

Despite initial controversy and uncertainties, Medicare Part D now provides drug coverage to thirty-nine million beneficiaries through dozens of private plans in each region. Although firmly established, the program faces challenges, including projected spending growth. Enrollees also face challenges as plans adopt new strategies to control costs.