Patricia Ursomanno

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients.

BACKGROUND This study analyzes a single institutional experience with minimally invasive mitral valve operations of 6 years, reviewing short-term morbidity and mortality and long-term echocardiographic follow-up data. METHODS Seven hundred fourteen consecutive patients had minimally invasive mitral valve procedures between November 1995 and November 2001; concomitant procedures included 91 multiple valves and 18 coronary artery bypass grafts. Of these 714 patients, 561 patients had isolated mitral valve operations (375 repairs, 186 replacements). Mean age was 58.3 years (range, 14 to 96 years; 30.1% > 70 years), and 15.4% of patients had previous cardiac operations. Arterial cannulation was femoral in 79.0% and central in 21%, with the port access balloon endo-occlusion used in 82.3%. Cardioplegia was transjugular retrograde (54.1%) or antegrade (29.4%). Right anterior minithoracotomy was used in 96.6% and left posterior minithoracotomy in 2.2%. RESULTS Hospital mortality for primary isolated mitral valve repair was 1.1% and 5.8% for isolated mitral valve replacement. Overall hospital mortality was 4.2% (30 of 714). Mean cross-clamp time was 92 minutes and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 127 minutes. Postoperatively, median ventilation time was 11 hours, intensive care unit time was 19 hours, and total hospital stay was 6 days. Complications for all patients included permanent neurologic deficit (2.9%), aortic dissection (0.3%); there was no mediastinal infection (0.0%). Follow-up echocardiography demonstrated 89.1% of the repair patients had only trace or no residual mitral insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that the minimally invasive port access approach to mitral valve operations is reproducible with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and with late outcomes that are equivalent to conventional operations.

A Decade of Minimally Invasive Mitral Repair: Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND Short-term results with minimally invasive approaches for mitral valve repair in degenerative disease have been encouraging, with potential for diminishing blood loss and hospital length of stay. Little is known, however, about the long-term efficacy of this approach. This report analyzes a single institutions results over 12 years with minimally invasive mitral repair. METHODS Since 1986, 3,057 patients have undergone mitral valve repair; 1,601 patients had degenerative disease and are the subject of this report. Minimally invasive mitral repair was done in 1071 patients with a right anterior minithoracotomy and direct vision. Clinical and echocardiographic variables were entered prospectively into a database. RESULTS Hospital mortality was 2.2% for all patients (36 of 1601); 1.3% for isolated minimally invasive (9 of 712) and 1.3% (3 of 223) for isolated sternotomy mitral valve repair; and 3.6% (24 of 666) for valve repair plus a concomitant cardiac procedure. For isolated valve repair, 8-year freedom from reoperation was 91% +/- 2% for sternotomy and 95% +/- 1% for minimally invasive (p = 0.24), and 8-year freedom from reoperation or severe recurrent insufficiency was 90% +/- 2% for sternotomy and 93% +/- 1% for minimally invasive (p = 0.30). Eight-year freedom from all valve-related complications was 86% +/- 3% for sternotomy and 90% +/- 2% for minimally invasive (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that long-term outcomes after minimally invasive mitral repair are excellent and equivalent to results achieved with sternotomy. In view of previously published advantages of short-term morbidity, minimally invasive approaches to mitral valve surgery deserve expanded use.

Evolution of operative techniques and perfusion strategies for minimally invasive mitral valve repair

OBJECTIVE Perfusion strategies and operative techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair have evolved over time. During the past decade, our institutions approach has progressed from a port access platform with femoral perfusion to predominantly a central aortic cannulation through a right anterior minithoracotomy incision. We analyzed this institutional experience to evaluate the impact of approach on patient outcomes. METHODS Between 1995 and 2007, 1282 patients (mean age, 59.3 years; range, 18-99 years) underwent first-time, isolated mitral valve repair using a minimally invasive technique. Patient demographics included peripheral vascular disease (3.2%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.3%), atherosclerotic aorta (6.5%), cerebrovascular disease (4.3%), and ejection fraction less than 30% (4.3%). Retrograde perfusion was performed in 394 (30.7%) of all patients and endoaortic balloon occlusion in 373 (29.1%); the operative technique was a right anterior minithoracotomy in 1264 (98.6%) and left posterior minithoracotomy in 18 (1.4%). The etiology of mitral disease was degenerative in 73.2%, functional in 20.6%, and rheumatic in 2.4%. Data were collected prospectively using the New York State Cardiac Surgery Report System and a customized minimally invasive surgery data form. Logistic analysis was used to evaluate risk factors and outcomes; operative experience was divided into tertiles. RESULTS Overall hospital mortality was 2.0% (25/1282). Mortality was 1.1% (10/939) for patients with degenerative etiology and 0.4% (3/693) for patients younger than 70 years of age with degenerative valve disease. Risk factors for death were advanced age (P = .007), functional etiology (P = .010; odds ratio [OR] = 3.3), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .013; OR = 3.4), peripheral vascular disease (P = .014; OR = 4.2), and atherosclerotic aorta (P = .03; OR = 2.8). Logistic risk factors for neurologic events were advanced age (P = .02), retrograde perfusion (P = .001; OR = 3.8), and emergency procedure (P = .01; OR = 66.6). Interaction modeling revealed that the only significant risk factor for neurologic event was the use of retrograde perfusion in high-risk patients with aortic disease (P = .04; OR = 8.5). Analysis of successive tertiles during this 12-year experience revealed a significant decrease in the use of retrograde arterial perfusion (89.6%, 10.4%, and 0.0%; P < .001) and endoaortic balloon occlusion (89.3%, 10.7%, and 0%; P < .001). The overall frequency of postoperative neurologic events was 2.3% (30/1282) and decreased from 4.7% in the first tertile to 1.2% in the second and third tertiles (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Central aortic cannulation through a right anterior minithoracotomy for mitral valve repair allows excellent outcomes in patients with a broad spectrum of comorbidities and has become our preferred approach for most patients undergoing mitral valve repair. Retrograde arterial perfusion is associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease and should be reserved for select patients without significant atherosclerosis.

Reoperative Valve Surgery in the Elderly: Predictors of Risk and Long-Term Survival

BACKGROUND Elderly patients requiring reoperative cardiac surgery for valve disease are considered high risk for immediate outcomes, but little is known about their long-term survival. It is often conjectured that medical therapy provides equivalent late survival in this population, which may dissuade both patient and surgeon from considering reoperation. We analyzed a cohort of such patients undergoing reoperative valve surgery to determine their long-term survival. METHODS From 1992 through 2007, 363 patients aged 75 years or more underwent reoperative isolated valve surgery; 211 (58%) had aortic valve replacement and 152 (42%) had mitral valve surgery. Mean age was 80.5 years. Hospital outcomes were prospectively recorded. Survival from all-cause death was determined from the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS Hospital mortality was 13.8% (12.8% for aortic and 15.1% for mitral valve operations; p = 0.52). Multivariable predictors of hospital death were New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (odds ratio = 3.19, p = 0.012), dialysis (odds ratio = 15.63, p = 0.003), and more than one reoperation (odds ratio = 2.59, p = 0.058). At 5 years, overall survival was 62% ± 3% for all patients (66% ± 4% for aortic and 56% ± 4% for mitral valve patients). For aortic valve patients aged 80 years or more, 5-year survival was 60% ± 0.6%. Life expectancy table analysis predicted a 5-year survival of 57% for an age-matched and sex-matched comparison group. CONCLUSIONS Reoperative surgery for elderly patients with isolated aortic or mitral valve pathology is associated with excellent long-term survival, particularly when treating aortic valve disease. While in-hospital mortality is higher among the elderly than among younger patients, specific predictors of poor outcome can be identified preoperatively to risk stratify these patients.

Minimally Invasive Reoperative Isolated Valve Surgery: Early and Mid-Term Results

Abstract  Objective: Minimally invasive, nonsternotomy approaches for valve procedures may reduce the risks associated with cardiac surgery after prior sternotomy and may improve outcomes. We analyzed our institutional experience to test this hypothesis. Methods: Between 1995 and 2002, 498 patients with previous cardiac operations via sternotomy underwent isolated valve surgery: 337 via median sternotomy (aortic = 160; mitral = 177) and 161 via mini‐thoracotomy (aortic = 61; mitral = 100). Data were collected prospectively using the New York State Cardiac Surgery Report Form. Results: Preoperative incidences of congestive heart failure, renal disease, and nonelective procedures were higher in the sternotomy group. Hospital mortality was significantly lower with the minimally invasive approach, 5.6% (9/161) versus 11.3% (38/337) (univariate, p = 0.04). However, multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 95% confidence intervals, p value) revealed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (6.6: 1.4 to 3.1, p = 0.001), renal disease (4.1: 1.52 to 11.2, p = 0.01), cerebrovascular disease (2.2: 1.03 to 4.78, p = 0.04), and ejection faction <30% (1.5: 0.96 to 5.5, p = 0.06) were associated with increased mortality. While mean bypass time, cross‐clamp times, and stroke rates were comparable between groups, patients undergoing minimally invasive valve surgery had no deep wound infections (0% vs 2.4%, p = 0.05), less need for blood products (p = 0.02), and shorter hospital stays (p = 0.009). Five‐year survival was higher with minimally invasive techniques as compared to a sternotomy approach (92.4 ± 2% and 86.0 ± 2%, respectively, p = 0.08). Conclusions: Reoperative valve surgery can be safely performed using a nonsternotomy, minimally invasive approach, with at least equal mortality, less hospital morbidity, decreased hospital length of stay, and slightly favorable mid‐term survival as compared to sternotomy.

Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery in the Elderly: A Case-Control Study

Introduction—Although minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (MIAVR) is performed in many centers, few studies have compared its results to a standard sternotomy (SS) approach. We assessed the hypothesis that, when compared with SS in the elderly population, MIAVR has similar morbidity and mortality and allows faster hospital recovery. Methods and Results—From January 1995 through February 2002, 515 patients over age 65 underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. Using data gathered prospectively, 189 MIAVR patients were matched with 189 SS patients by age, ventricular function, valvular pathology, urgency of operation, diabetes, previous cardiac surgery, renal disease, and history of stroke. In each group, 56.1% of patients underwent non-elective procedures, and 28% were ≥80 years old. Hospital mortality (6.9%) and freedom from postoperative morbidity (82.5% versus 81.5%, P =0.79) were similar. Multivariate analysis revealed that urgent procedures [Odds Ratio (OR)=3.97; P =0.03], congestive heart failure (OR=3.94; P =0.03), and ejection fraction <30% (OR=4.16; P =0.03) were significant predictors of hospital mortality. Prolonged length of stay was associated with age (P =0.05), preoperative stroke (OR=3.5, P =0.001), CHF (OR=2.2, P =0.004), and sternotomy approach (OR=2.3, P =0.002) by multivariate analysis. More MIAVR patients were discharged home (52.6% versus 38.6%, P =0.03) rather than to rehabilitation facilities. Three year actuarial survival revealed no difference between groups. Conclusions—Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery is safe in elderly patients, with morbidity and mortality comparable to sternotomy approach. The shorter hospital stay and greater percentage of patients discharged home after MIAVR reflect enhanced recovery with this technique.

Retrograde Arterial Perfusion, Not Incision Location, Significantly Increases the Risk of Stroke in Reoperative Mitral Valve Procedures

BACKGROUND A recent report suggested that a thoracotomy approach for reoperative mitral valve (MV) procedures was associated with an equivalent mortality and an unacceptable risk of stroke. We assessed these outcomes in a single institutions experience. METHODS From 1992 through 2007, 905 patients underwent reoperative MV procedures. The approach was a median sternotomy in 612 (67.6%), right anterior thoracotomy in 242 (26.7%), and left posterior thoracotomy in 51 (5.6%). Concomitant procedures in 411 patients (67.6%) included aortic procedures in 189, tricuspid procedures in 170, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 90. Hypothermic fibrillation was used in 65 patients. Logistic analysis was used to analyze risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS Overall mortality was 12.7% (115 of 905), 6.7% (25 of 371) for first time isolated MV reoperations, and 10.1% (50 of 494) for all isolated MV operations. Overall incidence of stroke was 3.8% (34 of 905); 10.9% (9 of 82) with retrograde arterial perfusion and 3.0% (25 of 824) with central aortic cannulation (p < 0.001). For isolated MV reoperations, the incidence of stroke was 4.3% (21 of 494): 2.9% (7 of 241) for antegrade perfusion and 5.5% (14 of 253) for retrograde perfusion (p = 0.15). Risk factors for death were age (p < 0.001), renal failure (p < 0.01), tricuspid valve disease (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 4.9; p < 0.001), emergency procedure (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.9; p = 0.02), and ejection fraction less than 0.30 (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.3, p = 0.018). Risk factors for stroke were retrograde perfusion (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.3; p < 0.01) and ejection fraction below 0.30 (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 5.0; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of stroke in reoperative MV operations is associated with perfusion strategies, not with the incisional approach. Reoperative sternotomy and minithoracotomy with central cannulation are both useful for reoperative MV procedures and are associated with low stroke rates.

Management of blood transfusion in aortic valve surgery: impact of a blood conservation strategy.

BACKGROUND There are limited data in the literature concerning the effect of a blood conservation strategy (BCS) on aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients. METHODS From 2007 to 2011, 778 patients underwent AVR at a single institution. During this period, a multidisciplinary BCS was initiated with emphasis on limiting intraoperative hemodilution, tolerance of perioperative anemia, and blood management education for the cardiac surgery care providers. RESULTS Mortality was 3.0% (23 of 778) overall and 1.7% (9 of 522) for isolated first-time AVR. There was no difference in rates of mortality (p = 0.5) or major complications (p = 0.4) between the pre-BCS and post-BCS groups; however, the BCS was associated with a lower risk of major complications (odds ratio, 1.7; p = 0.046) by multivariable analysis. The incidence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion decreased from 82.9% (324 of 391) to 68.0% (263 of 387; p < 0.01). Of those patients who did not receive any day-of-operation RBC transfusions, 64.5% (191 of 296) did not receive any postoperative RBC transfusions. Lower risk of RBC transfusion was associated with isolated AVR (p < 0.01), a minimally invasive approach (p < 0.01), and BCS (p < 0.01), whereas a greater risk of RBC transfusion was associated with older age (p < 0.01), prior cardiac operation (p = 0.01), female sex (p < 0.01), and smaller body surface area (p < 0.01). Day-of-operation RBC transfusion of 2 units or more was associated with increased deaths (p = 0.01), prolonged intubation (p < 0.01), postoperative renal failure (p = 0.01), and increased incidence of any complication (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative BCS reduced RBC transfusion in AVR patients without an increase in mortality or morbidity. Guidelines for BCS in routine cardiac operations should be extended to AVR patients.

Ten-Year Results of Folding Plasty in Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND Folding plasty (FP) for posterior mitral leaflet repair (PLR) is a technique that reduces the height of the repaired leaflet, closes the gap created by leaflet resection by rotation of residual leaflet, and reduces the need for localized annular plication. This report reviews late outcomes with FP repair. METHODS From January 1994 to August 2006, 1,402 mitral valve repairs were performed for degenerative disease: 1,012 had PLR and 531 had FP technique. RESULTS Overall hospital mortality was 2.4% (33 of 1,402 patients) and 1.3% (14 of 1,103 patients) for isolated mitral repair. For those patients with PLR, mortality for all procedures was 1.5% (15 of 1,012 patients) and 1.2% (11 of 891 patients) for isolated PLR repairs. Mortality was 0.9% (5 of 531 patients) for FP. In the last 5 years FP was used in 64.4% of PLR, compared with 35.6% of PLR in the prior era (p < 0.001). The 10-year actuarial freedom from mitral reoperation was 89%; 10-year freedom from reoperation or recurrent severe mitral insufficiency was 86% with FP and 87% without (p = 0.76). The 5-year freedom from reoperation or recurrent severe insufficiency was 89% when an annuloplasty device was used and 62% when not used (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Repair of posterior leaflet prolapse with FP is straightforward and durable. In our experience, FP is currently used for two thirds of PLR. These data also confirm that valve repair for degenerative disease should include an annuloplasty device for optimal late results.

Systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve: A 30-year perspective

OBJECTIVE Systolic anterior motion (SAM) can occur after mitral valve repair (MVr), most frequently in patients with degenerative valve disease. Our initial observations (1981-1990) revealed that most patients with SAM can be successfully treated medically. Here the authors review the last 16 years of their experience with SAM after MVr. METHODS Between January 1996 and October 2011, 1918 patients with degenerative mitral valve disease underwent MVr at our institution. We performed a retrospective analysis of SAM in this patient population. RESULTS The incidence of SAM was 4.6% (89 of 1918) overall, 4.0% (77 of 1906) in patients who did not have SAM preoperatively (de novo). Compared with our previously published report, the incidence of SAM decreased from 6.4% to 4.0% (P = .03). Hospital mortality was 2.0% (38 of 1918) overall, 1.3% (14 of 1078) for isolated MVr. One patient with de novo SAM (1 of 77; 1.3%) died after emergency MVr. All patients with de novo SAM were successfully managed conservatively with intravenous fluids, α agonists, and/or β blockers. A higher incidence of SAM was associated with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 60% (P = .01), posterior leaflet resection (P = .048), and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (P < .01). The incidence of SAM was lower in patients who underwent device mitral annuloplasty with a semirigid posterior band compared with a complete ring (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS In the more recent era, SAM occurs one-third less frequently after repair of degenerative mitral valve disease. Use of an incomplete annuloplasty band rather than a complete ring is associated with a lower incidence of SAM. The mainstay treatment of SAM continues to be medical management.