Patricia Woods

Assessment of quality of life as observed from the baseline data of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trial quality-of-life substudy

The improvement of aspects of a patients quality of life may be as important as prolonging survival in evaluating clinical trials of heart failure. The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the baseline measures from the quality-of-life substudy from the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trial. The measures included the 6-Minute Walk Test, Dyspnea Scale, Living with Heart Failure, Physical Limitations, Psychologic Distress and Health Perceptions, as reported by both patients and staff. Cognitive functioning, such as Vocabulary, Digit Span and Trails Making, was also assessed. Patients were classified as New York Heart Association class I (n = 158) versus II or III (n = 150). The internal consistencies (i.e., reliabilities) of the self-report measures were high, except for the Health Perceptions of Class II or III patients. Reliability of the SOLVD quality-of-life battery was confirmed by significantly better life quality among New York Heart Association class I patients versus class II or III patients combined on the Walk Test, Physical Limitations, Dyspnea, Living with Heart Failure, Psychologic Distress and staff perceptions of patient health. In accordance with prior studies, the measures were uncorrelated with left ventricular ejection fraction. By demonstrating strong internal consistencies, reliability based on physician reports, and independence of ejection fraction levels, use of this quality-of-life assessment battery in this and other clinical trials of compromised ventricular functioning is supported.

Evaluation of Simulated Presence: a personalized approach to enhance well-being in persons with Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Simulated Presence, a personalized approach to enhance well‐being among nursing home residents with Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD).

Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' first point-of-care clinical trial

OBJECTIVES The Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center in collaboration with the Stanford Center for Innovative Study Design set out to test the feasibility of a new method of evidence generation. The first pilot of a point-of-care clinical trial (POCCT), adding randomization and other study processes to an electronic medical record (EMR) system, was launched to compare the effectiveness of two insulin regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS Existing functionalities of the Veterans Affairs (VA) computerized patient record system (CPRS)/veterans health information systems and technology architecture (VISTA) were modified to support the activities of a randomized controlled trial including enrolment, randomization, and longitudinal data collection. RESULTS The VAs CPRS/VISTA was successfully adapted to support the processes of a clinical trial and longitudinal study data are being collected from the medical record automatically. As of 30 June 2011, 55 of the 67 eligible patients approached received a randomized intervention. DISCUSSION The design of CPRS/VISTA made integration of study workflows and data collection possible. Institutions and investigators considering similar designs must carefully map clinical workflows and clinical trial workflows to EMR capabilities. POCCT study teams are necessarily interdisciplinary and interdepartmental. As a result, executive sponsorship is critical. CONCLUSION POCCT represent a promising new method for conducting clinical science. Much work is needed to understand better the optimal uses and designs for this new approach. Next steps include focus groups to measure patient and clinician perceptions, multisite deployment of the current pilot, and implementation of additional studies.

Characteristics of peak aerobic capacity in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with left ventricular dysfunction

Expired gas analysis was used to determine the aerobic exercise performance of subjects with depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function and congestive heart failure (CHF). To determine whether subjects with no or minimal CHF have better aerobic exercise performance than do those with overt CHF, oxygen consumption (VO2) at anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise was measured in 184 subjects with LV ejection fraction less than or equal to 0.35 who participated in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Subjects were divided into those with overt CHF needing treatment (treatment trial; n = 20) and those who had neither overt CHF nor treatment for CHF (prevention trial; n = 164). Treatment trial subjects had a lower LV ejection fraction (0.25 +/- 0.07) than did prevention trial ones (0.29 +/- 0.05; p = 0.001), but there were no differences in age, gender, body weight, resting heart rate and blood pressure. Treadmill exercise testing was performed after 2 to 3 weeks of placebo (no angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) treatment. Treatment trial subjects exercised for a shorter time (493 +/- 160 seconds) and attained a lower peak VO2 (13 +/- 4 ml/kg/min) and VO2 at AT (11 +/- 4 ml/kg/min) than did prevention trial ones (842 +/- 277 seconds, and 20 +/- 6 and 16 +/- 5 ml/kg/min, respectively). Analysis of covariance showed that the differences in peak VO2 and VO2 at AT were statistically significant between the 2 trials after adjusting for age, gender, LV ejection fraction and New York Heart Association functional class.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dimensions of decreased psychological well-being in advanced dementia.

Evaluation of psychological well-being among persons with an advanced dementia is primarily dependent on verbal and non-verbal cues and behaviors that are observed and interpreted by others. The purpose of the present study was to determine how many components of psychological well-being can be measured. Fifty-seven individuals who were institutionalized for advanced dementia and exhibited agitation or withdrawal were evaluated by direct observations and by interviews with nursing home staff. Engagement was measured by the Lawton Positive Affect scale, visual analog scale, and reported degree of patients interest in the environment. Mood was measured by a global indicator of mood interpreted from facial expression and two mood items from the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects. Agitation was measured by a visual analog scale and by the Short Form of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory. Correlation analyses and multidimensional scaling provided evidence for three dimensions of psychological well-being: engagement-apathy, happy sad mood, and calm-agitation. Evaluation of these three dimensions is important for measuring quality of care in long-term care settings and for determining effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Veterans Healthcare Administration providers’ attitudes and perceptions regarding pragmatic trials embedded at the point of care

Background The Veterans Healthcare Administration (VA) is implementing an adaptation of a pragmatic trial program, Point of Care Research (POC-R). The goal of POC-R is to embed research into clinical practice, contributing to a Learning Healthcare System. Provider acceptance and participation in POC-R is essential to its successful implementation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate provider’s perceptions and beliefs regarding the POC-R program. Methods Provider focus groups and interviews were conducted at seven VA medical facilities involving 62 providers. A semi-structured script was used that included descriptions of four use cases and targeted questions regarding perceptions, concerns, and attitudes about the POC-R program. Sessions were audio-taped, de-identified, transcribed, and analyzed using systematic qualitative techniques to create response categories and overarching themes. Results The emergent themes were as follows: (1) POC-R is a valuable component of evidence-based practice, providing an opportunity to base clinical practice on more generalizable evidence as well as providing tools to improve local practice; (2) POC-R highlights the tension between the need for autonomy of practice and compliance with protocols; (3) POC-R may create increased time and burden resulting from added research responsibilities; (4) concern about the scientific validity and reliability of results; (5) potential for a negative impact on the provider–patient relationship; and (6) uncertainty regarding what constitutes equipoise, given differences in provider knowledge and preferences. Despite substantive concerns, barriers were generally felt to be solvable. Implementation should include provider education, careful attention to workflow for all arms of the study, inclusion of the entire team, and adequate oversight. Limitations The study design is qualitative with limited implications for causal inference. Participants are from the VA and may not be representative of other clinicians. Conclusion VA providers are supportive of the importance and value of pragmatic trials in general and of POC-R in particular. However, providers have significant concerns regarding the burden, ethics, and evidence regarding equipoise. Results are discussed in terms of implementation recommendations.