Patrick B. Mark

Blood pressure changes after renal denervation at 10 European expert centers

We did a subject-level meta-analysis of the changes (Δ) in blood pressure (BP) observed 3 and 6 months after renal denervation (RDN) at 10 European centers. Recruited patients (n=109; 46.8% women; mean age 58.2 years) had essential hypertension confirmed by ambulatory BP. From baseline to 6 months, treatment score declined slightly from 4.7 to 4.4 drugs per day. Systolic/diastolic BP fell by 17.6/7.1 mm Hg for office BP, and by 5.9/3.5, 6.2/3.4, and 4.4/2.5 mm Hg for 24-h, daytime and nighttime BP (P⩽0.03 for all). In 47 patients with 3- and 6-month ambulatory measurements, systolic BP did not change between these two time points (P⩾0.08). Normalization was a systolic BP of <140 mm Hg on office measurement or <130 mm Hg on 24-h monitoring and improvement was a fall of ⩾10 mm Hg, irrespective of measurement technique. For office BP, at 6 months, normalization, improvement or no decrease occurred in 22.9, 59.6 and 22.9% of patients, respectively; for 24-h BP, these proportions were 14.7, 31.2 and 34.9%, respectively. Higher baseline BP predicted greater BP fall at follow-up; higher baseline serum creatinine was associated with lower probability of improvement of 24-h BP (odds ratio for 20-μmol l−1 increase, 0.60; P=0.05) and higher probability of experiencing no BP decrease (OR, 1.66; P=0.01). In conclusion, BP responses to RDN include regression-to-the-mean and remain to be consolidated in randomized trials based on ambulatory BP monitoring. For now, RDN should remain the last resort in patients in whom all other ways to control BP failed, and it must be cautiously used in patients with renal impairment.

Gadodiamide contrast agent 'activates' fibroblasts: a possible cause of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a fibrotic disease generating intense interest due to its recent discovery, and unknown cause. It appears confined to patients with renal disease and presents as grossly thickened, indurated, tight skin that is woody to palpation. Histologically, the dermis contains thickened collagen bundles, numerous plump fibroblast‐like cells, and elevated hyaluronan expression. Recent data suggest a link between the use of gadolinium chelate as an MRI contrast agent and the onset of the disease. Fibroblasts from the lesions of six NSF patients, all of whom were exposed to gadodiamide, were compared with control fibroblasts for hyaluronan and collagen synthesis. Serum from NSF patients was assessed for fibroblast hyaluronan‐stimulating activity, collagen synthesis, and gadodiamide for its effect on fibroblast proliferation and matrix synthesis. NSF fibroblasts synthesized excess levels of hyaluronan and collagen compared with control fibroblasts, with up to 2.8‐fold and 3.3‐fold increases, respectively. NSF patient serum stimulated control fibroblast hyaluronan synthesis by up to 7‐fold, and collagen synthesis by up to 2.4‐fold. 1 mM gadodiamide added to culture medium stimulated fibroblast growth in a dose‐dependent manner, decreasing their doubling time from 28 h to 22 h, and increasing the maximum cell density. Even a short exposure to gadodiamide stimulated cell growth, suggesting that the cells were activated by the gadodiamide. The growth of fibroblasts within contracted collagen lattices was also significantly stimulated by gadodiamide, while fibroblasts exposed to gadodiamide synthesized increased levels of hyaluronan. Control fibroblasts exposed to gadodiamide, and NSF fibroblasts exhibited an extensive pericellular coat of hyaluronan, and expressed α‐smooth muscle actin. Gadolinium chloride did not affect fibroblast growth. This report demonstrates that NSF fibroblasts synthesize excess levels of hyaluronan and collagen, and that gadodiamide stimulates control fibroblast growth, matrix synthesis, and differentiation into myofibroblasts, suggesting a possible role for gadodiamide in the pathophysiology of NSF. Copyright

Prognostic value of cardiovascular screening in potential renal transplant recipients: a single-center prospective observational study.

We assessed the outcome of pretransplant cardiac assessment in a single center. Three hundred patients with end‐stage renal disease underwent electrocardiogram, Bruce exercise testing (ETT) and ventricular assessment by cardiac MRI. Patients with high index of suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if indicated. Two hundred and twenty‐two patients were accepted onto the renal transplant waiting list; 80 patients were transplanted during the follow‐up period and 60 died (7 following transplantation). Successful transplantation was associated with improved survival (mean survival 4.5 ± 0.6 years vs. listed not transplanted 4.1 ± 1.4 years vs. not listed 3.1 ± 1.7 years; p < 0.001). Ninety‐nine patients underwent coronary angiography; 65 had normal or low‐grade CAD and 34 obstructive CAD. Seventeen patients (5.6%) were treated by PCI. There was no apparent survival difference between patients who underwent PCI or coronary artery bypass graft compared to those who underwent angiography without intervention or no angiography (p = 0.67). Factors associated with nonlisting for renal transplantation included burden of preexisting cardiovascular disease, poor exercise tolerance and severity of CAD. Pretransplant cardiovascular screening provides prognostic information and information that can be used to restrict access to transplantation. However, if the aim is to identify and treat CAD, the benefits are far from clear.

NT-proBNP can be used to detect right ventricular systolic dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension.

Right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD) at baseline (pre-treatment) predicts early death in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, RVSD can only be detected reliably by prohibitively invasive or expensive techniques. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide concentration ([NT-proBNP]) correlates with RV function in PH; however, an [NT-proBNP] threshold that indicates RVSD in individual patients has not previously been determined. Twenty-five patients with PH (pulmonary arterial hypertension (n = 19) or chronic thromboembolic PH (n = 6)) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and NT-proBNP measurement at baseline. [NT-proBNP] was correlated against RV dimensions and ejection fraction (RVEF) measured directly by CMR imaging. The ability of NT-proBNP to detect RVSD (defined as a CMR-derived RVEF >2 sds below control values) was tested and predictors of [NT-proBNP] identified. [NT-proBNP] correlated negatively with RVEF. RVSD was present in nine out of 25 patients. An [NT-proBNP] threshold of 1,685 pg·mL−1 was sensitive (100%) and specific (94%) in detecting RVSD. RVEF and RV mass index independently predicted [NT-proBNP]. In pulmonary hypertension, a baseline N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide concentration of >1,685 ng·L−1 suggests right ventricular systolic dysfunction, and thus an increased risk of early death. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide could prove useful as an objective, noninvasive means of identifying patients with pulmonary hypertension who have right ventricular systolic dysfunction at presentation.

Plasma apelin concentration is depressed following acute myocardial infarction in man.

Apelin, a novel peptide with a putative role in cardiovascular homeostasis, has gained interest as an endogenous inotrope, but has yet to be described following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in man. We aimed to characterize plasma apelin concentrations following AMI and to examine its relationship with clinical and prognostic biomarkers.

Hypertension, antihypertensive agents and outcomes following renal transplantation.

Abstract:  Hypertension is common following renal transplantation and adversely affects graft and patient survival. However, strategies for antihypertensive drug therapy and target blood pressure have not been clearly defined.

Determinants of Left Ventricular Mass and Hypertrophy in Hemodialysis Patients Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular death in hemodialysis (HD) patients and one of the three forms of uremic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a volume-independent technique to assess cardiac structure. We used CMR to assess the determinants of left ventricular mass (LVM) and LVH in HD patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A total of 246 HD patients (63.8% male; mean age 51.5 +/- 12.1 yr) underwent CMR on a postdialysis day. LVM was measured from a stack of cine loops and indexed for body surface area (LVM index [LVMI]). Demographic, past biochemical, hematologic, and dialysis data were collected by patient record review. Results up to 180 d before CMR were collected. LVH was defined as LVMI >84.1 g/m(2) (male) or >76.4 g/m(2) (female). RESULTS A total of 157 (63.8%) patients had LVH. LVH was more common in patients with higher predialysis systolic BP, predialysis pulse pressure, and calcium-phosphate product (Ca X PO4). Furthermore, LVH was significantly associated with higher end-diastolic and systolic volumes and lower ejection fraction. There were positive correlations with LVMI and end-diastolic and systolic volumes. There were weak positive correlations among LVMI, mean volume of ultrafiltration, and Ca X PO4. Using multivariate linear and logistic regression (entering one BP and cardiac variable), the independent predictors of LVMI and LVH were end-diastolic volume, predialysis systolic BP, and Ca X PO4. CONCLUSIONS The principal determinants of LVM and LVH in HD patients are end-diastolic LV volume, predialysis BP, and Ca X PO4.

Eligibility for Renal Denervation: Experience at 11 European Expert Centers

Based on the SYMPLICITY studies and CE (Conformité Européenne) certification, renal denervation is currently applied as a novel treatment of resistant hypertension in Europe. However, information on the proportion of patients with resistant hypertension qualifying for renal denervation after a thorough work-up and treatment adjustment remains scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation and the reasons for noneligibility at 11 expert centers participating in the European Network COordinating Research on renal Denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension (ENCOReD). The analysis included 731 patients. Age averaged 61.6 years, office blood pressure at screening was 177/96 mm Hg, and the number of blood pressure–lowering drugs taken was 4.1. Specialists referred 75.6% of patients. The proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation according to the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 criteria and each center’s criteria was 42.5% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%–47.0%) and 39.7% (36.2%–43.2%), respectively. The main reasons of noneligibility were normalization of blood pressure after treatment adjustment (46.9%), unsuitable renal arterial anatomy (17.0%), and previously undetected secondary causes of hypertension (11.1%). In conclusion, after careful screening and treatment adjustment at hypertension expert centers, only ≈40% of patients referred for renal denervation, mostly by specialists, were eligible for the procedure. The most frequent cause of ineligibility (approximately half of cases) was blood pressure normalization after treatment adjustment by a hypertension specialist. Our findings highlight that hypertension centers with a record in clinical experience and research should remain the gatekeepers before renal denervation is considered.Based on the SYMPLICITY studies and CE (Conformite Europeenne) certification, renal denervation is currently applied as a novel treatment of resistant hypertension in Europe. However, information on the proportion of patients with resistant hypertension qualifying for renal denervation after a thorough work-up and treatment adjustment remains scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation and the reasons for noneligibility at 11 expert centers participating in the European Network COordinating Research on renal Denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension (ENCOReD). The analysis included 731 patients. Age averaged 61.6 years, office blood pressure at screening was 177/96 mm Hg, and the number of blood pressure–lowering drugs taken was 4.1. Specialists referred 75.6% of patients. The proportion of patients eligible for renal denervation according to the SYMPLICITY HTN-2 criteria and each center’s criteria was 42.5% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%–47.0%) and 39.7% (36.2%–43.2%), respectively. The main reasons of noneligibility were normalization of blood pressure after treatment adjustment (46.9%), unsuitable renal arterial anatomy (17.0%), and previously undetected secondary causes of hypertension (11.1%). In conclusion, after careful screening and treatment adjustment at hypertension expert centers, only ≈40% of patients referred for renal denervation, mostly by specialists, were eligible for the procedure. The most frequent cause of ineligibility (approximately half of cases) was blood pressure normalization after treatment adjustment by a hypertension specialist. Our findings highlight that hypertension centers with a record in clinical experience and research should remain the gatekeepers before renal denervation is considered. # Novelty and Significance {#article-title-32}

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who would otherwise require dialysis. Patients with ESRD are at dramatically increased cardiovascular (CV) risk compared with the general population. As well as improving quality of life, successful transplantation accords major benefits by reducing CV risk in these patients. Worldwide, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death with a functioning graft and therefore is a leading cause of graft failure. This review focuses on the mechanisms underpinning excess CV morbidity and mortality and current evidence for improving CV risk in kidney transplant recipients. Conventional CV risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and pre‐existing ischaemic heart disease are all highly prevalent in this group. In addition, kidney transplant recipients exhibit a number of risk factors associated with pre‐existing renal disease. Furthermore, complications specific to transplantation may ensue including reduced graft function, side effects of immunosuppression and post‐transplantation diabetes mellitus. Strategies to improve CV outcomes post‐transplantation may include pharmacological intervention including lipid‐lowering or antihypertensive therapy, optimization of graft function, lifestyle intervention and personalizing immunosuppression to the individual patients risk profile.

Association of Left Atrial Volume With Mortality Among ESRD Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Referred for Kidney Transplantation

Background Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular death. Left atrial volume (LAV), measured using echocardiography, predicts death in patients with ESRD. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a volume-independent method of accurately assessing cardiac structure and function in patients with ESRD. Study Design Single-center prospective observational study to assess the determinants of all-cause mortality, particularly LAV, in a cohort of ESRD patients with LVH, defined using CMR imaging. Setting & Participants 201 consecutive ESRD patients with LVH (72.1% men; mean age, 51.6 ± 11.7 years) who had undergone pretransplant cardiovascular assessment were identified using CMR imaging between 2002-2008. LVH was defined as left ventricular mass index >84.1 g/m2 (men) or >74.6 g/m2 (women) based on published normal left ventricle dimensions for CMR imaging. Maximal LAV was calculated using the biplane area-length method at the end of left ventricle systole and corrected for body surface area. Predictors CMR abnormalities, including LAV. Outcome All-cause mortality. Results 54 patients died (11 after transplant) during a median follow-up of 3.62 years. Median LAV was 30.4 mL/m2 (interquartile range, 26.2-58.1). Patients were grouped into high (median or higher) or low (less than median) LAV. There were no significant differences in heart rate and mitral valve Doppler early to late atrial peak velocity ratio. Increased LAV was associated with higher mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed poorer survival in patients with higher LAV (log rank P = 0.01). High LAV and left ventricular systolic dysfunction conferred similar risk and were independent predictors of death using multivariate analysis. Limitations Only patients undergoing pretransplant cardiac assessment are included. Limited assessment of left ventricular diastolic function. Conclusions Higher LAV and left ventricular systolic dysfunction are independent predictors of death in ESRD patients with LVH.