Patrick C. Freeny
University of Washington Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Patrick C. Freeny.
British Journal of Surgery | 2007
T.L. Bollen; H.C. van Santvoort; M.G. Besselink; M. S. van Leeuwen; Karen D. Horvath; Patrick C. Freeny; H. G. Gooszen
In a complex disease such as acute pancreatitis, correct terminology and clear definitions are important. The clinically based Atlanta Classification was formulated in 1992, but in recent years it has been increasingly criticized. No formal evaluation of the use of the Atlanta definitions in the literature has ever been performed.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2000
Michael P. Federle; Judith L. Chezmar; Daniel L. Rubin; Jeffrey C. Weinreb; Patrick C. Freeny; Udo P. Schmiedl; Jeffrey J. Brown; Joseph A. Borrello; Joseph K. T. Lee; Richard C. Semelka; Robert F. Mattrey; Abraham H. Dachman; Sanjay Saini; Steven E. Harms; D. G. Mitchell; Mark W. Anderson; Hollis H. Halford; William F. Bennett; Stuart W. Young; Matthew Rifkin; Rocco Ballerini; Paul F. Sherwin; Ronald O. Robison
The efficacy of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting and characterizing, or excluding, hepatic masses was assessed in 404 patients, following the intravenous administration of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection, a hepatic MRI contrast agent. An initial contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination was followed by unenhanced MRI, injection of MnDPDP (5 μmol/kg IV), and enhanced MRI at 15 minutes post injection. Agreement of the radiologic diagnoses with the patients final diagnoses was higher for enhanced MRI and for the combined unenhanced and enhanced MRI evaluations than for unenhanced MRI alone or enhanced CT using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. Mangafodipir‐enhanced MRI uniquely provided additional diagnostic information in 48% of the patients, and patient management was consequently altered in 6% of the patients. MnDPDP‐enhanced MRI was comparable or superior to unenhanced MRI and enhanced CT for the detection, classification, and diagnosis of focal liver lesions in patients with known or suspected focal liver disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:689–701.
International Journal of Pancreatology | 1993
Patrick C. Freeny
SummaryAcute pancreatitis represents a wide spectrum of inflammatory disease involving the pancreas, peripancreatic tissues, adjacent solid organs, gastrointestinal and biliary tract, and vascular system. The extent and severity of the inflammatory process determines the prognosis of the patient and the need for specific surgical, endoscopic, and radiologically-guided intervention. Computed tomography is the single best imaging test for evaluating patients with acute pancreatitis. It can accurately stage the inflammatory process and can identify associated complications that require careful observation or immediate intervention. It also is essential for guiding percutaneous catheter placement for treatment of infected and noninfected fluid collections.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2000
Michael P. Federle; Judith L. Chezmar; Daniel L. Rubin; Jeffrey C. Weinreb; Patrick C. Freeny; Richard C. Semelka; Jeffrey J. Brown; Joseph A. Borrello; Joseph K. T. Lee; Robert F. Mattrey; Abraham H. Dachman; Sanjay Saini; Marc J. Fenstermacher; Retta E. Pelsang; Steven E. Harms; D. G. Mitchell; Hollis H. Halford; Mark W. Anderson; C. Daniel Johnson; Isaac R. Francis; James G. Bova; Philip J. Kenney; Donald L. Klippenstein; Gregory S. Foster; David A. Turner; Arthur E. Stillman; Rendon C. Nelson; Stuart W. Young; Richard H. Patt; Matthew Rifkin
The short‐term1 safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection was studied in 546 adults with known or suspected focal liver lesions. An initial contrast‐enhanced computed tomography examination was followed by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), injection of MnDPDP (5 μmol/kg), and enhanced MRI. Adverse events were reported for 23% of the patients; most were mild to moderate in intensity, did not require treatment, and were not drug related. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (7%) and headache (4%). The incidence of serious adverse events was low (nine events in six patients) and not drug related. Injection‐associated discomfort was reported for 69% of the patients, and the most commonly reported discomforts included heat (49%) and flushing (33%). Changes in laboratory values and vital signs were generally transient, were not clinically significant, and did not require treatment. There were no clinically significant short‐term risks from exposure to MnDPDP. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:186–197.
Pancreas | 2006
M.G. Besselink; H.C. van Santvoort; T.L. Bollen; M. S. van Leeuwen; Johan S. Laméris; E.J. van der Jagt; Sp Strijk; Erik Buskens; Patrick C. Freeny; H. G. Gooszen
Objectives: The 1992 Atlanta classification is a clinically based classification system that defines the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis. A study was undertaken to assess the interobserver agreement of categorizing peripancreatic collections on computed tomography (CT) using the Atlanta classification. Methods: Preoperative contrast-enhanced CTs from 70 consecutive patients (49 men; median age, 59 years; range, 29-79 years) operated for acute necrotizing pancreatitis (2000-2003) in 11 hospitals were reviewed. Five abdominal radiologists independently categorized the peripancreatic collections according to the Atlanta classification. Radiologists were aware of the timing of the CT and the clinical condition of the patient. Interobserver agreement was determined. Results: Interobserver agreement among the radiologists was poor (&kgr;, 0.144; SD, 0.095). In 3 (4%) of 70 cases, the same Atlanta definition was chosen. In 13 (19%) of 70 cases, 4 radiologists agreed, and in 42 (60%) of 70 cases, 3 radiologists agreed on the definition. In 21 cases (30%), 1 or more of the radiologists classified a collection as pancreatic abscess, whereas 1 or more radiologist used another Atlanta definition. Conclusion: The interobserver agreement of the Atlanta classification for categorizing peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis on CT is poor. The Atlanta classification should not be used to describe complications of acute pancreatitis on CT.
Pancreatology | 2008
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort; Thomas L. Bollen; Marc G. Besselink; Peter A. Banks; Marja A. Boermeester; Casper H.J. van Eijck; Jonathan Evans; Patrick C. Freeny; Lars Grenacher; J. Hermans; Karen D. Horvath; David M. Hough; Johan S. Laméris; Maarten S. van Leeuwen; Koenraad J. Mortele; John P. Neoptolemos; Michael G. Sarr; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Jens Werner; Hein G. Gooszen
Background/Aims: The current terminology for describing peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis (AP) derived from the Atlanta Symposium (e.g. pseudocyst, pancreatic abscess) has shown a very poor interobserver agreement, creating the potential for patient mismanagement. A study was undertaken to determine the interobserver agreement for a new set of morphologic terms to describe peripancreatic collections in AP. Methods: An international, interobserver agreement study was performed: 7 gastrointestinal surgeons, 2 gastroenterologists and 8 radiologists in 3 US and 5 European tertiary referral hospitals independently evaluated 55 computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with predicted severe AP. The percentage agreement [median, interquartile range (IQR)] for 9 clinically relevant morphologic terms was calculated among all reviewers, and separately among radiologists and clinicians. The percentage agreement was defined as poor (<0.50), moderate (0.51–0.70), good (0.71–0.90), and excellent (0.91–1.00). Results: Overall agreement was good to excellent for the terms collection (percentage agreement = 1; IQR 0.68–1), relation with pancreas (1; 0.68–1), content (0.88; 0.87–1), shape (1; 0.78–1), mass effect (0.78; 0.62–1), loculated gas bubbles (1; 1–1), and air-fluid levels (1; 1–1). Overall agreement was moderate for extent of pancreatic nonenhancement (0.60; 0.46–0.88) and encapsulation (0.56; 0.48–0.69). The percentage agreement was greater among radiologists than clinicians for extent of pancreatic nonenhancement (0.75 vs. 0.57, p = 0.008), encapsulation (0.67 vs. 0.46, p = 0.001), and content (1 vs. 0.78, p = 0.008). Conclusion: Interobserver agreement for the new set of morphologic terms to describe peripancreatic collections in AP is good to excellent. Therefore, we recommend that current clinically based definitions for CT findings in AP (e.g. pancreatic abscess) should no longer be used.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | 1993
Thomas C. Winter; Patrick C. Freeny
Teratomas of the liver in adults are rare. We believe this to be only the fifth such case reported, the first with CT correlation and with plain film documentation of the development and slow progression of the lesion from age 44 to 61. A review of the literature regarding hepatic teratomas is appended.
Seminars in Ultrasound Ct and Mri | 1996
Thomas C. Winter; Hanh V. Nghiem; Udo P. Schmiedl; Patrick C. Freeny
CT angiography (CTA) is a promising new technique for vascular imaging. This review focuses first on the technique necessary for successful scanning of the visceral vessels. As in many new modalities, there are different protocols for scanning and rendering of images. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these different approaches are discussed. A discussion of the applications of CTA to depict normal and abnormal anatomy of the visceral vessels follows. These applications include celiac stenosis, splenic artery aneurysms, evaluation for hepatic arterial anatomy before liver transplantation, visceral arterial anatomy in pancreaticoduodenal surgery, the superior mesenteric artery in intestinal ischemia, vascular encasement in patients with pancreatic neoplasms, and, finally, the hepatic vessels before hepatic tumor resection.
Seminars in Ultrasound Ct and Mri | 1996
Hanh V. Nghiem; Thomas C. Winter; Udo P. Schmiedl; Patrick C. Freeny
MR angiography (MRA) has become an increasingly important and practical clinical tool for the noninvasive assessment of abdominal vessels. Both two-dimensional time-of-flight and phase contrast techniques allow accurate evaluation of the portal venous system. This article reviews these two MRA techniques and discusses their impact on the diagnosis of vascular abnormalities of the portal venous system.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1994
Thomas C. Winter; Patrick C. Freeny; Hanh V. Nghiem; Charles R. Thomas
We compared the efficacy of rapidly acquired magnetization prepared gradient-echo (MP-GRE) sequences with CT and standard MRI pulse sequences for the detection of focal liver lesions. Fourteen patients with 28 focal liver lesions were scanned. TI times of 300, 450, and 600 ms were used. MP-GRE lesion conspicuity was compared to corresponding CT, T1, T2, T2-post-superparamagnetic-iron-oxide (SPIO), and STIR images. It was found that the differences between MP-GRE and CT and MP-GRE and T1 MRI were not significant. However, overall anatomic detail was better with CT and T1 MRI than MP-GRE. Lesion conspicuity was significantly worse with the MP-GRE than with the T2, T2-post-SPIO, and STIR sequences (all p values = 0.00). Maximal liver signal nulling occurred at TI = 300 ms in 13 out of 14 patients. However, the T1 for optimal focal liver lesion conspicuity varied widely and could not be predicted before scanning. No new lesions were seen on the MP-GRE sequence that could not be seen on the CT or standard MRI sequences. As currently implemented, MP-GRE imaging offers no advantage in the detection of focal liver lesions over CT and standard MRI pulse sequences.