Patrick J. Lamparello

The cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy. METHODS The records of 2365 patients undergoing 3062 carotid endarterectomies from 1965 through 1991 were reviewed. Sixty-six (2.2%) operations were associated with a perioperative stroke. The mechanism of stroke was determined in 63 of 66 cases. Patient risk factors and surgeon-dependent factors were analyzed. RESULTS More than 20 different mechanisms of perioperative stroke were identified, but most could be grouped into broad categories of ischemia during carotid artery clamping (n = 10), postoperative thrombosis and embolism (n = 25), intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 12), strokes from other mechanisms associated with the surgery (n = 8), and stroke unrelated to the reconstructed artery (n = 8). Dividing the operative experience approximately into thirds, during the years 1965 to 1979, 1980 to 1985, and 1986 to 1991 the perioperative stroke rates were 2.7%, 2.2%, and 1.5%, respectively. This, in part, is associated with a better selection of patients (more symptom free, fewer with neurologic deficits). There has been a notable decrease in perioperative stroke caused by ischemia during clamping and intracerebral hemorrhage, but postoperative thrombosis and embolism remain the major cause of neurologic complications. CONCLUSIONS Although patient selection seems to play a role, most perioperative strokes were due to technical errors made during carotid endarterectomy or reconstruction and were preventable.

The value of silent myocardial ischemia monitoring in the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery

Real-time electrocardiographic monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia was performed on 200 patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery to try to better define those at high risk of perioperative myocardial infarction. The patients were divided into those undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm or lower extremity revascularization procedures (group I, n = 120) and those undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy (group II, n = 80). Silent ischemia was detected during the preoperative, intraoperative, or post-operative periods in 60.8% of group I and 67.5% of group II patients. Six group I and three group II patients suffered an acute perioperative myocardial infarction with two cardiac deaths. In both groups I and II a variety of parameters based on monitoring of silent myocardial ischemia were compared between the subgroups of patients who had myocardial infarction and those who did not. The results show that in both groups there was a significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) greater total duration of perioperative ischemic time, total number of perioperative ischemic episodes, and total duration of perioperative ischemic time as a percent of total monitoring time in patients who suffered a perioperative myocardial infarction compared to those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of preoperative characteristics in all 200 patients showed the occurrence of preoperative silent myocardial ischemia and angina at rest to be the only significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. Thus perioperative monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia might noninvasively identify those patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery who are at increased risk for perioperative myocardial infarction, permitting implementation of timely preventive measures in selected patients.

Beta blockade to decrease silent myocardial ischemia during peripheral vascular surgery

Abstract The incidence and duration of intraoperative silent myocardial ischemia have been shown to be significantly correlated with the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative beta blockade in limiting such silent myocardial ischemia, a group of 48 patients was treated with oral metoprolol immediately prior to peripheral vascular surgery. The total duration of intraoperative silent myocardial ischemia, the percentage of intraoperative time silent myocardial ischemia was present, the number of intraoperative episodes of silent myocardial ischemia, and the intraoperative heart rate in the treated patients were compared with those in 152 similar but untreated peripheral vascular surgery patients. The patients treated with oral metoprolol had significantly less intraoperative silent ischemia with respect to relative duration and frequency of episodes, a significantly lower intraoperative heart rate, and less intraoperative silent myocardial ischemia in terms of total absolute duration. These results suggest that beta-adrenergic activation may play a major role in the pathogenesis of silent myocardial ischemia during peripheral vascular surgery.

Atheromatosis of the aortic arch as an occult source of multiple systemic emboli

Atheroemboli may occur after catheter or surgical manipulation of the abdominal aorta, causing arterial obstruction (1). They may also occur during cardiac catheterization (2). Our laboratory previ...

Intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy

Among 1500 carotid endarterectomies performed between 1975 and 1984, 11 ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhages (IH) occurred between the first and tenth postoperative days for an incidence of 0.7%. The mortality rate among these patients was 36%. The only recognizable predisposing factor was relief of high-grade carotid stenosis (greater than 90%) whereas other factors such as age (58 to 81 years), preoperative hypertension (systolic blood pressure 120 to 160 mm Hg), preoperative head CT scans showing recent infarction (only one in five positive), and preoperative cerebral infarction (only 1 of 11 patients) did not play a role. All patients had normal coagulation studies. No patient required a shunt because all tolerated cross-clamping of the carotid artery. Postoperative systolic blood pressures were 200 to 240 mm Hg in 6 of 11 patients. The time of occurrence of IH extended from the immediate postoperative period to the tenth postoperative day (mean interval 3.3 days). Treatment consisted of craniotomy in five patients; four survived and one recovered completely. Of the six patients treated nonoperatively, three survived and two completely recovered. IH shares equal incidence with recurrent thrombosis, cross-clamping ischemia, and embolization as a cause of perioperative stroke. Although all except IH can be prevented by current practice, the means of preventing IH are not apparent; however, careful monitoring of blood pressure to prevent uncontrolled hypertension deserves consideration.

The surgical management of carotid artery stenosis in patients with previous neck irradiation

BACKGROUND A history of therapeutic irradiation to the neck complicates the management of carotid artery occlusive disease. Serious surgical concerns are raised regarding alternative incisions, difficult dissections, and adequate wound closure. Pathology may be typical atherosclerotic occlusive disease or radiation-induced arteritis. In order to establish guidelines for the treatment of these patients, we have reviewed our operative experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS A review of our operative experience over the past 15 years revealed 10 patients with a history of prior irradiation to the neck who underwent 14 carotid operations. RESULTS The indications for radiation included laryngeal carcinoma and lymphoma. Five patients had undergone previous radical neck dissections, and four patients had permanent tracheostomies. The surgical indications were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 7 cases, transient ischemic attack in 4 cases, stroke in 2 cases, and a pseudoaneurysm in 1 case. Conventional carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty was used in 10 of the 14 operations. In the remaining four operations, saphenous vein interposition grafting was utilized to replace the diseased segment of carotid artery secondary to a panarteritis. Wound closure required dermal grafting in two of five cases where surgery was performed ipsilateral to a prior radical neck dissection. One perioperative cerebral infarction occurred; there were no other neurologic or non-neurologic complications. All patients are doing well in one- to five-year follow-up, with serial postoperative duplex scans demonstrating no signs of recurrent stenosis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a history of irradiation to the neck should be screened for the presence of carotid disease. Carotid occlusive disease should be treated surgically in these patients with the usual indications. Intraoperative surgical management is similar to that of non-irradiated patients. Concerns about difficulty in achieving an adequate endarterectomy plane and about problems with wound closure have generally been unfounded.

Natural history and management of the asymptomatic, moderately stenotic internal carotid artery

PURPOSE Although it has been widely accepted as the evidence supporting prophylactic carotid endarterectomy, aspects of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study have left unease among clinicians who must decide which individuals without symptoms should undergo surgery. Additional confusion has been created by the fact that the several large randomized trials investigating the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy have classified and analyzed different categories of carotid stenosis. In an effort to provide more information on the natural history of asymptomatic, moderate carotid artery stenosis (50% to 79%), we have reviewed data on approximately 500 arteries. METHODS Records of our vascular laboratory from 1990 to 1992 were reviewed. We identified 425 patients with asymptomatic, moderate carotid artery stenosis; 71 patients had bilateral stenoses in this category, resulting in 496 arteries for study. RESULTS The mean length of follow-up was 38 +/- 18 months. New ipsilateral strokes occurred in 16 (3.8%) patients. New ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks occurred in 25 (5.9%) patients. Documented progression of stenosis occurred in 48 (17%) of the 282 arteries for which a repeat duplex examination was available. Arteries that progressed to > 80% stenosis were significantly more likely to have caused strokes than those that remained in the 50% to 79% range (10.4% vs 2.1%, p < 0.02). Conversely, arteries that remained stable in the degree of stenosis were significantly more likely to have remained asymptomatic than those that progressed (92.7% vs 62.5%, p < 0.001). With life-table analysis the estimated cumulative ipsilateral stroke rate was 0.85% at 1 year, 3.6% at 3 years, and 5.4% at 5 years. The respective estimated cumulative transient ischemic attack rates were 1.9%, 5.5%, and 6.3%. The respective estimated cumulative rates for progression of stenosis were 4.9%, 16.7%, and 26.5%. Life-table comparison of ipsilateral stroke revealed a significantly higher cumulative rate among arteries that progressed in the degree of stenosis than among those that remained stable (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Based on the low rate of permanent neurologic events in these cases, prophylactic carotid endarterectomy for the asymptomatic, moderately stenotic internal carotid artery cannot currently be recommended. The only factor that appears to predict increased risk for future stroke is progression of stenosis. Careful follow-up with serial repeat duplex examinations must be performed in these patients. Until there are widely accepted duplex parameters that can provide all clinicians with accurate identification of arteries with narrowing corresponding to 60% stenosis as defined by the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, all surgeons will need to be aware of specifically how their noninvasive laboratories are deriving their results. For the many laboratories that continue to use the University of Washington criteria, 80% should remain the level above which prophylactic carotid endarterectomy is warranted.

Endovascular treatment of spontaneous dissections of the superior mesenteric artery

BACKGROUND Spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is exceedingly rare. Treatment options range from observation to anticoagulation to open surgery or endovascular repair. We present our experience to date in the management of isolated SMA dissections. METHODS A retrospective review of the vascular surgery and radiology databases from 1998 to 2008 was performed. In general, incidental radiologic findings of a dissection were managed expectantly. The decision to intervene was based on anatomic suitability, patient comorbidities and symptoms, and physician preference. Endovascular stents were placed using a brachial approach, with the choice of stent determined by physician preference. Patients who underwent endovascular stent placement (ESP) were maintained on antiplatelet therapy for 6 months postoperatively. Follow-up consisted of yearly office visits and adjunctive computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when clinically indicated. RESULTS CT or MRI imaging identified nine patients (7 men, 2 women) with an isolated SMA dissection. One patient also had a concomitant celiac artery dissection. Median age was 70 years (range, 46-73 years). Median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 13.8-62.5 months). Presentations included an incidental radiologic finding in three patients and acute onset abdominal pain in six. Treatment included expectant management in four patients, anticoagulation in two, and ESP in three. ESP was performed primarily in two patients and in a third patient after initial management with anticoagulation failed. The reduction in the diameter of the true lumen was significantly greater in patients treated with ESP vs patients who were successfully managed expectantly or with anticoagulation (F = 15.59, P < .005). No procedural complications were associated with ESP. CONCLUSIONS An isolated SMA dissection is a rare entity that may be managed successfully in a variety of ways based on clinical presentation. Endovascular stenting can be performed with good results and may be the preferred treatment in patients with symptomatic isolated SMA dissections.

Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease

PURPOSE We examined the perioperative course and long-term fate of individuals who required reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease. METHODS The records of 2289 patients undergoing 2961 consecutive operations during a 22-year period were reviewed. Forty-two patients (1.8%) who underwent reoperations were studied. Forty-seven redo carotid artery reconstructions were performed on these 42 patients for neurologic symptoms or asymptomatic high-grade stenosis. Long-term follow-up was obtained on 41 of 42 patients (mean 54 months; range 9 to 202 months). RESULTS The forty-seven reoperations consisted of endarterectomy with patch angioplasty (n = 36), saphenous vein or polytetrafluoroethylene interposition graft (n = 7), or simply vein or polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasty (n = 4). There were no perioperative strokes or deaths. Three patients had perioperative transient ischemic attacks and two had cranial nerve injuries. The incidence of late failure after secondary surgery was 19.5% (8/41 patients). These failures consisted of one stroke, three transient ischemic attacks, and four asymptomatic occlusions. One tertiary carotid artery reconstruction was performed for a restenosis at the site of the secondary reconstruction. CONCLUSION The factors responsible for the high incidence of late failures after secondary carotid artery reconstruction are unclear. Reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease appears less durable than primary carotid endarterectomy. Close postoperative surveillance is recommended after carotid artery reoperation.

A comparison of regional and general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE The optimal anesthetic for use during carotid endarterectomy is controversial. Advocates of regional anesthesia suggest that it may reduce the incidence of perioperative complications in addition to decreasing operative time and hospital costs. To determine whether the anesthetic method correlated with the outcome of the operation, a retrospective review of 3975 carotid operations performed over a 32-year period was performed. METHODS The records of all patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy at our institution from 1962 to 1994 were retrospectively reviewed. Operations performed with the patient under regional anesthesia were compared with those performed with the patient under general anesthesia with respect to preoperative risk factors and perioperative complications. RESULTS Regional anesthesia was used in 3382 operations (85.1%). There were no significant differences in the age, gender ratio, or the rates of concomitant medical illness between the two patient populations. The frequency of perioperative stroke in the series was 2.2%; that of myocardial infarction, 1.7%; and that of perioperative death, 1.5%. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death on the basis of anesthetic technique. A trend toward higher frequencies of perioperative stroke (3.2% vs 2.0%) and perioperative death (2.0% vs 1.4%) in the general anesthesia group was noted. In examining operative indications, however, there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients receiving general anesthesia who had sustained preoperative strokes when compared with the regional anesthesia patients (36.1% vs 26.4%; p < 0.01). There was also a statistically significant higher frequency of contralateral total occlusion in the general anesthesia group (21.8% vs 15.4%; p = 0.001). The trend toward increased perioperative strokes in the general anesthesia group may be explicable either by the above differences in the patient populations or by actual differences based on anesthetic technique that favor regional anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS In a retrospective review of a large series of carotid operations, regional anesthesia was shown to be applicable to the vast majority of patients with good clinical outcome. Although the advantages over general anesthesia are perhaps small, the versatility and safety of the technique is sufficient reason for vascular surgeons to include it in their armamentarium of surgical skills. Considering that carotid endarterectomy is a procedure in which complication rates are exceedingly low, a rigidly controlled, prospective randomized trial may be required to accurately assess these differences.