Patrick J. McGrath

Acute and Longer- Term Outcomes in Depressed Outpatients Requiring One or Several Treatment Steps: A STAR*D Report

OBJECTIVEnThis report describes the participants and compares the acute and longer-term treatment outcomes associated with each of four successive steps in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial.nnnMETHODnA broadly representative adult outpatient sample with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder received one (N=3,671) to four (N=123) successive acute treatment steps. Those not achieving remission with or unable to tolerate a treatment step were encouraged to move to the next step. Those with an acceptable benefit, preferably symptom remission, from any particular step could enter a 12-month naturalistic follow-up phase. A score of <or=5 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR(16)) (equivalent to <or=7 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD(17)]) defined remission; a QIDS-SR(16) total score of >or=11 (HRSD(17)>or=14) defined relapse.nnnRESULTSnThe QIDS-SR(16) remission rates were 36.8%, 30.6%, 13.7%, and 13.0% for the first, second, third, and fourth acute treatment steps, respectively. The overall cumulative remission rate was 67%. Overall, those who required more treatment steps had higher relapse rates during the naturalistic follow-up phase. In addition, lower relapse rates were found among participants who were in remission at follow-up entry than for those who were not after the first three treatment steps.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWhen more treatment steps are required, lower acute remission rates (especially in the third and fourth treatment steps) and higher relapse rates during the follow-up phase are to be expected. Studies to identify the best multistep treatment sequences for individual patients and the development of more broadly effective treatments are needed.

Light therapy for seasonal affective disorder. A review of efficacy.

Bright artificial light has been found effective in reducing winter depressive symptoms of Seasonal Affective Disorder, although conclusions about the true magnitude of treatment effect and importance of time of day of light exposure have been limited by methodologic problems. Individual subjects data from 14 research centers studying 332 patients over 5 years were analyzed with a pooled clustering technique. Overall, 2500-lux intensity light exposure for at least 2 hours daily for 1 week resulted in significantly more remissions--Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score reduction of 50% or more to a level under 8--when administered in the early morning (53%) than in the evening (38%) or at midday (32%). All three times were significantly more effective than dim light controls (11%). Dual daily exposures (morning-plus-evening light) provided no benefit over morning light alone. In morning-evening crossovers, remission rates were 62% under morning light alone, compared with 28% under evening light alone, with a differential morning-evening response present in 59% of morning responders compared with 10% of evening responders (p less than 0.001). Remission rates with morning light were highest given low severity at baseline (HAM-D score of 10-16: 67% remission), as compared with moderate-to-severe cases (HAM-D score above 16: approximately 40% remission) where no morning-evening differences were found. Firmer conclusions await treatment studies with larger sample sizes and full assessment of atypical vegetative symptoms seen in winter depression but underrepresented in the Hamilton scale. Longer treatment course and greater light intensity may help clarify clinical response despite the impossibility of achieving a conventional blind placebo control.

Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR*D report.

OBJECTIVEnPhase III clinical trials for depression enroll participants with major depressive disorder according to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients may not be representative of typical depressed patients seeking treatment. This analysis used data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) project--which used broad inclusion and minimal exclusion criteria--to evaluate whether phase III clinical trials recruit representative depressed outpatients.nnnMETHODnOf 2,855 participants, 22.2% met typical entry criteria for phase III clinical trials (efficacy sample) and 77.8% did not (nonefficacy sample). These groups were compared regarding baseline sociodemographic and clinical features and the characteristics and outcomes of acute-phase treatment.nnnRESULTSnThe efficacy sample had a shorter average duration of illness and lower rates of family history of substance abuse, prior suicide attempts, and anxious and atypical symptom features. Despite similar medication dosing and time at exit dose, the efficacy participants tolerated citalopram better. They also had higher rates of response (51.6% versus 39.1%) and remission (34.4% versus 24.7%). These differences persisted even after adjustments for baseline differences.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPhase III trials do not recruit representative treatment-seeking depressed patients. Broader phase III inclusion criteria would increase the generalizability of results to practice, potentially reducing placebo response and remission rates (reducing the risk of failed trials) but at the risk of some increase in adverse events.

Brain ERPs of depressed patients to complex tones in an oddball task : Relation of reduced P3 asymmetry to physical anhedonia

Event-related potentials to binaural complex tones were recorded from 40 depressed outpatients and 22 normal control participants at 30 electrode sites. Patients did not differ from control participants in N1 or P3 amplitude but showed greater N2. N2 was greater over right than over the left hemisphere at lateral sites in patients and control participants. A P3 asymmetry was found for control participants and patients with low scores on a physical anhedonia scale, but not for patients with high anhedonia scores. Topographic (local Laplacian) maps corresponding to P3 showed greater radial current flow over right than over left central regions in control participants. Patients with high anhedonia did not show this asymmetry, whereas patients with low anhedonia showed an intermediate asymmetry. These findings support the hypothesis that anhedonic depression is associated with dysfunction of right hemisphere mechanisms mediating the processing of complex pitch information.

Acceptability of Second-Step Treatments to Depressed Outpatients: A STAR*D Report

OBJECTIVEnTreatment of major depressive disorder typically entails implementing treatments in a stepwise fashion until a satisfactory outcome is achieved. This study sought to identify factors that affect patients willingness to accept different second-step treatment approaches.nnnMETHODnParticipants in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial who had unsatisfactory outcomes after initial treatment with citalopram were eligible for a randomized second-step treatment trial. An equipoise-stratified design allowed participants to exclude or include specific treatment strategies. Analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the acceptability of the following second-step treatments: cognitive therapy versus no cognitive therapy, any switch strategy versus any augmentation strategy (including cognitive therapy), and a medication switch strategy only versus a medication augmentation strategy only.nnnRESULTSnOf the 1,439 participants who entered second-step treatment, 1% accepted all treatment strategies, 3% accepted only cognitive therapy, and 26% accepted cognitive therapy (thus, 71% did not accept cognitive therapy). Those with higher educational levels or a family history of a mood disorder were more likely to accept cognitive therapy. Participants in primary care settings and those who experienced a greater side effect burden or a lower reduction in symptom severity with citalopram were more likely to accept a switch strategy as compared with an augmentation strategy. Those with concurrent drug abuse and recurrent major depressive disorder were less likely to accept a switch strategy.nnnCONCLUSIONSnFew participants accepted all treatments. Acceptance of cognitive therapy was primarily associated with sociodemographic characteristics, while acceptance of a treatment switch was associated with the results of the initial treatment.

Association of Mu-Opioid Receptor Variants and Response to Citalopram Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVEnBecause previous preclinical and clinical studies have implicated the endogenous opioid system in major depression and in the neurochemical action of antidepressants, the authors examined how DNA variation in the mu-opioid receptor gene may influence population variation in response to citalopram treatment.nnnMETHODnA total of 1,953 individuals from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study were treated with citalopram and genotyped for 53 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a 100-kb region of the OPRM1 gene. The sample consisted of Non-Hispanic Caucasians, Hispanic Caucasians, and African Americans. Population stratification was corrected using 119 ancestry informative markers and principal components analysis. Markers were tested for association with phenotypes for general and specific citalopram response as well as remission.nnnRESULTSnAssociation between one SNP and specific citalopram response was observed. After Bonferroni correction, the strongest finding was the association between the rs540825 SNP and specific response. The rs540825 polymorphism is a nonsynonymous SNP in the final exon of the mu-opioid receptor-1X isoform of the OPRM1 gene, resulting in a histidine to glutamine change in the intracellular domain of the receptor. When Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Caucasians were analyzed separately, similar results in the population-corrected analyses were detected.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese results suggest that rates of response to antidepressants and consequent remission from major depressive disorder are influenced by variation in the mu-opioid receptor gene as a result of either an effect on placebo response or true pharmacologic response.

Psychosocial determinants of headache, abdominal pain, and sleep problems in a community sample of Finnish adolescents

The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence, co-occurrence, and psychosocial determinants of self-perceived headache, abdominal pain, and sleep problems among adolescents. The adolescents from two cities in Finland (nxa0=xa02,215, 90.9% of the target population) attending 7th and 9th grade (age range 13–18xa0years) participated in the cross-sectional survey inquiring about frequency of headache, abdominal pain, sleep problems, and psychosocial difficulties. The 6-month prevalence of weekly headache was 13%, abdominal pain 6%, and sleep problems 27%. All three symptoms were strongly associated with each other. Of the adolescents suffering from one symptom, 32% reported one co-occurring symptom and 17% two co-occurring symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, female gender, experience of psychological difficulties, emotional symptoms, smoking, victimization, and feeling not cared about by teachers were independently associated with all the individual symptoms, as well as an increasing number of symptoms. Sleep problems were associated with older age and peer and alcohol problems. Abdominal pain was associated with conduct problems, and both headache and abdominal pain were linked with immigration background. An increasing number of symptoms was associated with older age, having a chronic illness, and conduct and alcohol problems. Adolescents’ headache, abdominal pain and sleep problems were common and often co-occurred. An increasing frequency of each symptom and number of symptoms were associated with psychosocial factors in a similar way. Screening for psychiatric symptoms, substance use, victimization and difficulties with teachers should be included in the assessment of adolescents who suffer from recurrent headache, abdominal pain or sleep problems.

Dichotic Listening Tests of Functional Brain Asymmetry Predict Response to Fluoxetine in Depressed Women and Men

Patients having a depressive disorder vary widely in their therapeutic responsiveness to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), but there are no clinical predictors of treatment outcome. Studies using dichotic listening, electrophysiologic and neuroimaging measures suggest that pretreatment differences among depressed patients in functional brain asymmetry are related to responsiveness to antidepressants. Two new studies replicate differences in dichotic listening asymmetry between fluoxetine responders and nonresponders, and demonstrate the importance of gender in this context. Right-handed outpatients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depression, dysthymia, or depression not otherwise specified were tested on dichotic fused-words and complex tones tests before completing 12 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. Perceptual asymmetry (PA) scores were compared for 75 patients (38 women) who responded to treatment and 39 patients (14 women) who were nonresponders. Normative data were also obtained for 101 healthy adults (61 women). Patients who responded to fluoxetine differed from nonresponders and healthy adults in favoring left- over right-hemisphere processing of dichotic stimuli, and this difference was dependent on gender and test. Heightened left-hemisphere advantage for dichotic words in responders was present among women but not men, whereas reduced right-hemisphere advantage for dichotic tones in responders was present among men but not women. Pretreatment PA was also predictive of change in depression severity following treatment. Responder vs nonresponder differences for verbal dichotic listening in women and nonverbal dichotic listening in men are discussed in terms of differences in cognitive function, hemispheric organization, and neurotransmitter function.

Test-retest reliability of freesurfer measurements within and between sites

In the last decade, many studies have used automated processes to analyze magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data such as cortical thickness, which is one indicator of neuronal health. Due to the convenience of image processing software (e.g., FreeSurfer), standard practice is to rely on automated results without performing visual inspection of intermediate processing. In this work, structural MRIs of 40 healthy controls who were scanned twice were used to determine the test–retest reliability of FreeSurfer‐derived cortical measures in four groups of subjects—those 25 that passed visual inspection (approved), those 15 that failed visual inspection (disapproved), a combined group, and a subset of 10 subjects (Travel) whose test and retest scans occurred at different sites. Test–retest correlation (TRC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percent difference (PD) were used to measure the reliability in the Destrieux and Desikan–Killiany (DK) atlases. In the approved subjects, reliability of cortical thickness/surface area/volume (DK atlas only) were: TRC (0.82/0.88/0.88), ICC (0.81/0.87/0.88), PD (0.86/1.19/1.39), which represent a significant improvement over these measures when disapproved subjects are included. Travel subjects’ results show that cortical thickness reliability is more sensitive to site differences than the cortical surface area and volume. To determine the effect of visual inspection on sample size required for studies of MRI‐derived cortical thickness, the number of subjects required to show group differences was calculated. Significant differences observed across imaging sites, between visually approved/disapproved subjects, and across regions with different sizes suggest that these measures should be used with caution. Hum Brain Mapp 36:3472–3485, 2015.

Efficacy of desipramine in endogenomorphically depressed patients

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there are 2 biochemical subgroups of endogenously depressed patients--serotonin-deficient and noradrenalin-deficient groups--which respond differently to antidepressants depending on relative blockade of serotonin vs. norepinephrine (NE) reuptake. Patients with pervasive anhedonia and autonomy of depressed mood (endogenomorphic depressives) were treated first with the noradrenergic agent desipramine (DMI), then, if still depressed, such patients were randomized double-blind to continued DMI or clomipramine (CMI), a primarily serotonergic agent. Of 34 such endogenomorphically depressed patients 2 responded during a placebo period and 5 dropped out. Of 27 patients completing at least 4 weeks of DMI (mean maximum daily dose 283 mg, range 100-400 mg/d), 23 (85.2%) responded. With only 4 nonresponders, the second, or CMI, part of the study had to be abandoned. Since DMI strongly blocks neuronal reuptake of catecholamines with little effect on serotonin reuptake, these results suggest that endogenomorphic depressives may have a relatively homogeneous catecholamine deficiency. Alternatively, DMI may exert its effect by a mechanism other than blockade of EN reuptake. Eleven of the endogenomorphically depressed patients also met Research Diagnostic Criteria for situational depression (reactive). Ten of these 11 responded to DMI suggesting that presence or absence of a precipitant may be irrelevant in predicting response to tricyclic antidepressants in endogenomorphic depressions. Mean blood levels drawn at equivalent DMI dose were 238 ng/ml (range, 48-712) for responders, and 352 ng/ml (range, 160-877) for non-responders, indicating that patients appear to respond to DMI across a wide range of blood levels and suggesting the absence of a narrow therapeutic window.