Paul A. Godley

Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma").

The adrenals are triangular glands that sit atop each kidney. They influence or regulate the bodys metabolism, salt and water balance, and response to stress by secreting various hormones. Based on autopsy studies, adrenal masses are among the most common tumors in humans. At autopsy, an adrenal mass is found in at least 3% of persons older than age 50 years. Most adrenal masses cause no health problems. A small proportion, however, can lead to many serious hormonal diseases; approximately 1 of every 4000 adrenal tumors is malignant. Clinically inapparent adrenal masses are discovered inadvertently during diagnostic testing or treatment for other clinical conditions that are not related to suspicion of adrenal disease; thus, they are commonly known as incidentalomas. The definition of incidentaloma excludes patients undergoing imaging procedures as part of staging and work-up for cancer. Improvements in abdominal imaging techniques and technologies have increased detection of adrenal incidentalomas. Increasing clinical and scientific interest is reflected in a 20-fold increase in publications about this condition over the past three decades. When detected, clinically inapparent adrenal masses raise challenging questions for physicians and their patients. Diagnostic evaluation determines whether the lesion is hormonally active or nonfunctioning and whether it is malignant or benign. The test results will influence whether the mass is removed surgically or treated nonsurgically. Because the prevalence of these masses increases with age, appropriate management of adrenal tumors will be a growing challenge in our aging society. Over the past three decades, new information has become available regarding the epidemiology, biology, screening, treatment, and follow-up of adrenal tumors. For example, recent refinements in the field of minimally invasive surgery have made laparoscopic adrenalectomy a more frequently used method for removing adrenal masses. Recent reports suggest that up to 20% of patients with adrenal incidentaloma have some form of subclinical hormonal dysfunction and may represent a population at higher risk for metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease. It is important to determine whether groups of patients with subclinical disease benefit from treatment. The psychological effect of the patients knowing that he or she harbors an adrenal incidentaloma, an incompletely understood clinical problem, merits investigation. A 2.5-day National Institutes of Health (NIH) state-of-the-science conference, Management of the Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass (Incidentaloma), was convened on 46 February 2002 to explore and assess the current knowledge regarding adrenal incidentalomas, so that health care providers and the general public can make informed decisions about this important public health issue. After 1.5 days of expert presentations and questions and public discussion by members of the panel and the audience of interested attendees on incidental adrenal masses, an independent, nonfederal panel weighed the evidence and drafted a statement that was presented on the third day of the conference. Expert presentations and the panels statement addressed the following questions: 1) What are the causes, prevalence, and natural history of clinically inapparent adrenal masses? 2) Based on available scientific evidence, what is the appropriate evaluation of a clinically inapparent adrenal mass? 3) What criteria should guide the decision on surgical versus nonsurgical management of these masses? 4) If surgery is indicated, what is the appropriate procedure? 5) What is the appropriate follow-up for patients for each management approach? and 6) What additional research is needed to guide practice? The panels draft statement was posted on the NIH Consensus Program Web site (consensus.nih.gov) on 6 February 2002. The primary sponsors of this meeting were the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the NIH Office of Medical Applications of Research. Cosponsors included the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. 1. What are the Causes, Prevalence, and Natural History of Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Masses? Clinically inapparent adrenal masses are detected incidentally with imaging studies conducted for other reasons. They may be clinically important because some are caused by adrenal cortical carcinomas (estimated prevalence, 4 to 12 per million), which have a high mortality rate. The other clinical concern is hormone overproduction from pheochromocytomas, aldosteronomas, and subclinical hypercortisolism, which may be associated with morbidity if untreated. Prevalence of Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Masses In autopsy series, the prevalence of clinically inapparent adrenal masses is about 2.1%. Because of increased use of noninvasive high-resolution imaging technology, clinically inapparent adrenal masses are being recognized more often. Estimates range from 0.1% for general health screening with ultrasonography to 0.42% among patients evaluated for nonendocrinologic symptoms to 4.3% among patients who have a previous diagnosis of cancer. In addition to source of data (autopsy versus clinical series) and reasons for imaging (cancer work-up, nonendocrinologic symptoms, and general health screening), the prevalence of clinically inapparent adrenal masses varies with age. The prevalence of clinically inapparent adrenal masses detected at autopsy is less than 1% for patients younger than 30 years of age and increases to 7% in patients 70 years of age or older. Many of these lesions detected at autopsy are very small. More patients with clinically inapparent adrenal masses are women. This probably reflects the sex distribution of the population undergoing imaging procedures. Autopsy studies or general health examinations show no evidence of difference in prevalence between men and women. There is insufficient information to determine whether the prevalence of clinically inapparent adrenal masses differs by the initial diagnostic test. Causes of Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Masses Clinically inapparent adrenal masses can be benign or malignant. These include adenomas, pheochromocytomas, myelolipomas, ganglioneuromas, adrenal cysts, hematomas, adrenal cortical carcinomas, metastases from other cancers, and other rare entities. The distributions of the pathologic origins of clinically inapparent adrenal masses vary with several clinically important factors, including cancer history and mass size. Three fourths of clinically inapparent adrenal masses among patients with cancer are metastatic lesions. In contrast, two thirds of clinically inapparent adrenal masses in populations with no history of cancer are benign tumors. Prevalence of primary adrenal cortical carcinoma is clearly related to the size of the tumor. Adrenal cortical carcinoma accounts for 2% of tumors that are 4 cm or less, 6% of tumors that are 4.1 to 6 cm, and 25% of tumors that are greater than 6 cm. Among unselected patients and those with nonendocrinologic symptoms, clinically inapparent adrenal masses are most often nonfunctioning tumors (approximately 70%). Approximately 5% to 10% of patients being evaluated for nonendocrinologic symptoms have subclinical hypercortisolism (sometimes called subclinical Cushing syndrome). The percentage of patients with subclinical hypercortisolism depends on the testing methods and cortisol levels achieved after dexamethasone suppression. The distribution of clinically inapparent adrenal masses derived from surgical series will overestimate the prevalence of adrenal cortical carcinoma, since suspicion of adrenal cortical carcinoma is an indication for surgery. Moreover, the reported frequency of adrenal cortical carcinomas is derived from highly selected patient populations and does not reflect the prevalence rates seen in population-based studies. The age and sex of the patient do not seem to help predict the presence of adrenal cortical carcinoma. Distribution estimates from autopsy studies are not biased by surgical indications but may not reflect the risk for adrenal cortical carcinoma among the subset of people undergoing abdominal imaging studies. A precise estimate of the risk for adrenal cortical carcinoma that could guide clinical decision making may not be possible. Almost all the reported large studies used imaging equipment that is now considered obsolete. The use of contemporary equipment may increase the prevalence of detected clinically inapparent adrenal masses and enhance our ability to differentiate adrenal cortical carcinomas from adenomas. In addition, the literature comprises mainly small, retrospective studies with variable definitions of clinically inapparent adrenal masses, which cause variation in the relative proportions of adrenal pathologic classifications. Natural History of Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Masses The observed natural history of clinically inapparent adrenal masses varies, depending on the composition of the study sample and the size and pathologic classification of the adrenal mass. Patients with or without a previous cancer diagnosis found to have adrenal gland metastatic lesions will have a clinical course defined by the stage, grade, and site of the primary tumor. Usually, large clinically inapparent adrenal masses (>6 cm) are treated surgically. Approximately 25% of masses greater than 6 cm in diameter are adrenal cortical carcinomas, and these patients have poor clinical outcomes. Most studies report less than 50% 5-year overall survival for adrenal cortical carcinoma, and several report less than 50% 2-year overall survival. Inconclusive evidence suggests that adrenalectomy at stage 1 or 2 may improve the survival rate. Follow-up of patients with nonfunctioning adrenal masses suggests that 5% to 25% of masses increase in size by at least 1 cm. The threshold for clinically significant

Renal cell carcinoma.

Purpose of review This review highlights recent contributions to the biology and treatment of renal cell carcinoma, the expanded use of antiangiogenic agents as well as interest in other inhibitory drug mechanisms. In addition, recent findings are reported on biomarkers which are undergoing investigation as correlative prognostic indicators of either survival or response to treatment. Recent findings Advances in our understanding of the molecular biology underpinning renal cell carcinoma and the introduction of new targeted therapeutics with benefit in the metastatic setting have had a major impact on the treatment of this disease. Summary The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has undergone a dramatic evolution in the past year, marked by the approval of two drugs by the US Food and Drug Administration. These drugs have demonstrated improved progression-free survival as well as potentially improved overall survival for patients with metastatic disease. These groundbreaking treatment strategies have fueled a surge in translational studies expanding our knowledge of the molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Proton Therapy, or Conformal Radiation Therapy and Morbidity and Disease Control in Localized Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT There has been rapid adoption of newer radiation treatments such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy despite greater cost and limited demonstrated benefit compared with previous technologies. OBJECTIVE To determine the comparative morbidity and disease control of IMRT, proton therapy, and conformal radiation therapy for primary prostate cancer treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Population-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked data from 2000 through 2009 for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of gastrointestinal and urinary morbidity, erectile dysfunction, hip fractures, and additional cancer therapy. RESULTS Use of IMRT vs conformal radiation therapy increased from 0.15% in 2000 to 95.9% in 2008. In propensity score-adjusted analyses (N = 12,976), men who received IMRT vs conformal radiation therapy were less likely to receive a diagnosis of gastrointestinal morbidities (absolute risk, 13.4 vs 14.7 per 100 person-years; relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96) and hip fractures (absolute risk, 0.8 vs 1.0 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93) but more likely to receive a diagnosis of erectile dysfunction (absolute risk, 5.9 vs 5.3 per 100 person-years; RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients were less likely to receive additional cancer therapy (absolute risk, 2.5 vs 3.1 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89). In a propensity score-matched comparison between IMRT and proton therapy (n = 1368), IMRT patients had a lower rate of gastrointestinal morbidity (absolute risk, 12.2 vs 17.8 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.79). There were no significant differences in rates of other morbidities or additional therapies between IMRT and proton therapy. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, the use of IMRT compared with conformal radiation therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity and fewer hip fractures but more erectile dysfunction; IMRT compared with proton therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity.

Neoadjuvant Clinical Trial With Sorafenib for Patients With Stage II or Higher Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE The multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib is used for the treatment of advanced-stage renal cell carcinoma. However, the safety and efficacy of this agent have yet to be evaluated in the preoperative period, where there may be potential advantages including tumor downstaging. This prospective trial evaluates the safety and feasibility of sorafenib in the preoperative setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty patients with clinical stage II or higher renal masses, selected based on their candidacy for nephrectomy, underwent preoperative treatment with sorafenib. Toxicities, surgical complications, and tumor responses were monitored. RESULTS Of the thirty patients enrolled, 17 patients had localized disease and 13 had metastatic disease. After a course of sorafenib therapy (median duration, 33 days), a decrease in primary tumor size (median, 9.6%) and radiographic evidence of loss of intratumoral enhancement, quantified using a methodology similar to Choi criteria (median, 13%), was also observed. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, of the 28 patients evaluable for response, two patients had a partial response and 26 had stable disease, with no patients progressing on therapy. Toxicities from sorafenib were similar to that expected with this class of medication. All patients were able to proceed with nephrectomy and no surgical complications related to sorafenib administration were observed. CONCLUSION The administration of preoperative sorafenib therapy can impact the size and density of the primary tumor and appears safe and feasible. Further studies are required to determine if preoperative systemic therapy improves outcomes in patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Use of 5-α-Reductase Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention: American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Urological Association 2008 Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based guideline on the use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) for prostate cancer chemoprevention. METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Committee (HSC), ASCO Cancer Prevention Committee, and the American Urological Association Practice Guidelines Committee jointly convened a Panel of experts, who used the results from a systematic review of the literature to develop evidence-based recommendations on the use of 5-ARIs for prostate cancer chemoprevention. Results The systematic review completed for this guideline identified 15 randomized clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria, nine of which reported prostate cancer period prevalence. CONCLUSION Asymptomatic men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <or= 3.0 ng/mL who are regularly screened with PSA or are anticipating undergoing annual PSA screening for early detection of prostate cancer may benefit from a discussion of both the benefits of 5-ARIs for 7 years for the prevention of prostate cancer and the potential risks (including the possibility of high-grade prostate cancer). Men who are taking 5-ARIs for benign conditions such as lower urinary tract [obstructive] symptoms (LUTS) may benefit from a similar discussion, understanding that the improvement of LUTS relief should be weighed with the potential risks of high-grade prostate cancer from 5-ARIs (although the majority of the Panel members judged the latter risk to be unlikely). A reduction of approximately 50% in PSA by 12 months is expected in men taking a 5-ARI; however, because these changes in PSA may vary across men, and within individual men over time, the Panel cannot recommend a specific cut point to trigger a biopsy for men taking a 5-ARI. No specific cut point or change in PSA has been prospectively validated in men taking a 5-ARI.

Preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibition as an adjunct to debulking nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone dramatic changes. However, the use of TKI therapy in adjunctive settings remains to be defined. We present a single-institution experience of patients who received preoperative TKI before nephrectomy for metastatic or unresectable disease. METHODS The records of 9 patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC treated with TKI therapy before nephrectomy at the University of North Carolina were reviewed. All procedures and radiographic images were performed at 1 institution. The cases were surveyed for the effect of TKI on tumor burden and surgical approach and timing. RESULTS The patients received systemic therapy with either sorafenib or sunitinib before proceeding to nephrectomy on clinical trials for metastatic disease or as the standard of care. The surgery was well tolerated by all patients, without an apparent effect from TKI therapy on the surgical technique or complications. Responses were observed in the primary tumor, as well as in the metastatic sites. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant TKI therapy can induce responses in the primary tumor and has the potential advantage of cytoreduction when administered before nephrectomy for RCC. This setting also potentially provides an opportunity to evaluate the TKI responsiveness of patients with metastatic disease. However, prospective trials evaluating adjunctive surgical approaches to locally advanced and metastatic RCC are needed to determine the significant benefits of TKI therapy and to define the optimal agent, timing of therapy, and disease stage to derive benefit for preoperative therapy.

Hidden barriers between knowledge and behavior: the North Carolina prostate cancer screening and treatment experience.

Prostate cancer (PC) mortality is much greater for African American than for Caucasian men. To identify patient factors that might account for some of this disparity, men within 6 months of diagnosis were surveyed about health attitudes and behavior.

A phase II study of estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 99813.

The authors determined the safety and efficacy of estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin with granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) support in patients with hormone‐refractory prostate carcinoma.

A phase II trial of neoadjuvant erlotinib in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: Clinical and pathological results

Study Type – Therapy (cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b

Association Between Choice of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy, or Active Surveillance and Patient-Reported Quality of Life Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

Importance Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer have to decide among treatment strategies that may differ in their likelihood of adverse effects. Objective To compare quality of life (QOL) after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy vs active surveillance. Design, Setting, and Participants Population-based prospective cohort of 1141 men (57% participation among eligible men) with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were enrolled from January 2011 through June 2013 in collaboration with the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 5 weeks, and all men were enrolled with written informed consent prior to treatment. Final follow-up date for current analysis was September 9, 2015. Exposures Treatment with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance. Main Outcomes and Measures Quality of life using the validated instrument Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices was assessed at baseline (pretreatment) and 3, 12, and 24 months after treatment. The instrument contains 4 domains—sexual dysfunction, urinary obstruction and irritation, urinary incontinence, and bowel problems—each scored from 0 (no dysfunction) to 100 (maximum dysfunction). Propensity-weighted mean domain scores were compared between each treatment group vs active surveillance at each time point. Results Of 1141 enrolled men, 314 pursued active surveillance (27.5%), 469 radical prostatectomy (41.1%), 249 external beam radiotherapy (21.8%), and 109 brachytherapy (9.6%). After propensity weighting, median age was 66 to 67 years across groups, and 77% to 80% of participants were white. Across groups, propensity-weighted mean baseline scores were 41.8 to 46.4 for sexual dysfunction, 20.8 to 22.8 for urinary obstruction and irritation, 9.7 to 10.5 for urinary incontinence, and 5.7 to 6.1 for bowel problems. Compared with active surveillance, mean sexual dysfunction scores worsened by 3 months for patients who received radical prostatectomy (36.2 [95% CI, 30.4-42.0]), external beam radiotherapy (13.9 [95% CI, 6.7-21.2]), and brachytherapy (17.1 [95% CI, 7.8-26.6]). Compared with active surveillance at 3 months, worsened urinary incontinence was associated with radical prostatectomy (33.6 [95% CI, 27.8-39.2]); acute worsening of urinary obstruction and irritation with external beam radiotherapy (11.7 [95% CI, 8.7-14.8]) and brachytherapy (20.5 [95% CI, 15.1-25.9]); and worsened bowel symptoms with external beam radiotherapy (4.9 [95% CI, 2.4-7.4]). By 24 months, mean scores between treatment groups vs active surveillance were not significantly different in most domains. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, each treatment strategy was associated with distinct patterns of adverse effects over 2 years. These findings can be used to promote treatment decisions that incorporate individual preferences.