Paul A. Nelson
Argonne National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul A. Nelson.
Journal of Power Sources | 1999
Andrew N. Jansen; Arthur J. Kahaian; Keith D. Kepler; Paul A. Nelson; K. Amine; Dennis W. Dees; Donald R. Vissers; Michael M. Thackeray
Safety is a key concern for a high-power energy storage system such as will be required in a hybrid vehicle. Present lithium-ion technology, which uses a carbon/graphite negative electrode, lacks inherent safety for two main reasons: (1) carbon/graphite intercalates lithium at near lithium potential, and (2) there is no end-of-charge indicator in the voltage profile that can signal the onset of catastrophic oxygen evolution from the cathode (LiCoO{sub 2}). Our approach to solving these safety/life problems is to replace the graphite/carbon negative electrode with an electrode that exhibits stronger two-phase behavior further away from lithium potential, such as Li{sub 4}Ti{sub 5}O{sub 12}. Cycle-life and pulse-power capability data are presented in accordance with the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV) test procedures, as well as a full-scale design based on a spreadsheet model.
Journal of Power Sources | 2002
Paul A. Nelson; Dennis W. Dees; Khalil Amine; Gary Henriksen
Batteries were designed with the aid of a computer modeling program to study the requirements of the thermal control system for meeting the goals set by the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV). The battery designs were based upon the lithium-ion cell composition designated Gen-2 in the US Department of Energy Advanced Technology Development Program. The worst-case cooling requirement that would occur during prolonged aggressive driving was estimated to be 250 W or about 5 W per cell for a 48-cell battery. Rapid heating of the battery from a very low startup temperature is more difficult than cooling during driving. A dielectric transformer fluid is superior to air for both heating and cooling the battery. A dedicated refrigeration system for cooling the battery coolant would be helpful in maintaining low temperature during driving. The use of ample insulation would effectively slow the battery temperature rise when parking the vehicle in warm weather. Operating the battery at 10 °C during the first several years when the battery has excess power would extend the battery life.
Journal of Power Sources | 2002
Paul A. Nelson; Ira Bloom; Khalil Amine; Gary Henriksen
A computer design modeling technique has been developed for lithium-ion batteries to assist in setting goals for cell components, assessing materials requirements, and evaluating thermal management strategies. In this study, the input data for the model included design criteria from Quallion, LLC for Gen-2 18650 cells, which were used to test the accuracy of the dimensional modeling. Performance measurements on these cells were done at the electrochemical analysis and diagnostics laboratory (EADL) at Argonne National Laboratory. The impedance and capacity related criteria were calculated from the EADL measurements. Five batteries were designed for which the number of windings around the cell core was increased for each succeeding battery to study the effect of this variable upon the dimensions, weight, and performance of the batteries. The lumped-parameter battery model values were calculated for these batteries from the laboratory results, with adjustments for the current collection resistance calculated for the individual batteries.
Electrochimica Acta | 1993
Thomas D. Kaun; Paul A. Nelson; Laszlo Redey; Donald R. Vissers; Gary Henriksen
Bipolar LiAl/FeS and LiAl/FeS2 batteries are being developed for electric vehicle (EV) applications by Argonne National Laboratory. Current technology employs a two-phase Li alloy negative electrode, low melting point LiCl—rich LiClLiBrKBr molten salt electrolyte, and either an FeS or an upper-plateau (UP) FeS2 positive electrode. These components are assembled in an “electrolyte-starved” bipolar cell configuration. Use of the two-phase Li alloy (α + β LiAl and Li5Al5Fe2) negative electrode provides in situ overcharge tolerance that renders the bipolar design viable. Employing LiCl rich LiClLiBrKBr electrolyte in “electrolyte-starved” cells achieves low-burdened cells that possess low area-specific impedance; comparable to that of flooded cells using LiClLiBrKBr eutectic electrolyte. The combination of dense U.P. FeS2 electrodes and low-melting electrolyte produces a stable and reversible couple, achieving over 1000 cycles in flooded cells, with high power capabilities. In addition, a family of stable chalcogenide ceramic/sealant materials was developed that produce high-strength bonds between a variety of metals and ceramics, which renders lithium/iron sulfide bipolar stacks practical. Bipolar LiAl/FeS and LiAl/FeS2 cells and four-cell stacks using these seals are being built and tested in the 13 cm diameter size for EV applications. To date, LiAl/FeS cells have achieved 240 W kg−1 power at 80% depth of discharge (DOD) and 130 Wh kg−1 energy at the 25 W kg−1 rate. LiAl/FeS2 cells have attained 400 W kg−1 power at 80% DOD and 180 Wh kg−1 energy at the 30 W kg−1 rate. When cell performance characteristics are used to model full-scale EV and hybrid vehicle (HV) batteries, they are projected to meet or exceed the performance requirements for a large variety of EV and HV applications.
SAE World Congress & Exhibition | 2007
Phillip Sharer; Aymeric Rousseau; Sylvain Pagerit; Paul A. Nelson
Because Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) substitute electrical power from the utility grid for fuel, they have the potential to reduce petroleum use significantly. However, adoption of PHEVs has been hindered by expensive, low-energy batteries. Recent improvements in Li-ion batteries and hybrid control have addressed battery-related issues and have brought PHEVs within reach. The FreedomCAR Office of Vehicle Technology has a program that studies the potential benefit of PHEVs. This program also attempts to clarify and refine the requirements for PHEV components. Because the battery appears to be the main technical barrier, both from a performance and cost perspective, the main efforts have been focused on that component. Working with FreedomCAR energy storage and vehicle experts, Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) researchers have developed a process to define the requirements of energy storage systems for plug-in applications. This paper describes the impact of All Electric Range (AER), drive cycle, and control strategy on battery requirements for both the midsize and SUV classes of vehicles.
Lithium-Ion Batteries#R##N#Advances and Applications | 2014
Kevin G. Gallagher; Paul A. Nelson
Abstract Predicting the interrelation of lithium-ion battery performance and cost (BatPaC) is critical to understanding the origin of the manufacturing cost, pathways to lower these costs, and how low these costs may fall in the future. A freely available BatPaC model is presented that enables a direct evaluation of manufacturing cost. After the basis for the model is detailed, an in-depth discussion of the cost drivers highlights the most significant contributions to the total battery cost. Approaches to reducing battery cost are presented within the context of materials, engineering, and manufacturing.
Archive | 2012
Paul A. Nelson; Kevin G. Gallagher; Ira Bloom; Dennis W. Dees
This report details the Battery Performance and Cost model (BatPaC) developed at Argonne National Laboratory for lithium-ion battery packs used in automotive transportation. The model designs the battery for a specified power, energy, and type of vehicle battery. The cost of the designed battery is then calculated by accounting for every step in the lithium-ion battery manufacturing process. The assumed annual production level directly affects each process step. The total cost to the original equipment manufacturer calculated by the model includes the materials, manufacturing, and warranty costs for a battery produced in the year 2020 (in 2010 US
Journal of Power Sources | 1990
Paul A. Nelson
). At the time this report is written, this calculation is the only publically available model that performs a bottom-up lithium-ion battery design and cost calculation. Both the model and the report have been publically peer-reviewed by battery experts assembled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This report and accompanying model include changes made in response to the comments received during the peer-review. The purpose of the report is to document the equations and assumptions from which the model has been created. A user of the model will be able to recreate the calculations and perhaps more importantly, understand the driving forces for the results. Instructions for use and an illustration of model results are also presented. Almost every variable in the calculation may be changed by the user to represent a system different from the default values pre-entered into the program. The distinct advantage of using a bottom-up cost and design model is that the entire power-to-energy space may be traversed to examine the correlation between performance and cost. The BatPaC model accounts for the physical limitations of the electrochemical processes within the battery. Thus, unrealistic designs are penalized in energy density and cost, unlike cost models based on linear extrapolations. Additionally, the consequences on cost and energy density from changes in cell capacity, parallel cell groups, and manufacturing capabilities are easily assessed with the model. New proposed materials may also be examined to translate bench-scale values to the design of full-scale battery packs providing realistic energy densities and prices to the original equipment manufacturer. The model will be openly distributed to the public in the year 2011. Currently, the calculations are based in a Microsoft{reg_sign} Office Excel spreadsheet. Instructions are provided for use; however, the format is admittedly not user-friendly. A parallel development effort has created an alternate version based on a graphical user-interface that will be more intuitive to some users. The version that is more user-friendly should allow for wider adoption of the model.
SAE transactions | 2003
Paul A. Nelson; Dennis W. Dees; Khalil Amine; Gary Henriksen
Abstract Recent results for LiAl/FeS 2 cells and a bipolar battery design have shown the possibility of achieving high specific energy (210 W h kg −1 ) and high specific power (239 W kg −1 ) at the cell level for an electric vehicle application. Outstanding performance is also projected for sodium/metal chloride cells having large electrolyte areas and thin, positive electrodes.
29th Annual Earthmoving Industry Conference | 1978
Leslie Burris; Paul A. Nelson
This study involves the battery requirements for a fuel cell-powered hybrid electric vehicle. The performances of the vehicle [a 3200-Ib (1455-kg) sedan], the fuel cell, and the battery were evaluated in a vehicle simulation. Most of the attention was given to the design and performance of the battery, a lithium-ion, manganese spinel-graphite system of 75-kW power to be used with a 50-kW fuel cell. The total power performance of the system was excellent at the full operating temperatures of the fuel cell and battery. The battery cycling duty is very moderate, as regenerative braking for the Federal Urban Driving Schedule and the Highway Fuel Economy Test cycles can do all charging of the battery. Cold start-up at 20°C is straightforward, with full power available immediately. Cold start-up at -20°C is more difficult, but can be accomplished by the use of thermal storage in the form of 10 L of transformer heat-transfer fluid heated to 180°C, which can warm the battery to 10°C and restore the battery to full power within two minutes.