Paul A. Volberding

The efficacy of azidothymidine (AZT) in the treatment of patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex. A double blind, placebo-controlled trial

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy of oral azidothymidine (AZT) in 282 patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) manifested by Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia alone, or with advanced AIDS-related complex. The subjects were stratified according to numbers of T cells with CD4 surface markers and were randomly assigned to receive either 250 mg of AZT or placebo by mouth every four hours for a total of 24 weeks. One hundred forty-five subjects received AZT, and 137 received placebo. When the study was terminated, 27 subjects had completed 24 weeks of the study, 152 had completed 16 weeks, and the remainder had completed at least 8 weeks. Nineteen placebo recipients and 1 AZT recipient died during the study (P less than 0.001). Opportunistic infections developed in 45 subjects receiving placebo, as compared with 24 receiving AZT. The base-line Karnofsky performance score and weight increased significantly among AZT recipients (P less than 0.001). A statistically significant increase in the number of CD4 cells was noted in subjects receiving AZT (P less than 0.001). After 12 weeks, the number of CD4 cells declined to pretreatment values among AZT recipients with AIDS but not amonG AZT recipients with AIDS-related complex. Skin-test anergy was partially reversed in 29 percent of subjects receiving AZT, as compared with 9 percent of those receiving placebo (P less than 0.001). These data demonstrate that AZT administration can decrease mortality and the frequency of opportunistic infections in a selected group of subjects with AIDS or AIDS-related complex, at least over the 8 to 24 weeks of observation in this study.

Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel.

CONTEXT Recent data regarding the consequences of untreated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and the expansion of treatment choices for antiretroviral-naive and antiretroviral-experienced patients warrant an update of the International AIDS Society-USA guidelines for the use of antiretroviral therapy in adults with HIV infection. OBJECTIVES To provide updated recommendations for management of HIV-infected adults, using antiretroviral drugs and laboratory monitoring tools available in the international, developed-world setting. This report provides guidelines for when to initiate antiretroviral therapy, selection of appropriate initial regimens, patient monitoring, when to change therapy, and what regimens to use when changing. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION A panel with expertise in HIV research and clinical care reviewed relevant data published or presented at selected scientific conferences since the last panel report through April 2010. Data were identified through a PubMed search, review of scientific conference abstracts, and requests to antiretroviral drug manufacturers for updated clinical trials and adverse event data. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS New evidence was reviewed by the panel. Recommendations were drafted by section writing committees and reviewed and edited by the entire panel. The quality and strength of the evidence were rated and recommendations were made by full panel consensus. CONCLUSIONS Patient readiness for treatment should be confirmed before initiation of antiretroviral treatment. Therapy is recommended for asymptomatic patients with a CD4 cell count < or = 500/microL, for all symptomatic patients, and those with specific conditions and comorbidities. Therapy should be considered for asymptomatic patients with CD4 cell count > 500/microL. Components of the initial and subsequent regimens must be individualized, particularly in the context of concurrent conditions. Patients receiving antiretroviral treatment should be monitored regularly; treatment failure should be detected and managed early, with the goal of therapy, even in heavily pretreated patients, being HIV-1 RNA suppression below commercially available assay quantification limits.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 90 homosexual men: relation to generalized lymphadenopathy and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

We describe the histologic and clinical features of non-Hodgkins lymphoma diagnosed between January 1980 and December 1983 in 90 homosexual men from San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, and New York. The median age was 37 years, with an age distribution identical to that for cases of AIDS reported to the Centers for Disease Control. Sixty-two per cent of the patients had high-grade (aggressive) subtypes of lymphoma, 29 per cent had subtypes of intermediate grade, and 7 per cent had low-grade subtypes. Histologic subtypes and malignant cell phenotypes were consistent with a B-cell origin. All but two men had extranodal lymphoma: central-nervous-system, bone-marrow, bowel, and mucocutaneous sites were most commonly involved. Thirty-five of 66 evaluable men (53 per cent) had complete responses to combination chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both, and thus far, 19 (54 per cent) of them have had a relapse. Mortality and morbidity were closely related to prodromal manifestations; death or illness have occurred in 19 (91 per cent) of the 21 men who presented with AIDS, in 26 (79 per cent) of the 33 who presented with generalized lymphadenopathy, and in 5 (42 per cent) of the 12 who had no prodromal manifestations. Mortality rates analyzed according to histologic grade were higher than currently reported rates in other patient populations. Kaposis sarcoma or severe opportunistic infections characteristic of AIDS developed in 14 of 33 men (42 per cent) who presented with generalized lymphadenopathy and in 3 of 12 (33 per cent) without prodromal manifestations. We conclude that non-Hodgkins lymphoma in members of an AIDS risk group is a serious manifestation of AIDS and the AIDS-related complex.

Antiretroviral Treatment of Adult HIV Infection2008 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society–USA Panel

CONTEXT The availability of new antiretroviral drugs and formulations, including drugs in new classes, and recent data on treatment choices for antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients warrant an update of the International AIDS Society-USA guidelines for the use of antiretroviral therapy in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. OBJECTIVES To summarize new data in the field and to provide current recommendations for the antiretroviral management and laboratory monitoring of HIV infection. This report provides guidelines in key areas of antiretroviral management: when to initiate therapy, choice of initial regimens, patient monitoring, when to change therapy, and how best to approach treatment options, including optimal use of recently approved drugs (maraviroc, raltegravir, and etravirine) in treatment-experienced patients. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION A 14-member panel with expertise in HIV research and clinical care was appointed. Data published or presented at selected scientific conferences since the last panel report (August 2006) through June 2008 were identified. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data that changed the previous guidelines were reviewed by the panel (according to section). Guidelines were drafted by section writing committees and were then reviewed and edited by the entire panel. Recommendations were made by panel consensus. CONCLUSIONS New data and considerations support initiating therapy before CD4 cell count declines to less than 350/microL. In patients with 350 CD4 cells/microL or more, the decision to begin therapy should be individualized based on the presence of comorbidities, risk factors for progression to AIDS and non-AIDS diseases, and patient readiness for treatment. In addition to the prior recommendation that a high plasma viral load (eg, >100,000 copies/mL) and rapidly declining CD4 cell count (>100/microL per year) should prompt treatment initiation, active hepatitis B or C virus coinfection, cardiovascular disease risk, and HIV-associated nephropathy increasingly prompt earlier therapy. The initial regimen must be individualized, particularly in the presence of comorbid conditions, but usually will include efavirenz or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine). Treatment failure should be identified and managed promptly, with the goal of therapy, even in heavily pretreated patients, being an HIV-1 RNA level below assay detection limits.

The Safety and Efficacy of Zidovudine (AZT) in the Treatment of Subjects with Mildly Symptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV) Infection: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zidovudine early in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection. DESIGN A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with subject stratification by pretreatment CD4 T lymphocyte counts. SETTING Multicenter trial at AIDS Clinical Trial units. SUBJECTS Seven hundred eleven subjects with mildly symptomatic HIV infection. INTERVENTION Three hundred fifty-one subjects were assigned to placebo and 360 to zidovudine, 200 mg orally every 4 hours. The median duration of follow-up was 11 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Fifty-one subjects developed the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), advanced AIDS-related complex, or death as a first critical event. For the stratum of subjects with more than 200 but less than 500 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3 before treatment, 34 events occurred in placebo recipients and 12 in zidovudine recipients (P = 0.0002; relative risk [RR] estimate, 3.23 [95% CI, 1.67 to 6.24]). For the stratum of subjects with 500 to 799 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3 before treatment, 2 events occurred in placebo recipients and 3 in zidovudine recipients. Candidiasis at study entry independently increased the risk for having an event (P = 0.005; RR estimate, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.29 to 4.12]); HIV antigenemia at study entry also increased this risk (P = 0.01; RR estimate, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.2 to 3.8]). Significant differences between the treatment groups in CD4 T-lymphocyte counts occurred in subjects with more than 200 but less than 500 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3 after 4 weeks of therapy (P = 0.002). Differences persisted through week 52. Less prominent changes occurred in subjects with 500 or more CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3. Serum levels of HIV antigen decreased significantly in zidovudine recipients. Serious anemia and neutropenia occurred in 5% and 4% of zidovudine recipients, respectively, and in 0% and 1% of placebo recipients, respectively. CONCLUSION Zidovudine delayed progression of HIV disease and produced little toxicity in subjects with mildly symptomatic HIV disease and less than 500 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3.

Doxorubicin Encapsulated in Liposomes Containing Surface‐Bound Polyethylene Glycol: Pharmacokinetics, Tumor Localization, and Safety in Patients with AIDS‐Related Kaposi's Sarcoma

A study of the plasma pharmacokinetics, tumor localization, and safety of a single dose of doxorubicin encapsulated in liposomes containing surface‐bound polyethylene glycol (PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin) was conducted in patients with Kaposis sarcoma (KS) as a manifestation of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Eighteen patients with AIDS‐KS diagnosed by examination of biopsy specimens were randomly assigned to receive either standard doxorubicin or PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin. Consecutive participants were entered at three dose levels (10, 20, and 40 mg/m2) in ascending fashion. Clearance of PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin was 0.034 L/h/m2 to 0.108 L/h/m2, volume of distribution (Vd) was 2.2 L/m2 to 4.4 L/m2, and half‐lives (t1/2) of the initial decline in the plasma concentration—time curve and of the terminal decline were 3.77 hours and 41.3 hours, respectively. Seventy‐two hours after administration, doxorubicin levels observed in lesions of patients receiving PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin were 5.2 to 11.4 times greater than those found in patients given comparable doses of standard doxorubicin. PEG‐liposomal doxorubicin and standard doxorubicin were roughly equipotent in producing toxicity. Encapsulation in liposomes containing surface‐bound PEG significantly limits the distribution and elimination of doxorubicin, results in greater accumulation of the drug in KS lesions 72 hours after dosing than does standard doxorubicin, and may improve drug efficacy and therapeutic index in the treatment of AIDS‐KS.

A Controlled Trial Comparing Continued Zidovudine with Didanosine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

BACKGROUND Although zidovudine is effective in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, its efficacy may decline with prolonged use. Didanosine is another inhibitor of HIV reverse transcriptase. We evaluated the effectiveness of changing anti-HIV treatment from zidovudine to didanosine. METHODS This multicenter, double-blind study involved 913 patients who had tolerated zidovudine for at least 16 weeks. The patients had the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), AIDS-related complex with less than or equal to 300 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter, or asymptomatic HIV infection with less than or equal to 200 CD4 cells per cubic milliliter. They were randomly assigned to receive 600 mg per day of zidovudine, 750 mg per day of didanosine, or 500 mg per day of didanosine. RESULTS There were significantly fewer new AIDS-defining events and deaths among the 298 subjects assigned to 500 mg per day of didanosine than among the subjects who continued to receive zidovudine (relative risk, 1.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.82; P = 0.015). With 750 mg of didanosine, there was no clear benefit over zidovudine (relative risk, 1.10; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.42). The efficacy of didanosine was unrelated to the duration of previous zidovudine treatment. In the two didanosine groups, there were improvements in the number of CD4 cells (P less than 0.001 for both groups) and in p24 antigen levels (P = 0.03 in the 500-mg group; P = 0.005 in the 750-mg group), as compared with the zidovudine group. CONCLUSIONS Changing treatment from zidovudine to 500 mg per day of didanosine appears to slow the progression of HIV disease.

Antiretroviral therapy and management of HIV infection

Antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection has changed a uniformly fatal into a potentially chronic disease. There are now 17 drugs in common use for HIV treatment. Patients who can access and adhere to combination therapy should be able to achieve durable, potentially lifelong suppression of HIV replication. Despite the unquestioned success of antiretroviral therapy, limitations persist. Treatment success needs strict lifelong drug adherence. Although the widely used drugs are generally well tolerated, most have some short-term toxic effects and all have the potential for both known and unknown long-term toxic effects. Drug and administration costs limit treatment in resource-poor regions, and are a growing concern even in resource rich settings. Finally, complete or near complete control of viral replication does not fully restore health. Long-term treated patients who are on an otherwise effective regimen often show persistent immune dysfunction and have higher than expected risk for various non-AIDS-related complications, including heart, bone, liver, kidney, and neurocognitive diseases.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole or Pentamidine for Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Forty patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and their first episodes of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were assigned at random to receive either trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or pentamidine isethionate. The two groups did not differ significantly in the severity of pulmonary or systemic processes at enrollment. Five patients treated initially with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and one patient treated initially with pentamidine died during the 21-day treatment period (p = 0.09, Fishers exact test). No significant differences were seen between groups in rates of improvement, pulmonary function tests, or 67Ga uptake by the lungs in the survivors at completion of therapy. Adverse reactions necessitated changing from the initial drug in 10 patients in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 11 in the pentamidine group. Minor reactions occurred in all patients. In patients with AIDS, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and pentamidine do not have statistically significant differences in efficacy or frequency of adverse reactions.

Recombinant Alpha-2 Interferon Therapy for Kaposi's Sarcoma Associated with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

In a randomized prospective study we tested the toxicity and efficacy of recombinant alpha-2 interferon in the treatment of Kaposis sarcoma associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. High doses (50 X 10(6) U/m2 body surface area, intravenously) or low doses (1 X 10(6) U/m2, subcutaneously) of recombinant alpha-2 interferon were administered to 20 patients for 5 days/wk, every other week, for four treatment cycles. Therapy was well tolerated subjectively and caused only mild hematologic and hepatic toxicity at both dose levels. No consistent or sustained changes were seen in immunologic variables during or after treatment. Six patients with Kaposis sarcoma, four at high dose and two at low dose, had objective responses (complete or partial) to treatment. However, therapy did not appear to eradicate cytomegalovirus carriage or prevent opportunistic infections related to cytomegalovirus.