Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul Andrew Johnson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul Andrew Johnson.


Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership | 2012

School Board Governance The Times They Are A-Changin’

Paul Andrew Johnson

Do school boards have a role in student achievement? Recent research suggests that they do. This case study identifies 12 board of education governance practices associated with higher levels of student achievement. The relationship between these board governance practices and the role of the board in district leadership is examined in the context of Superintendent Smith’s change initiative.


Leadership and Policy in Schools | 2013

Campaign Expenditures in School Levy Referenda and Their Relationship to Voter Approval: Evidence From Ohio, 2007–2010

William Kyle Ingle; Paul Andrew Johnson; Matt Ryan Givens; Jerry Rampelt

Abstract Using logistic regression, this study sought to understand the relationship between district characteristics, district finances, levy characteristics, and campaign expenditures with new operating levy outcomes. We found that employee benefits as a percentage of the districts budget were negatively associated with levy outcomes, while salaries were positively associated with levy outcomes, suggesting that voters may be more sensitive to retirement and healthcare benefits than salaries when voting. While campaign spending was related to levy success, types of expenditures were largely insignificant. School district personnel must be cognizant of the local conditions in crafting campaigns and recruiting community stakeholders.


Educational Administration Quarterly | 2012

Hired Guns and "Legitimate Voices": The Politics and Participants of Levy Campaigns in Five Ohio School Districts.

William Kyle Ingle; Paul Andrew Johnson; Ruth Ann Petroff

Background: In Ohio, levy campaigns are a burdensome task for district administrators and stakeholders alike. To date, there is little research on the districts’ role in crafting school budget referenda campaigns. Purpose: This study asked three research questions: How did the macropolitical contexts shape stakeholders’ decision making in terms of campaign strategizing and participation? How did the micropolitical contexts shape stakeholder decision making in terms of campaign strategizing and participation? How did successful districts differ in political strategies from districts that were not successful? Research Design: Qualitative case studies. Data Collection: Twenty-three informants from five Ohio school districts with levies on the November 2008 ballot. Using a snowball sampling technique, initial informants (i.e., superintendent, treasurer) were asked to identify additional stakeholders who participated in the campaigns. Data Analysis: Coding was initially guided by multiple theoretical frameworks, including macro/micropolitics, Johnson’s 21 campaign strategies and Anderson’s framework of “authentic” participation. After coding, an iterative team memo-writing process was used. Findings: This study offers important insight into the complexities of the environments and strategies used in levy campaigns. Four macropolitical themes were identified—state campaign policies, state education finance policy, the high-profile nature of the Presidential election, and the state of the economy. Despite a small sample, districts varied greatly in strategies used and community involvement. Districts that heavily engaged community members and created a sense of urgency yielded greater success at the polls than “central office campaigns.” Adequate message training for campaign participants was also integral to success.


Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership | 2009

And the Survey Says: The Case for Community Engagement

Paul Andrew Johnson

Often superintendents and boards of education employ an expert-based, school-centered, “decide and defend” decision making approach when dealing with critical school district issues. In the case presented here, involving what to do with an historic school building, it is an approach that did not yield the result the superintendent or board of education anticipated. This case gives prospective administrators an opportunity to contrast a “decide and defend” approach to decision-making with a community engagement approach. The teaching notes highlight the essential elements of effective community engagement and conclude with a culminating activity that asks students to identify a critical issue in their school district and outline a community engagement plan to address it.


Journal of College Teaching & Learning | 2011

Actively Pursuing Knowledge In The College Classroom

Paul Andrew Johnson


Journal of School Public Relations | 2009

Campaign Strategies and Voter Approval of School Referenda: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Paul Andrew Johnson; William Kyle Ingle


Journal of School Public Relations | 2008

Try, Try, Again: A Two-Step Strategy for Passing School Levies.

Paul Andrew Johnson


Journal of Education Finance | 2011

Estimating Resource Costs of Levy Campaigns in Five Ohio School Districts.

W. Kyle Ingle; Ruth Ann Petroff; Paul Andrew Johnson


ERS spectrum | 2008

Community Engagement? Let's Dance!.

Paul Andrew Johnson


Mid-Western educational researcher | 2011

A "Tale of Two Cities:" A Comparative Case Study of Community Engagement and Costs in Two Levy Campaigns.

W. Kyle Ingle; Paul Andrew Johnson; Ruth Ann Petroff

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul Andrew Johnson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William Kyle Ingle

Bowling Green State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ruth Ann Petroff

Bowling Green State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matt Ryan Givens

Bowling Green State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge