Paul B. Lester
United States Military Academy
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul B. Lester.
Human Resource Development Review | 2006
Fred Luthans; Gretchen R. Vogelgesang; Paul B. Lester
In these turbulent times, we propose the importance of developing the psychological capital dimension of resiliency. After providing the theoretical background and meaning of psychological capital in general and resiliency in particular, the authors present proactive and reactive human resource development (HRD) strategies for its development. The proactive HRD includes increasing psychological assets, decreasing risk factors, and facilitating processes that allow human resources to enhance their resilience. The reactive HRD largely draws from a broaden-and-build model of positive emotions and self-enhancement, external attribution, and hardiness. The article includes specific guidelines for HRD applications and an agenda for future needed research.
The Journal of Positive Psychology | 2007
Sean T. Hannah; Patrick J. Sweeney; Paul B. Lester
This paper presents a new model outlining the subjective experience of courage. Various positive psychological states and traits are proposed to reduce the level of fear experienced when facing risk, that join with an individuals core values and beliefs to create a courageous mindset which, bolstered by affirming normative and informational social forces, promotes courageous action. Finally, intrapersonal attribution processes are proposed to influence self-perceptions of courageousness and that, through self-reflection, reinforce the courageous mindset, perpetuating future courageous action.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies | 2009
Bruce J. Avolio; Ketan H. Mhatre; Steven M. Norman; Paul B. Lester
A total of 57 intervention-based leadership studies that included sufficient data on leader and follower gender were included in this meta-analysis. By intervention, the authors mean any study where the researcher overtly manipulated leadership as the independent variable through training, assignment, scenarios, or other means. Results showed a significant difference in the effect sizes for leadership interventions conducted with all-male and majority-male participants versus all-female and majority-female participant studies; however, these differences varied based on the setting of the intervention, the theoretical basis of the intervention, and the type of outcome. Implications for further research on gender differences with respect to examining cause—effect impact of leadership interventions are discussed.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies | 2015
Dina V. Krasikova; Paul B. Lester; Peter D. Harms
Luthans, Youssef, Sweetman, and Harms proposed a holistic approach to psychological capital that involves examining psychological capital and its effects across multiple life domains, including work, relationships, and health. This article focuses on the effects of psychological capital on objective health outcomes. Using data from a sample of 1,889 U.S. Army soldiers, we demonstrate that soldiers with higher levels of psychological capital prior to deployment were less likely to receive diagnoses for mental health problems and substance abuse postdeployment. In addition, the effects of psychological capital on mental health diagnoses were mediated by soldiers’ overall health perceptions.
Archive | 2013
Peter D. Harms; Dina V. Krasikova; Adam J. Vanhove; Mitchel N. Herian; Paul B. Lester
This chapter examines the role of stress and emotional well-being as critical antecedents of important outcomes in the military context. In it, we provide a framework for understanding the sources of stress among military personnel. Using this model, we review the risk factors associated with combat and deployment cycles in addition to protective factors, such as personality characteristics and social support, which mitigate the effects of stress on emotional well-being and performance. Finally, we evaluate efforts by military organizations to enhance the emotional well-being of service members through training programs designed to build resiliency.
The Journal of Positive Psychology | 2015
Paul B. Lester; Peter D. Harms; Mitchel N. Herian; Walter Sowden
The US Army launched the Global Assessment Tool (GAT) – a 105-item psychometric instrument taken by approximately one million soldiers annually – in October, 2009 in support of a population-wide resilience development initiative known as the Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness (CSF2) program. The lead developer of the GAT was Chris Peterson, and his work on this project – along with that of Nansook Park and Colonel Carl Castro – will likely leave an important and indelible mark on not only the Army, but also the field of military psychology. In this paper, we provide more detail on the history and components of the GAT. In addition, we demonstrate the practical utility of the GAT by showing that high-performing soldiers (soldiers who attained Ranger status) have relatively high GAT scores, and that soldiers with behavioral problems generally evidence low GAT scores. We conclude by discussing future directions of GAT methodology and usage in support of research.
Leadership Quarterly | 2009
Sean T. Hannah; Paul B. Lester
Academy of Management Learning and Education | 2011
Paul B. Lester; Sean T. Hannah; Peter D. Harms; Gretchen R. Vogelgesang; Bruce J. Avolio
Archive | 2005
Sean T. Hannah; Paul B. Lester; Gretchen Vogelgesang Lester
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology | 2016
Adam J. Vanhove; Mitchel N. Herian; Alycia L. U. Perez; Peter D. Harms; Paul B. Lester