Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul B. Paulus is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul B. Paulus.


Applied Psychology | 2000

Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups

Paul B. Paulus

On voit apparaitre une nouvelle litte´rature traitant de la cre´ativite´ et de l’innovation dans les groupes et les e´quipes. Bien que de nombreaux facteurs inhibent la cre´ativite´ des groupes, nos investigations et analyses indiquent que l’interaction dans les groupes et e´quipes serait une source fe´conde d’innovations et d’ide´es cre´atives. On pre´sente dans cet article un mode`le the´orique de la cre´ativite´ dans les groupes producteurs d’ide´es et l’impact sur le travail en e´quipe et les recherches a` venir. There is an emerging literature on group and team creativity and innovation. Although there are many factors that appear to inhibit creativity in groups, our review and analysis suggests that interaction in groups and teams can be an important source of creative ideas and innovations. A theoretical model of creativity in idea-generating groups is developed and implications for teamwork and future research are presented.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 1993

Social Influence Processes in Group Brainstorming

Paul B. Paulus; Mary T. Dzindolet

A series of studies examined the role of social influence processes in group brainstorming. Two studies with pairs and 1 with groups of 4 revealed that the performance of participants in interactive groups is more similar than the performance of those in nominal groups. A 4th study demonstrated that performance levels in an initial group session predicted performance on a different problem 2 sessions later. In a 5th study it was found that the productivity gap between an interactive and nominal group could be eliminated by giving interactive group members a performance standard comparable with the typical performance of nominal groups


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 1995

The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming

L. Mabel Camacho; Paul B. Paulus

The authors predicted that individuals high in dispositional anxiousness would perform poorly when brainstorming in groups but not during solitary brainstorming. Experiment 1 demonstrated this result in a comparison of groups of 4 that were all high or all low in interaction anxiousness. In groups with 2 low-anxious and 2 high-anxious individuals, the low-anxious individuals lowered their performance in the direction of the high-anxious individuals. These results suggest that part of the productivity loss observed in interactive brainstorming groups may be due to the inhibited performance of individuals who are uncomfortable with group interaction. Moreover, these individuals may influence others in the group to lower their performance in line with that inhibited performance level. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the poor performance in line with that inhibited performance level. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the poor performance of socially anxious groups in interactive brainstorming is not dependent on whether group members have individual microphones or share 1 common microphone


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2000

Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming.

Karen Leggett Dugosh; Paul B. Paulus; Evelyn J. Roland; Huei Chuan Yang

Research on group brainstorming has demonstrated that it is less effective for generating large numbers of ideas than individual brainstorming, yet various scholars have presumed that group idea sharing should enhance cognitive stimulation and idea production. Three experiments examined the potential of cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Experiments 1 and 2 used a paradigm in which individuals were exposed to ideas on audiotape as they were brainstorming, and Experiment 3 used the electronic brainstorming paradigm. Evidence was obtained for enhanced idea generation both during and after idea exposure. The attentional set of the participant and the content of the exposure manipulation (number of ideas, presence of irrelevant information) influenced this effect. These results are consistent with a cognitive perspective on group brainstorming.


Small Group Research | 1998

Modeling Cognitive Interactions During Group Brainstorming

Vincent R. Brown; Michael Tumeo; Timothy S. Larey; Paul B. Paulus

Despite laboratory evidence that group brainstormers produce fewer ideas than individual brainstormers, brainstorming groups remain popular in business and industry. Here the authors present a model of the cognitive factors involved in group idea generation. Simulations suggest that group interaction should be beneficial when one group member primes another into thinking of ideas they would not have considered alone, at least not in the context of the task at hand. Many concepts relevant to group cognition can be defined within the model framework (stochastic transition matrices) including fluency, flexibility, category accessibility, convergent/divergent thinking, attention to partners, and the relationship between the knowledge structures of the brainstorming participants. Attention plays a crucial role in the model, linking together individuals in a brainstorming group. Simulations also suggest that convergent group behavior may be the result ofcognitivefactors in addition to the socialfactors outlined by a number of researchers.


Current Directions in Psychological Science | 2002

Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective

Vincent R. Brown; Paul B. Paulus

Much literature on group brainstorming has found it to be less effective than individual brainstorming. However, a cognitive perspective suggests that group brainstorming could be an effective technique for generating creative ideas. Computer simulations of an associative memory model of idea generation in groups suggest that groups have the potential to generate ideas that individuals brainstorming alone are less likely to generate. Exchanging ideas by means of writing or computers, alternating solitary and group brainstorming, and using heterogeneous groups appear to be useful approaches for enhancing group brainstorming.


Basic and Applied Social Psychology | 1995

Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting

Paul B. Paulus; Timothy S. Larey; Anita H. Ortega

Employees of a corporation who had undergone considerable training for effective teamwork were asked to brainstorm about a job-relevant issue in groups of four or alone. One half of the groups brainstormed alone first, and the other half brainstormed as a group before brainstorming alone. Participants were also asked to rate their performance and indicate whether they would perform better in groups or alone on a brainstorming task. Consistent with past laboratory research, groups generated only about half as many ideas as a similar number of individuals (nominal group), and group brainstorming led to more favorable perceptions of individual performance. Participants also believed that they would brainstorm more effectively in a group than alone. These results indicate that productivity losses in brainstorming groups are not restricted to laboratory groups. Such losses occur even in groups who work together on a daily basis, have considerable training in group dynamics, and are dealing with a job-relevant issue. The sequence of alone to group brainstorming did not influence overall productivity. The relation of this research to that of facilitated and electronic brainstorming is discussed.


Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 1971

Anticipated evaluation and audience presence in the enhancement of dominant responses

Paul B. Paulus; Peter Murdoch

Abstract Recent studies have shown that the presence of an audience enhances the emission of dominant responses in individual performance. The present study tested the hypothesis that anticipated evaluation is essential to this enhancement of dominant responses. Audience presence (absent or present) and anticipated evaluation (absent or present) were varied in a 2 × 2 factorial design. In each condition 18 subjects performed a pseudorecognition task, using responses based on habits of varying strengths established in prior training. The hypothesis was supported in that anticipated evaluation of performance produced greater emission of dominant responses than no anticipation of evaluation. The presence or absence of an audience did not significantly affect the emission of dominant responses.


Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice | 2006

Effects of task instructions and brief breaks on brainstorming.

Paul B. Paulus; Toshihiko Nakui; Vicky L. Putman; Vincent R. Brown

Experiment 1 examined the effects of additional brainstorming rules for groups and looked at whether the presence of a facilitator who actively enforced the rules of brainstorming was beneficial. Experiments 2 and 3 examined whether the additional rules and brief breaks were beneficial to individual brainwriters and electronic brainstormers working alone. Clear benefits of the additional rules were found under a variety of conditions. The presence of a facilitator to enforce the rules enhanced the efficiency of idea generation (number of words used to express ideas) but not the number of ideas generated. There appears to be a small benefit to taking breaks in brainwriting sessions, but the benefit of breaks is reduced or eliminated in electronic brainstorming sessions.


Small Group Research | 2004

The Functional Perspective as a Lens for Understanding Groups

Gwen M. Wittenbaum; Andrea B. Hollingshead; Paul B. Paulus; Randy Y. Hirokawa; Deborah Ancona; Randall S. Peterson; Karen A. Jehn; Kay Yoon

The functional perspective is a normative approach to describing and predicting group performance that focuses on the functions of inputs and/or processes. The aim of theory and research from this perspective is to understand why some groups are successful and others are not. This article investigates theory and, to a lesser extent, research of small groups based on the functional perspective. The authors present the underlying theoretical assumptions and review theories that fit into the functional perspective from several representative areas of research. They conclude by outlining notable strengths and weaknesses associated with viewing groups from this perspective and propose some directions for future theory development.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul B. Paulus's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Garvin McCain

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas W. Kohn

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Verne C. Cox

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Runa M. Korde

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali A. Minai

University of Cincinnati

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonali Baruah

Southern Methodist University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jared B. Kenworthy

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge