Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul C. Hanson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul C. Hanson.


Conservation Ecology | 1999

Ecological and Social Dynamics in Simple Models of Ecosystem Management

Stephen R. Carpenter; William A. Brock; Paul C. Hanson

Simulation models were developed to explore and illustrate dynamics of socioecological systems. The ecosystem is a lake subject to phosphorus pollution. Phosphorus flows from agriculture to upland soils, to surface waters, where it cycles between water and sediments. The ecosystem is multistable, and moves among domains of attraction depending on the history of pollutant inputs. The alternative states yield different economic benefits. Agents form expectations about ecosystem dynamics, markets, and/or the actions of managers, and choose levels of pollutant inputs accordingly. Agents have heterogeneous beliefs and/or access to information. Their aggregate behavior determines the total rate of pollutant input. As the ecosystem changes, agents update their beliefs and expectations about the world they co−create, and modify their actions accordingly. For a wide range of scenarios, we observe irregular oscillations among ecosystem states and patterns of agent behavior. These oscillations resemble some features of the adaptive cycle of panarchy theory.


PLOS ONE | 2011

Fate of allochthonous dissolved organic carbon in lakes: a quantitative approach.

Paul C. Hanson; David P. Hamilton; Emily H. Stanley; Nicholas D. Preston; Owen C. Langman; Emily L. Kara

Inputs of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to lakes derived from the surrounding landscape can be stored, mineralized or passed to downstream ecosystems. The balance among these OC fates depends on a suite of physical, chemical, and biological processes within the lake, as well as the degree of recalcintrance of the allochthonous DOC load. The relative importance of these processes has not been well quantified due to the complex nature of lakes, as well as challenges in scaling DOC degradation experiments under controlled conditions to the whole lake scale. We used a coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model to simulate broad ranges in lake area and DOC, two characteristics important to processing allochthonous carbon through their influences on lake temperature, mixing depth and hydrology. We calibrated the model to four lakes from the North Temperate Lakes Long Term Ecological Research site, and simulated an additional 12 ‘hypothetical’ lakes to fill the gradients in lake size and DOC concentration. For each lake, we tested several mineralization rates (range: 0.001 d−1 to 0.010 d−1) representative of the range found in the literature. We found that mineralization rates at the ecosystem scale were roughly half the values from laboratory experiments, due to relatively cool water temperatures and other lake-specific factors that influence water temperature and hydrologic residence time. Results from simulations indicated that the fate of allochthonous DOC was controlled primarily by the mineralization rate and the hydrologic residence time. Lakes with residence times <1 year exported approximately 60% of the DOC, whereas lakes with residence times >6 years mineralized approximately 60% of the DOC. DOC fate in lakes can be determined with a few relatively easily measured factors, such as lake morphometry, residence time, and temperature, assuming we know the recalcitrance of the DOC.


BioScience | 2007

Understanding Regional Change: A Comparison of Two Lake Districts

Stephen R. Carpenter; Barbara J. Benson; Reinette Biggs; Jonathan Chipman; Jonathan A. Foley; Shaun A. Golding; Roger B. Hammer; Paul C. Hanson; Pieter T. J. Johnson; Amy M. Kamarainen; Timothy K. Kratz; Richard C. Lathrop; Katherine D. McMahon; Bill Provencher; James A. Rusak; Christopher T. Solomon; Emily H. Stanley; Monica G. Turner; M. Jake Vander Zanden; Chin-Hsien Wu; Hengliang Yuan

ABSTRACT We compared long-term change in two lake districts, one in a forested rural setting and the other in an urbanizing agricultural region, using lakes as sentinel ecosystems. Human population growth and land-use change are important drivers of ecosystem change in both regions. Biotic changes such as habitat loss, species invasions, and poorer fishing were prevalent in the rural region, and lake hydrology and biogeochemistry responded to climate trends and landscape position. Similar biotic changes occurred in the urbanizing agricultural region, where human-caused changes in hydrology and biogeochemistry had conspicuous effects. Feedbacks among ecosystem dynamics, human uses, economics, social dynamics, and policy and practice are fundamental to understanding change in these lake districts. Sustained support for interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to build understanding of regional change.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2014

Creating and maintaining high‐performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills

Kendra Spence Cheruvelil; Patricia A. Soranno; Kathleen C. Weathers; Paul C. Hanson; Simon Goring; Christopher T. Filstrup; Emily K. Read

Collaborative research teams are a necessary and desirable component of most scientific endeavors. Effective collaborative teams exhibit important research outcomes, far beyond what could be accomplished by individuals working independently. These teams are made up of researchers who are committed to a common purpose, approach, and performance goals for which they hold themselves mutually accountable. We call such collaborations “high-performing collaborative research teams”. Here, we share lessons learned from our collective experience working with a wide range of collaborative teams and structure those lessons within a framework developed from literature in business, education, and a relatively new discipline, “science of team science”. We propose that high-performing collaborative research teams are created and maintained when team diversity (broadly defined) is effectively fostered and interpersonal skills are taught and practiced. Finally, we provide some strategies to foster team functioning and make recommendations for improving the collaborative culture in ecology.


Ecological Monographs | 2006

LAKE DISSOLVED INORGANIC CARBON AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN: CHANGING DRIVERS FROM DAYS TO DECADES

Paul C. Hanson; Stephen R. Carpenter; David E. Armstrong; Emily H. Stanley; Timothy K. Kratz

Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and dissolved oxygen (DO) are commonly measured to compute metabolism of aquatic ecosystems. However, concentrations of DIC and DO depend on many factors in addition to ecosystem metabolism, such as water temperature, gas exchange with the atmosphere, abiotic chemical reactions, and inputs in precipitation, groundwater, and surface water. We used 20-year time series from seven lakes to understand how DIC and DO concentrations are controlled as a function of time scale. Diel cycles of both solutes are controlled primarily by metabolism, exchange with the atmosphere, and temperature. At seasonal and annual scales, metabolism is important, but physical processes associated with spring and autumn mixing, as well as solute loading from the watershed, have comparably large effects. At decadal scales, effects of metabolism are negligible. Controls of the two solutes diverge, with variance in DIC explained largely by solute inputs and variance in DO explained largely by water temperature. Like other indicators in many ecosystems, variability of DIC and DO is strongly scale dependent and associated with different drivers depending on the time scale of the analysis.


Hydrobiologia | 2012

A community-based framework for aquatic ecosystem models

Dennis Trolle; David P. Hamilton; Matthew R. Hipsey; Karsten Bolding; Jorn Bruggeman; Wolf M. Mooij; Jan H. Janse; Anders Lade Nielsen; Erik Jeppesen; J. Alex Elliott; Vardit Makler-Pick; Thomas Petzoldt; Karsten Rinke; Mogens Flindt; George B. Arhonditsis; Gideon Gal; Rikke Bjerring; Koji Tominaga; Jochem 't Hoen; Andrea S. Downing; David Manuel Lelinho da Motta Marques; Carlos Ruberto Fragoso; Martin Søndergaard; Paul C. Hanson

Here, we communicate a point of departure in the development of aquatic ecosystem models, namely a new community-based framework, which supports an enhanced and transparent union between the collective expertise that exists in the communities of traditional ecologists and model developers. Through a literature survey, we document the growing importance of numerical aquatic ecosystem models while also noting the difficulties, up until now, of the aquatic scientific community to make significant advances in these models during the past two decades. Through a common forum for aquatic ecosystem modellers we aim to (i) advance collaboration within the aquatic ecosystem modelling community, (ii) enable increased use of models for research, policy and ecosystem-based management, (iii) facilitate a collective framework using common (standardised) code to ensure that model development is incremental, (iv) increase the transparency of model structure, assumptions and techniques, (v) achieve a greater understanding of aquatic ecosystem functioning, (vi) increase the reliability of predictions by aquatic ecosystem models, (vii) stimulate model inter-comparisons including differing model approaches, and (viii) avoid ‘re-inventing the wheel’, thus accelerating improvements to aquatic ecosystem models. We intend to achieve this as a community that fosters interactions amongst ecologists and model developers. Further, we outline scientific topics recently articulated by the scientific community, which lend themselves well to being addressed by integrative modelling approaches and serve to motivate the progress and implementation of an open source model framework.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2014

CO2 and CH4 emissions from streams in a lake‐rich landscape: Patterns, controls, and regional significance

John T. Crawford; Noah R. Lottig; Emily H. Stanley; John F. Walker; Paul C. Hanson; Jacques C. Finlay; Robert G. Striegl

Aquatic ecosystems are important components of landscape carbon budgets. In lake-rich landscapes, both lakes and streams may be important sources of carbon gases (CO2 and CH4) to the atmosphere, but the processes that control gas concentrations and emissions in these interconnected landscapes have not been adequately addressed. We use multiple data sets that vary in their spatial and temporal extent during 2001–2012 to investigate the carbon gas source strength of streams in a lake-rich landscape and to determine the contribution of lakes, metabolism, and groundwater to stream CO2 and CH4. We show that streams emit roughly the same mass of CO2 (23.4 Gg C yr−1; 0.49 mol CO2 m−2 d−1) as lakes at a regional scale (27 Gg C yr−1) and that stream CH4 emissions (189 Mg C yr−1; 8.46 mmol CH4 m−2 d−1) are an important component of the regional greenhouse gas balance. Gas transfer velocity variability (range = 0.34 to 13.5 m d−1) contributed to the variability of gas flux in this landscape. Groundwater inputs and in-stream metabolism control stream gas supersaturation at the landscape scale, while carbon cycling in lakes and deep groundwaters does not control downstream gas emissions. Our results indicate the need to consider connectivity of all aquatic ecosystems (lakes, streams, wetlands, and groundwater) in lake-rich landscapes and their connections with the terrestrial environment in order to understand the full nature of the carbon cycle.


The ISME Journal | 2013

A decade of seasonal dynamics and co-occurrences within freshwater bacterioplankton communities from eutrophic Lake Mendota, WI, USA.

Emily L. Kara; Paul C. Hanson; Yu Hen Hu; Luke A. Winslow; Katherine D. McMahon

With an unprecedented decade-long time series from a temperate eutrophic lake, we analyzed bacterial and environmental co-occurrence networks to gain insight into seasonal dynamics at the community level. We found that (1) bacterial co-occurrence networks were non-random, (2) season explained the network complexity and (3) co-occurrence network complexity was negatively correlated with the underlying community diversity across different seasons. Network complexity was not related to the variance of associated environmental factors. Temperature and productivity may drive changes in diversity across seasons in temperate aquatic systems, much as they control diversity across latitude. While the implications of bacterioplankton network structure on ecosystem function are still largely unknown, network analysis, in conjunction with traditional multivariate techniques, continues to increase our understanding of bacterioplankton temporal dynamics.


Ecosystems | 2015

Integrating Landscape Carbon Cycling: Research Needs for Resolving Organic Carbon Budgets of Lakes

Paul C. Hanson; Michael L. Pace; Stephen R. Carpenter; Jonathan J. Cole; Emily H. Stanley

Based on empirical and synthetic research, lakes make, store, and mineralize organic carbon (OC) at rates that are significant and relevant to regional and global carbon budgets. Although some global-scale studies have examined specific processes such as carbon burial and CO2 exchange with the atmosphere, most studies of lake carbon cycling are from single systems, focus only on a specific habitat, and do not account for all of the major terms in OC budgets. Hence, most lake OC budgets are incomplete, leaving some key processes highly uncertain. To advance the analysis of the role of the inland waters in C-cycling, ecosystem science needs a new generation of studies that confront these shortcomings. Here we address research needs and priorities for improving OC budgets. We present ten key research questions and recommend a framework for essential ecosystem-scale studies of lake OC cycling. Answers to these ten questions will not only improve carbon budgets but also provide robust estimates of lake contributions to global and regional carbon cycling. In addition, studies of lake carbon budgets will provide relative autochthonous and allochthonous carbon fluxes, indicate sources and rates of carbon burial, improve quantification of lake-atmosphere carbon exchanges, better integrate lakes with terrestrial and lotic carbon dynamics, promote understanding of how climate and land-use change will impact lakes, and enable tests of ecological theory related to subsidies and food web stability.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2015

Small lakes show muted climate change signal in deepwater temperatures

Luke A. Winslow; Jordan S. Read; Gretchen J. A. Hansen; Paul C. Hanson

Water temperature observations were collected from 142 lakes across Wisconsin, USA, to examine variation in temperature of lakes exposed to similar regional climate. Whole lake water temperatures increased across the state from 1990 to 2012, with an average trend of 0.042°C yr−1 ± 0.01°C yr−1. In large (>0.5 km2) lakes, the positive temperature trend was similar across all depths. In small lakes ( 0.5 times the maximum lake depth. The differing response of small versus large lakes is potentially a result of wind-sheltering reducing turbulent mixing magnitude in small lakes. These results demonstrate that small lakes respond differently to climate change than large lakes, suggesting that current predictions of impacts to lakes from climate change may require modification.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul C. Hanson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jordan S. Read

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen R. Carpenter

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luke A. Winslow

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy K. Kratz

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hilary A. Dugan

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily H. Stanley

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily K. Read

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge