Paul Chambon
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul Chambon.
SAE 2011 World Congress & Exhibition | 2011
Paul Chambon; Shean Huff; Kevin Norman; K. Dean Edwards; John F. Thomas; Vitaly Y. Prikhodko
Lean Gasoline Direct Injection (LGDI) combustion is a promising technical path for achieving significant improvements in fuel efficiency while meeting future emissions requirements. Though Stoichiometric Gasoline Direct Injection (SGDI) technology is commercially available in a few vehicles on the American market, LGDI vehicles are not, but can be found in Europe. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) obtained a European BMW 1-series fitted with a 2.0l LGDI engine. The vehicle was instrumented and commissioned on a chassis dynamometer. The engine and after-treatment performance and emissions were characterized over US drive cycles (Federal Test Procedure (FTP), the Highway Fuel Economy Test (HFET), and US06 Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (US06)) and steady state mappings. The vehicle micro hybrid features (engine stop-start and intelligent alternator) were benchmarked as well during the course of that study. The data was analyzed to quantify the benefits and drawbacks of the lean gasoline direct injection and micro hybrid technologies from a fuel economy and emissions perspectives with respect to the US market. Additionally that data will be formatted to develop, substantiate, and exercise vehicle simulations with conventional and advanced powertrains.
SAE 2013 World Congress & Exhibition | 2013
Jeffrey Wishart; Richard Barney Carlson; Paul Chambon; Tyler Gray
As energy storage system (ESS) technology advances, vehicle testing in both laboratory and on-road settings is needed to characterize the performance of state-of-the-art technology and also identify areas for future improvement. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL), through its support of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity (AVTA), is collaborating with ECOtality North America and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to conduct on-road testing of advanced ESSs for the Electric Drive Advanced Battery (EDAB) project. The project objective is to test a variety of advanced ESSs that are close to commercialization in a controlled environment that simulates usage within the intended application with the variability of on-road driving to quantify the ESS capabilities, limitations, and performance fade over cycling of the ESS. To accommodate on-road testing of a wide range of ESS size, mass, and intended applications, the EDAB testbed was constructed on a mid-sized pickup truck chassis. This truck was converted into a Series Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) which enables vehicle operation consistent with any electrified vehicle. Sophisticated software algorithms were prepared and integrated into the testbed to emulate the physical characteristics and ESS demands of the intended application during on-road operation. This emulation is vital for proper ESS operation since the testbed is larger and heavier than the vehicle for which the ESS is typically designed. On-road testing is conducted over a range of ambient temperatures and driving route types ranging from ‘stop-and-go’ city driving to constant-speed highway driving. Battery laboratory cycling with standard test procedures has been conducted throughout all phases of testing to corroborate the on-road data and accurately measure the ESS degradation. The first ESS to be tested is the Type I EV Pack manufactured by EnerDel, Inc. The ESS has a Li-ion chemistry, with a mixed-oxide cathode and amorphous hard carbon anode and a rated capacity of 70 Ah (at a C/3 rate). Due to the sealed enclosure, there is no internal thermal management system (TMS). The intended application for this ESS is for a small EV. This paper will report on current results of energy consumption, city vs. highway proportions, battery throughput, and laboratory testing results. The results illustrate the performance of the unit under test and the degradation throughout. The end-of-test criteria are 100,000 miles, three years of operation, or a 23% decrease in battery capacity, whichever occurs first.
Archive | 2012
John M. Miller; Paul Chambon; Perry T. Jones; Clifford P. White
Archive | 2013
John M. Miller; Steven L Campbell; Paul Chambon; Larry Eugene Seiber; Clifford P. White
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants | 2010
James E. Parks; Vitaly Y. Prikhodko; William P. Partridge; Jae-Soon Choi; Kevin Norman; Shean Huff; Paul Chambon
SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition | 2016
Scott Curran; Paul Chambon; Randall F. Lind; Lonnie J. Love; Robert M. Wagner; Steven Whitted; David H. Smith; Brian K. Post; Ronald L. Graves; Craig A. Blue; Johney B. Green; Martin Keller
SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains | 2013
Paul Chambon; Dean Deter; David K. Irick; David H. Smith
Applied Energy | 2017
Paul Chambon; Scott Curran; Shean Huff; Lonnie J. Love; Brian K. Post; Robert M. Wagner; Roderick K Jackson; Johney B. Green
Archive | 2012
John M. Miller; Paul Chambon; Perry T. Jones; Clifford P. White
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants | 2017
John F. Thomas; Shean Huff; Brian H. West; Paul Chambon