Paul D. Biddinger

Be Prepared — The Boston Marathon and Mass-Casualty Events

The fact that there was not more loss of life in the Boston Marathon bombings is attributable in large part to the medical communitys prior efforts to build and sustain emergency-preparedness programs and to practice its response in exercises and drills.

The initial response to the Boston marathon bombing: lessons learned to prepare for the next disaster.

Objective:We discuss the strengths of the medical response to the Boston Marathon bombings that led to the excellent outcomes. Potential shortcomings were recognized, and lessons learned will provide a foundation for further improvements applicable to all institutions. Background:Multiple casualty incidents from natural or man-made incidents remain a constant global threat. Adequate preparation and the appropriate alignment of resources with immediate needs remain the key to optimal outcomes. Methods:A collaborative effort among Bostons trauma centers (2 level I adult, 3 combined level I adult/pediatric, 1 freestanding level I pediatric) examined the details and outcomes of the initial response. Each center entered its respective data into a central database (REDCap), and the data were analyzed to determine various prehospital and early in-hospital clinical and logistical parameters that collectively define the citywide medical response to the terrorist attack. Results:A total of 281 people were injured, and 127 patients received care at the participating trauma centers on that day. There were 3 (1%) immediate fatalities at the scene and no in-hospital mortality. A majority of the patients admitted (66.6%) suffered lower extremity soft tissue and bony injuries, and 31 had evidence for exsanguinating hemorrhage, with field tourniquets in place in 26 patients. Of the 75 patients admitted, 54 underwent urgent surgical intervention and 12 (22%) underwent amputation of a lower extremity. Conclusions:Adequate preparation, rapid logistical response, short transport times, immediate access to operating rooms, methodical multidisciplinary care delivery, and good fortune contributed to excellent outcomes.

Boarding Inpatients in the Emergency Department Increases Discharged Patient Length of Stay

BACKGROUND Boarding of inpatients in the Emergency Department (ED) has been widely recognized as a major contributor to ED crowding and a cause of adverse outcomes. We hypothesize that these deleterious effects extend to those patients who are discharged from the ED by increasing their length of stay (LOS). STUDY OBJECTIVES This study investigates the impact of boarding inpatients on the ED LOS of discharged patients. METHODS This retrospective, observational, cohort study investigated the association between ED boarder burden and discharged patient LOS over a 3-year period in an urban, academic tertiary care ED. Median ED LOS of 179,840 discharged patients was calculated for each quartile of the boarder burden at time of arrival, and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to summarize the relationship. Subgroup analyses were conducted, stratified by patient acuity defined by triage designation, and hour of arrival. RESULTS Overall median discharged patient ED LOS increased by boarder burden quartile (205 [95% confidence interval (CI) 203-207], 215 [95% CI 214-217], 221 [95% CI 219-223], and 221 [95% CI 219-223] min, respectively), with a Spearman correlation of 0.25 between daily total boarder burden hours and median LOS. When stratified by patient acuity and hour of arrival (11:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m.), LOS of medium-acuity patients increased significantly by boarder burden quartile (252 [95% CI 247-255], 271 [95% CI 267-275], 285 [95% CI 95% CI 278-289], and 309 [95% CI 305-315] min, respectively) with a Spearman correlation of 0.18. CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, increasing boarder burden was associated with increasing LOS of patients discharged from the ED, with the greatest effect between 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. on medium-acuity patients. This relationship between LOS and ED capacity limitation by inpatient boarders has important implications, as ED and hospital leadership increasingly focus on ED LOS as a measure of efficiency and throughput.

Use of After Action Reports (AARs) to Promote Organizational and Systems Learning in Emergency Preparedness

Many public health and healthcare organizations use formal knowledge management practices to identify and disseminate the experiences gained over time. The “lessons-learned” approach is one such example of knowledge management practice applied to the wider concept of organizational learning. In the field of emergency preparedness, the lessons-learned approach stands on the assumption that learning from experience improves practice and minimizes avoidable deaths and negative economic and social consequences of disasters. In this project, we performed a structured review of AARs to analyze how lessons learned from the response to real-incidents may be used to maximize knowledge management and quality improvement practices such as the design of public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) exercises. We chose as a source of data the “Lessons Learned Information Sharing (LLIS.gov)” system, a joined program of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security DHS and FEMA that serves as the national, online repository of lessons learned, best practices, and innovative ideas. We identified recurring challenges reported by various states and local public health agencies in the response to different types of incidents. We also strived to identify the limitations of systematic learning that can be achieved due to existing weaknesses in the way AARs are developed.

Helicopter trauma transport: an overview of recent outcomes and triage literature.

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to assess literature pertinent to outcomes benefits accrued by the use of helicopter emergency medical services for trauma transport. A previous annotated bibliography assessed literature published between 1980 and 2000. The goal of this paper is to address developments since fall 2001, and to cast recent studies in the light of earlier work in an attempt to provide a long-range overview of the relevant literature. Recent findings In the year covered by this review, we identified four papers that directly assessed the association between the helicopter emergency medical services utilization and trauma outcome, and three that addressed the closely related issue of the helicopter emergency medical services triage appropriateness. An Italian study found no benefit associated with advanced prehospital care for patients with severe head injury. A US multicenter trial assessing blunt trauma transports found a substantial mortality reduction associated with helicopter use. Two other US studies, characterized by a similar ‘natural experiment’ design of assessing mortality changes on either side of a timepoint at which the helicopter emergency medical services availability ceased, reached opposite conclusions about the benefits of the service. Recent studies addressing the helicopter emergency medical services utilization in terms of triage were characterized by varying levels of agreement with the widely held belief that this service is characterized by overtriage. Summary The preponderance of recent and previously extant evidence supports an argument that the helicopter emergency medical services transport is associated with significant benefit for some injured patients. The primary challenges at this time include the determination of which patients benefit and the elucidation of which aspects of the helicopter emergency medical services are responsible for any salutary effects of its utilization.

Supplemented Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) Improves Performance Measures in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND Emergency Department (ED) crowding is well recognized, and multiple studies have demonstrated its negative effect on patient care. STUDY OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the effect of an intervention, Supplemented Triage and Rapid Treatment (START), on standard ED performance measures. The START program complemented standard ED triage with a team of clinicians who initiated the diagnostic work-up and selectively accelerated disposition in a subset of patients. METHODS This retrospective before-after study compared performance measures over two 3-month periods (September-November 2007 and 2008) in an urban, academic tertiary care ED. Data from an electronic patient tracking system were queried over 12,936 patients pre-intervention, and 14,220 patients post-intervention. Primary outcomes included: 1) overall length of stay (LOS), 2) LOS for discharged and admitted patients, and 3) the percentage of patients who left without complete assessment (LWCA). RESULTS In the post-intervention period, patient volume increased 9% and boarder hours decreased by 1.3%. Median overall ED LOS decreased by 29 min (8%, 361 min pre-intervention, 332 min post-intervention; p < 0.001). Median LOS for discharged patients decreased by 23 min (7%, 318 min pre-intervention, 295 min post-intervention; p < 0.001), and by 31 min (7%, 431 min pre-intervention, 400 min post-intervention) for admitted patients. LWCA was decreased by 1.7% (4.1% pre-intervention, 2.4% post-intervention; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this study, a comprehensive screening and clinical care program was associated with a significant decrease in overall ED LOS, LOS for discharged and admitted patients, and rate of LWCA, despite an increase in ED patient volume.

Assessing Public Health Capabilities During Emergency Preparedness Tabletop Exercises: Reliability and Validity of a Measurement Tool

Objectives. Improving the ability of local public health agencies to respond to large-scale emergencies is an ongoing challenge. Tabletop exercises can provide an opportunity for individuals and groups to practice coordination of emergency response and evaluate performance. The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable self-assessment performance measurement tool for tabletop exercise participants. Methods. The study population comprised 179 public officials who attended three tabletop exercises in Massachusetts and Maine between September 2005 and November 2006. A 42-item questionnaire was developed to assess five public health functional capabilities: (1) leadership and management, (2) mass casualty care, (3) communication, (4) disease control and prevention, and (5) surveillance and epidemiology. Analyses were undertaken to examine internal consistency, associations among scales, the empirical structure of the items, and inter-rater agreement. Results. Thirty-seven questions were retained in the final questionnaire and grouped according to the original five domains. Alpha coefficients were 0.81 or higher for all scales. The five-factor solution from the principal components analysis accounted for 60% of the total variance, and the factor structure was consistent with the five domains of the original conceptual model. Inter-rater agreement ranged from good to excellent. Conclusions. The resulting 37-item performance measurement tool was found to reliably measure public health functional capabilities in a tabletop exercise setting, with preliminary evidence of a factor structure consistent with the original conceptualization and of criterion-related validity.

A long-term analysis of physician triage screening in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES The problem of emergency department (ED) crowding is well recognized; however, little data exist on the sustainability of potential solutions, including physician triage and screening. The authors hypothesized that a physician triage screening program (Supplemented Triage and Rapid Treatment [START]) sustainably improves standard ED performance metrics. METHODS This retrospective, observational, before-and-after study compared performance measures over 4 years in a tertiary care urban academic medical center with approximately 90,000 annual ED visits. Patients seen between December 2006 and November 2010 were included. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS) for ED patients, percentage of patients who left without completing assessment (LWCA), percentage of patients treated and dispositioned by START without using monitored beds, and door-to-room time. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS Median LOS for START patients was 56 minutes/patient lower when comparing 2010 to 2007 (p < 0.0001) and for non-START patients 22 minutes/patient lower (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who LWCA decreased from 4.8% to 2.9% (p < 0.0001) during the same time period. In STARTs first half-year, 18% of patients were discharged without using monitored beds. This increased to 29% by year 3. In addition, median door-to-room time decreased from 18.4 to 9.9 minutes during the same 3-year interval. CONCLUSIONS Physician screening appears to provide sustainable improvements in ED performance metrics including ED LOS, percentage of patients who LWCA, door-to-room time, and percentage of patients treated without using a monitored bed, despite increasing ED volume. Physician screening delivers additional incremental benefits for several years after implementation and can effectively increase ED capacity by allowing emergency physicians to more efficiently use monitored beds.

Typhoon Haiyan and the Professionalization of Disaster Response

When international medical response teams landed in the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, they had to act as professional humanitarian responders. Medical responders to disasters can help best when they are well prepared and function as part of a coordinated effort.

The Effect of an Ambulance Diversion Ban on Emergency Department Length of Stay and Ambulance Turnaround Time

STUDY OBJECTIVE Massachusetts became the first state in the nation to ban ambulance diversion in 2009. It was feared that the diversion ban would lead to increased emergency department (ED) crowding and ambulance turnaround time. We seek to characterize the effect of a statewide ambulance diversion ban on ED length of stay and ambulance turnaround time at Boston-area EDs. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, pre-post observational analysis of 9 Boston-area hospital EDs before and after the ban. We used ED length of stay as a proxy for ED crowding. We compared hospitals individually and in aggregate to determine any changes in ED length of stay for admitted and discharged patients, ED volume, and turnaround time. RESULTS No ED experienced an increase in ED length of stay for admitted or discharged patients or ambulance turnaround time despite an increase in volume for several EDs. There was an overall 3.6% increase in ED volume in our sample, a 10.4-minute decrease in length of stay for admitted patients, and a 2.2-minute decrease in turnaround time. When we compared high- and low-diverting EDs separately, neither saw an increase in length of stay, and both saw a decrease in turnaround time. CONCLUSION After the first statewide ambulance diversion ban, there was no increase in ED length of stay or ambulance turnaround time at 9 Boston-area EDs. Several hospitals actually experienced improvements in these outcome measures. Our results suggest that the ban did not worsen ED crowding or ambulance availability at Boston-area hospitals.