Paul E. Nachtigall
University of Hawaii
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul E. Nachtigall.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1995
Whitlow W. L. Au; Jeffrey L. Pawloski; Paul E. Nachtigall; Michèle Blonz; Robert C. Gisner
The echolocation transmission beam pattern of a false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens) was measured in the vertical and horizontal planes. A vertical array of seven broadband miniature hydrophones was used to measure the beam pattern in the vertical plane and a horizontal array of the same hydrophones was used in the horizontal plane. The measurements were performed in the open waters of Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii, while the whale performed a target discrimination task. Four types of signals, characterized by their frequency spectra, were measured. Type-1 signals had a single low-frequency peak at 40 +/- 9 kHz and a low-amplitude shoulder at high frequencies. Type-2 signals had a bimodal frequency characteristic with a primary peak at 46 +/- 7 kHz and a secondary peak at 88 +/- 13 kHz. Type-3 signals were also bimodal but with a primary peak at 100 +/- 7 kHz and a secondary peak at 49 +/- 9 kHz. Type-4 signals had a single high-frequency peak at 104 +/- 7 kHz. The center frequency of the signals were found to be linearly correlated to the peak-to-peak source level, increasing with increasing source level. The major axis of the vertical beam was directed slightly downward between 0 and -5 degrees, in contrast to the +5 to 10 degrees for Tursiops and Delphinapterus. The beam in the horizontal plane was directed forward between 0 degrees and -5 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2005
Michelle M. L. Yuen; Paul E. Nachtigall; Marlee Breese; Alexander Ya. Supin
Behavioral and auditory evoked potential (AEP) audiograms of a false killer whale were measured using the same subject and experimental conditions. The objective was to compare and assess the correspondence of auditory thresholds collected by behavioral and electrophysiological techniques. Behavioral audiograms used 3-s pure-tone stimuli from 4 to 45 kHz, and were conducted with a go/no-go modified staircase procedure. AEP audiograms used 20-ms sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone bursts from 4 to 45 kHz, and the electrophysiological responses were received through gold disc electrodes in rubber suction cups. The behavioral data were reliable and repeatable, with the region of best sensitivity between 16 and 24 kHz and peak sensitivity at 20 kHz. The AEP audiograms produced thresholds that were also consistent over time, with range of best sensitivity from 16 to 22.5 kHz and peak sensitivity at 22.5 kHz. Behavioral thresholds were always lower than AEP thresholds. However, AEP audiograms were completed in a shorter amount of time with minimum participation from the animal. These data indicated that behavioral and AEP techniques can be used successfully and interchangeably to measure cetacean hearing sensitivity.
The Journal of Experimental Biology | 2010
T. Aran Mooney; Roger T. Hanlon; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Peter T. Madsen; Darlene R. Ketten; Paul E. Nachtigall
SUMMARY Although hearing has been described for many underwater species, there is much debate regarding if and how cephalopods detect sound. Here we quantify the acoustic sensitivity of the longfin squid (Loligo pealeii) using near-field acoustic and shaker-generated acceleration stimuli. Sound field pressure and particle motion components were measured from 30 to 10,000 Hz and acceleration stimuli were measured from 20 to 1000 Hz. Responses were determined using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) with electrodes placed near the statocysts. Evoked potentials were generated by both stimuli and consisted of two wave types: (1) rapid stimulus-following waves, and (2) slower, high-amplitude waves, similar to some fish AEPs. Responses were obtained between 30 and 500 Hz with lowest thresholds between 100 and 200 Hz. At the best frequencies, AEP amplitudes were often >20 μV. Evoked potentials were extinguished at all frequencies if (1) water temperatures were less than 8°C, (2) statocysts were ablated, or (3) recording electrodes were placed in locations other than near the statocysts. Both the AEP response characteristics and the range of responses suggest that squid detect sound similarly to most fish, with the statocyst acting as an accelerometer through which squid detect the particle motion component of a sound field. The modality and frequency range indicate that squid probably detect acoustic particle motion stimuli from both predators and prey as well as low-frequency environmental sound signatures that may aid navigation.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2003
Paul E. Nachtigall; Jeffrey L. Pawloski; Whitlow W. L. Au
Behaviorally determined hearing thresholds for a 7.5-kHz tone for an Atlantic bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) were obtained following exposure to fatiguing low-frequency octave band noise. The fatiguing stimulus ranged from 4 to 11 kHz and was gradually increased in intensity to 179 dB re 1 microPa and in duration to 55 min. Exposures occurred no more frequently than once per week. Measured temporary threshold shifts averaged 11 dB. Threshold determination took at least 20 min. Recovery was examined 360, 180, 90, and 45 min following exposure and was essentially complete within 45 min.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1999
B. Mo; hl; Whitlow W. Au; Jeffrey L. Pawloski; Paul E. Nachtigall
The auditory input area of the dolphin head was investigated in an unrestrained animal trained to beach itself and to accept noninvasive electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes for the recording of the auditory brain-stem response (ABR). The stimulus was a synthetic dolphin click, transmitted from a piezo-electric transducer and coupled to the skin via a small volume of water. The results conform with earlier experiments on acute preparations that show best auditory sensitivity at the middle of the lower jaw. Minimum latency was found at the rear of the lower jaw. A shaded receiver configuration for the dolphin ear is proposed.
The Journal of Experimental Biology | 2005
Paul E. Nachtigall; Michelle M. L. Yuen; T. Aran Mooney; Kristen A. Taylor
SUMMARY An infant Rissos dolphin (Grampus griseus) was rescued from the beach in Southern Portugal, and an audiogram was measured using auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and envelope following response (EFR) techniques for frequencies from 4 to 150 kHz. The stimuli used were custom sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tone-bursts, and the AEP responses were collected, averaged and analyzed to quantify the animals physiological response and, thereby, hearing thresholds. The infant animal showed a wide range of best sensitivity, with the lowest threshold of 49.5 dB re. 1 μPa at 90 kHz. The audiogram showed a typical mammalian ∪-shape with a gradual, low-frequency slope of 16.4 dB octave-1 and a sharp high-frequency increase of 95 dB octave-1. When compared with an audiogram of an older Rissos dolphin obtained using behavioral methods, the threshold values at upper frequencies were much lower for this infant animal, and this infant heard higher frequencies. These results redefine the hearing capabilities of Rissos dolphins by demonstrating very high-frequency sensitivity.
Journal of Comparative Physiology A-neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology | 1995
W.F. Dolphin; Whitlow W. L. Au; Paul E. Nachtigall; Jeffrey L. Pawloski
A temporal modulation rate transfer function (MRTF) is a quantitative description of the ability of a system to follow the temporal envelope of a stimulating waveform. In this study MRTFs were obtained from three cetacean species: the false killer whale Pseudorca crassidens; the beluga whale Delphinapterus leucas; and the bottlenosed dolphin Tursiops truncatus, using auditory-evoked potentials. Steady-state electrophysiological responses were recorded noninvasively from behaving, alert animals using suction cup electrodes placed on the scalp surface. Responses were elicited using continuous two-tone (TT) and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) stimuli. MRTFs were obtained for modulation frequencies ranging from 18–4019 Hz using carrier and primary frequencies of 500, 1000, 4000, and 10000 Hz. Scalp potentials followed the low-frequency temporal envelope of the stimulating waveform; this envelope following response (EFR) was the dependent variable in all experiments. MRTFs were generally low-pass in shape with corner frequencies between approximately 1–2 kHz.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1984
Patrick W. Moore; R. W. Hall; W. A. Friedl; Paul E. Nachtigall
A backward masking function relating target detection to masker delay was generated for a bottlenosed dolphin in an active echolocation target detection task. The masker was triggered by each outgoing echolocation click and could be temporally adjusted from coincidence with the target echo to delays of 700 microseconds. The animal reported target condition using a go/no-go response procedure. A modified method of constants was used to present the four masking delay intervals. Results indicated that 700- and 500-microseconds delays had little effect on target detection. However, as the delay was reduced to 100 microseconds, detection dropped to chance performance. The calculated 70% detection threshold corresponded to a delay of 265 microseconds. The results are discussed in support of the view that time separation pitch (TSP) may be an analytic mechanism used by the dolphin to discern various within-echo target attributes rather than an analytic mechanism for determining target range.
Neural Networks | 1995
Herbert L. Roitblat; Whitlow W. L. Au; Paul E. Nachtigall; Reid H. Shizumura; Gerald C. Moons
Abstract Dolphins have biological sonar abilities that exceed those of any man-made system in an aquatic environment. One problem of particular importance, and for which only limited capabilities exist, is the detection and recognition of targets buried under sediment. This paper reviews dolphin echolocation capabilities and describes a system that uses a dolphin-like signal and biomimetic signal processing mechanisms to emulate the performance of the dolpin on such targets. The system employed a digitized dolphin click with a center frequency of 120 kHz and a 3dB bandwidth of 39 kHz, 50 μs duration. This signal was transmitted through seawater into mud and the echoes reflected from the objects were recorded and digitized. Two spectral estimators were used to extract a time-frequency representation of the echo. One was based on short-time fast Fourier transforms, and the other was based on an autoregressive estimator. The time-frequency representation was then processed by a separate backpropagation neural network for each estimator, designed to derive independent identifications of the targets. These identifications were then combined in a modified probabilistic neural network that used a linear transfer function rather than a binary function for its output. Finally the output of the probabilistic network was processed symbolically by a simple expert system. Three experiments are described in which the system was used to discriminate a small stainless-steel cylinder from cyliners of the same size made of hollow aluminium, foam-filled aluminium, or coral rock embedded in resin. Each of the targets was presented buried in mud at a depth of several centimeters. The system proved highly effectively at recognizing these buried targets.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2009
T. Aran Mooney; Paul E. Nachtigall; Marlee Breese; Stephanie Vlachos; Whitlow W. L. Au
Noise levels in the ocean are increasing and are expected to affect marine mammals. To examine the auditory effects of noise on odontocetes, a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) was exposed to octave-band noise (4-8 kHz) of varying durations (<2-30 min) and sound pressures (130-178 dB re 1 microPa). Temporary threshold shift (TTS) occurrence was quantified in an effort to (i) determine the sound exposure levels (SELs) (dB re 1 microPa(2) s) that induce TTS and (ii) develop a model to predict TTS onset. Hearing thresholds were measured using auditory evoked potentials. If SEL was kept constant, significant shifts were induced by longer duration exposures but not for shorter exposures. Higher SELs were required to induce shifts in shorter duration exposures. The results did not support an equal-energy model to predict TTS onset. Rather, a logarithmic algorithm, which increased in sound energy as exposure duration decreased, was a better predictor of TTS. Recovery to baseline hearing thresholds was also logarithmic (approximately -1.8 dB/doubling of time) but indicated variability including faster recovery rates after greater shifts and longer recoveries necessary after longer duration exposures. The data reflected the complexity of TTS in mammals that should be taken into account when predicting odontocete TTS.