Paul E. Sirbaugh

A prospective, population-based study of the demographics, epidemiology, management, and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVES To perform a population-based study addressing the demography, epidemiology, management, and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest (PCPA). METHODS Prospective, population-based study of all children (17 years of age or younger) in a large urban municipality who were treated by EMS personnel for apneic, pulseless conditions. Data were collected prospectively for 3(1/2) years using a comprehensive data collection tool and on-line computerized database. Each child received standard pediatric advanced cardiac life support. RESULTS During the 3(1/2)-year period, 300 children presented with PCPA (annual incidence of 19. 7/100,000 at risk). Of these, 60% (n=181) were male (P =.0003), and 54% (n=161) were patients 12 months of age or younger (152,500 at risk). Compared with the population at risk (32% black patients, 36% Hispanic patients, 26% white patients), a disproportionate number of arrests occurred in black children (51.6% versus 26.6% in Hispanics, and 17% in white children; P <.0001). Over 60% of all cases (n=181) occurred in the home with family members present, and yet those family members initiated basic CPR in only 31 (17%) of such cases. Only 33 (11%) of the total 300 PCPA cases had a return of spontaneous circulation, and 5 of the 6 discharged survivors had significant neurologic sequelae. Only 1 factor, endotracheal intubation, was correlated positively with return of spontaneous circulation (P =.032). CONCLUSION This population-based study underscores the need to investigate new therapeutic interventions for PCPA, as well as innovative strategies for improving the frequency of basic CPR for children.

The pediatrician and disaster preparedness

For decades, emergency planning for natural disasters, public health emergencies, workplace accidents, and other calamities has been the responsibility of government agencies on all levels and certain nongovernment organizations such as the American Red Cross. In the case of terrorism, however, entirely new approaches to emergency planning are under development for a variety of reasons. Terrorism preparedness is a highly specific component of general emergency preparedness. In addition to the unique pediatric issues involved in general emergency preparedness, terrorism preparedness must consider several additional issues, including the unique vulnerabilities of children to various agents as well as the limited availability of age- and weight-appropriate antidotes and treatments. Although children may respond more rapidly to therapeutic intervention, they are at the same time more susceptible to various agents and conditions and more likely to deteriorate if they are not monitored carefully. This article is designed to provide an overview of key issues for the pediatrician with respect to disaster, terrorism, and public health emergency preparedness. It is not intended to be a complete compendium of didactic content but rather offers an approach to what pediatricians need to know and how pediatricians must lend their expertise to enhance preparedness in every community. To become fully and optimally prepared, pediatricians need to become familiar with these key areas of emergency preparedness: unique aspects of children related to terrorism and other disasters; terrorism preparedness; mental health vulnerabilities and development of resiliency; managing family concerns about terrorism and disaster preparedness; office-based preparedness; hospital preparedness; community, government, and public health preparedness; and advocating for children and families in preparedness planning.

Management of pediatric trauma

Injury is the number 1 killer of children in the United States. In 2004, injury accounted for 59.5% of all deaths in children younger than 18 years. The financial burden to society of children who survive childhood injury with disability continues to be enormous. The entire process of managing childhood injury is complex and varies by region. Only the comprehensive cooperation of a broadly diverse group of people will have a significant effect on improving the care and outcome of injured children. This statement has been endorsed by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Pediatric Surgical Association, National Association of Childrens Hospitals and Related Institutions, National Association of State EMS Officials, and Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Hurricane katrina : Medical response at the houston astrodome/reliant center complex

On September 1, 2005, with only 12 hours notice, various collaborators established a medical facility—the Katrina Clinic—at the Astrodome/Reliant Center Complex in Houston. By the time the facility closed roughly two weeks later, the Katrina Clinic medical staff had seen over 11,000 of the estimated 27,000 Hurricane Katrina evacuees who sought shelter in the Complex. Herein, we describe the scope of this medical response, citing our major challenges, successes, and recommendations for conducting similar efforts in the future.

Policy statement - Consent for emergency medical services for children and adolescents

Parental consent generally is required for the medical evaluation and treatment of minor children. However, children and adolescents might require evaluation of and treatment for emergency medical conditions in situations in which a parent or legal guardian is not available to provide consent or conditions under which an adolescent patient might possess the legal authority to provide consent. In general, a medical screening examination and any medical care necessary and likely to prevent imminent and significant harm to the pediatric patient with an emergency medical condition should not be withheld or delayed because of problems obtaining consent. The purpose of this policy statement is to provide guidance in those situations in which parental consent is not readily available, in which parental consent is not necessary, or in which parental refusal of consent places a child at risk of significant harm.

Outside the Box and Into Thick Air: Implementation of an Exterior Mobile Pediatric Emergency Response Team for North American H1N1 (Swine) Influenza Virus in Houston, Texas

Study objective We describe the implementation of a mobile pediatric emergency response team for mildly ill children with influenza-like illnesses during the H1N1 swine influenza outbreak. Methods This was a descriptive quality improvement study conducted in the Texas Childrens Hospital (Houston, TX) pediatric emergency department (ED), covered, open-air parking lot from May 1, 2009, to May 7, 2009. Children aged 18 years or younger were screened for viral respiratory symptoms and sent to designated areas of the ED according to level of acuity, possibility of influenza-like illness, and the anticipated need for laboratory evaluation. Results The mobile pediatric emergency response team experienced 18% of the total ED volume, or a median of 48 patients daily, peaking at 83 patients treated on May 3, 2009. Although few children had positive rapid influenza assay results and the morbidity of disease in the community appeared to be minimal for the majority of children, anxiety about pandemic influenza drove a large number of ED visits, necessitating an increase in surge capacity. Surge capacity was augmented both through utilization of existing institutional resources and by creating a novel area in which to treat patients with potential airborne pathogens. Infection control procedures and patient safety were also maximized through patient cohorting and adaptation of social distancing measures to the ED setting. Conclusion The mobile pediatric emergency response team and screening and triage algorithms were able to safely and effectively identify a group of low-acuity patients who could be rapidly evaluated and discharged, alleviating ED volume and potentially preventing transmission of H1N1 influenza.

Caring for Evacuated Children Housed in the Astrodome: Creation and Implementation of a Mobile Pediatric Emergency Response Team: Regionalized Caring for Displaced Children After a Disaster

REPARATION: LONG-TERM RESCUE AND DISASTER-RELIEF STRATEGIES: Located only 50 miles from the Gulf Coast and Galveston, Houston, Texas, is familiar with the challenges posed by hurricanes, tropical storms, and flooding. The hospitals of Houston and Harris County are no strangers to the aftermath of such natural disasters, themselves being victims of massive damage in 2001, when the entire Houston downtown area and Texas Medical Center complex, as well as a great portion of the city, were severely damaged by unexpected and unprecedented flooding in the wake of Tropical Storm Allison. City, county, and hospital officials are ever mindful of the need to learn lessons from the past and to have disaster-relief plans in effect. Texas Childrens Hospital (TCH), in particular, has participated in numerous citywide disaster drills and is well prepared to deal with many types of disasters that may occur within its region. Indeed, the TCH emergency center (TCHEC) alone evaluates more than 80000 children per year and serves a large populous and a large geographic area. Hence, it is poised for participation in any large disaster-relief effort. Beginning on Friday, August 26, 2005, area officials and rescue and disaster-relief mechanisms were about to be tested. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Houston was faced with the sudden arrival of thousands of people, many in need of medical care. Although officials had prepared in advance for this event, a lack of pediatric provider involvement was associated with woefully inadequate strategies for providing emergency medical care for thousands of children and adolescents. The eye of Hurricane Katrina made landfall at 6:10 am and crossed the wetlands/barrier islands between New Orleans, Louisiana, and the Gulf of Mexico. By 9:00 am, officials learned that the lower Ninth Ward levee had failed to restrain the rising water of Lake Pontchartrain and that … Address correspondence to Paul Sirbaugh, DO, FAAP, Texas Childrens Hospital, Emergency Medicine Department, 6621 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: sirbaugh{at}bcm.tmc.edu

Prehospital evaluation of non-transported pediatric patients by a large emergency medical services system

Objectives 1) To determine whether demographic characteristics of prehospital pediatric patients evaluated, but not transported, by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel were different than those of transported patients in a large metropolitan area, 2) to determine whether chart documentation for non-transported (NT) patients by EMS personnel varied among paramedic and ambulance units, and 3) to describe the most common complaints of pediatric non-transported patients. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of children 12 years of age and less who were evaluated, but not transported, by EMS personnel over a 1-year period. We incorporated a nested case control study, comparing the demographic and presenting characteristics of the NT and transported children (eg, age, gender, ethnicity, and time of day). Among NT patients, significant elements of chart documentation as completed by personnel on paramedic versus ambulance units were compared. Chief complaints of the NT children were described. Results During the study period, 3057 patients met inclusion criteria for cases, and 12,302 met the criteria for controls. Non-transport was less common in the first two years of life, among Hispanic patients, and during the hours of midnight to 6 am. Among NT patients, personnel of paramedic units had significantly better documentation of contact with on-line medical command (OLMC) (52% vs. 33%) than did personnel of ambulance units. Injuries (27.7%), motor vehicle accidents (20.4%), and choking episodes (10.2%) were the most common complaints among NT patients. Conclusions In this large metropolitan population, non-transport was less common in children under 2 years of age and during the early morning hours. Hispanic children were more likely to be transported. Ambulance units were significantly less likely than paramedic units to document contact with OLMC. Injuries were the most common complaints of pediatric NT patients.

Ventricular fibrillation and the use of automated external defibrillators on children.

The use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) has been advocated in recent years as a part of the chain of survival to improve outcomes for adult cardiac arrest victims. When AEDs first entered the market, they were not tested for pediatric usage and rhythm interpretation. In addition, the presumption was that children do not experience ventricular fibrillation, so they would not benefit from use of AEDs. Recent literature has shown that children do experience ventricular fibrillation, and this rhythm has a better outcome than do other cardiac arrest rhythms. At the same time, the arrhythmia software on AEDs has become more extensive and validated for children, and attenuation devices have become available to downregulate the energy delivered by AEDs to allow their use in children. Pediatricians are now being asked whether AED programs should be implemented, and where they are being implemented, pediatricians are being asked to provide guidance on the use of AEDs in children. As AED programs expand, pediatricians must advocate on behalf of children so that their needs are accounted for in these programs. For pediatricians to be able to provide guidance and ensure that children are included in AED programs, it is important for pediatricians to know how AEDs work, be up-to-date on the literature regarding pediatric fibrillation and energy delivery, and understand the role of AEDs as life-saving interventions for children.

Evaluation and management of children and adolescents with acute mental health or behavioral problems. Part I: Common clinical challenges of patients with mental health and/or behavioral emergencies

This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have fi led confl ict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any confl icts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication. Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefi t from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not refl ect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent. The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffi rmed, revised, or retired at or before that time. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1570