Paul E. Wallner

Addressing Overutilization in Medical Imaging

The growth in medical imaging over the past 2 decades has yielded unarguable benefits to patients in terms of longer lives of higher quality. This growth reflects new technologies and applications, including high-tech services such as multisection computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET). Some part of the growth, however, can be attributed to the overutilization of imaging services. This report examines the causes of the overutilization of imaging and identifies ways of addressing the causes so that overutilization can be reduced. In August 2009, the American Board of Radiology Foundation hosted a 2-day summit to discuss the causes and effects of the overutilization of imaging. More than 60 organizations were represented at the meeting, including health care accreditation and certification entities, foundations, government agencies, hospital and health systems, insurers, medical societies, health care quality consortia, and standards and regulatory agencies. Key forces influencing overutilization were identified. These include the payment mechanisms and financial incentives in the U.S. health care system; the practice behavior of referring physicians; self-referral, including referral for additional radiologic examinations; defensive medicine; missed educational opportunities when inappropriate procedures are requested; patient expectations; and duplicate imaging studies. Summit participants suggested several areas for improvement to reduce overutilization, including a national collaborative effort to develop evidence-based appropriateness criteria for imaging; greater use of practice guidelines in requesting and conducting imaging studies; decision support at point of care; education of referring physicians, patients, and the public; accreditation of imaging facilities; management of self-referral and defensive medicine; and payment reform.

Models for evaluating agents intended for the prophylaxis, mitigation and treatment of radiation injuries. Report of an NCI Workshop, December 3-4, 2003

Abstract Stone, H. B., Moulder, J. E., Coleman, C. N., Ang, K. K., Anscher, M. S., Barcellos-Hoff, M. H., Dynan, W. S., Fike, J. R., Grdina, D. J., Greenberger, J. S., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hill, R. P., Kolesnick, R. N., MacVittie, T. J., Marks, C., McBride, W. H., Metting, N., Pellmar, T., Purucker, M., Robbins, M. E., Schiestl, R. H., Seed, T. M., Tomaszewski, J., Travis, E. L., Wallner, P. E., Wolpert, M. and Zaharevitz, D. Models for Evaluating Agents Intended for the Prophylaxis, Mitigation and Treatment of Radiation Injuries. Report of an NCI Workshop, December 3–4, 2003. Radiat. Res. 162, 711–728 (2004). To develop approaches to prophylaxis/protection, mitigation and treatment of radiation injuries, appropriate models are needed that integrate the complex events that occur in the radiation-exposed organism. While the spectrum of agents in clinical use or preclinical development is limited, new research findings promise improvements in survival after whole-body irradiation and reductions in the risk of adverse effects of radiotherapy. Approaches include agents that act on the initial radiochemical events, agents that prevent or reduce progression of radiation damage, and agents that facilitate recovery from radiation injuries. While the mechanisms of action for most of the agents with known efficacy are yet to be fully determined, many seem to be operating at the tissue, organ or whole animal level as well as the cellular level. Thus research on prophylaxis/protection, mitigation and treatment of radiation injuries will require studies in whole animal models. Discovery, development and delivery of effective radiation modulators will also require collaboration among researchers in diverse fields such as radiation biology, inflammation, physiology, toxicology, immunology, tissue injury, drug development and radiation oncology. Additional investment in training more scientists in radiation biology and in the research portfolio addressing radiological and nuclear terrorism would benefit the general population in case of a radiological terrorism event or a large-scale accidental event as well as benefit patients treated with radiation.

The effect of fraction size on control of early glottic cancer

A retrospective analysis of 600 patients treated for head and neck malignancy at the Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center was undertaken. Patients who had surgical intervention (excluding biopsy) were withdrawn from this review. Fifty-eight patients with Stage I Glottic Laryngeal Carcinoma were identified and constitute the basis of this report. Various parameters were analyzed to assess their impact on local control. These include age, sex, serum hemoglobin, tumor bulk, differentiation, field size, total dose, total treatment time, and fraction size. Overall local control was 87% with a median follow-up of 63 months. The only factor that influenced local control was fraction size. Of 28 patients treated with 180 cGy fractions, seven (25%) had a local recurrence within 3 years. Twenty-eight patients treated with 200 cGy or greater fractions have had no failures to date. The difference in control rate when comparing the two treatment schema was significant (p less than 0.01). The median dose in the controlled 180 cGy group was 6660 cGy (range, 6300-7020 cGy). In the patients who failed in the 180 cGy group the median dose was 6660 cGy (range, 6480-6840 cGy). The patients receiving 200 cGy fractions or greater had a median dose of 6600 cGy (range, 6000-6950 cGy) and an average dose of 6507 cGy. The mean NSD in the 180 cGy group failing was 1787 RET (range, 1735-1843 RET). Patients who were controlled and received 180 cGy fractions had a median NSD of 1796 RET (range, 1743-1868). The mean NSD in the 200 cGy group was 1847 RET. The median TDF in the 180 cGy group of patients controlled was 102. Those failing also had a TDF of 102 (range, 101-105). Patients receiving 200 cGy fractions or greater had a median TDF of 109. It appears from this data that fraction size is a highly significant factor in our ability to control glottic laryngeal cancer.

Selective tumor irradiation by infusional brachytherapy in nonresectable pancreatic cancer: A phase I study

PURPOSE Selective high-dose radiation of solid tumors has been a goal of radiation oncology. The physiological barriers of solid tumors (high interstitial tumor pressure, reduced tumor vascularity, and poor perfusion) have been major barriers in achieving significant tumor dose of systemically infused radioconjugates. Direct tumor infusional brachytherapy overcomes these barriers and leads to selective high tumor doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS The development of interstitial tumor infusion of macroaggregated albumin (MAA) followed by colloidal chromic phosphate 32P has overcome solid tumor obstacles in 47 patients with nonresectable pancreatic cancer in a Phase I dose escalation study. The colloidal 32P infusion was followed by external radiation and five fluorouracil. RESULTS Of the 28 patients with cancer limited to the pancreas, 15 of 16 patients retained 86-100% (mean 96%) of the infused colloidal 32P isotope. While the other 12 patients had partial shunting to the liver, shunting to the liver was due to high interstitial resistance with tumor dose deposition of 17-88% (mean 52 %). Of the 19 patients with metastatic pancreas cancer, colloidal 32P tumor deposition ranged from 22 to 100% of the infused dose (mean 79%). The less than optimal tumor deposition led to our increasing the MAA from 600,000 to 1.5-2.5 million particles. Interstitial dexamethasone 2 mg and later 4 mg was infused first and prevented liver shunting by somehow reducing tumor resistance. The median survival in 28 Phase I patients with nonresectable pancreas cancer without metastasis, was 12 months. No significant toxicity occurred when treatment was limited to two infusions with as much as 30 mCi each. The maximum tumor dose was 17,000 Gy (1.700,000 cGy). In 19 nonresectable pancreatic cancer patients with metastasis, a 6.9 months median survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS Infusional brachytherapy is an outpatient procedure that delivers high-dose radiation selectively to pancreatic cancer. Results of the Phase I study in nonresectable pancreas cancer has led to a national multiinstitutional Phase II trial.

American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) Emerging Technology Committee Report on Electronic Brachytherapy

The development of novel technologies for the safe and effective delivery of radiation is critical to advancing the field of radiation oncology. The Emerging Technology Committee of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology appointed a Task Group within its Evaluation Subcommittee to evaluate new electronic brachytherapy methods that are being developed for, or are already in, clinical use. The Task Group evaluated two devices, the Axxent Electronic Brachytherapy System by Xoft, Inc. (Fremont, CA), and the Intrabeam Photon Radiosurgery Device by Carl Zeiss Surgical (Oberkochen, Germany). These devices are designed to deliver electronically generated radiation, and because of their relatively low energy output, they do not fall under existing regulatory scrutiny of radioactive sources that are used for conventional radioisotope brachytherapy. This report provides a descriptive overview of the technologies, current and future projected applications, comparison of competing technologies, potential impact, and potential safety issues. The full Emerging Technology Committee report is available on the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Web site.

Impact of initial quality control review on study outcome in lung and head/neck cancer studies—review of the radiation therapy oncology group experience

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated cooperative clinical trials in 1971. In 1978, RTOG developed a formalized program of Quality Control (QC) divided into initial and final phases. The initial review process consisted of two steps. The first phase of review is an evaluation performed by a radiation oncologist to verify treatment plan and field borders. The second portion of the initial review process originally consisted of dosimetry calculation verification based on machine data provided by the regional Radiological Physics Center and treatment planning data provided by the accessioning institution. Between 1978 and December 31, 1987, a total of 11,343 cases in 96 RTOG protocols, excluding particle studies, underwent initial review. Of this number, 2227 patients were entered in lung cancer studies and 1341 patients were entered in head/neck cancer studies. Initial review was carried out in 2089 (93.8%) of the lung cancer cases. Missing or delayed data accounted for 138 (6.2%) cases not reviewed initially. In head/neck cancer trials, 1251 (93.2%) received initial review and 90 (6.8%) did not. Our findings suggest that there are sharply defined but long lasting learning experiences involved in clinical trial participation. Consideration may be given to modifying the initial review process to use random sampling of cases accessioned by experienced investigators in ongoing clinical trials and to continuing the total case evaluation on all new studies and cases entered by inexperienced investigators or investigators/institutions with unsatisfactory performance. Recommendations regarding initial review of other sites will await evaluation of the impact of initial review on those sites.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: report of the ASTRO Emerging Technology Committee.

*Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; yUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; zCancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; {Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Toms River, NJ; xH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL; **Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN; yyUniversity of Colorado Health Services, Boulder, CO; {{University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; xxWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; and ***21st Century Oncology, Inc, Moorestown, NJ.

Education and Training for Radiation Scientists: Radiation Research Program and American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, May 12-14, 2003

Abstract Coleman, C. N., Stone, H. B., Alexander, G. A., Barcellos-Hoff, M. H., Bedford, J. S., Bristow, R. G., Dynlacht, J. R., Fuks, Z., Gorelic, L. S., Hill, R. P., Joiner, M. C., Liu, F-F., McBride, W. H., McKenna, W. G., Powell, S. N., Robbins, M. E. C., Rockwell, S., Schiff, P. B., Shaw, E. G., Siemann, D. W., Travis, E. L., Wallner, P. E., Wong, R. S. L. and Zeman, E. M. Education and Training for Radiation Scientists: Radiation Research Program and American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, May 12–14, 2003. Radiat. Res. 160, 729–737 (2003). Current and potential shortfalls in the number of radiation scientists stand in sharp contrast to the emerging scientific opportunities and the need for new knowledge to address issues of cancer survivorship and radiological and nuclear terrorism. In response to these challenges, workshops organized by the Radiation Research Program (RRP), National Cancer Institute (NCI) (Radiat. Res. 157, 204–223, 2002; Radiat. Res. 159, 812–834, 2003), and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (Nature, 421, 787, 2003) have engaged experts from a range of federal agencies, academia and industry. This workshop, Education and Training for Radiation Scientists, addressed the need to establish a sustainable pool of expertise and talent for a wide range of activities and careers related to radiation biology, oncology and epidemiology. Although fundamental radiation chemistry and physics are also critical to radiation sciences, this workshop did not address workforce needs in these areas. The recommendations include: (1) Establish a National Council of Radiation Sciences to develop a strategy for increasing the number of radiation scientists. The strategy includes NIH training grants, interagency cooperation, interinstitutional collaboration among universities, and active involvement of all stakeholders. (2) Create new and expanded training programs with sustained funding. These may take the form of regional Centers of Excellence for Radiation Sciences. (3) Continue and broaden educational efforts of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), and the Radiation Research Society (RRS). (4) Foster education and training in the radiation sciences for the range of career opportunities including radiation oncology, radiation biology, radiation epidemiology, radiation safety, health/government policy, and industrial research. (5) Educate other scientists and the general public on the quantitative, basic, molecular, translational and applied aspects of radiation sciences.

Patterns of care study. Analysis of outcome survey data ― anterior two ― thirds of tongue and floor of mouth

The Patterns of Care Study, begun in 1973, carried out its second outcome survey from December 1978 through April 1979. The review of patients with epidermoid carcinomas of the anterior two-thirds of tongue and floor of mouth included patients treated between January 1973 and June 1975 so that a minimum follow-up period of 2 years was evaluable. Records of 434 patients from 96 facilities were available for analysis, although not every patient could be evaluated for every variable. Almost three-fourths (320) were treated with radiation alone. In these data, four patient and disease characteristics were strongly related to recurrence rates including stage at presentation, deep ulceration, deep infiltration, and age. Treatment variables significantly affecting recurrence included use of interstitial therapy in Stages I and II, use of surgery in Stages III and IV, and a facilitys best equipment.

Complete remission of nonresectable pancreatic cancer after infusional colloidal phosphorus-32 brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and 5-fluorouracil: a preliminary report.

This is a preliminary report of five patients diagnosed with locally advanced nonresectable pancreatic cancer who achieved improved quality of life, delay of local progression, and reduction of biomarker CA 19-9 after infusion of colloidal phosphorus 32 (32P) and administration of combined chemoradiotherapy. A phase II trial using intratumoral colloidal 32P delivery for nonresectable pancreatic cancer without metastases is in progress. Patients initially were given infusions of decadron followed by macroaggregated albumin and 30 mCi colloidal 32P to the interstitial space of the tumor by two infusions 1 week apart. Through this method, doses ranging from 750,000 to 1,800,000 cGy were delivered. After administration of colloidal 32P, external radiation to a dose of 6000 cGy minimum tumor dose, including regional lymph nodes, was given concomitantly with four intravenous infusions of 500 mg bolus 5-fluorouracil on alternating days within the first 2 weeks after initiation of external radiation. All five of these patients demonstrated cessation of local tumor growth or regression of disease on serial computed tomography scans for a minimum of 10 months from completion of therapy. Three of these patients have survived without local disease progression over 24 months from initiation of therapy, with one patient approaching 36 months. CA 19-9 values for all patients declined within weeks after completion of therapy. This new method of isotope delivery has resulted in reduction of tumor volume, normalization of the biomarker CA 19-9, and improved performance status in those patients who have localized nonresectable disease without dissemination.