Paul G. Layer

Cholinesterases regulate neurite growth of chick nerve cells in vitro by means of a non-enzymatic mechanism

Cholinesterases present homologies with some cell adhesion molecules; however, it is unclear whether and how they perform adhesive functions. Here, we provide the first direct evidence showing that neurite growth in vitro from various neuronal tissues of the chick embryo can be modified by some, but not all, anticholinesterase agents. By quantifying the neuritic G4 antigen in tectal cell cultures, the effect of anticholinesterases on neurite growth is directly compared with their cholinesterase inhibitory action. BW 284C51 and ethopropazine, inhibiting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), respectively, strongly decrease neurite growth in a dose-dependent manner. However, echothiophate which inhibits both cholinesterases, does not change neuritic growth. These quantitative data are supplemented by morphological observations in retinal explant cultures grown on striped laminin carpets, viz., defasciculation of neurite bundles by BW 284C51 and Bambuterol occurs, indicating that these drugs disturb adhesive mechanisms. These data strongly suggest that a) cholinesterases can participate in regulating axonal growth, b) both AChE and BChE can perform such a nonsynaptic function, and c) this function is not the result of the enzyme activity per se, since at least one drug was found that inhibits all cholinesterase activities but not neurite growth. Thus, a secondary site on cholinesterase molecules must be responsible for adhesive functions.

Of layers and spheres: the reaggregate approach in tissue engineering

The reaggregate approach involves the regeneration of histotypical three-dimensional spheres from dispersed cells of a given tissue in suspension culture. Reaggregated spheres are used as tumour, genetic, toxicological, biohybrid and neurosphere models, and often replace animal experimentation. A particularly instructive example is the use of reaggregation to regenerate complete laminar tissue from avian embryonic retina. By revealing constraints of layered tissue formation, such retinal spheres could be instrumental for regenerative medicine, including stem cell-based tissue engineering.

Cholinesterases during development of the avian nervous system.

Summary1.Long before onset of synaptogenesis in the chicken neural tube, the closely related enzymes butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) are expressed in a mutually exclusive manner. Accordingly, neuroblasts on the ventricular side of the neural tube transiently express BChE before they abruptly accumulate AChE while approaching the outer brain surface.2.By exploiting AChE as a sensitive and early histochemical differentiation marker, we have demonstrated complex polycentric waves of differentiation spreading upon the cranial part of the chicken neural tube but a smooth rostrocaudal wave along the spinal cord. Shortly after expression of AChE, these cells extend long projecting neurites. In particular, segmented spinal motor axons originate from AChE-positive motoneurones; they navigate through a BChEactive zone within the rostral half of the sclerotomes before contacting BChE/AChE-positive myotome cells. At synaptogenetic stages, cholinesterases additionally are detectable in neurofibrillar laminae foreshadowing the establishment of cholinergic synapses.3.In order to elucidate the functional significance of cholinesterases at early stages, we have investigated specific cholinesterase molecules and their mechanism of actionin vivo andin vitro. A developmental shift from the low molecular weight forms to the tetramers of both enzymes has been determined.In vitro, the addition of a selective BChE inhibitor leads to a reduction of AChE gene expression. Thus,in vivo andin vitro data suggest roles of cholinesterases in the regulation of cell proliferation and neurite growth.4.Future research has to show whether neurogenetic functioning of cholinesterases can help to understand their reported alterations in neural tube defects, mental retardations, dementias and in some tumours.

Quantitative Development and Molecular Forms of Acetyl-and Butyrylcholinesterase During Morphogenesis and Synaptogenesis of Chick Brain and Retina

Abstract: The embryonic development of total specific activities as well as of molecular forms of acetylcholinesterase (AChE, EC 3.1.1.7) and of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE, EC 3.1.1.8) have been studied in the chick brain. A comparison of the development in different brain parts shows that cholinesterases first develop in diencephalon, then in tectum and telencephalon; cholinesterase development in retina is delayed by about 2–3 days; and the development in rhomb‐encephalon [not studied until embryonic day 6 (E6)] and cerebellum is last. Both enzymes show complex and independent developmental patterns. During the early period (E3‐E7) first BChE expresses high specific activities that decline rapidly, but in contrast AChE increases more or less constantly with a short temporal delay. Thereafter the developmental courses approach a late phase (E14‐E20), during which AChE reaches very high specific activities and BChE follows at much lower but about parallel levels. By extraction of tissues from brain and retina in high salt plus 1% Triton X‐100, we find that both cholinesterases are present in two major molecular forms, AChE sedimenting at 5.9S and 11.68 (corresponding to G2 and G4 globular forms) and BChE at 2.9S and 10.3S (G1 and G4, globular). During development there is a continuous increase of G4 over G2 AChE, the G4 form reaching 80% in brain but only 30% in retina. The proportion of G1 BChE in brain remains almost constant at 55%, but in retina there is a drastic shift from 65% G1 before E5 to 70% G4 form at E7. Our results show that the light‐molecular‐weight forms of both enzymes are prevalent during the morphogenetic period, whereas the G4 forms correlate with final differentiation processes, e.g., synaptogenesis.

Pigmented epithelium induces complete retinal reconstitution from dispersed embryonic chick retinae in reaggregation culture.

Reaggregation of dispersed retinal cells of the chick embryo leads to histotypic retinospheroids in which the laminar organization remains incomplete: photoreceptors form rosettes which are surrounded by constituents of the other retinal layers. Here, for the first time, a complete arrangement of layers is achieved in cellular spheres (stratoids), provided that fully dispersed retinal cells are younger than embryonic day E6, and are reaggregated in the presence of a monolayer of retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE). A remarkable mechanism of stratoid formation from 1 to 15 days in vitro is revealed by the establishment of a radial Müller glia scaffold and of photoreceptors. During the first two days of reaggregation on RPE, rosettes are still observed. At this stage immunostaining with vimentin and F11 antibodies for radial Müller glia reveal a disorganized pattern. Subsequently, radial glia processes organize into long parallel fibre bundles which are arranged like spokes to stabilize the surface and centre of the stratoid. The opsin–specific antibody CERN 901 detects photoreceptors as they gradually build up an outer nuclear layer at the surface. These findings assign to the RPE a decisive role for the genesis and regeneration of a vertebrate retina.

Embryonic chicken retinal cells can regenerate all cell layers in vitro, but ciliary pigmented cells induce their correct polarity

SummaryThe capacities of retinal and pigmented cells to regenerate histotypic in-vitro-retinae (IVR) in rotary culture were investigated by dividing the eye cups of 6-day-old chicken embryos into a central and a peripheral part; they were cut along the ora serrata, and the retinal and the pigmented constituents of both parts were isolated. The 4 dissociated cell populations were cultured separately and in all double combinations. Two different types of IVRs were generated; one developed from central or peripheral retinal cells, the other required the addition of pigmented cells from the ciliary margin of the eye. The shape of these IVRs was examined using scanning electron microscopy, and they were also characterized histologically. The acetylcholinesterase pattern marked the inner half of the retina; F11-antibody and a peanut agglutinin marker revealed both plexiform layers and a radial fiber system. In both types, organized histotypical areas consisted of complete sets of retinal layers. In the type containing pigmented cells from the eye periphery, the sequence of layers was identical with that of an in-situ-retina (“laminar IVR”). In IVRs derived from retinal cells only, the sequence of layers was reversed (“rosetted IVR”).

Acetylcholinesterase in cell adhesion, neurite growth and network formation

The expression of acetylcholinesterase is not restricted to cholinergically innervated tissues and relates to both neurotransmission and multiple biological aspects, including neural development, stress response and neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, the classical function of acetylcholinesterase has to be distinguished from its non‐classical, e.g. enzymatic from non‐enzymatic, functions. Here, the roles of acetylcholinesterase in cell adhesion, promoting neurite outgrowth and neural network formation are reviewed briefly, together with potential mechanisms to support these functions. Part of these functions may depend on the structural properties of acetylcholinesterase, for example, protein–protein interactions. Recent findings have revealed that laminin‐1 is an interaction partner for acetylcholinesterase. The binding of acetylcholinesterase to this extracellular matrix component may allow cell‐to‐cell recognition, and also cell signalling via membrane receptors. Studies using monolayer and 3D spheroid retinal cultures, as well as the acetylcholinesterase‐knockout mouse, have been instrumental in elaborating the non‐classical functions of acetylcholinesterase.

Lucifer yellow stains displaced amacrine cells of the chicken retina during embryonic development.

We have used Lucifer Yellow for histological tracing of displaced amacrine cells within the ganglion cell layer (GCL) during the embryonic development of the chicken retina. Incubating whole eyes in the dye leads to bright staining of all displaced amacrine cells, whereas ganglion cells and glial cells are not stained. A subpopulation of cells of the inner part of the inner nuclear layer (INL) are also stained (for further details see ref. 13). Kainic acid, which is known to interfere with and kill amacrine cell systems, blocks the staining of these cells fully. This in addition to histological evidence confirms that the LY-stained cells in the GCL are displaced amacrine cells. Of the cells in the GCL, 23% (+/- 3%) are of the displaced amacrine type. Further, we find that the cytoarchitectural arrangement of these cells changes significantly during development.

Cranial nerve growth in birds is preceded by cholinesterase expression during neural crest cell migration and the formation of an HNK-1 scaffold

SummaryThe expression of the neural crest cell (NCC) markers acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and the HNK-1-epitope is compared from the emigration of cephalic NCC until the formation of the cranial nerves V-X in chicken and quail hindbrain. We show that NCC transiently express acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity during their emigration; NCC migrate into butyrylcholinesterase (BChE)-positive areas of the cranial mesenchyme. Along these migratory tracks that foreshadow the course of later projecting cranial nerves, BChE increases strongly in cells that may represent immature Schwann cells. Both AChE and BChE, but not HNK-1, are expressed in the ectodermal placodes. In NCC, HNK-1 is expressed strongly only when they approach their destination sites. Their intense expression of HNK-1 then leads to the establishment of tunnel-shaped HNK-1 matrices, within which G4-positive cranial neurites begin to extend. We conclude that AChE and HNK-1 expression in cephalic NCC serve different functions, since AChE is related to their migration, and HNK-1 to their aggregation and the formation of an extracellular neurite scaffold.

Müller glia endfeet, a basal lamina and the polarity of retinal layers form properly in vitro only in the presence of marginal pigmented epithelium

SummaryDissociated embryonic chicken retinal cells regenerate in rotary culture into cellular spheres that consist of subareas expressing all three nuclear layers in an inside-out sequence (rosetted vitroretinae). However, when pigmented cells from the eye margin (peripheral retinal pigment epithelium) are added to the system, the sequence of layers is identical with that of an in-situ retina (laminar vitroretinae). In order to elucidate further the lamina-stabilizing effect exerted by the retinal pigment epithelium, we have compared both systems, laying particular emphasis on the ultrastructure of the basal lamina and of Müller glia processes. Ultrastructurally, in both systems, an outer limiting membrane, inner segments of photoreceptors and the segregation of cell bodies into three cell layers develop properly. Synapses are detectable in a premature state, although only in the inner plexiform layer of laminar vitroretinae. Although present in both systems, radial processes of juvenile Müller glia cells are properly fixed at their endfeet only in laminar vitroretinae, since a basal lamina is only expressed here. Large amounts of laminin are detected immunohistochemically within the retinal pigment epithelium and along a basal stalk that reaches inside the laminar vitroretinae. We conclude that the peripheral retinal pigment epithelium is essential for the expression of a basal lamina in vitro. Moreover, the basal lamina may be responsible both for stabilizing the correct polarity of retinal layers and for the final differentiation of the Müller cells.