Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul George Lovell is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul George Lovell.


Journal of Vision | 2012

Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception.

Paul George Lovell; Marina Bloj; Julie M. Harris

We explore the relative utility of shape from shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. Ray-traced images either featured a smooth surface illuminated from above (shading-only) or were defined by small dots (disparity-only). Observers judged which of a pair of smoothly curved convex objects had most depth. The shading cue was around half as reliable as the rich disparity information for depth discrimination. Shading- and disparity-defined cues where combined by placing dots in the stimulus image, superimposed upon the shaded surface, resulting in veridical shading and binocular disparity. Independently varying the depth delivered by each channel allowed creation of conflicting disparity-defined and shading-defined depth. We manipulated the reliability of the disparity information by adding disparity noise. As noise levels in the disparity channel were increased, perceived depths and variances shifted toward those of the now more reliable shading cue. Several different models of cue combination were applied to the data. Perceived depths and variances were well predicted by a classic maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) model of cue integration, for all but one observer. We discuss the extent to which MLE is the most parsimonious model to account for observer performance.


Archive | 2015

3D camouflage : exploiting photons to conceal form

Olivier Penacchio; Paul George Lovell; Innes C. Cuthill; Graeme D. Ruxton; Julie M. Harris

Many animals have a gradation of body color, termed “countershading,” where the areas that are typically exposed to more light are darker. One hypothesis is that this patterning enhances visual camouflage by making the retinal image of the animal match that of the background, a fundamentally two-dimensional theory. More controversially, countershading may also obliterate cues to three-dimensional (3D) shape delivered by shading. Despite relying on distinct cognitive mechanisms, these two potential functions hitherto have been amalgamated in the literature. It has previously not been possible to validate either hypothesis empirically, because there has been no general theory of optimal countershading that allows quantitative predictions to be made about the many environmental parameters involved. Here we unpack the logical distinction between using countershading for background matching and using it to obliterate 3D shape. We use computational modeling to determine the optimal coloration for the camouflage of 3D shape. Our model of 3D concealment is derived from the physics of light and informed by perceptual psychology: we simulate a 3D world that incorporates naturalistic lighting environments. The model allows us to predict countershading coloration for terrestrial environments, for any body shape and a wide range of ecologically relevant parameters. The approach can be generalized to any light distribution, including those underwater.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

Optimizing countershading camouflage

Innes C. Cuthill; N. Simon Sanghera; Olivier Penacchio; Paul George Lovell; Graeme D. Ruxton; Julie M. Harris

Significance Because the sun and sky are above us, natural illumination is directional and the cues from shading reveal shape and depth. However, many animals are darker on their backs and, over 100 years ago, it was proposed that this phenomenon was camouflage: countering the cues to shape that directional illumination creates. However, does this camouflage work in practice? We predicted the optimal countershading for different lighting conditions and tested this possibility with correspondingly patterned model “caterpillars” predated by birds in the wild. Predation rates varied with coloration and lighting in exactly the manner predicted. Such subtlety in the effects of countershading vindicates conclusions from prior evidence demonstrating stronger countershading in animals in more brightly lit habitats. Countershading, the widespread tendency of animals to be darker on the side that receives strongest illumination, has classically been explained as an adaptation for camouflage: obliterating cues to 3D shape and enhancing background matching. However, there have only been two quantitative tests of whether the patterns observed in different species match the optimal shading to obliterate 3D cues, and no tests of whether optimal countershading actually improves concealment or survival. We use a mathematical model of the light field to predict the optimal countershading for concealment that is specific to the light environment and then test this prediction with correspondingly patterned model “caterpillars” exposed to avian predation in the field. We show that the optimal countershading is strongly illumination-dependent. A relatively sharp transition in surface patterning from dark to light is only optimal under direct solar illumination; if there is diffuse illumination from cloudy skies or shade, the pattern provides no advantage over homogeneous background-matching coloration. Conversely, a smoother gradation between dark and light is optimal under cloudy skies or shade. The demonstration of these illumination-dependent effects of different countershading patterns on predation risk strongly supports the comparative evidence showing that the type of countershading varies with light environment.


Ecology and Evolution | 2016

Eggshell pigment composition covaries with phylogeny but not with life history or with nesting ecology traits of British passerines

Kaat Brulez; Ivan Mikšík; Christopher R. Cooney; Mark E. Hauber; Paul George Lovell; Golo Maurer; Steven J. Portugal; Douglas Russell; Silas James Reynolds; Phillip Cassey

Abstract No single hypothesis is likely to explain the diversity in eggshell coloration and patterning across birds, suggesting that eggshell appearance is most likely to have evolved to fulfill many nonexclusive functions. By controlling for nonindependent phylogenetic associations between related species, we describe this diversity using museum eggshells of 71 British breeding passerine species to examine how eggshell pigment composition and concentrations vary with phylogeny and with life‐history and nesting ecology traits. Across species, concentrations of biliverdin and protoporphyrin, the two main pigments found in eggshells, were strongly and positively correlated, and both pigments strongly covaried with phylogenetic relatedness. Controlling for phylogeny, cavity‐nesting species laid eggs with lower protoporphyrin concentrations in the shell, while higher biliverdin concentrations were associated with thicker eggshells for species of all nest types. Overall, these relationships between eggshell pigment concentrations and the biology of passerines are similar to those previously found in nonpasserine eggs, and imply that phylogenetic dependence must be considered across the class in further explanations of the functional significance of avian eggshell coloration.


PLOS ONE | 2013

Eggshell appearance does not signal maternal corticosterone exposure in Japanese quail: an experimental study with brown-spotted eggs.

Camille Duval; Phillip Cassey; Paul George Lovell; Ivan Mikšík; S. James Reynolds; Karen A. Spencer

Reproduction is a critical period for birds as they have to cope with many stressful events. One consequence of an acute exposure to stress is the release of corticosterone, the avian stress hormone. Prolonged stress can have negative impacts on the immune system, resulting in, for example, increased oxidative stress. Through maternal effects, females are known to modulate their investment in eggs content according to their own physiological condition. Less is known about maternal investment in eggshells, especially in pigments. The two main eggshell pigments may possess opposite antioxidant properties: protoporphyrin (brown) is a pro-oxidant, whereas biliverdin (blue-green) is an antioxidant. In Japanese quail, we know that the deposition of both pigments is related to female body condition. Thus, a chronic stress response may be reflected in eggshell coloration. Using female Japanese quails that lay brown-spotted eggs, we explored whether physiological exposure to corticosterone induces a change in female basal stress and antioxidant factors, and eggshell pigment concentration, spectrophotometric reflectance, and maculation coverage. We supplemented adult females over a 2 week period with either peanut oil (control) or corticosterone (treatment). We collected pre- and post-supplementation eggs and analysed the effect of corticosterone treatment on female physiology and eggshell appearance parameters. Except for corticosterone-fed birds which laid eggs with brighter spots, supplementation had no significant effect on female physiology or eggshell pigment concentration, reflectance and maculation. The change in eggshell spot brightness was not detected by a photoreceptor noise-limited color opponent model of avian visual perception. Our data confirms that eggshell reflectance in spotted eggs varies over the laying sequence, and spot reflectance may be a key factor that is affected by females CORT exposure, even if the changes are not detected by an avian visual model.


I-perception | 2012

Binocular Vision, Training and Lightness Constancy

Lucy Jane Spencer; Paul George Lovell; Julie M. Harris

Lightness constancy refers to the ability to estimate an objects lightness (ie, surface reflectance), regardless of variations in the light being reflected from the object—for example, when the illumination changes or the object moves. Buckley et al (1994) observed that binocular cues improve lightness constancy. Here we explored how training improved lightness constancy under binocular, bi-ocular (identical images to each eye), and monocular viewing. Stimuli consisted of a diffusely illuminated Lambertian grey box, containing a single target: a faceted rectangular block that could be presented at a range of depths within the box. Stimuli were presented stereoscopically (to provide full binocular cues), monocularly, and bi-ocularly. In the experiment, participants were asked to select one of a number of blocks, presented below the box, that was of the same material as the target block. Four groups of participants received differing training regimes. Active training involved moving a block of fixed reflec...


I-perception | 2012

Efficient Cue-Combination Even at the Temporal Limits of Perception

Paul George Lovell; Marina Bloj; Julie M. Harris

Attempts to measure cue combination at very brief stimulus durations are rare. Previous studies with static (2 s duration) stimuli have demonstrated efficient (maximum likelihood estimate—MLE) cue combination between shading and binocular disparity (SVG 2011, JOV 2012). Here, we present a novel methodology and additional experimental data, which enables us to visualise the depth discrimination performance of observers as a 2D surface defined by the axes duration and physical depth. By separately mapping this surface for shade, binocular disparity, and for both cues in combination, we can trace how channel variances change as a function of presentation time. The variances of the shade and stereo-disparity channels fall as a function of duration. For the shade cue, variance is initially lower, but the variance of the binocular disparity channel falls more quickly with duration. MLE is then used to infer cue weightings as a function of stimulus duration and predicts that observers will initially rely upon sh...


I-perception | 2014

Countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference

Olivier Penacchio; Paul George Lovell; Graeme D. Ruxton; Innes C. Cuthill; Julie M. Harris


I-perception | 2014

Are shadows only coarsely processed? Exploring depth discrimination with cast shadow cue conflicts across spatial frequency

Paul George Lovell; Kenneth C. Scott-Brown


Perception | 2012

Understanding bird egg patterning: assessing visual camouflage using visual difference and edge-detection models

Karen A. Spencer; Keri V Langridge; Graeme D. Ruxton; Paul George Lovell

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul George Lovell's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marina Bloj

University of Bradford

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Camille Duval

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kaat Brulez

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge