Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul J. Cocker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul J. Cocker.


Neuropsychopharmacology | 2014

Dissociable Contributions of Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala on a Rodent Cost/Benefit Decision-Making Task of Cognitive Effort

Jay G. Hosking; Paul J. Cocker; Catharine A. Winstanley

Personal success often requires the choice to expend greater effort for larger rewards, and deficits in such effortful decision making accompany a number of illnesses including depression, schizophrenia, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Animal models have implicated brain regions such as the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in physical effort-based choice, but disentangling the unique contributions of these two regions has proven difficult, and effort demands in industrialized society are predominantly cognitive in nature. Here we utilize the rodent cognitive effort task (rCET), a modification of the five-choice serial reaction-time task, wherein animals can choose to expend greater visuospatial attention to obtain larger sucrose rewards. Temporary inactivation (via baclofen–muscimol) of BLA and ACC showed dissociable effects: BLA inactivation caused hard-working rats to ‘slack off’ and ‘slacker’ rats to work harder, whereas ACC inactivation caused all animals to reduce willingness to expend mental effort. Furthermore, BLA inactivation increased the time needed to make choices, whereas ACC inactivation increased motor impulsivity. These data illuminate unique contributions of BLA and ACC to effort-based decision making, and imply overlapping yet distinct circuitry for cognitive vs physical effort. Our understanding of effortful decision making may therefore require expanding our models beyond purely physical costs.


Biological Psychiatry | 2014

A Selective Role for Dopamine D4 Receptors in Modulating Reward Expectancy in a Rodent Slot Machine Task

Paul J. Cocker; Bernard Le Foll; Robert D. Rogers; Catharine A. Winstanley

BACKGROUND Cognitive distortions regarding gambling outcomes confer vulnerability to pathological gambling. Using a rat slot machine task (rSMT), we previously demonstrated that the nonspecific D₂ agonist quinpirole enhances erroneous expectations of reward on near-miss trials, suggesting a pivotal role for the D₂ receptor family in mediating the near-miss effect. Identifying which receptor subtype is involved could facilitate treatment development for compulsive slot machine play. METHODS Thirty-two male Long Evans rats learned the rSMT. Three flashing lights could be set to on or off. A win was signaled if all three lights were set to on, whereas any other light pattern indicated a loss. Rats then chose between responding on the collect lever, which delivered 10 sugar pellets on win trials but a 10-second time penalty on loss trials, or to start a new trial instead. Performance was assessed following systemic administration of selective D₂, D₃, and D₄ receptor ligands. RESULTS The selective D₂ antagonist L-741,626, the D₃ antagonist SB-277011-A, and the D₃ agonist PD128,907 had no effect. In contrast, the selective D₄ agonist PD168077 partially mimicked quinpiroles effects, increasing erroneous collect responses on nonwin trials, whereas the D₄ antagonist L-745,870 improved the error rate. L-745,870 was also the only antagonist that could attenuate the deleterious effects of quinpirole. CONCLUSIONS The dopamine D₄ receptor is critically involved in signaling reward expectancy in the rSMT. The ability of L-745,870 to reduce the classification of losses as wins suggests that D₄ antagonists could be effective in treating problematic slot machine play.


Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2014

Dissociable effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on decision making biases in rats when loss or gain is emphasized

Melanie Tremblay; Paul J. Cocker; Jay G. Hosking; Fiona D. Zeeb; Robert D. Rogers; Catharine A. Winstanley

Individuals switch from risk seeking to risk aversion when mathematically identical options are described in terms of loss versus gains, as exemplified in the reflection and framing effects. Determining the neurobiology underlying such cognitive biases could inform our understanding of decision making in health and disease. Although reports vary, data using human subjects have implicated the amygdala in such biases. Animal models enable more detailed investigation of neurobiological mechanisms. We therefore tested whether basolateral amygdala (BLA) lesions would affect risk preference for gains or losses in rats. Choices in both paradigms were always between options of equal expected value—a guaranteed outcome, or the 50:50 chance of double or nothing. In the loss-chasing task, most rats exhibited strong risk seeking preferences, gambling at the risk of incurring double the penalty, regardless of the size of the guaranteed loss. In the betting task, the majority of animals were equivocal in their choice, irrespective of bet size; however, a wager-sensitive subgroup progressively shifted away from the uncertain option as the bet size increased, which is reminiscent of risk aversion. BLA lesions increased preference for the smaller guaranteed loss in the loss-chasing task, without affecting choice on the betting task, which is indicative of reduced risk seeking for losses, but intact risk aversion for gains. These data support the hypothesis that the amygdala plays a more prominent role in choice biases related to losses. Given the importance of the amygdala in representing negative affect, the aversive emotional reaction to loss, rather than aberrant estimations of probability or loss magnitude, may underlie risk seeking for losses.


Behavioural Brain Research | 2017

Dissociable effects of systemic and orbitofrontal administration of adrenoceptor antagonists on yohimbine-induced motor impulsivity

Wendy K. Adams; Michael M. Barrus; Fiona D. Zeeb; Paul J. Cocker; James Benoit; Catharine A. Winstanley

ABSTRACT The &agr;2‐adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, is commonly used as a pharmacological stressor. Its behavioural effects are typically attributed to elevated noradrenaline release via blockade of central, inhibitory autoreceptors. We have previously reported that yohimbine increases motor impulsivity in rats on the five‐choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT), a cognitive behavioural assessment which measures motor impulsivity and visuospatial attention. Furthermore, this effect depended on cyclic adenomonophosphate (cAMP) signalling via cAMP response element binding (CREB) protein in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). However, the role of specific adrenoceptors in this effect is not well‐characterised. We therefore investigated whether the pro‐impulsive effects of systemic yohimbine could be reproduced by direct administration into the OFC, or attenuated by intra‐OFC or systemic administration of prazosin and propranolol—antagonists at the &agr;1‐ and &bgr;‐adrenoceptor, respectively. Male Long‐Evans rats were trained on the 5CSRTT and implanted with guide cannulae aimed at the OFC. Systemically administered &agr;1‐ or &bgr;‐adrenoceptor antagonists attenuated yohimbine‐induced increases in premature responding. In contrast, local infusion of yohimbine into the OFC reduced such impulsive responding, while blockade of &agr;1‐ or &bgr;‐adrenoceptors within the OFC had no effect on either basal or yohimbine‐stimulated motor impulsivity. Direct administration of selective antagonists at the &agr;1‐, &agr;2‐ or &bgr;‐adrenoceptor into the OFC therefore produce clearly dissociable effects from systemic administration. Collectively, these data suggest that the pro‐impulsivity effect of yohimbine can be modulated by adrenergic signalling in brain areas outside of the OFC, in addition to non‐adrenergic signalling pathways within the OFC.


Psychopharmacology | 2016

The agranular and granular insula differentially contribute to gambling-like behavior on a rat slot machine task: effects of inactivation and local infusion of a dopamine D4 agonist on reward expectancy

Paul J. Cocker; M. Y. Lin; M. M. Barrus; B. Le Foll; Catherine A. Winstanley

RationaleRats, like humans, are susceptible to the reinforcing effects of reward-related stimuli presented within a compound stimulus array, putatively analogous to the so-called near-miss effect. We have previously demonstrated using a rodent slot machine task (rSMT) that the reward expectancy these stimuli elicit is critically mediated by the dopamine D4 receptor. D4 receptors are principally located in prefrontal regions activated during slot machine play in humans, such as the insular cortex. The insula has recently attracted considerable interest as it appears to play a crucial role in substance and behavioral addictions. However, the insula is a heterogeneous area, and the relative contributions of subregions to addictive behaviors are unclear.MethodsMale Long Evans rats were trained to perform the rSMT, and then bilateral cannula targeting either the granular or agranular insula were implanted. The effects of inactivation and local administration of a D4 agonist were investigated.ResultsTemporary inactivation of the agranular, but not the granular insula impaired performance on the rSMT. In contrast, local infusion of the D4 agonist PD168077 into the agranular insula had no effect on task performance, but when administered into the granular insula, it improved animals’ ability to differentiate winning from non-winning trials. The agranular insula may therefore modulate decision making when conflicting stimuli are present, potentially due to its role in generating a cohesive emotional percept based on both externally and internally generated signals, whereas the granular insular is not critical for this process. Nevertheless, D4 receptors within the granular insula may amplify the incentive salience of aversive environmental stimuli.DiscussionThese data provide insight into the neurobiological mechanism underpinning maladaptive reward expectancy during gambling and provide further evidence that D4 receptors represent a potential target for developing pharmacotherapies for problem gambling.


eNeuro | 2017

Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Selectively Decreases Risky Choice in Risk-Preferring Rats

Wendy K. Adams; Cole Vonder Haar; Melanie Tremblay; Paul J. Cocker; Mason M. Silveira; Sukhbir Kaur; Christelle Baunez; Catharine A. Winstanley

Abstract Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) can improve the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and negate the problematic side effects of dopamine replacement therapy. Although there is concern that STN-DBS may enhance the development of gambling disorder and other impulse control disorders in this patient group, recent data suggest that STN-DBS may actually reduce iatrogenic impulse control disorders, and alleviate obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Here, we sought to determine whether STN-DBS was beneficial or detrimental to performance of the rat gambling task (rGT), a rodent analogue of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) used to assess risky decision making clinically. Rats chose between four options associated with different amounts and probabilities of sugar pellet rewards versus timeout punishments. As in the IGT, the optimal approach was to favor options associated with smaller per-trial gains but lower timeout penalties. Once a stable behavioral baseline was established, electrodes were implanted bilaterally into the STN, and the effects of STN-DBS assessed on-task over 10 consecutive sessions using an A-B-A design. STN-DBS did not affect choice in optimal decision makers that correctly favored options associated with smaller per-trial gains but also lower penalties. However, a minority (∼25%) preferred the maladaptive “high-risk, high-reward” options at baseline. STN-DBS significantly and progressively improved choice in these risk-preferring rats. These data support the hypothesis that STN-DBS may be beneficial in ameliorating maladaptive decision making associated with compulsive and addiction disorders.


Current Addiction Reports | 2015

Towards a Better Understanding of Disordered Gambling: Efficacy of Animal Paradigms in Modelling Aspects of Gambling Behaviour

Paul J. Cocker; Catharine A. Winstanley

The parallels between gambling and substance addiction are increasingly acknowledged; despite this, legislation surrounding gambling is being progressively relaxed and opportunities to gamble continue to increase. There are currently no dedicated treatment options for gambling disorder, and as such, it may come to represent a considerable public health concern. Gamblers represent a heterogeneous population; yet, deficits have been repeatedly observed in regard to impulse control and decision making. Additionally, gamblers typically demonstrate greater endorsement of irrational or distorted beliefs regarding gambling in comparison to healthy controls. In this review, we suggest that animal models may offer a valuable opportunity to elucidate the neurobiological basis underlying these three major areas of dysfunction. We present a number of rodent behavioural paradigms that indicate a somewhat common involvement of the dopamine D2-like receptor family. Yet, importantly, these tasks show that these behaviours appear to be both pharmacologically and neurologically dissociable. Use of these animal models could therefore theoretically inform more symptom-directed pharmacotherapies based on areas of dysfunction seen in individuals.


Neuropsychopharmacology | 2011

Dopamine Modulates Reward Expectancy During Performance of a Slot Machine Task in Rats: Evidence for a ‘Near-miss’ Effect

Catharine A. Winstanley; Paul J. Cocker; Robert D. Rogers


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2012

Irrational Choice under Uncertainty Correlates with Lower Striatal D2/3 Receptor Binding in Rats

Paul J. Cocker; Katherine Dinelle; Rick Kornelson; Vesna Sossi; Catharine A. Winstanley


Psychopharmacology | 2012

Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence decreases impulsive choice, but not impulsive action, in adult rats and alters markers of synaptic plasticity in the orbitofrontal cortex

HaoSheng Sun; Paul J. Cocker; Fiona D. Zeeb; Catharine A. Winstanley

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul J. Cocker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catharine A. Winstanley

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay G. Hosking

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fiona D. Zeeb

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melanie Tremblay

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Benoit

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael M. Barrus

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy K. Adams

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sukhbir Kaur

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge