Paul J. Goodnick

A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND Previous reports have described the effects of vagus nerve stimulation plus treatment as usual (VNS+TAU) during open trials of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). To better understand these effects on long-term outcome, we compared 12-month VNS+TAU outcomes with those of a comparable TRD group. METHODS Admission criteria were similar for those receiving VNS+TAU (n = 205) or only TAU (n = 124). In the primary analysis, repeated-measures linear regression was used to compare the VNS+TAU group (monthly data) with the TAU group (quarterly data) according to scores of the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (IDS-SR(30)). RESULTS The two groups had similar baseline demographic data, psychiatric and treatment histories, and degrees of treatment resistance, except that more TAU participants had at least 10 prior major depressive episodes, and the VNS+TAU group had more electroconvulsive therapy before study entry. Vagus nerve stimulation plus treatment as usual was associated with greater improvement per month in IDS-SR(30) than TAU across 12 months (p < .001). Response rates according to the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (last observation carried forward) at 12 months were 27% for VNS+TAU and 13% for TAU (p < .011). Both groups received similar TAU (drugs and electroconvulsive therapy) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This comparison of two similar but nonrandomized TRD groups showed that VNS+TAU was associated with a greater antidepressant benefit over 12 months.

Use of Antidepressants in Treatment of Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus and Depression as Well as in Diabetic Neuropathy

UNLABELLED After a brief review of epidemiology, the focus is on biochemistry of diabetes. Animal and human studies are reviewed in terms of the impact of alterations in catecholamines and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5HT) on glucose utilization. Then, the implications of these experimental results for the choice of antidepressant in comorbid diabetes mellitus and depression as well as in diabetic neuropathy are discussed. Results of clinical investigations are then reviewed in terms of the above hypotheses. An Index Medicus Search for the past 10 years was supplemented by references from previous related reviews of the topic as well as by pending results, where available, not previously published. The range of prevalence of depression in diabetic patients has been 8-27%, depending on study criteria and procedures. An increase of catecholamines appears to increase glucose while both reducing insulin release and reducing sensitivity to insulin that is available. In contrast, increases in serotonergic function by increased precursor, increased release, or blocked metabolism and blocked reuptake in contrast seem to increase sensitivity to insulin and reduce plasma glucose. There have been six studies of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), at a dose of 60 mg/day pursued up to 12 months that have demonstrated that medications usefulness in diabetic patients, with reductions in weight (to 9.3 kg), in FPG (to 45 mg%), and in HbA1c (to 2.5%). In studies in comorbid diabetes mellitus and depression, nortriptyline, a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that produces increased synaptic catechols, has led to worsening of indices of glucose control. However, fluoxetine and sertraline, both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, in the same patient group, have produced results consistent with reductions in glucose levels. In diabetic neuropathy, perhaps due to the fact that catecholamines and serotonin may both be implicated in pain pathways, dual-action antidepressants appear more effective at lower doses than do specific serotonergic agents. The tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) (66.7%) have had success in double-blind studies, particularly imipramine, with a 81% response rate. Yet, there are positive reports concerning the SSRIs (paroxetine, citalopram, sertraline), as well as nefazodone, that focus on serotonin selectivity. CONCLUSIONS In comorbid diabetes mellitus and depression, most evidence supports the use of fluoxetine in control of glucose handling. Other characteristics in terms dosing, drug interactions, cognition, and sleep make sertraline an attractive alternative agent. In diabetic neuropathy without depression, the best choices among non-TCAs may include sertraline, citalopram, and perhaps, venlafaxine, since the TCAs appear to increase cravings and increase FBG levels.

Life Events as Predictors of Mania and Depression in Bipolar I Disorder

To date, few prospective studies of life events and bipolar disorder are available, and even fewer have separately examined the role of life events in depression and mania. The goal of this study was to prospectively examine the role of negative and goal-attainment life events as predictors of the course of bipolar disorder. One hundred twenty-five individuals with bipolar I disorder were interviewed monthly for an average of 27 months. Negative and goal-attainment life events were assessed with the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule. Changes in symptoms were evaluated using the Modified Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale. The clearest results were obtained for goal-attainment life events, which predicted increases in manic symptoms over time. Negative life events predicted increases in depressive symptoms within regression models but were not predictive within multilevel modeling of changes in depressive symptoms. Given different patterns for goal attainment and negative life events, it appears important to consider specific forms of life events in models of bipolar disorder.

Aripiprazole: profile on efficacy and safety

Aripiprazole (Abilitat™, Bristol-Myers Squibb) is the most recent addition to the new class of atypical antipsychotic medications, following the release of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone. Aripiprazole exhibits typical antagonism at dopamine (D2) receptors in the mesolimbic pathway, as well as having unique partial agonist activity at D2 receptors in the mesocortical pathway. As exemplified by other atypical antipsychotics, it displays strong 5-HT2a receptor antagonism and is similar to ziprasidone in also having agonistic activity at the 5-HT1a receptor. Among the atypical antipsychotics, aripiprazole displays the lowest affinity for α1adrenergic (α1), histamine (H1) and muscarinic (M1) receptors. This combination of effects may be responsible for its efficacy in positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and in bipolar disorder. Similarly, this profile may be the reason for the low rates of reported side effects observed. This includes general adverse events, a low incidence of reported weight gain and a low liability for inducing movement disorders. Other early data suggest that aripiprazole may induce reductions in plasma prolactin, as well as in plasma glucose and lipid profiles. Finally, results also support the proposition that aripiprazole may lead to reductions in corrected QT interval and have minimal drug interactions.

Antipsychotics: impact on prolactin levels

Hyperprolactinaemia has been associated with a variety of side effects including amenorrhoea, galactorrhoea, sexual dysfunction, breast engorgement and osteoporosis. Since the mid-1970s, the impact of antipsychotics on human prolactin (hPrl) levels has been investigated. Baseline levels of hPrl were found to be similar in healthy controls and patients who were diagnosed as having schizophrenia. Short-term acute studies done after single parenteral or oral doses of phenothiazines found rapid two- to tenfold increases in hPrl. Similar increases were found in longer term studies that reported increases of three times in both men and women after 3 days that doubled again after several weeks of treatment. A study of longer term injectable fluphenazine enanthate found that elevation induced by a single injection lasted up to 28 days. The same results with significant increases have been reported with the butyrophenone, haloperidol. Substantial increases are found after single injections (up to nine times) and after weeks of treatment (up to three times sustained). Thus, early literature believed that there might be an association between these induced changes and response to therapy. However, prolactin is secreted by the anterior pituitary and is under inhibitory control of dopamine released from the tuberoinfundibular neurons. Thus, increases in prolactin are due to antipsychotic impact on tuberoinfundibular tract, one of four dopamine-related tracts. With the application of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics, it was found that medications can successfully treat psychosis without increasing hPrl. In fact, early single-dose trails found clozapine to reduce hPrl by 16%. Later studies replicated this result and also found that up to 6 weeks of administration led to reductions in hPrl of up to 80%. Risperidone, however, has been found to persistently elevate hPrl in studies, despite its impact on other receptor sites. Olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone have all been found to have little effect or produce decreases in hPrl. Most recently, aripiprazole, in early studies, appears to produce significant reductions in hPrl while maintaining therapeutic efficacy for psychosis.

Psychotropic drugs and the ECG: focus on the QTc interval

The QT interval measuring depolarisation and repolarisation has, when lengthened, been implicated as a risk factor for the development of torsades de pointes and sudden death, particularly in patients predisposed to these complications due to cardiovascular impairment. Since some of the medications used in psychiatry have been implicated, an extensive review of available literature was made of the major classes, including antipsychotics, antidepressants, lithium, anticonvulsants and benzodiazepines. Further, where no publications were found on a particular medication, the pharmaceutical firms responsible for these items were contacted concerning possibly unpublished data. Results of the survey indicate that there may be difficulty in one of three situations: immediate (in the first minutes to hours after oral or parenteral administration), short-term use of 4 – 12 weeks or long-term use of ≥ 6 months. Based on this approach, the greatest concern is directed at the immediate application of haloperidol, droperidol, pimozide and trazodone, the short-term use of thioridazine, pimozide, sertindole, nortriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin and the long-term use of clozapine, olanzapine and carbamazepine. It is of interest that a reduction in QTc is reported with aripiprazole. Among the antidepressants, the tertiary tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, amitriptyline and doxepin) appear to have a more general impact, while the secondary tricyclic antidepressants (nortriptyline, desipramine) may impact more on children and the elderly. Among other antidepressants, the only reports of torsades de pointes appeared to occur with mirtazapine. It was also of interest to find data showing no effect or reductions in QTc produced by sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine and bupropion in multiple studies. Effects of medications on other heart parameters are also briefly reviewed. In particular, the safety of sertraline in post-MI patients and of bupropion in heart disease patients is highlighted. Little information was available on other classes of medications used in psychiatric disorders. What is available concerning lithium, the anticonvulsants and the benzodiazepines indicates little effect on the QTc, although there may be effects on other cardiovascular parameters.

Pharmacokinetic Optimisation of Therapy with Newer Antidepressants

SummarySince the early 1950s, when imipramine was first introduced, a whole series of antidepressants with differences in structures, neurochemical effects and pharmacokinetics have been developed. Structurally or functionally, they have been classified as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), tetracyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), or selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In addition, there is a series of antidepressants with unique structures.Many of the newer TCAs appear to have shorter half-lives than the standard TCAs (e.g. imipramine), allowing for the possibility of a more rapid response, but requiring the drugs to be given in multiple daily doses, which may reduce patient compliance. The short time to peak plasma concentration (tmax) can also lead to rapid onset of adverse effects. The tetracyclic antidepressants have longer elimination half-lives (t½) than the TCAs, but there is only very minimal evidence for a relationship between drug concentrations in the blood and clinical response. The triazolopyridines, like the newer TCAs, show pharmacokinetic evidence for rapid onset of adverse effects and the need for multiple daily doses due to short tmax and t½.The newer MAOIs are a significant addition to therapy, as the rapid binding action of these medications increases their safety margin with regard to tyramine interactions. Further information in this area is required. In addition, moclobemide has pharmacokinetic features that are clinically beneficial (e.g. aging and renal dysfunction have little effect on the elimination of the drug), but also features that are not beneficial (e.g. nonlinear pharmacokinetics).Among the SSRIs, there are a range of t½ values for the parent drugs, from relatively short t½ values of less than 24 hours (paroxetine, fluvoxamine) to among the longest found (e.g. 2 days for fluoxetine). Only 2 of the agents (sertraline and citalopram) have linear pharmacokinetics, and 1 drug has nonlinear pharmacokinetics within the usual therapeutic range (fluvoxamine). Once a therapeutic blood concentration is established, linearity is helpful in avoiding the small dose changes and repeated rechecking of concentrations of medications that would be required for those agents with nonlinear pharmacokinetics. Sertraline stands out as having the best effects on behaviour among all antidepressants. However, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine are least likely to penetrate into breast milk.All 3 of the structurally unique newer antidepressants [amfebutamone (bupropion), viloxazine venlafaxine] have relatively short tmax values (1 to 2 hours), which may relate to the early onset of adverse effects. Amfebutamone has the benefits of linear pharmacokinetics with potential for defined therapeutic blood concentrations, lack of effect of liver enzymes on metabolism of the drug, and lack of significant effects of either aging or hepatic dysfunction on elimination of the drug.Thus, the antidepressants best suited for pharmacokinetic optimisation of therapy are the following: desipramine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, citalopram and amfebutamone.

Treatment of depression in comorbid medical illness.

The rate of comorbid depression and medical illness varies from 10 to 40%. Over the years, there has been a paucity of studies completed despite the importance of knowing which antidepressants are the most effective and safest to use in comorbid states. In this review, focus is placed on disorders in these important areas: cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, diabetes mellitus and cancer. Cardiovascular disease complications can be related in many cases to platelet clumping produced by medications; reductions in morbidity can be achieved by reducing platelet adhesiveness. Specific results have shown sertraline administration to be safe in the post myocardial infarction (MI) state. This is a time of depression-induced increases of 200 - 300% in mortality. Evidence for safe administration of bupropion, as well as the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine and paroxetine, is also available. The appearance of major depression and diabetes mellitus has been successfully treated with fluoxetine, sertraline and nortriptyline (NTI) , however, NTI may lead to a worsening of glucose indices due to its noradrenergic specificity. Regarding neurologic disorders, there is controlled data showing the safety and efficacy of citalopram, sertraline and fluoxetine in post stroke depression. Parkinson’s disease has been associated frequently with depression, as might be expected from its characteristic dopamine deficient state. For perhaps the same reason, the agents that can block re-uptake of dopamine i.e., tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), have been effective in comorbid depression with Parkinson’s disease. In dementia, there is a paucity of information on new agents. However, double-blind data seems to show efficacy for sertraline, paroxetine and citalopram. There are few studies of cancer-related depression treated in a controlled fashion with antidepressants; imipramine, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, mirtazapine and mianserin (not available in the USA) all have support from some published studies.

Antipsychotic medication: effects on regulation of glucose and lipids.

Since the introduction of chlorpromazine in the 1950s, antipsychotics have been used for the treatment of schizophrenia. The phenothiazines were followed by the butyrophenones, particularly haloperidol. With all the movement disorder side effects of these medications (extrapyramidal syndrome, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia), the pharmaceutical industry has gradually released atypical antipsychotics. This class includes clozapine (released in the USA in 1990), risperidone (1994), olanzapine (1996), quetiapine (1998) and ziprasidone (2001). However, the rate of diabetes mellitus in patients with schizophrenia appeared to increase with the availability of this class of medications. In reviewing rate and degree of changes in weight, glucose control and lipid levels induced by typical and atypical antipsychotics, it was found that in contrast to case reports, there is a dearth of retrospective, open and controlled studies. However, in studies as early as 1964, significant weight increases were found to be associated with use of chlorpromazine. While the phenothiazines may have some effect on patients with chemical diabetes, there is little evidence of the typical antipsychotics producing diabetes mellitus de novo, or worsening diabetes that is already been discovered. Ziprasidone appears to be the antipsychotic with the most beneficial combination of effects: no weight gain, no change in glucose utilisation and reductions in cholesterol and serum triglycerides (TGs).

Bupropion treatment of fluoxetine-resistant chronic fatigue syndrome

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) includes many symptoms of major depression. For this reason, many antidepressants have been used to treat the symptoms of this disorder. Among the more recently released antidepressants are fluoxetine and bupropion. In this open study, nine CFS patients who either could not tolerate or did not respond to fluoxetine showed significant response when administered 300 mg/day of bupropion for an 8-week period in both rating of HDRS (t = 4.80, p < 0.01) and BDI (t = 2.48, p < 0.05). Furthermore, bupropion improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale correlated significantly with change in plasma homovanillic acid (HVA) (r = 0.96, p < 0.01). Plasma total methylhydroxyphenolglycol (MHPG) also increased significantly during bupropion treatment (t = 2.37, p = 0.05). Measures of T1 microsomal antibodies also decreased over treatment time; increases in natural killer cell numbers correlated inversely with change in plasma levels of free MHPG (r = -0.88, p < 0.05). Bupropion responders were more likely to have trough blood levels above 30 ng/ml (chi 2 = 3.6, p = 0.05).