Paul J. King

The Cost of Unnecessary Hospital Days for Medicare Joint Arthroplasty Patients Discharging to Skilled Nursing Facilities

BACKGROUND The 72-hour Medicare mandate (3-night stay rule) requires a 3-day inpatient stay for patients discharging to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Studies show that 48%-64% of Medicare total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients are safe for discharge to SNFs on postoperative day (POD) #2. The purpose of this study was to extrapolate the financial impact of the 3-night stay rule. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all primary TJAs performed in 2015. Discharge destination was recorded. Institutional cost accounting examined costs for patients discharging on POD #2 vs POD #3. RESULTS A total of 42,423 TJAs (14,395 total hip arthroplasties [THAs] and 28,028 total knee arthroplasties [TKAs]) were performed in patients over the age of 65 years. Of these patients, 5252 THAs (36.5%) and 12,022 TKAs (42.9%) were discharged from the hospital on POD #3, with 2404 THAs (16.7%) and 5083 TKAs (18.1%) being discharged to SNFs. Institutional cost accounting revealed hospital costs for THA were

Do shorter lengths of stay increase readmissions after total joint replacements

2014 more, whereas hospital costs for TKA were

Evaluation of the Learning Curve When Transitioning From Posterolateral to Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty: A Consecutive Series of 1000 Cases

1814 more for a 3-day length of stay when compared with a 2-day length of stay (P < .001). The mean charge per day for an SNF was

Minimum 5-Year Follow-up of Articular Surface Replacement Acetabular Components Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty

486. CONCLUSION The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database is a representative sample of all surgeries performed in the United States. Extrapolating our findings to all Medicare TJAs nationally gives an estimated

Decreasing Postanesthesia Care Unit to Floor Transfer Times to Facilitate Short Stay Total Joint Replacements

63 million in annual savings. Medicare mandated, but potentially medically unnecessary inpatient days at a higher level of care increase the total cost for TJAs. Policies regarding minimum stay requirements before discharge should be re-evaluated.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Costs for Hospital Returns After Total Joint Arthroplasties

Background Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for total joint replacements (TJRs) emphasize early discharge, yet the impact on readmissions is not well documented. We evaluate the impact of a one-day length of stay (LOS) discharge protocol on readmissions. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all primary TJRs (hip and knee) from April 2014 to March 2015. Patients who had adequate support to be discharged home were categorized into 2 groups, 1-day (n = 174) vs 2-day (n = 285) LOS groups. Patients discharged to rehabilitation were excluded (n = 196). Results Patients in the 1 day group were more likely to be younger (61.7 vs 64.8 years, P < .001), be male (56.3% vs 40.4%, P = .001), and have a lower body mass index (30.0 vs 31.4 kg/m2, P = .012). One-day LOS patients had shorter surgical times (79.7 vs 85.6 minutes, P = .001) and more likely had spinal anesthesia (46.0% vs 31.2%, P = .001). The overall 30-day all-cause (2.3% vs 2.5%, P = .591) and 90-day wound-related (1.1% vs 1.1%, P = .617) readmission rates were equivalent between groups. Conclusions Early discharge does not increase readmissions and may help attenuate costs associated with TJRs. Further refinement of protocols may allow for more patients to be safely discharged on postoperative day 1.

Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND The direct anterior approach (DAA) for primary hip replacement has been gaining more attention and widespread use in recent years. There are a number of published studies evaluating the learning curve when a surgeon changes technique; these studies typically look at complications during the initial cases. This study examines procedure and total operating room (OR) time along with all complications for a surgeon transitioning from the posterolateral approach (PA) to DAA. METHODS A retrospective review of a single surgeon series of 1000 initial DAA procedures. Total OR time, procedure time, and complications were collected and analyzed. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc least significant difference tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS There was an initial increase in both procedure and OR times compared with the mature PA, by 34% and 30%, respectively. The procedure time became statistically equivalent to the mature PA time after the 400th DAA case, and significantly shorter after the 850th case. The total OR time became statistically equivalent after the 900th DAA case. There were 18 early (<90 days) and 18 late reoperations performed in this series with a nonsignificant trend toward femoral complications occurring early in the series. Minimum follow-up time was 2 years. CONCLUSION There was an initial increase in both total OR time and procedure time when an experienced surgeon introduced the DAA. By the end of the series, procedure time was significantly shorter and total OR time was equivalent. Complications overall were low and femoral complications decreased with time.

Who Is Not a Candidate for a 1-Day Hospital-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The articular surface replacement (ASR) monoblock metal-on-metal acetabular component was recalled due to a higher than expected early failure rate. We evaluated the survivorship of the device and variables that may be predictive of failure at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. A single-center, single-surgeon retrospective review was conducted in patients who received the DePuy Synthes ASR™ XL Acetabular hip system from December 2005 to November 2009. Mean values and percentages were calculated and compared using the Fishers exact test, simple logistic regression, and Students t-test. The significance level was P ≤ .05. This study included 29 patients (24 males, 5 females) with 32 ASR™ XL acetabular hip systems. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) reached 55.2 years and 28.9 kg/m², respectively. Mean postoperative follow-up was 6.2 years. A total of 2 patients (6.9%) died of an unrelated cause and 1 patient was lost to follow-up (3.4%), leaving 26 patients with 28 hip replacements, all of whom were available for follow-up. The 5-year revision rate was 34.4% (10 patients with 11 hip replacements). Mean time to revision was 3.1 years. Age (P = .76), gender (P = .49), BMI (P = .29), acetabular component abduction angle (P = .12), and acetabulum size (P = .59) were not associated with the increased rate for hip failure. Blood cobalt (7.6 vs 6.8 µg/L, P = .58) and chromium (5.0 vs 2.2 µg/L, P = .31) levels were not significantly higher in the revised group when compared with those of the unrevised group. In the revised group, a 91% decrease in cobalt and 78% decrease in chromium levels were observed at a mean of 6 months following the revision. This study demonstrates a high rate of failure of ASR acetabular components used in total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. No variable that was predictive of failure could be identified in this series. Close clinical surveillance of these patients is required.

The Impact of Surgical Technique on Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Early Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Purpose: We describe a process for studying and improving baseline postanesthesia care unit (PACU)‐to‐floor transfer times after total joint replacements. Design: Quality improvement project using lean methodology. Methods: Phase I of the investigational process involved collection of baseline data. Phase II involved developing targeted solutions to improve throughput. Phase III involved measured project sustainability. Findings: Phase I investigations revealed that patients spent an additional 62 minutes waiting in the PACU after being designated ready for transfer. Five to 16 telephone calls were needed between the PACU and the unit to facilitate each patient transfer. The most common reason for delay was unavailability of the unit nurse who was attending to another patient (58%). Phase II interventions resulted in transfer times decreasing to 13 minutes (79% reduction, P < .001). Phase III recorded sustained transfer times at 30 minutes, a net 52% reduction (P < .001) from baseline. Conclusions: Lean methodology resulted in the immediate decrease of PACU‐to‐floor transfer times by 79%, with a 52% sustained improvement. Our methods can also be used to improve efficiencies of care at other institutions.