Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul May is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul May.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Early Oncologic Failure after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

Ahmed A. Hussein; Matthias Saar; Paul May; C. Wijburg; Lee Richstone; Andrew A. Wagner; Timothy Wilson; Bertram Yuh; Joan Palou Redorta; Prokar Dasgupta; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Mani Menon; James O. Peabody; Abolfazl Hosseini; Franco Gaboardi; Alexandre Mottrie; Koon-Ho Rha; Ashok K. Hemal; M. Stöckle; John D. Kelly; Thomas J. Maatman; A.E. Canda; Peter Wiklund; Khurshid A. Guru; Mevlana Derya Balbay; Vassilis Poulakis; Michael Woods; Wei Shen Tan; Omar Kawa; Giovannalberto Pini

Purpose: We sought to investigate the prevalence and variables associated with early oncologic failure. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the IRCC (International Radical Cystectomy Consortium) database of patients who underwent robot‐assisted radical cystectomy since 2003. The final cohort comprised a total of 1,894 patients from 23 institutions in 11 countries. Early oncologic failure was defined as any disease relapse within 3 months of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy. All institutions were surveyed for the pneumoperitoneum pressure used, breach of oncologic surgical principles, and techniques of specimen and lymph node removal. A multivariate model was fit to evaluate predictors of early oncologic failure. The Kaplan‐Meier method was applied to depict disease specific and overall survival, and Cox proportional regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of disease specific and overall survival. Results: A total of 305 patients (22%) experienced disease relapse, which was distant in 220 (16%), local recurrence in 154 (11%), peritoneal carcinomatosis in 17 (1%) and port site recurrence in 5 (0.4%). Early oncologic failure developed in 71 patients (5%) at a total of 10 institutions. The incidence of early oncologic failure decreased from 10% in 2006 to 6% in 2015. On multivariate analysis the presence of any complication (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.38–5.96, p = 0.004), pT3 or greater disease (OR 3.73, 95% CI 2.00–6.97, p <0.001) and nodal involvement (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.21–3.80, p = 0.008) was a significant predictor of early oncologic failure. Patients with early oncologic failure demonstrated worse disease specific and overall survival (23% and 13%, respectively) at 1 and 3 years compared to patients who experienced later or no recurrences (log rank p <0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of early oncologic failure following robot‐assisted radical cystectomy has decreased with time. Disease related rather than technical related factors have a major role in early oncologic failure after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Natural History, Predictors and Management of Ureteroenteric Strictures after Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

Youssef Ahmed; Ahmed A. Hussein; Paul May; Basim Ahmad; Taimoor Ali; Ayesha Durrani; Saira Khan; Prasanna Kumar; Khurshid A. Guru

Purpose: Ureteroenteric strictures represent the most common complication requiring reoperation after radical cystectomy. We investigated the prevalence, outcomes, predictors and management of ureteroenteric strictures. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our quality assurance, robot assisted radical cystectomy database to identify patients in whom ureteroenteric strictures developed. Data were reviewed for demographics, perioperative outcomes and ureteroenteric stricture characteristics. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to calculate time to ureteroenteric stricture and multivariable stepwise regression was done to evaluate predictors of ureteroenteric strictures. Results: Ureteroenteric strictures developed in 12%, 16% and 19% of 51 patients (13%) at 1, 3 and 5 years after robot assisted radical cystectomy, respectively. All patients were initially treated endoscopically or percutaneously, including 57% treated only endoscopically or percutaneously and 43% who required surgery, which was open repair in 6 and robot assisted repair in 16. At a median followup of 23 months 33 patients (65%) were free of disease, including 13 after endoscopic or percutaneous treatment, 15 after robot assisted repair and 5 after open revision. Open and robot assisted revisions showed comparable perioperative outcomes. On multivariable analysis the predictors of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures were body mass index (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13, p = 0.02), intracorporeal urinary diversion (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.41–7.61, p = 0.006), length of the right resected ureter (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88, p = 0.004), estimated glomerular filtration rate 30 days after assisted radical cystectomy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98, p = 0.03), urinary tract infection (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.31–5.49, p = 0.007) and leakage (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.05–14.1, p = 0.04). Male gender (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.96, p = 0.04) and higher body mass index (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72–0.996, p = 0.05) were associated with lower odds of successful endoscopic management. Conclusions: Multiple modifiable factors were associated with ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures following robot assisted radical cystectomy. Surgical revision can provide a definitive management with comparable outcomes for open and robotic repairs.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Outcomes of Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

Ahmed A. Hussein; Paul May; Zhe Jing; Youssef Ahmed; C. Wijburg; Abdulla Erdem Canda; Prokar Dasgupta; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Mani Menon; James O. Peabody; Abolfazl Hosseini; John D. Kelly; Alexandre Mottrie; Jihad H. Kaouk; Ashok K. Hemal; Peter Wiklund; Khurshid A. Guru; Andrew J. Wagner; Matthias Saar; M. Stöckle; Joan Palou Redorta; Lee Richstone; Ketan K. Badani; Douglas S. Scherr; Hijab Khan; Franco Gaboardi; Koon-Ho Rha; Omar Kawa; Wei Shen Tan; Francis Schanne

Purpose: This study aimed to provide an update and compare perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot‐assisted radical cystectomy using data from the multi‐institutional, prospectively maintained International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2,125 patients from a total of 26 institutions. Intracorporeal urinary diversion was compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Multivariate logistic regression models using stepwise variable selection were fit to evaluate preoperative, operative and postoperative predictors of intracorporeal urinary diversion, operative time, high grade complications and 90‐day hospital readmissions after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy. Results: In our cohort 1,094 patients (51%) underwent intracorporeal urinary diversion. These patients demonstrated shorter operative time (357 vs 400 minutes), less blood loss (300 vs 350 ml) and fewer blood transfusions (4% vs 19%, all p <0.001). They experienced more high grade complications (13% vs 10%, p = 0.02). Intracorporeal urinary diversion use increased from 9% of all urinary diversions in 2005 to 97% in 2015. Complications after this procedure decreased significantly with time (p <0.001). On multivariable analysis higher annual cystectomy volume (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03, p <0.002), year of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (2013–2016 OR 68, 95% CI 44–105, p <0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists® score less than 3 (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.38–2.22, p <0.001) were associated with undergoing intracorporeal urinary diversion. The procedure was associated with a shorter operative time of 27 minutes (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The use of intracorporeal urinary diversion has increased in the last decade. A higher annual institutional volume of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy was associated with intracorporeal urinary diversion as well as with shorter operative time. Although intracorporeal urinary diversion was associated with higher grade complications than extracorporeal urinary diversion, they decreased with time.


BJUI | 2017

Robot‐assisted approach to ‘W’‐configuration urinary diversion: a step‐by‐step technique

Ahmed A. Hussein; Youssef Ahmed; Justen Kozlowski; Paul May; John Nyquist; Sandra Sexton; Leslie Curtin; James O. Peabody; Hassan Abol-Enein; Khurshid A. Guru

To describe a detailed step‐by‐step approach of our technique for robot‐assisted intracorporeal ‘W’‐configuration orthotopic ileal neobladder.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Natural History and Predictors of Parastomal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion

Ahmed A. Hussein; Youssef Ahmed; Paul May; Taimoor Ali; Basim Ahmad; Sana Raheem; Kevin Stone; Adam Hasasnah; Omer Rana; Adam Cole; Derek Wang; Peter A. Loud; Khurshid A. Guru

Purpose We investigated the prevalence of and variables associated with parastomal hernia and its outcomes after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit creation for bladder cancer. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent robot‐assisted radical cystectomy at our institution. Parastomal hernia was defined as the protrusion of abdominal contents through the stomal defect in the abdominal wall on cross‐sectional imaging. Parastomal hernia was further described in terms of patient and hernia characteristics, symptoms, management and outcomes. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to determine time to parastomal hernia and time to surgery. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression was done to evaluate variables associated with parastomal hernia. Results A total of 383 patients underwent robot‐assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit creation. Of the patients 75 (20%) had parastomal hernia, which was symptomatic in 23 (31%), and 11 (15%) underwent treatment. Median time to parastomal hernia was 13 months (IQR 9–22). Parastomal hernia developed in 9%, 23% and 32% of cases at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Patients with parastomal hernia had a significantly higher body mass index (30 vs 28 kg/m2, p = 0.02), longer overall operative time (357 vs 340 minutes, p = 0.01) and greater blood loss (325 vs 250 ml, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis operative time (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21–3.90, p <0.001), a fascial defect 30 mm or greater (OR 5.23, 95% CI 2.32–11.8, p <0.001) and a lower postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.21–3.90, p = 0.01) were significantly associated with parastomal hernia. Conclusions Symptoms develop in approximately a third of patients with parastomal hernia and 15% will require surgery. The risk of parastomal hernia plateaued after postoperative year 3. Longer operative time, a larger fascial defect and lower postoperative kidney function were associated with parastomal hernia.


BJUI | 2017

Development, validation and clinical application of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Assessment and Completion Evaluation: intraoperative assessment of lymph node dissection after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

Ahmed A. Hussein; Nobuyuki Hinata; Shiva Dibaj; Paul May; Justen Kozlowski; Hassan Abol-Enein; Ronney Abaza; Daniel Eun; M S Khan; James L. Mohler; Piyush Agarwal; Kamal S. Pohar; Richard Sarle; Ronald Boris; Sridhar S. Mane; Alan D. Hutson; Khurshid A. Guru

To develop a scoring tool, Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Appropriateness and Completion Evaluation (PLACE), to assess the intraoperative completeness and appropriateness of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) following robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).


BJUI | 2017

Development of a patient and institutional-based model for estimation of operative times for robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

Ahmed A. Hussein; Paul May; Youssef Ahmed; Matthias Saar; C. Wijburg; Lee Richstone; Andrew A. Wagner; Timothy Wilson; Bertram Yuh; Joan Palou Redorta; Prokar Dasgupta; Omar Kawa; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Mani Menon; James O. Peabody; Abolfazl Hosseini; Franco Gaboardi; Giovannalberto Pini; Francis Schanne; Alexandre Mottrie; Koon Ho Rha; Ashok K. Hemal; M. Stöckle; John D. Kelly; Wei Shen Tan; Thomas J. Maatman; Vassilis Poulakis; Jihad H. Kaouk; A.E. Canda; Mevlana Derya Balbay

To design a methodology to predict operative times for robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) based on variation in institutional, patient, and disease characteristics to help in operating room scheduling and quality control.


The Journal of Urology | 2018

PD41-09 COMPARING INTRACORPOREAL URINARY DIVERSION AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ROBOTIC CYSTECTOMY CONSORTIUM; A MATCHED ANALYSIS

Youssef Ahmed; Ahmed A. Hussein; Paul May; Zhe Jing; A. Erdem Canda; Mevlana Derya Balbay; Lee Richstone; Andrew J. Wagner; Jihad H. Kaouk; Bertram Yuh; Ketan K. Badani; Vassilis Poulakis; Juan Palou Redorta; Prokar Dasgupta; Omar Kawa; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Peter Wiklund; Abolfazl Hosseini; Franco Gaboardi; Giovannalberto Pini; Thomas J. Maatman; Alexandre Mottrie; C. Wijburg; John Kelly; Matthias Saar; Hijab Khan; M. Stöckle; Alon Z. Weizer; Mani Menon; James O. Peabody

NAC in LR patients was significantly associated with greater odds of finding pT1 disease at RC (OR 2.62; p<0.001) as well as pT0 status (OR 2.82; p<0.001); however, receipt of NAC in LR patients was not associated with a significant difference in 5-year cancer-specific survival (65% vs 68%; p1⁄40.31). CONCLUSIONS: Our results validate the proposed risk groups for patients with MIBC and support the use of NAC for HR patients. Moreover, we noted that, while NAC in LR patients was associated with a higher likelihood of favorable pathologic outcomes, only aminority (4.7%) of LR patients treated with up front RC were upstaged but unable to receive adjuvant chemotherapy due to postoperative complications, and receipt of NAC in LR patients was not associated with improved survival.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2018

Development and validation of surgical training tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for men

Ahmed A. Hussein; Kevin Sexton; Paul May; Maxwell V. Meng; Abolfazl Hosseini; Daniel D. Eun; Siamak Daneshmand; Bernard H. Bochner; James O. Peabody; Ronney Abaza; Eila C. Skinner; Khurshid A. Guru

BackgroundWe aimed to develop a structured scoring tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) that objectively measures and quantifies performance during robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for men.MethodsA multinational 10-surgeon expert panel collaborated towards development and validation of CASE. The critical steps of RARC in men were deconstructed into nine key domains, each assessed by five anchors. Content validation was done utilizing the Delphi methodology. Each anchor was assessed in terms of context, score concordance, and clarity. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each aspect. A CVI ≥ 0.75 represented consensus, and this statement was removed from the next round. This process was repeated until consensus was achieved for all statements. CASE was used to assess de-identified videos of RARC to determine reliability and construct validity. Linearly weighted percent agreement was used to assess inter-rater reliability (IRR). A logit model for odds ratio (OR) was used to assess construct validation.ResultsThe expert panel reached consensus on CASE after four rounds. The final eight domains of the CASE included: pelvic lymph node dissection, development of the peri-ureteral space, lateral pelvic space, anterior rectal space, control of the vascular pedicle, anterior vesical space, control of the dorsal venous complex, and apical dissection. IRR > 0.6 was achieved for all eight domains. Experts outperformed trainees across all domains.ConclusionWe developed and validated a reliable structured, procedure-specific tool for objective evaluation of surgical performance during RARC. CASE may help differentiate novice from expert performances.


Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2018

Use of Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE) for assessment of surgical competency during urethrovesical anastomosis

Hijab Khan; Justen Kozlowski; Ahmed A. Hussein; Mohamed Sharif; Youssef Ahmed; Paul May; Yana Hammond; Kevin Stone; Basim Ahmad; Adam J. Cole; Adam Hasasneh; Sana Raheem; Khurshid A. Guru

INTRODUCTION We sought to evaluate the Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE), a validated tool that objectively quantifies surgical skills specifically for urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA), as a tool to track progress of trainees, and to determine the predictive value of RACE. METHODS UVAs performed by trainees at our institution were evaluated using RACE over a period of two years. Trainees were supervised by an experienced robotic surgeon. Outcomes included trainee-related variables (RACE score, proportion of UVA performed by trainee, and suturing speed), and clinical outcomes (total UVA duration, postoperative urinary continence, and UVA-related complications). Significance was determined using linear regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 51 UVAs performed by six trainees were evaluated. Trainee RACE scores (19.8 to 22.3; p=0.01) and trainee proportion of UVA (67% to 80%; p=0.003) improved significantly over time. Trainee suture speed was significantly associated with RACE score (mean speed range 0.54-0.74 sutures/minute; p=0.03). Neither urinary continence at six weeks nor six months was significantly associated with RACE score (p=0.17 and p=0.15, respectively), and only one UVA-related postoperative complication was reported. CONCLUSIONS Trainee RACE scores improved and proportion of UVA performed by trainees increased over time. RACE can be used as an objective measure of surgical performance during training. Strict mentor supervision allowed safe training without compromising patient outcomes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul May's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Khurshid A. Guru

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Youssef Ahmed

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Basim Ahmad

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abolfazl Hosseini

Karolinska University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Omar Kawa

King's College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Franco Gaboardi

Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge