Paul Monk
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Paul Monk.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2002
Padma Nadella; Charles Shapiro; Gregory A. Otterson; Marsha Hauger; Selnur Erdal; Eric H. Kraut; Steven K. Clinton; Manisha H. Shah; Mike Stanek; Paul Monk; Miguel A. Villalona-Calero
PURPOSE Capecitabine and docetaxel have demonstrated preclinical antitumor synergy. This synergy is thought to occur from docetaxel-mediated upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase (dThdPase), an enzyme responsible for the relative tumor selectivity of capecitabine. On the basis of the time-dependency and transiency for this upregulation, we performed a phase I study of capecitabine in combination with weekly docetaxel. We hypothesized that weekly docetaxel would result in sustained dThdPase expression and that capecitabine administration at times of maximum dThdPase upregulation would increase the therapeutic index for this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid malignancies received docetaxel on days 1, 8, and 15, and capecitabine bid on days 5 to 18, every 4 weeks. Docetaxel was fixed at 36 mg/m(2)/wk, whereas capecitabine was escalated in successive patients cohorts. RESULTS Sixteen patients received 77 courses at capecitabine doses from 950 to 1,500 mg/m(2)/d. The most common toxicities were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and asthenia. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were infrequent and no treatment-related hospitalizations occurred. Three of three patients treated at 1,500/36 mg/m(2) capecitabine/docetaxel developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome or diarrhea during either their first or second course, whereas only two of 13 patients at 1,250/36 mg/m(2) doses developed significant toxicity. Antitumor responses (n = 7) occurred in patients with hepatocellular, non-small-cell lung, and chemotherapy-refractory breast, bladder, and colorectal carcinomas. Prolonged stabilizations occurred in patients with metastatic mesothelioma (n = 2), chemorefractory non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. CONCLUSION Capecitabine in combination with weekly docetaxel is well tolerated. Recommended doses are capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2)/d (625 mg/m(2) bid) with docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)/wk. The acceptable toxicity profile in this dose schedule, and the antitumor activity observed, warrant further evaluation of this regimen.
Journal of Immunotherapy | 2014
Elaine T. Lam; Michael K.K. Wong; Neeraj Agarwal; Bruce G. Redman; Theodore F. Logan; Dexiang Gao; Thomas W. Flaig; Karl D. Lewis; Jamie Poust; Paul Monk; Anthony Jarkowski; Arun Sendilnathan; Marcus Bolden; Timothy M. Kuzel; Thomas Olencki
Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the most common first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL2) remains the only agent that provides durable complete responses. The optimal sequence of these agents remains uncertain. This retrospective multi-institutional study examined the safety and efficacy of HD-IL2 following TKI therapy. After IRB approval at 7 HD-IL2 centers, data relating to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics among 40 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with HD-IL2 after at least 1 prior TKI therapy were retrospectively collected. The most common cardiac adverse events were grade 3 hypotension and vascular leak syndrome. Six patients (15%) experienced other grade ≥3 cardiac adverse events. There were 2 treatment-related deaths due to congestive heart failure, occurring in 1 patient with short TKI to HD-IL2 interval and another patient with an abnormal baseline cardiac stress test. Best responses included 2 CRs (5%, duration 40+ and 62+ mo), 3 PRs (8%, duration 6, 11, and 24 mo), 13 SD (32%, median duration 12 mo), 20 PD (50%), and 2 not evaluable patients. Median overall survival was 22 months. Administration of HD-IL2 could be safe and effective after TKI therapy; however, careful selection of patients is critical. We recommend baseline cardiac risk factor assessment, screening with both cardiac stress test and echocardiogram, and allowing a TKI to HD-IL2 interval of at least 2 months.
Journal of Immunotherapy | 2014
Paul Monk; Elaine Lam; Amir Mortazavi; Kari Kendra; Gregory B. Lesinski; Thomas A. Mace; Susan Geyer; William E. Carson; Sanaa Tahiri; Arvinder Bhinder; Steven K. Clinton; Thomas Olencki
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) followed by sorafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Biomarkers relevant to the antitumor effects of IL-2 that may be altered by sorafenib including the percentages of natural T-regulatory cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) in T cells were evaluated. We hypothesized that the proposed treatment schedule is feasible and safe and may lead to enhanced tumor response. A phase I dose escalation trial was conducted in patients with either metastatic RCC or MM. HD IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg IV q8h×8–12 doses) was administered on days 1–5 and 15–19, followed by sorafenib on days 29–82. The sorafenib dose was escalated. The percentage of Tregs, MDSC, and pSTAT5 in T cells were evaluated in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Twelve of the 18 patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The treatment-related toxicity was predictable and did not seem to be additive with this schedule of administration. Partial responses were seen in 3 patients. No significant changes in the percentage of circulating Treg and MDSC were observed, whereas sorafenib did not adversely affect the ability of IL-2 to induce pSTAT5 in T cells. HD IL-2 followed by sorafenib was safe and feasible in patients with MM and RCC and did not adversely affect T-cell signaling through STAT5 in response to IL-2.
Onkologie | 2013
Ludmila Katherine Martin; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Derek S. Serna; Paul Monk; Steven K. Clinton; Michael R. Grever; Eric H. Kraut
Background: This phase I study evaluated the safety of SU5416, a potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase Flk-1, in combination with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The patients received cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 weekly from week 1 to week 4, with SU5416 at either 65 mg/m2 (dose level (DL)1) or 85 mg/m2 (DL2) twice weekly for 6 weeks (1 cycle). Serial 18fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) and 15O-H2O-PET scans were obtained. Results: 13 patients were treated (7 on DL1, 6 on DL2); 7 patients completed at least 1 cycle of treatment. 3 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at DL2 (grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia causing treatment delay, grade 3 nausea/vomiting). No objective responses were observed at DL1, which was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). 1 partial response (PR) was observed at DL2. 18FDG-PET responses were documented but did not predict response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Conclusions: SU5416 at 65 mg/m2 twice weekly combined with cisplatin and irinotecan weekly for 4 of 6 weeks is well tolerated but without evidence of clinical activity. 18FDG-PET may be a useful pharmacodynamic marker of SU5416 bioactivity but requires additional development.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2008
Pankaj P. Dangle; Wenle Paul Wang; Joel L. Mayerson; Amir Mortazavi; Paul Monk
BackgroundTumor recurrence following radical cystectomy for a low-grade superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is exceedingly uncommon and has not been reported previously.Case presentationWe describe a case of a young male presenting with anorexia, weight loss and a large, painful locally destructive pelvic recurrence, ten years after radical cystoprostatectomy. The pathology was consistent with a low-grade urothelial carcinoma. After an unsuccessful treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the patient underwent a curative intent hemipelvectomy with complete excision of tumor and is disease free at one year follow-up.ConclusionA literature review related to this unusual presentation is reported and a surgical solutions over chemotherapy and radiotherapy is proposed.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Gregory R. Pond; Guru Sonpavde; Melissa Plets; Maha Hussain; Primo N. Lara; Amir Goldkorn; Mark Garzotto; Philip C. Mack; Celestia S. Higano; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Ian M. Thompson; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Peter Van Veldhuizen; Neeraj Agarwal; Michael A. Carducci; Paul Monk; David I. Quinn
5079Background: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and bone scan changes are often used as components of primary endpoints in phase II trials of mCRPC. However, they do not reliably capture drug activ...
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Andrea B. Apolo; Amir Mortazavi; Mark N. Stein; Nicole N. Davarpanah; Rosa Nadal; Howard L. Parnes; Yangmin M. Ning; Deneise C Francis; Lisa M Cordes; Marilise Anne Berniger; Seth M. Steinberg; Piyush K. Agarwal; Mohammadhadi Bagheri; Swati Nanda; Paul Monk; Tiffany Lancaster; Tina Moore; Rene Costello; Donald P. Bottaro; Sumanta K. Pal
Annals of Oncology | 2016
A.B. Apolo; A. Mortazavi; Mark N. Stein; Sumanta K. Pal; N. Davarpanah; H.L. Parnes; Y.M. Ning; D.C. Francis; L.M. Cordes; M. Berniger; Seth M. Steinberg; Paul Monk; T. Lancaster; T. Mayer; R. Costello; D.P. Bottaro; William L. Dahut
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Paul Monk; Glenn Liu; Walter M. Stadler; Susan Geyer; Jennifer Sexton; John J. Wright; Miguel A. Villalona-Calero; James L. Wade; Russell Z. Szmulewitz; Shilpa Gupta; Amir Mortazavi; Robert Dreicer; Roberto Pili; Matthew M. Cooney; Nancy A. Dawson; Saby George; Jorge A. Garcia
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Roberto Pili; David I. Quinn; Hans J. Hammers; Paul Monk; Saby George; Tanya B. Dorff; Thomas Olencki; Li Shen; Alan D. Hutson; Richard Piekarz; Michael A. Carducci