Paul Moser

The pharmacology of latent inhibition as an animal model of schizophrenia

The nature of the primary symptoms of schizophrenia and our lack of knowledge of its underlying cause both contribute to the difficulty of generating convincing animal models of schizophrenia. A more recent approach to investigating the biological basis of schizophrenia has been to use information processing models of the disease to link psychotic phenomena to their neural basis. Schizophrenics are impaired in a number of experimental cognitive tasks that support this approach, including sensory gating tasks and models of selective attention such as latent inhibition (LI). LI refers to a process in which noncontingent presentation of a stimulus attenuates its ability to enter into subsequent associations, and it has received much attention because it is widely considered to relate to the cognitive abnormalities that characterise acute schizophrenia. Several claims have been made for LI having face and construct validity for schizophrenia. In this review of the pharmacological studies carried out with LI we examine its claim to predictive validity and the role of methodological considerations in drug effects. The data reviewed demonstrate that facilitation of low levels of LI is strongly related to demonstrated antipsychotic activity in man and all major antipsychotic drugs, both typical and atypical, have been shown to potentiate LI using a variety of protocols. Very few compounds without antipsychotic activity are active in this model. In contrast, disruption of LI occurs with a wide range of drugs and the relationship with psychotomimetic potential is less clear. Although reversal of disrupted LI has also been used as a model for antipsychotic acticity, mostly using amphetamine-induced disruption, insufficient studies have been carried out to evaluate its claim to predictive validity. However, like facilitation, it is sensitive to both typical and atypical antipsychotic agents. The data we have reviewed here demonstrate that facilitation of LI and, perhaps to a lesser extent, reversal of disrupted LI fulfil the criteria for predictive validity.

Electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral evidence for 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 mediated control of dopaminergic function

Several lines of evidence have suggested a link between serotonergic and dopaminergic systems in the brain. The interpretation of much of these early data needs careful reevaluation in light of the recent understanding of the plethora of serotonin receptor subtypes, their distribution in the brain and the new findings with more selective serotonin antagonists. Electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral evidence obtained using highly selective antagonists of the 5-HT2 or 5-HT3 receptor subtypes, MDL 100,907 or MDL 73,147EF, respectively, supports the thesis that serotonin modulates the dopaminergic system. This modulation is most evident when the dopaminergic system has been activated.

Reversal of amphetamine-induced behaviours by MDL 100,907, a selective 5-HT2A antagonist

MDL 100,907 is a potent and selective antagonist of the 5-HT2A receptor which, unlike other antagonists at this receptor, has little affinity for the 5-HT2C receptor. We have investigated the antipsychotic potential of MDL 100,907 by examining its ability to antagonise different behavioural effects of amphetamine in rats. MDL 100,907 reversed the locomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine in rats without itself having any effect on locomotor activity. It also antagonised the disruptive effects of amphetamine on the development of latent inhibition. In contrast, MDL 100,907 had no effect on the discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine, nor did it affect the ability of amphetamine to reduce the threshold required to sustain rewarding brain stimulation in the ventral tegmental area. This profile is different from that of typical and atypical neuroleptics, and also from other 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, which lack the selectivity of MDL 100,907. These results suggest that MDL 100,907 may have a unique interaction with dopaminergic systems and support the further development of selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonists as a novel therapeutic strategy for schizophrenia.

Behavioral Indices in Antipsychotic Drug Discovery

Schizophrenia is characterized by three major symptom classes: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Classical antipsychotics (phenothiazines, thioxanthenes, and butyrophenones) are effective against positive symptoms but induce major side effects, in particular, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The discovery of clozapine, which does not induce EPS and is thought effective against all three classes of symptom, has driven research for novel antipsychotics with a wider activity spectrum and lower EPS liability. To increase predictiveness, current efforts aim to develop translational models where direct parallels can be drawn between the processes studied in animals and in humans. The present article reviews existing procedures in animals for their ability to predict compound efficacy and EPS liability in relation to their translational validity. Rodent models of positive symptoms include procedures related to dysfunction in central dopamine and glutamatergic (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) neurotransmission. Procedures for evaluating negative symptoms include rodent models of anhedonia, affective flattening, and diminished social interaction. Cognitive deficits can be assessed in rodent models of attention (prepulse inhibition) and of learning/memory (object and social recognition, Morris water maze and operant-delayed alternation). The relevance of the conditioned avoidance response is also discussed. A final section reviews procedures for assessing EPS liability, in particular, parkinsonism (catalepsy in rodents), acute dystonia (purposeless chewing in rodents, dystonia in monkeys), akathisia (defecation in rodents), and tardive dyskinesia (long-term antipsychotic treatment in rodents and monkeys). It is concluded that, with notable exceptions (attention, learning/memory, EPS liability), current predictive models for antipsychotics fall short of clear translational validity.

Use of latency to immobility improves detection of antidepressant-like activity in the behavioral despair test in the mouse

The behavioral despair test (BDT), also called the forced swim test, is an economic, reliable and sensitive test for the detection of potential antidepressant-like activity of new test substances. The vast majority of clinically active antidepressants are active in the BDT, although substances specifically acting on serotonin transmission are generally reported to be less easily detected. Substances active in the BDT decrease the duration of immobility at doses considered as relatively high. In contrast, some psychostimulants are considered as potential false positives since they are also active in the BDT although they are not recognized as clinically active antidepressants. In the present study we have evaluated the usefulness of latency to the first immobility period as an additional parameter in the BDT to further evaluate the effects of antidepressants and psychostimulants administered intraperitoneally in the mouse. The results show that this measure increases the sensitivity of the test for detecting the effects of tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine) and selective serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine and venlafaxine) but not of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine and escitalopram). In contrast with previous reports, psychostimulants (amphetamine and modafinil) did not affect the duration or the latency to immobility in the BDT. The mouse strain used in the BDT seems to be an important parameter to discriminate between antidepressants and psychostimulants. These results suggest that the measure of the latency to the first immobility improves the predictive validity of the BDT.

Effects of clozapine on latent inhibition in the rat.

In the present study we have examined the effect of clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, on latent inhibition (LI) using the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. In this procedure, ten pre-exposures to the to-be-conditioned stimulus result in weak or no LI whereas 30 pre-exposures produce robust LI. Three different experimental protocols were used to study the effects of clozapine: facilitation of LI in animals subjected to ten pre-exposures to the to-be-conditioned stimulus; antagonism of the disruptive effect of amphetamine (1 mg/kg, s.,c.) on LI in animals receiving 30 pre-exposures; antagonism of the disruptive effect of nicotine (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.) on LI in animals receiving 30 pre-exposures. High doses of clozapine (3 and 10 mg/kg, s.c.) disrupted the CER in non pre-exposed animals. Despite this, clozapine significantly facilitated the development of LI at 1 and 10 mg/kg and significantly attenuated the disruptive effects of nicotine at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg and of amphetamine at 2 and 5 mg/kg. These results demonstrate that clozapine is active in the LI model and further support the utility of this model in the study of mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs.

Preclinical Behavioral Models for Predicting Antipsychotic Activity

Schizophrenia is a major psychiatric disease that is characterized by three distinct symptom domains: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive impairment. Additionally, treatment with classical antipsychotic medication can be accompanied by important side effects that involve extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). The discovery of clozapine in the 1970s, which is efficacious in all three symptom domains and has a reduced propensity to induce EPS, has driven research for new antipsychotic agents with a wider spectrum of activity and a lower propensity to induce EPS. The following chapter reviews existing behavioral procedures in animals for their ability to predict compound efficacy against schizophrenia symptoms and liability to induce EPS. Rodent models of positive symptoms include procedures related to hyperfunction in central dopamine and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) systems and hypofunction of central glutamatergic (N-methyl-d-aspartate) neurotransmission. Procedures for evaluating negative symptoms include rodent models of anhedonia, affective flattening, and diminished social interaction. Cognitive deficits can be assessed in rodent models of attention (prepulse inhibition (PPI), latent inhibition) and of learning and memory (passive avoidance, object and social recognition, Morris water maze, and operant-delayed alternation). The relevance of the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) is also discussed. A final section reviews animal procedures for assessing EPS liability, in particular parkinsonism (catalepsy), acute dystonia (purposeless chewing in rodents, dystonia in monkeys), akathisia (defecation in rodents), and tardive dyskinesia (long-term antipsychotic treatment in rodents and monkeys).

Rodent Models of Depression: Forced Swim and Tail Suspension Behavioral Despair Tests in Rats and Mice

The development of antidepressants requires simple rodent behavioral tests for initial screening before undertaking more complex preclinical tests and clinical evaluation. Presented in the unit are two widely used screening tests used for antidepressants, the forced swim (also termed behavioral despair) test in the rat and mouse, and the tail suspension test in the mouse. These tests have good predictive validity and allow rapid and economical detection of substances with potential antidepressant‐like activity. The behavioral despair and the tail suspension tests are based on the same principle: measurement of the duration of immobility when rodents are exposed to an inescapable situation. The majority of clinically used antidepressants decrease the duration of immobility. Antidepressants also increase the latency to immobility, and this additional measure can increase the sensitivity of the behavioral despair test in the mouse for certain classes of antidepressant. Testing of new substances in the behavioral despair and tail suspension tests allows a simple assessment of their potential antidepressant activity by the measurement of their effect on immobility. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 49:5.8.1‐5.8.14.

Central and peripheral effects of the dihydropyridine calcium channel activator BAY K 8644 in the rat

Following intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration BAY K 8644 (0.5-4 mg/kg) induced an increase in blood pressure associated with bradycardia, increased tail-flick latency in response to radiant heat, decreased locomotion, induced muscle contraction, postural changes and also reduced reflex activity. Only the postural changes and reduced locomotion were seen after intracerebroventricular administration (5-20 micrograms/kg), suggesting that the other effects are mediated peripherally. All the above effects were antagonised by the calcium channel blocker nifedipine. BAY K 8644 (4 mg/kg i.p.) also significantly increased homovanillic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid concentrations in the cortex and striatum, an effect which could also be reversed by nifedipine. Apart from inducing hypotension and tachycardia, nifedipine alone had no effect on any of the above parameters. The analgesic-like activity of BAY K 8644 observed in the tail-flick test appears to be related to its vasoconstrictor effects as the peripherally acting vasodilator phenylephrine had similar analgesic activity. These results show that both central and peripheral dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels mediate the effects of BAY K 8644. Although a physiological role for the dihydropyridine-sensitive voltage-operated calcium channel in the CNS remains to be demonstrated, activation of these channels can clearly have functional effects.

5-HT1A receptor antagonists neither potentiate nor inhibit the effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone in the forced swim test in rats

Recent clinical data suggest that coadministration of pindolol with an antidepressant, particularly the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, can shorten the time to onset of clinical activity and increase the proportion of responders. We have examined the interaction of antidepressants with 5-HT1A receptors using the forced swim test in rats using both (+/-)-pindolol and the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride) in combination with either fluoxetine or the selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor befloxatone. 8-Hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.125-1 mg/kg s.c.), used as a reference for 5-HT1A agonist activity, reduced immobility in the forced swim test and this effect was significantly antagonised by WAY 100,635. WAY 100,635 alone (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.) was without effect, although a higher dose, 0.3 mg/kg s.c., had a nonsignificant tendency to increase immobility. In contrast, (+/-)-pindolol (1-16 mg/kg s.c.) significantly reduced immobility, but to a lesser extent than 8-OH-DPAT. As expected, the antidepressants fluoxetine (10-80 mg/kg p.o.) and befloxatone (0.03-1 mg/kg p.o.) dose-dependently reduced immobility time. When the antidepressants were combined with WAY 100,635 (0.1 mg/kg), WAY 100,635 either had no effect or, at relatively high doses, significantly reduced their activity in this test. Combination of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol (2 or 4 mg/kg s.c.) failed to reveal a significant interaction. These results demonstrate that the anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone are neither facilitated nor antagonised by doses of WAY 100,635 that completely reverse the effects of 8-OH-DPAT. Furthermore, there was no evidence that coadministration of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol was able to facilitate their antidepressant-like effects. Thus, whereas direct agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors can modulate immobility in the forced swim test, this receptor subtype does not appear to play a major role in the antidepressant-like effects of fluoxetine or befloxatone under the conditions used in this study.