Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul O'Brien is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul O'Brien.


Contraception | 2008

Copper-containing, framed intrauterine devices for contraception : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Paul O'Brien; Regina Kulier; Frans M. Helmerhorst; Margaret Usher-Patel; Catherine d'Arcangues

BACKGROUND Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are safe and effective methods of long-term reversible contraception. The design and copper content as well as placement of the copper on IUDs could affect their effectiveness and side effect profile. We compared different copper IUDs for their effectiveness and side effects. STUDY DESIGN We searched multiple electronic databases with appropriate keywords and names of the IUDs known to be on the market. We searched the reference lists of papers identified and contacted authors when possible. There was no language restriction. Randomized controlled trials comparing different IUDs that reported on clinical outcomes were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers independently extracted data on outcomes and trial characteristics. We combined the trial results in meta-analyses and expressed results as rate difference (RD) using a fixed-effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI). In the presence of significant heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. RESULTS We included 35 trials, resulting in 18 comparisons of 10 different IUDs in approximately 48,000 women. TCu380A was more effective in preventing pregnancy than MLCu375 (RD 1.70%, 95% CI 0.07-2.95% after 4 years of use). TCu380A was also more effective than MLCu250, TCu220 and TCu200. There tended to be fewer pregnancies with TCu380S compared to TCu380A after the first year of use, a difference which was statistically significant in the fourth year (RD -1.62%, 95% CI -3.00% to -0.24%). This occurred despite more expulsions with TCu380S (RD 3.50%, 95% CI 0.36-6.63% at 4 years). MLCu375 was no more effective than TCu220 at 1 year of use, or MLCu250 and NovaT up to 3 years. Compared to TCu380A or TCu380S, none of the IUDs showed any benefits in terms of bleeding or pain or any of the other reasons for early discontinuation. None of the trials that reported events at insertion found one IUD easier to insert than another or caused less pain at insertion. There is no evidence that uterine perforation rates vary by type of device. There are minimal randomized data on IUD use in nulliparous women. CONCLUSIONS TCu380A and TCu380S appear to be more effective than other IUDs. No IUD showed consistently lower removal rates for bleeding and pain in comparison to other IUDs. There is no evidence that any particular framed copper device is better suited to women who have not had children.


Contraception | 2013

Randomized trial of the effect of tailored versus standard use of the combined oral contraceptive pill on continuation rates at 1 year

Judith Stephenson; Jill Shawe; Sabeena Panicker; Nataliya Brima; Andrew Copas; Ulrike Sauer; Chris Wilkinson; Hannat Akintomide; Paul O'Brien

BACKGROUND There is growing interest from women and clinicians in extended or tailored use of the combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill. Potential advantages include less bleeding, greater contraceptive efficacy and user satisfaction. We examined the effect of a tailored pill regimen, compared with the standard regimen, on continuation and satisfaction rates at 1 year and associated bleeding patterns. STUDY DESIGN This was a randomized controlled trial with 503 women aged 18-45 years. Women were randomized to either the standard regimen (21 daily pills followed by a 7-day pill-free interval) or tailored regimen (daily pills until three consecutive days bleeding triggers a 3-day pill-free interval) of Microgynon 30® (ethinyl oestradiol 30 mcg, levonorgestrel 150 mcg). Primary outcome was COC continuation at 12 months; secondary outcomes included satisfaction with pill regimen regarding contraception and bleeding pattern. Daily electronic diaries were used to record womens pill use, switching to other contraceptive methods, menstrual bleeding patterns and satisfaction levels. RESULTS Eighty-three percent of women were already taking the COC at recruitment, 13% were restarting the COC and 4% were first time COC users. Seventy-one percent of all women were followed up at 12 months. Continuation rates at 1 year were 82% in the tailored arm versus 80% in the standard arm [odds ratio (OR)=1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.67-1.91]. Satisfaction with contraceptive regimen was 86% (tailored) versus 94% (standard) (OR=0.37; 95% CI=0.17-0.79), and satisfaction with bleeding pattern was 79% versus 87%, respectively (OR=0.53; 95% CI=0.30-0.93). Median number of bleeding days per month was 2.4 (tailored) and 4.9 (standard). Incidence, duration and intensity of bleeding episodes were significantly lower in the tailored arm. CONCLUSIONS In women familiar with standard use of the COC, switching to tailored COC use or continuing with standard use were both associated with high COC continuation rates and high satisfaction with contraceptive regimen and bleeding pattern. While significant differences tended to favor the standard group, tailored COC use was associated with significantly less bleeding, suited some women very well and can provide a suitable alternative to standard use.


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2015

Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H. Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul O'Brien; David Hubacher


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2007

Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception.

Regina Kulier; Paul O'Brien; Frans M. Helmerhorst; Margaret Usher-Patel; Catherine d'Arcangues


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2013

Progestin‐only pills for contraception

David A. Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Paul O'Brien; Elizabeth G. Raymond


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2005

Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception

Paul O'Brien; Caroline C Marfleet


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2008

Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility

Dagmar E. Besselink; Cindy Farquhar; J.A.M. Kremer; Jane Marjoribanks; Paul O'Brien


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 1998

Intra‐uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility

Paul O'Brien; P Vandekerckhove


Contraception | 2006

The Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group: synthesizing the best evidence about family planning

Frans M. Helmerhorst; Toni Belfield; Regina Kulier; Nandita Maitra; Paul O'Brien; David A. Grimes


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2018

Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment

Petronella Al Kop; M.H. Mochtar; Paul O'Brien; Fulco van der Veen; Madelon van Wely

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul O'Brien's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Regina Kulier

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frans M. Helmerhorst

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Grimes

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Copas

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Wilkinson

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge