Paul Wiemers

Early experience of transaortic TAVI--the future of surgical TAVI?

BACKGROUND Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now a well recognised procedure for the high risk surgical patient with native or bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis. Transfemoral and transapical implantation techniques are well described. With increasing referral of more marginal transapical patients, we describe our experience of a transaortic TAVI approach which we believe reduces the postoperative wound pain, respiratory complications, operative risk and hospital stay. METHODS Patients referred for surgical TAVI underwent trans-catheter aortic valve implantation via an upper sternotomy and direct cannulation of the ascending aorta. RESULTS Thirteen patients with a mean age of 81 years underwent transaortic Edwards SAPIEN valve implantation. There was no in hospital mortality in our series. One patient required insertion of a permanent pacemaker for complete heart block. There were no aortic cannulation complications. CONCLUSION The transaortic TAVI approach provides good exposure of the distal ascending aorta, a familiar cannulation site for cardiac surgeons. Our initial experience demonstrates the approach to be a safe technique with the potential for faster and less complicated recovery in patients undergoing surgical TAVI procedures. With further experience and greater acceptance, the transaortic approach may ultimately become the procedure of choice for patients unsuitable for a transfemoral approach.

Cardiac surgery in indigenous Australians - How wide is 'The Gap'?

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality in the Indigenous Australian population. Limited research exists in regards to cardiac surgery in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) population. We aimed to investigate risk profiles, surgical pathologies, surgical management and short term outcomes in a contemporary group of patients. METHODS Variables were assessed for 557 consecutive patients who underwent surgery at our institution between August 2008 and March 2010. RESULTS 19.2% (107/557) of patients were of Indigenous origin. ATSI patients were significantly younger at time of surgery (mean age 54.1±13.23 vs. 63.1±12.46; p=<0.001) with higher rates of preventable risk factors. Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) was the dominant valvular pathology observed in the Indigenous population. Significantly higher rates of left ventricular impairment and more diffuse coronary artery disease were observed in ATSI patients. A non-significant trend towards higher 30-day mortality was observed in the Indigenous population (5.6% vs. 3.1%; p=0.244). CONCLUSIONS Cardiac surgery is generally required at a younger age in the Indigenous population with patients often presenting with more advanced disease. Despite often more advanced disease, surgical outcomes do not differ significantly from non-Indigenous patients. Continued focus on preventative strategies for coronary artery disease and RHD in the Indigenous population is required.

First Australian Transapical Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implant for a Failed Mitral Bioprosthesis: How To Do It

Transcatheter aortic valve replacements lower mortality in patients not suitable for surgical valve replacement compared to conservative treatment. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implants have been shown to be feasible in failed bioprostheses in aortic, mitral, pulmonary and tricuspid positions. We report the first Australasian experience of a transapical mitral valve-in-valve placement with an Edwards Sapien(®) transcatheter valve for a failed mitral bioprosthesis, focussing on the technical aspects of this novel procedure. Whilst the evidence for this niche indication is limited currently to case reports and case series, further evaluation of its long term outcomes may justify its use in this particularly high risk group of re-do sternotomy patients.

A Review of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Indigenous Australian Population

INTRODUCTION Indigenous Australians experience poorer health outcomes than non-Indigenous Australians. Ischaemic heart disease is a leading contributor to the mortality gap which exists between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. METHODS We reviewed the literature in regards to Indigenous Australians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for management of ischaemic heart disease. RESULTS Younger patients with higher rates of preventable risk factors constitute the Indigenous Australian CABG population. Indigenous Australian females are over-represented in series to date. High rates of left ventricular dysfunction are seen in the Indigenous CABG cohorts potentially reflecting barriers to medical care or the influence of high rates of diabetes observed in the Indigenous Australian population. The distribution of coronary artery disease appears to differ between Indigenous Australian and non-Indigenous CABG cohorts likely reflecting a difference in the referral patterns of the two population groups with diabetes again likely influencing management decisions. Reduced utilisation of arterial conduits in Indigenous Australian cohorts has been identified in a number of series. This is of particular concern given the younger age structure of the Indigenous Australian cohorts. Indigenous Australian patients suffer excess morbidity and mortality in the longer term after undergoing CABG. Ventricular dysfunction and excess comorbidities in the Indigenous Australian CABG population appear largely responsible for this. CONCLUSION Excess morbidity and mortality endured by Indigenous Australians in the longer term following CABG appears largely contributed to by higher rates of ventricular dysfunction and comorbidities in the Indigenous Australian CABG population. Maximising internal mammary artery use and continued focus on strategies to reduce the impact of diabetes, renal impairment and heart failure in the Indigenous Australian population is essential to reduce the mortality gap experienced by Indigenous Australians secondary to ischaemic heart disease.

An Overview of Indigenous Australian Disadvantage in Terms of Ischaemic Heart Disease

BACKGROUND Indigenous Australians experience poorer health outcomes than non-Indigenous Australians and a significant life expectancy gap exists. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) represents the leading specific cause of death in Indigenous Australians and is a significant, if not the most significant, contributor to the mortality gap. With this narrative review we aim to describe the burden of IHD within the Indigenous Australian community and explore the factors driving this disparity. METHODS A broad search of the literature was undertaken utilising an electronic search of the PubMed database along with national agency databases-the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). RESULTS A complex interplay between multiple factors contributes to the excess burden of IHD in the Indigenous Australian population: CONCLUSIONS: In terms of IHD, Indigenous Australians experience disadvantage at multiple stages of the disease process. Ongoing efforts are needed to continue to inform clinicians of both this disadvantage and strategies to assist negating it. Further research is needed to develop evidence based practices which may help reduce this disparity in outcomes.