Paul Worley

The Parallel Rural Community Curriculum: an integrated clinical curriculum based in rural general practice

In an attempt to address the rural medical workforce maldistribution and the concurrent inappropriate caseload at the urban tertiary teaching hospitals, Flinders University and the Riverland Division of General Practice decided to pilot, in 1997, an entire year of undergraduate clinical curriculum in Australian rural general practice. This program is called the Parallel Rural Community Curriculum (PRCC). This paper is a discussion of the aims of the programme; student selection; practice recruitment; curriculum structure, and academic content, together with lessons learnt from the evaluation of the first cohort of students’ experience of the course.

Cohort study of examination performance of undergraduate medical students learning in community settings

Abstract Objectives To determine whether moving clinical medical education out of the tertiary hospital into a community setting compromises academic standards. Design Cohort study. Setting Flinders University four year graduate entry medical course. In their third year, students are able to choose to study at the tertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide, in rural general practices, or at Royal Darwin Hospital, a regional secondary referral hospital. Participants All 371 medical students who did their year 3 study from 1998-2002. Main outcome measures Mean student examination score (%) at the end of year 3. Results The unadjusted mean year 3 scores at each location differed significantly (P < 0.001); the mean score was 65.2 (SE = 0.43) for Adelaide students, 68.2 (0.83) for Darwin students, and 69.3 (0.97) for students on the rural programme. Mean year 2 scores were similar for each location. Post hoc tests of means adjusted for sex, age, year 2 score, and cohort year showed that the rural and Darwin groups had a significantly improved score in year 3 compared with the Adelaide group (adjusted mean difference = 3.08, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 4.90, P < 0.001 for rural group; 1.91, 0.47 to 3.36, P = 0.001 for Darwin group). Conclusions These findings show that the concern that student academic performance in the tertiary hospital would be better than that of students in the regional hospital and community settings is not justified. This challenges the orthodoxy of a tertiary hospital education being the gold standard for undergraduate medical students.

Empirical evidence for symbiotic medical education: a comparative analysis of community and tertiary-based programmes.

Background  Flinders University has developed the Parallel Rural Community Curriculum (PRCC), a full year clinical curriculum based in rural general practice in South Australia. The examination performance of students on this course has been shown to be higher than that of their tertiary hospital‐based peers.

Demonstrating the value of longitudinal integrated placements to general practice preceptors.

Medical Education 2011: 45: 455–463

Symbiosis: a new model for clinical education

Some of the principles of symbiosis have been implicit in approaches to medical education for some time but they are increasingly difficult to maintain in large tertiary academic medical centres. The case mix of these centres is concentrated in the higher levels of tertiary care, with a predominance of acute and emergency illness. Patients frequently undergo complex technological interventions but, at the same time, have relatively short periods of time in hospitals. There is a new emphasis on patient ‘rights’ and choice, with limits to the number of skills and procedures that students and junior doctors can undertake with patients. There are strong pressures for clinicians to spend more time performing clinical services in the budget-driven management structures of hospitals, often at the expense of time for teaching. Finally, most of the burden of health care is widely distributed beyond hospitals in the community, where chronic disease represents perhaps one of the major challenges for health care systems of the future. If these trends are to continue questions may be raised about the ongoing suitability of some traditional environments for undergraduate and graduate-entry medical courses.

Country report: Australia

The last 10 years has been an interesting time for Australian medical education despite reduced funding.

Using rural and remote settings in the undergraduate medical curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 47

The goal of global equity in health care requires that the training of health-care professionals be better tuned to meet the needs of the communities they serve. In fact medical education is being driven into isolated communities by factors including workforce undersupply, education pedagogy, medical practice and research needs. Rural and remote medical education (RRME) happens in rural hospitals and rural general practices, singly or in combination, generally for periods of 4 to 40 weeks. An effective RRME programme matches the context of the local health service and community. Its implementation reflects the local capacity for providing learning opportunities, facilitates collaboration of all participants and capitalises on local creativity in teaching. Implementation barriers stem from change management, professional culture and resource allocation. Blending learning approaches as much as technology and local culture allow is central to achieving student learning outcomes and professional development of local medical teachers. RRME harnesses the rich learning environment of communities such that students rapidly achieve competence and confidence in a primary care/generalist setting. Longer programmes with an integrated (generalist) approach based in the immersion learning paradigm appear successful in returning graduates to rural practice and a career track with a quality lifestyle.

What do medical students actually do on clinical rotations

As medical schools make use of an increasing variety of clinical teaching settings, it is of interest to find that that there is very little published research that explores the actual learning activities undertaken by students in different environments. This study was designed to describe and analyse a typical week for students learning the same curricular material in one of three Australian settings: an urban tertiary teaching hospital, a remote secondary referral hospital and a rural community-based programme. Twenty-eight students completed week-long learning logs in weeks 9 and 35 of a 40-week academic year. Each student recorded his or her activity in 15-minute intervals for each week. Analysis of these data revealed that, compared with the hospital-based students, the community-based students reported greater patient contact, more time spent in clinical settings and increased time supervised by experienced clinicians. Whilst the community-based students valued their learning in clinical settings more highly than the learning they undertook at their home, the opposite was found for the tertiary hospital-based students. This study, the first to compare student activity in these three prototypical settings in the medical education literature, provides empirical evidence supporting community-based programmes as credible alternatives to traditional teaching hospital-based environments.

Do consultations in rural general practice take more time when practitioners are precepting medical students

Context  At Flinders University, Adelaide, a subset of students on the 4‐year, graduate‐entry medical course chooses to spend Year 3 based in rural general practice as part of the Parallel Rural Community Curriculum (PRCC). This programme is equivalent to the tertiary teaching hospital option in terms of student educational outcomes. However, there is concern that this success comes at the cost of lost consulting time for the general practitioners (GPs) who supervise these students.

What do general practitioners do differently when consulting with a medical student

Objectives  The practice of having medical students see patients in a general practice setting, in their own consulting rooms, prior to the GP preceptor joining the consultation does not increase general practitioner (GP) consultation time. How do GPs meet the needs of both patient and student without extending consultation time? This study sought to quantify and compare GP consultation activities with and without students.