Pauli Sallinen

CDKN2/p16 predicts survival in oligodendrogliomas: comparison with astrocytomas.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor (CDKN2/p16) is a cell cycle regulatory protein that has been demonstrated to be inactivated by mutations, deletions or transcriptional silencing during pathogenesis of a variety of human malignancies. We studied the correlation of CDKN2/p16 expression with cell proliferation activity and patient survival in 42 oligodendrogliomas and 36 astrocytomas. CDKN2/p16 expression was frequently decreased in grade II and anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (17/42) where lack of CDKN2/p16 protein predicted poor survival (p=0.0045). In astrocytomas low CDKN2/p16 expression was associated with high histologic malignancy grade (p=0.002): CDKN2/p16 protein level was decreased in 9 out of 10 glioblastomas, in 5 out of 9 anaplastic astrocytomas, in 3 out of 10 grade II astrocytomas and in none of pilocytic astocytomas (0/7). Low CDKN2/p16 expression was also associated with high cell proliferation activity (MIB-1 immunocytochemistry: p=0.004; mitotic index: p=0.007) and poor patient survival (p=0.025) in astrocytomas. Low CDKN2/p16 mRNA expression had the same topographic distribution as nuclear CDKN2/p16 immunoreactivity proving for reliability of the immunocytochemical findings. Our results are in agreement with earlier studies demonstrating CDKN2/p16 inactivation during tumorigenesis of astrocytic tumors. Furthermore, our findings suggest that loss of CDKN2/p16 expression may also play an important role in the progression of oligodendrogliomas. According to our findings CDKN2/p16 immunocytochemistry could be used as a tool to identify those oligodendrogliomas and low grade astrocytomas that are likely to progress and have poor outcome, and thus would need more aggressive therapy.

Cyclin D1 expression in astrocytomas is associated with cell proliferation activity and patient prognosis.

An important positive regulator of the cell cycle, cyclin D1, is often amplified and overexpressed in malignancies. Cyclin D1 aberrations were analysed in grade II–IV astrocytomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), mRNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Proliferation activity was determined by Ki‐67MIB‐1 immunolabelling and mitotic counting. High cyclin D1 expression was observed in grade IV astrocytomas (grades II–III versus grade IV; mRNA expression: p < 0·001; immunoexpression: p = 0·013), and correlated with poor patient survival (p < 0·001, n = 46). Upregulated cyclin D1 expression was also closely associated with poor patient prognosis in grade II–III astrocytomas (p < 0·001, n = 30). Cyclin D1 gene was not found to be amplified (n = 7). Cell proliferation activity was significantly increased in tumours exhibiting high cyclin D1 mRNA levels (Ki‐67MIB‐1: p < 0·001; mitotic count: p < 0·001) and high cyclin D1 protein expression (Ki‐67MIB‐1: p = 0·002; mitotic count: p = 0·012). These results indicate that increased production of cyclin D1 is closely associated with high cell proliferation activity and aggressive behaviour in diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas. Copyright

Grading of diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas by quantitative histopathology, cell proliferation and image cytometric DNA analysis. Comparison of 133 tumours in the context of the WHO 1979 and WHO 1993 grading schemes.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the applicability of quantitative histopathology as an aid for grading diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas. Primary astrocytomas were analysed for parameters (mean nuclear size, mitosis count, area fraction of endothelial cells and tumour necrosis, area fraction of nuclei, and Ki‐67 (MIB‐1) labelling index), which are closely related to the World Health Organization (WHO) 1979 and WHO 1993 grading criteria. All estimates correlated with the WHO histopathological grade and patient outcome. According to the receiver–operating characteristics curve, the presence of tumour necrosis and mitosis count (cut‐off at 3 mitoses/mm2 of neoplastic tissue) showed the best sensitivity and specificity in separating patients with different survival. The multivariate survival analyses confirmed this result. A decision‐tree model was constructed based on these two variables: twig I with less than 3 mitoses/mm2, twig II with equal or more than 3 mitoses/mm2 but no necrosis, and twig III with tumour necrosis. This model was found to be more strongly associated with survival than the WHO 1979 or WHO 1993 grading schemes. Low‐malignancy astrocytomas (WHO grade II or twig I tumours) could be further divided into two prognostic categories by the image cytometric DNA analysis. The results put an emphasis on astrocytoma grading on mitosis counts (grade II vs. III) and tumour necrosis (grade III vs. IV). To standardize the sampling for mitosis counting, it is suggested that a parallel Ki‐67 immunostaining be used for the identification of the most proliferative areas.

Chromosome imbalances in familial gliomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization

Familial occurrence of gliomas, in the absence of well‐defined hereditary multisystem disorders, is reported occasionally. We describe 17 families that have been afflicted with two or more gliomas but do not raise suspicion of other inheritable syndromes. The families were identified among 369 consecutive glioma patients operated at the Tampere University Hospital during 1983–1994. We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis on 21 gliomas occurring in these 17 families. The most frequent genetic alterations, detected in over 20% of the tumors, were losses of 6q, 10, 4q, 9p and gains of 7, 19, 20q, 1p. We compared the chromosomal alterations detected in the familial gliomas to those reported previously on 209 sporadic gliomas in nine different CGH studies. In this comparison, the familial gliomas more often showed losses of chromosome arms 4q and 6q and gains of 1p and 22q. The most frequent losses (9/21 tumors) in the familial gliomas resided on chromosome arm 6q (P = 0.005, Fishers exact test; with Bonferroni correction, P = 0.04). The loss of 6q was also the most common intrafamilial aberration, present in four separate gliomas belonging to two families. The minimal common area of loss on this chromosome resided at 6q14–16. In conclusion, we have found several characteristic aberrations by CGH in the familial gliomas and we present new chromosomal regions possibly involved in the familial predisposition to gliomas.

Absence of KLF6 gene mutations in human astrocytic tumors and cell lines.

In most cases, theallelic losses involve loci along the entire chromosome, afinding in line with monosomy 10. LOH on chromosome 10may also be detected in anaplastic astrocytomas (WHO GradeIII) and diffuse astrocytomas (WHO Grade II), but is lesscommon than in glioblastomas and more frequently restrictedto partial losses.

Arm-specific multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals widespread chromosomal instability in glioma cell lines.

An investigation of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations using chromosome arm-specific multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (armFISH) revealed considerable genetic heterogeneity among and within 11 glioma cell lines. Despite the substantial variation in numerical chromosome alterations among the cell lines, several distinct and glioma growth-associated losses or gains were frequently observed, that is, losses of chromosomes 10, 13, and 22 and gain of chromosome 7 in particular. Structural aberrations frequently affected chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 16, and 19; however, no single structural chromosome aberration common to all or even several glioma cell lines could be found. Structural alterations were often multiform, and a large variety of unstable chromosome structures were detected. Two of the cell lines also harbored small marker chromosomes containing mainly heterochromatin and chromosomal insertions within hetero-chromatic regions. Altogether, the armFISH provides a versatile tool for the identification of chromosomal aberrations as well as their formation patterns in tumors with a complex genome at the level of chromosome arms.

Peroxiredoxins and their expression in ependymomas

Aims Peroxiredoxins I–VI (Prxs) have recently been shown to have a role in the tumorigenesis of astrocytic brain tumours. In some tumour types they are associated with Nrf2 (transcription factor NF-E2-related factor), a sensor of oxidative stress, and DJ-1 (also known as PARK7), a protein known to stabilise Nrf2. Methods We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of Prxs I–VI, Nrf2 and DJ-1 in a total of 76 ependymomas and their relationship with clinicopathological features of these tumours. Results There was a significant expression of all Prxs except Prx IV in the ependymomas. Strong nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of Nrf2 could be detected in these tumours. Prx I expression was significantly associated with cytoplasmic and nuclear Nrf2 expression. Prx I expression was also associated with tumour site, with cerebellar ependymomas having a lower expression of Prx I than other tumours. DJ-1 did not associate with Prxs but nuclear DJ-1 had an inverse association with nuclear Nrf2. Cytoplasmic DJ-1 associated with worse survival in ependymoma patients. Conclusions This study indicates that oxidative mechanisms as reflected by Nrf2 expression are highly activated in ependymomas. Prxs, especially Prx I, were associated with Nrf2 expression, suggesting a role for Nrf2 in Prx I synthesis in ependymomas. While DJ-1 did not associate with any of the Prxs, its expression was associated with worsened patient survival and could have a role as a prognostic marker in ependymomas.