Pauline L. Martin

Developmental and reproductive toxicology studies in nonhuman primates

Developmental and reproductive toxicology testing in nonhuman primates (NHPs) has become more common due to the increasing number of biopharmaceuticals in drug development, since NHPs are frequently the only species to express pharmacologic responses similar to humans. NHPs may also be used to help resolve issues associated with small-molecule reproductive toxicology in traditional species (rodents and rabbits). Adequate designs in NHP are presented for developmental toxicity (embryo-fetal development, pre-postnatal development, enhanced pre-postnatal development), reproductive toxicity (male and female), and juvenile toxicity studies. Optional parameters that may be included in these studies are discussed, as are new study designs that consolidate multiple aspects of the reproductive assessment and thereby conserve the limited supply of sexually mature NHPs available for testing. The details described will assist scientists in pharmaceutical, regulatory, and contract research organizations who are involved in conducting these unique studies to optimize their design based on case-by-case considerations.

Effects of an Anti-TNF-α Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Throughout Pregnancy and Lactation, on the Development of the Macaque Immune System

Problem  The use of anti‐TNF‐α therapies during pregnancy and lactation on the development of the neonatal immune system has not been fully established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether treatment of macaques with an anti‐TNF‐α monoclonal antibody (golimumab) during pregnancy and lactation would result in defects in the developing immune system.

Alternative Strategies for Toxicity Testing of Species-Specific Biopharmaceuticals

Although toxicology studies should always be conducted in pharmacologically relevant species, the specificity of many biopharmaceuticals can present challenges in identification of a relevant species. In certain cases, that is, when the clinical product is active only in humans or chimpanzees, or if the clinical candidate is active in other species but immunogenicity limits the ability to conduct a thorough safety assessment, alternative approaches to evaluating the safety of a biopharmaceutical must be considered. Alternative approaches, including animal models of disease, genetically modified mice, or use of surrogate molecules, may improve the predictive value of preclinical safety assessments of species-specific biopharmaceuticals, although many caveats associated with these models must be considered. Because of the many caveats that are discussed in this article, alternative approaches should only be used to evaluate safety when the clinical candidate cannot be readily tested in at least one relevant species to identify potential hazards.

Considerations in assessing the developmental and reproductive toxicity potential of biopharmaceuticals

This report discusses the principles of developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) testing for biopharmaceuticals. Biopharmaceuticals are large-molecular-weight proteins or peptides produced by modern biotechnology techniques incorporating genetic engineering and hybridoma technologies. The principles of DART testing for biopharmaceuticals are similar to those for small-molecule pharmaceuticals and in general follow the regulatory guidance outlined in International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) document S5(R2). However, because many biopharmaceuticals are species-specific, alternate approaches may be needed to evaluate DART potential as outlined in ICH S6. For molecules that show species-specific cross-reactivity restricted to non-human primates (NHP), some aspects of DART may require NHP testing. For biopharmaceuticals that are uniquely specific and only active on intended human targets or human and chimpanzee targets, surrogate molecules that cross-react with the more traditional rodent species may need to be developed and used for DART testing. Alternatively, genetically modified transgenic animals may also need to be considered. Surrogate molecules and transgenic animals may also be considered for DART testing even if the biopharmaceutical is active in NHPs in order to reduce the use of NHPs. Because of the unique properties of biopharmaceuticals, a case-by-case approach is needed for DART and general toxicity evaluation, which requires consideration of specific product attributes including biochemical and biophysical characteristics, pharmacological activity, and intended clinical indication.

Developmental Toxicity Testing of Biopharmaceuticals in Nonhuman Primates Previous Experience and Future Directions

Developmental toxicity studies for pharmaceutical safety testing are designed to evaluate potential adverse effects of drug treatment on pregnancy and on the developing embryo/fetus. Biopharmaceuticals present specific challenges for developmental toxicity testing because the pharmacology of these molecules, which are frequently human-specific proteins, is often restricted to humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs). For those species-restricted molecules, the only option for the evaluation of potential effects on development of the human biopharmaceutical is to use NHPs. This article reviews each of the stages of development in cynomolgus macaques (the most frequently used NHP) and the potential exposure of the embryo, fetus, and infant following administration of a biopharmaceutical during pregnancy and lactation. Because the purpose of the NHP developmental studies is to identify potential human risks, a comparison between macaque and human development and potential exposure has been made when possible. Understanding the potential exposure of the conceptus relative to critical periods in development is essential to designing a scientifically based study that adequately addresses human risks. Some options for NHP study designs, including the option of combining end points into a single study, and the pros and cons of each of the study options have been reviewed. Developmental studies for biopharmaceuticals in NHPs need to be optimally designed on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the pharmacology of the molecule, the type of molecule (antibody or non-antibody), the potential exposure relative to the development of potential target organs, the clinical use, and the ethical considerations associated with the use of NHPs.

Development in the cynomolgus macaque following administration of ustekinumab, a human anti‐il‐12/23p40 monoclonal antibody, during pregnancy and lactation

BACKGROUND Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL) 12 and IL-23 and inhibits their pharmacological activity. To evaluate potential effects of ustekinumab treatment during pregnancy, developmental studies were conducted in cynomolgus macaques. METHODS Ustekinumab was tested in two embryo/fetal development (EFD) studies and in a combined EFD/pre and postnatal development (PPND) study. In the EFD studies, pregnant macaques (12/group) were dosed with saline or ustekinumab (9 mg/kg IV, 22.5 mg/kg SC, or 45 mg/kg IV or SC during the period of major organogenesis, gestation day [GD] 20-50). Fetuses were harvested on GD100-102 and examined for any effects on development. In the EFD/PPND study, pregnant macaques were injected with saline or ustekinumab (22.5 or 45 mg/kg SC) from GD20 through lactation day 33. Infants were examined from birth through 6 months of age for morphological and functional development. Potential effects on the immune system were evaluated by immunophenotyping of peripheral blood lymphocytes and immunohistopathology of lymphoid tissues in fetuses and infants and by T-dependent antibody response (TDAR) to KLH and TTX and by DTH response in infants. Ustekinumab concentrations were measured in serum from dams, fetus, and infants and in breast milk. RESULTS Ustekinumab treatment produced no maternal toxicity and no toxicity in the fetuses or infants, including no effects on the TDAR or DTH responses. Ustekinumab was present in serum from GD100 fetuses and was present in infant serum through day 120 post-birth. Low levels of ustekinumab were present in breast milk. CONCLUSIONS Exposure of macaque fetuses and infants to ustekinumab had no adverse effects on pre- and postnatal development.

Critical review of preclinical approaches to evaluate the potential of immunosuppressive drugs to influence human neoplasia.

Many immunosuppressive drugs are associated with an increased risk of B-cell lymphoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Kaposi sarcoma. Thirteen immunosuppressive drugs have been tested in 2-year carcinogenicity studies (abatacept; azathioprine; busulfan; cyclophosphamide; cyclosporine; dexamethasone; everolimus; leflunomide; methotrexate; mycophenolate mofetil; prednisone; sirolimus; and tacrolimus) and in additional models including neonatal and genetically modified mice; chemical, viral, ultraviolet, and ionizing radiation co-carcinogenesis, and in models with transplanted tumor cells. The purpose of this review is to outline the mechanisms by which immunosuppressive drugs can influence neoplasia, to summarize the available preclinical data on the 13 drugs, and to critically review the performance of the models. A combination of primary tumor and metastasis assays conducted with transplanted cells may provide the highest value for hazard identification and can be applied on a case-by-case basis. However, for both small molecules and therapeutic proteins, determining the relative risk to patients from preclinical data remains problematic. Classifying immunosuppressive drugs based on their mechanism of action and hazard identification from preclinical studies and a prospective pharmacovigilance program to monitor carcinogenic risk may be a feasible way to manage patient safety during the clinical development program and postmarketing.

Effects of Administration of a Monoclonal Antibody against Mouse Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha during Pregnancy and Lactation on the Pre- and Postnatal Development of the Mouse Immune System:

Monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) are currently employed in the treatment of various immune-mediated diseases. These studies were designed to evaluate potential effects of anti-TNFαtreatment in mice during pregnancy and lactation on the development of the immune system in the F1 generation. Pregnant CD-1 mice were treated with vehicle or with 10 or 40 mg/kg of an anti-mouse TNFαmonoclonal antibody (mAb) (cV1q) on days 6, 12, and 18 of gestation and on days 3, 9, and 15 of lactation. Evaluation of immune system functionality was conducted in F1 generation mice at 11 weeks of age. Immune function was evaluated by splenocyte phenotyping, immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody response to sheep red blood cells (SRBCs), spleen cell proliferative response to anti-CD3, and natural killer cell activity. Treatment of pregnant mice with cV1q produced no adverse effects in the dams and no adverse effects in the F1 generation. In general, the functioning of the immune system of the F1 generation did not appear to be adversely affected following exposure to cV1q in utero and during lactation. The only statistically significant change was a slight (~20%) reduction in the spleen cell expansion in response to SRBC immunization in the female F1 mice from the 40 mg/kg cV1q treatment group. In conclusion, administration of a monoclonal antibody against mouse TNFαduring pregnancy and lactation had little or no effect on selected immune parameters in mice, with only a possible minor attenuation of spleen cell response to immunization noted in the female F1 generation at 11 weeks of age.

Considerations regarding nonhuman primate use in safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals.

Selection of a pharmacologically responsive species can represent a major challenge in designing nonclinical safety assessment programs for many biopharmaceuticals (eg, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)). Frequently, the only relevant species for nonclinical testing of mAbs is the non-human primate (NHP). This situation, coupled with a rapidly increasing number of mAb drugs in development, has resulted in a significant increase in the number of NHPs used in nonclinical safety assessment. Apart from ethical considerations related to responsible animal use, there is a clear need for more efficient and innovative approaches to drug discovery and development; these factors drive the need to investigate alternative approaches and strategies for the safety assessment. This review summarizes important scientific and regulatory perspectives derived from presentations and audience discussions in an educational forum at the 2010 annual American College of Toxicology meeting regarding opportunities for employing alternative approaches to minimize NHP use in mAb drug development.

Reviews Preclinical Safety and Immune-Modulating Effects of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies to Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Cynomolgus Macaques

Abstract Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been shown to be efficacious in a number of autoimmune diseases. In this study, the safety of long-term administration of anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was evaluated in cynomolgus macaques. Effects on the immune system were evaluated by analysis of lymphocyte subsets and histopathology of lymphoid tissues. To evaluate the functioning of the immune system, the ability of mAb-treated monkeys to mount a humoral immune response (IgG and IgM) to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) was evaluated. Treatment with the anti-TNF-α mAb produced no histopathological changes in any of the lymphoid tissues examined. There was a small (< 2-fold) elevation in circulating T-and B-lymphocytes during anti-TNF-α mAb treatment that was not considered to be toxicologically significant. The antibody response to KLH was unaffected by anti-TNF-α mAb treatment. Treatment with anti-IL-6 mAb resulted in a decrease in the size of germinal centers in the spleens of a minority of the animals and a modest but significant decrease in the IgG antibody response to KLH. Weekly intravenous treatment with the anti-IL-6 mAb and twice-weekly subcutaneous treatment with the anti-TNF-α mAb for up to 6 months was not associated with any signs of toxicity, and no animal developed an infection throughout the study period. This study demonstrates that the anti-IL-6 and anti-TNF-α mAbs produce specific modulating effects on the immune system without rendering the animals immune compromised.